, and across questions posed by students and instructors, individually. Thehigh frequency of generative design questions is particularly meaningful when compared to twoanalogous studies of peer critiques within a conventional face-to-face setting, in which low-levelquestions were more prevalent. These findings overall support written, asynchronous designcritiques as a useful mode for enhancing exchanges of feedback between student peers.References[1] M. Mandala, C. Schunn, S. Dow, M. Goldberg, J. Pearlman, W. Clark, and I. Mena, “Impact of collaborative team review on the quality of feedback in engineering design projects”, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 4., pp. 1299-1313, 2018.[2] B. Lawson
Paper ID #356542020 BEST PIC I PAPER WINNER - Hands-On Cybersecurity CurriculumUsing aModular Training KitMr. Asmit De, Pennsylvania State University Asmit De is a PhD Candidate in Computer Engineering at PennState. His research interest is in developing secure hardware and architectures for mitigating system vulnerabilities. Asmit received his B. Tech degree in Computer Science and Engineering from National Institute of Technology Durgapur, India in 2014. He worked as a Software Engineer in the enterprise mobile security team at Samsung R&D Institute, India from 2014 to 2015. He has also worked as a Design Engineer
each student will write their individual memo based on some or all of the results from that brainstorming session and the resultant HAZOP table. You may prepare your HAZOP analysis on a reactor, separator, distillation tower, tank or other unit in your process.”An additional individual assignment the instructor assigns to the students include a quiz on anassigned CSB video, with questions listed here [7]:Process safety video quiz “A. What was the original chemical hazard (flammability, reactivity, or toxicity) in this accident? What was the chemical that posed this hazard? B. What actions did the operators perform that were directly linked to the explosion? C. Which Risk-Based Process Safety (RBPS) pillar or
autograding of programming assignments,” in Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE, pp. 278-283, Feb 21 2018.[4] H. Keuning, J. Jeuring, and B. Heeren. “Towards a Systematic Review of Automated Feedback Generation for Programming Exercises,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '16, pp. 41-46, Jul 2016.[5] J. Moghadam, R.R. Choudhury, H. Yin, and A. Fox, “AutoStyle: Toward Coding Style Feedback at Scale,” in Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, pp. 261-266, Mar 14, 2015.[6] T. Daradoumis, J.M. Puig, M. Arguedas, and L.C. Liñan, “Analyzing students' perceptions to improve the
Access, Virtual On line. 10.18260/1-2—35274[5] Le, X., & Ma, G. G., & Duva, A. W. (2015, June), “Testing the Flipped Classroom Approach in Engineering Dynamics Class,” Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24841[6] Swithenbank, S. B., & DeNucci, T. W. (2014, June), “Using a “Flipped Classroom” Model in Undergraduate Newtonian Dynamics,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2—23249[7] Hassanzadeh Gorakhki, M. R., & Baker, D. W., & Pilkington, S. F. (2019, June), “Evaluating the Effect of Flipped Classroom on Students’ Learning in Dynamics,” Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference
”, 2018 ASEE Southeast Section Annual Conference, Daytona Beach, FL, March 4 – 6, 2018.[8] Smith, D., Engineering Computation with MATLAB, Third edition, Pearson, 2013.[9] Attaway, S., MATLAB A Practical Introduction to Programming and Problem Solving, Second edition, Elsevier, 2012.[10] Gilat, A., MATLAB An Introduction with Applications, Fourth edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.[11] Gottfried, B.S., “Teaching Computer Programming Effectively Using Active Learning”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Milwaukee, WI, June 1997.[12] Chyung, S.Y., Moll, A., Marx, B., Frary, M. and Callahan, J., “Improving Engineering Student’s Cognitive and Affective Preparedness with a Pre
applications. The PAC supports several communication protocols,such as serial communications via RS-232, RS-485 and USB; IP-based Ethernet communication;WiFi wireless; and communication via 5G cellular also is expected to be added to its futuregeneration. (a) Connected AMAX-5580 unit in (b) AMAX-5580 with EtherCat modules experiment (Courtesy of Advantech Co. Ltd.)Figure 2. AMAX-5580 PAC was used in this project as the substitute for the robot arm controller and network interfaceAMAX-5580 collects the most recent data from the online database over the cloud-based IoT inorder to adjust the speed of move of the robot arm. For this experiment, MECA-500 robot
simulations, plotting results, and comparing theirsimulations to the physiological literature. Student feedback based on free-response questions inthe end of course surveys both years revealed that students were confident in their ability toimplement and apply a model to a physiological system (although two students out of 34 whoanswered the free response question expressed a desire for more model-building fundamentals).The results regarding understanding physiological concepts were more mixed, however, withmean scores on the exams at 80%, and just over half of the students performing B- or worse onthose assignments. (These results were quite consistent among the final exam in 2019 and thethree shorter midterms in 2020. All exams were open-notes and
Paper ID #33670Coding is the New Coal: A History of Integrating Computer Science AcrossWyoming’s K-12 CurriculumProf. Astrid K. Northrup P.E., Northwest College Astrid Northrup earned her B.S. degree in petroleum engineering from the Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology (Montana Tech) in 1984 and her M.S degree in petroleum engineering from Mon- tana Tech in 1986. She also earned a Certificate in Land Surveying from the University of Wyoming in 2005. She is a registered Professional Engineer in Colorado and Wyoming. She worked in the petroleum industry as a reservoir engineer and as a private consultant
,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 198–205, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1109/TE.2004.842905.[3] Y. Engeström, “Non Scolae Sed Vitae Discimus: Toward Overcoming the Encapsulation of School Learning,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 1, pp. 243–259, 1991.[4] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. January, pp. 103–120, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.[5] D.school, “Design Thinking Bootleg,” 2018, [Online]. Available: https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg.[6] B. A. Camburn et al., “Design Innovation: A Study of Integrated Practice,” presented at the ASME 2017
Paper ID #34418Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Civil and Environmental EngineeringEducation: Social Justice in a Changing ClimateDr. Daniel Erian ArmaniosDr. Sarah Jane Christian P.E., Carnegie Mellon University Sarah Christian serves as an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. Sarah earned her BS in Civil Engineering at Carnegie Mel- lon University in 2003, MCE at Johns Hopkins University in 2004 and PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering with a focus on Structural Engineering and Materials at Stanford University in 2009. Sarah has
timesolutions meant that students were engaged with learning at higher levels of the Bloom’sTaxonomy (i.e., analysis and evaluation). Table 1 summarizes the professional engineers whovisited and supported the course. Each one of the professional engineers provided valuableinsight concerning the project, current issues, and professional practice and many also served onthe panels.Table 1 - Summary of practicing engineer engagement, throughout two-semester capstone 1 Traffic Engineering – P.E. “A” 2 Drainage Engineering – P.E. “B” 3,4 Geotechnical Engineering - P.E. “C” and P.E. “D” 5 Field Trip, Design-Build Interchange/Road Project – PE “E”, local engineers 6,7 Structural Engineering – P.E. “F” and P.E
program, they now had enoughinformation to (a) ask more and better questions and have conversations in their schools; (b)better infuse things into their own CS curriculum; and (c) help others better understand theneed for technology and computer science.3.2. Cohort 2Similar to procedures for Cohort 1, Cohort 2 teachers completed a comprehensive end-of-courseevaluation. Quantitative results are shown below in Figure 10. In addition to the morequantitative ratings, open-ended questions probed individual reflections. Respondents wereappreciative of the opportunities to work with colleagues in small groups with the assistance andguidance of group facilitators along with the help provided for them outside of class time.Respondents indicated they
-reviewed journal and conference publications in grid and cloud computing. In the past, he designed and implemented a cloud-based public health informatics infrastruc- ture. He is a founding member of the School of Engineering at Istanbul Bilgi University, and was the chair of its Computer Engineering Department. He also designed an adaptive resource-matching frame- work for large-scale, autonomous grid computing environments, using epidemic dissemination protocols. He is the founding director of Engineers Without Borders International, Turkey branch. At the industry, Dr. Erdil has worked in management and software engineering roles for more than a decade at various organizations, including Fidelity National Information
these two people that I’m talking about, well I can those two real friends. (Student A) I have learned that it is okay to make friends in college. I did not expect to make so many these last two years especially because of my introverted personality. I prefer to struggle on my own and get through everything by myself but some of the current friends forced themselves into my life and I appreciate it. They are funny, cool, and good people at heart. (Student B) I did not expect to make many new friends through my college years. I expected semester friends however with this two-year program, many of the cohort members have become close friends of mine that I hope to keep.Growing in Possible
spring 2019 actually had been included in EGR 111 from thevery first offering of the course, fall 2017. This lecture, taught by Dr. Olga Pierrakos, has threeparts that evolved as the course evolved: (a) a historical perspective of engineering through thelens of a timeline of engineering innovations from Renaissance time to modern times, (b) arelated historical perspective of the timeline of establishment of engineering professionalsocieties in the United States, (c) a perspective of engineering cultures as related to engineeringeducation across three major traditions (French, British, and German) that influencedengineering education in the United States and examples of engineering cultures in othercontinents. Part (c) was inspired by the works
Paper ID #33035The Urgency of Intersectionality: A Review of Racialized Experiences inSTEM EntrepreneurshipJocelyn L. Jackson, University of Michigan Jocelyn Jackson is a second year doctoral student in Engineering Education at the University of Michigan and National Chair of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). Her major work includes improv- ing diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM and entrepreneurship as well as strategic planning for NSBE. She earned a MS and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Iowa State University.Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University In February 2021 Dr. Huang-Saad joined
Paper ID #32377”A New Way of Seeing”: Engagement With Women’s and Gender StudiesFosters Engineering Identity FormationDr. Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College Jenn Stroud Rossmann is Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Co-Director of the Hanson Center for Inclusive STEM Education at Lafayette College. She earned her BS in mechanical engineering and the PhD in applied physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to joining Lafayette, she was a faculty member at Harvey Mudd College. Her scholarly interests include the fluid dynamics of blood in vessels affected by atherosclerosis and aneurysm, the cultural
Paper ID #33770A Graduate-level Engineering Ethics Course: An Initial Attempt toProvoke Moral ImaginationMr. Yousef Jalali, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He re- ceived a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include interaction between critical thinking, imagination, and ethical reasoning, interpersonal and interinstitutional collaboration, diversity, equity, and inclusion, systems thinking, and chemical en- gineering learning systems. Yousef
transportation.This importance is underscored by the work of the ASCE Committee on America’sInfrastructure. In its 2021 report card, this committee gave US Infrastructure an overall grade ofC- (Mediocre, requires attention). They used the following criteria: a) capacity, b) condition, c)funding, d) future need, e) operation and maintenance, f) public safety, g) resilience, and h)innovation (ASCE, 2021). These criteria represent a systems view of transportation. We needfuture transportation engineers to develop these viewpoints to ensure a sustainable transportationinfrastructure for all. However, developing understanding of transportation engineering issuesand acquiring expertise requires long-term engagement including education pathways inundergraduate
,Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, 2013.[5] M. Harkins, “Engineering Boot Camp: A Broadly Based Online Summer Bridge Program forEngineering Freshman,” in 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Expo, New Orleans, Louisiana,United States of America, 2016.[6] C. Dalton, A. Quiroga, and B. Reed, “In-Person Team Engineering Design Project to aVirtual Setting,” in 2021 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual Meeting, 2021.
the connection between the two.Ada Barach, Ohio State University Ada recently graduated from The Ohio State University with a B.S. in Computer Science and Engineering. Her undergraduate research was in coding education for first-year students. Ada is currently pursuing a PhD in theoretical computer science at Ohio State.Connor Jenkins, Ohio State University Connor Jenkins is currently an undergraduate student pursuing a B.S. in Electrical and Computer En- gineering at The Ohio State University. His engineering education research interests include first-year engineering, teaching assistant programs, and technical communication education methods.Ms. Serendipity S. Gunawardena, Ohio State University Sery is an
, KS: The IDEA Center9. Benton, S. L., Webster, R., Gross, A. B., & Pallett, W. (2010). IDEA Technical Report No. 15: An analysis of IDEA student ratings of instruction in traditional versus online courses, 2002-2008 data. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.10. Wiebe, E. N, Branoff, T. J., & Shreve, M. A. (June, 2010). Paths to Learning: Understanding how students utilize online instructional resources in an introductory engineering graphics course. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, Kentucky, June 20-23, 2010.
video, having diversity in STEM in the next generation “it’s not a matter of how; itwill be just when.”AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Monica Cardella for her work creating thepartnership with NSBE SEEK that led to the program documented in this paper.References1. D. B. Thoman, E. R. Brown, A. Z. Mason, A. G. Harmsen, and J. L. Smith. “The Role of Altruistic Values in Motivating Underrepresented Minority Students for Biomedicine.” BioScience, vol 65, Issue 2, pp. 183-188, Feb. 2015.2. J. L. Smith, E. Cech, A. Metz, M. Huntoon, C. Moyer, “Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering”, Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 413-429, 2014.3
technologies, and their applications. The course will berevised continuously based on student feedback and lessons learned about the content, projectassignment, and hands-on activities. 9References[1] Yoder, B. L. (2017). Engineering by the Numbers, American Society of Engineering Education, Retrieved on January 1, 2021 from: https://www.asee.org/documents/papers- and-publications/publications/college-profiles/2017-Engineering-by-Numbers- Engineering-Statistics.pdf[2] Sen, P. K. (2011, April). Electric power and energy engineering education in USA: A status report, issues and challenges. In 2011 Rural Electric Power Conference (pp. A1-1).[3] Holland, S. (2020). Power
Awareness and Training through a Multidisciplinary OSINT Course Project Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2— 34367[2] Carpenter, A. (2018, June), A Hardware Security Curriculum and its Use for Evaluation of Student Understanding of ECE Concepts Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—29688[3] Whipple, A., & Smith, K. B., & Rowe, D. C., & Moses, S. (2015, June), Building a Vulnerability Testing Lab in an Educational Environment Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23640[4] Dvorak, R., Dillon H., Ralston, N., Welch
and the jobs available in 4 Mission to Mars: 4 60 the space industry. Create a Mars critter 5 End of day survey Gather student feedback 5 6 End of camp survey Gather student feedback 5 Total estimated task time 3.75 hrs.Appendix B: Materials and supplies for 40 families with 3 participants per family Qty/ Qty/ Unit Line Category Description Vendor
Paper ID #32692The Virtues of Teamwork: A Course Module to Cultivate the Virtuous TeamWorkerDr. Michael D. Gross, Wake Forest University Dr. Michael Gross is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor of Engineering and the David and Leila Farr Faculty Director of the Center for Entrepreneurship at Wake Forest University. He is part of the team that is planning, developing, and delivering the brand new Engineering program, a program viewed as an opportunity to break down silos across campus and creatively think about reimagining the undergraduate engineering educational experience, integration and collaboration across
5 0 0 a d c b g e k j h i f 1 2 7 6 4 3 5 Student Outcome (a-k) Student Outcome (1-7) Figure 2 - A comparison of the distribution outcome assessment across courses in the 2015-16 (left) and 2019-20 (right) academic years.2) Curricular Reform: As discussed previously, a program’s curriculum can be viewed throughmany lenses. For students (novices in a discipline) it provides information on the ordering andhierarchy of courses (and thus knowledge). For faculty it provides a design constraint as itreflects how a discipline organizes knowledge and is a
reasonably good grades (mostly A and B) in these math based lower division courses.” [1]The department has a webpage dedicated to 2+2 online outreach. This page receives considerabletraffic and is consistently one of the most visited pages in the College of Engineering (COE)website. A YouTube video on the page has received over 800 views in 18 months [1]. Theprogram has received several rankings of online schools in part due to the small number ofonline BS degrees in engineering that also drive traffic to the website: 1. 2020 Best Online Colleges Offering Bachelor's in Engineering Degrees by OnlineU [15] and ranked #1 for most affordable [16]. 2. 2021 Ranked #4 for online engineering by intelligent.com [17]. 3. 2020 Ranked one of