, and American Indian students)in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) majors. Even with massiveinterventions, the underrepresented students have not experienced exceptional gains [12].The State University of New York Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (SUNYLSAMP), has been a National Science Foundation funded program since 1996. SUNY LSAMPspans across 400 miles and serves many New York state doctoral granting institutions, smallliberal arts institutions, and community colleges. At its core, SUNY LSAMP objectives include:a) curricular and pedagogical innovations in STEM education; b) development of an innovative,cognitive, and social support network; c) development of experiential learning that leads toresearch
virtual teams during the rapid transition online due to COVID-19 Alexis Walsha, Sarah Norrisb, Nathaniel Blalockc, Daniel Mountainc and Courtney Faberd a) Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering; b) Department of Mechanical Aerospace Biomedical Engineering; c) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering; d) Cook Grand Challenge Honors Program University of Tennessee KnoxvilleIntroductionTeam projects are common in undergraduate engineering courses and have been shown toimprove self-efficacy, communication, and teamwork skills through group discussions andpresentations, preparing students for professional engineering practice [1], [2
. Beggs. “Technology for the sake of it, I don’t think so!” In ALTC Association for Learning Technology. 2018. Online: https://altc.alt.ac.uk/2018/sessions/technology-for-the-sake-of-it-i-dont-think-so-18-176/#gref [7] K. Roose. “This Should Be V.R.’s Moment. Why Is It Still So Niche?” The New York Times. 2020. Online Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/30/technology/virtual-reality.html [8] J. A. Paradiso and J.A. Landay. “Guest editors' introduction: Cross-reality environments.” IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2009, 8(3), 14-15. [9] B. Simões, R. De Amicis, I. Barandiaran and J. Posada. “Cross reality to enhance worker cognition in industrial assembly operations.” The
] J. Gainsburg, C. Rodriguez-Lluesma and D. A. Bailey, “knowledge profile of an engineering occupation: temporal patterns in the use of engineering knowledge,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no.3, pp. 197-219, 2010.[15] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T. McGlamery, T. M. Nathans-Kelly and C. G. Nicometo, “Understanding engineering work and identity: A cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp.153-174, 2010.[16] S. A. Male, M. B. Bush, E. S. Chapman, “Identification of competencies required by engineers graduating in Australia,” Conference paper of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Adelaide, 2009.[17] K. E. Watkins, V. J. Marsick, “Towards a
Paper ID #33255Investigating Students’ Expectations of Instruction in EngineeringLaboratory Courses During the COVID-19 PandemicMr. Keven Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology I am a Ph.D. student in mechanical engineering at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. The focus of my research is on the continuum-level coupled multiphysics behavior of polymeric materials. During the last year, I was also interested in investigating the impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the quality of education, which resulted in this publication.Mr. Ahmed Z. Edrees, University of Jeddah & New Jersey Institute of Technology Ahmed
course overfour non-consecutive years, focusing mainly on the class project. During this period, differentapproaches were used to implement the project activities. These approaches are (a) testing differentcapstone projects that are sponsored by local companies, (b) all student teams testing a singleproject that is being developed at the same time, and (c) testing a single project that has beenpreviously developed. Each approach presented several advantages and challenges for both thestudents and the instructor, as described in the paper. Based on the experience after teaching thecourse with different types of group projects, we present lessons learned and recommendations forfuture editions of the course. These recommendations include offering
goals in creating this cogen were very similar to those of a typical cogenpractice, however. Namely, our goals were to (a) embody anti-racist, feminist pedagogy in anengineering course (b) democratize class control and increase student agency over their learning(c) center the experiences of students who experience racial injustice, (d) empower students to leadclassroom conversations and direct course development. Additionally, it was important for us to(e) call attention to an important 21st-century social justice issue, (f) enable students to “plug in”to ongoing environmental movements at the university and nearby local communities, and (g)engage students in intimate, personal discussions during the era of online instruction, modeling an
often described theirusers in general terms, but following the intervention, they decreased their use of the generic‘you,’ indicating more specificity about who their users are and who their users are not. Somestudents also demonstrated deeper consideration of their users’ contexts in their sketchesincluding representations of people. Overall, prompting students to consider how to representpeople in their sketches may be a simple strategy for encouraging designers to think more deeplyabout the specific people who will use their designs.AcknowledgmentsThe study was reviewed by the University of Michigan IRB and found exempt, HUM00169175.References[1] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, “Students’ ways of experiencing human
often presented in a linear, cyclical fashion, but theimplementation of this problem solving process can be messy. Designers commonly repeat steps,skip steps, or take the steps in a different order [6]. The key with design thinking is that there aremultiple iterations, and each iteration incorporates user feedback to solve the defined problem.Working with users adds more time to the process, so iterations should be executed quickly.When designers “fail fast,” they learn more about their users in a short period of time, and thisknowledge helps designers rapidly prototype a solution that users love [7].B. PivotingWhile a commonly used term across industries, “pivoting” has little objective definition orknown factors that would cause a business or
Paper ID #34390Responding to Microaggressions in the Classroom: Perspectives FromIntroductory Mathematics InstructorsRebecca Machen, University of Colorado Boulder Rebecca Machen is currently a Ph.D. student in Curriculum and Instruction with a focus in STEM at the University of Colorado at Boulder. She is also a full-time staff member in the Student Academic Success Center, a comprehensive academic and social program that serves traditionally underrepresented students in higher education. Her research interests include multicultural communities of practice, the use of predictive analytics for admission and placement into
from, and make challenging decisions about students’ personal and professional futures. 3. Design a set of guiding principles and values for their personal and professional futures, and use their guiding principles and values to: a. Describe what being an engineer means for them and their responsibility in serving the common good. b. Support personal and professional decisions using their guiding principles and values. c. Inform the creation of professional documents (e.g., resumes, personal statements).Students began the course by briefly describing formative experiences during theirundergraduate years (e.g., courses, student organizations, internships) and identifying
techniques have been developed and in use now by many standard tools.One important method used in scheduling is the PERT technique (Program Evaluation andReview Technique) which uses probabilistic activity time estimates of all tasks in a project.PERT uses the flexible beta distribution technique (as opposed to a normal distribution) for thethree levels of estimation for each task which is generally asymmetrical. The three levels ofestimation for each task are noted as follows: optimistic time estimate (‘a’), pessimistic timeestimate (‘b’), and the most likely time estimate or mode (‘m’). The project is addressing tominimize the risk associated with each task completion with three estimates and estimates thebest possible completion time using beta
support the evaluation of RQ1, an independent samples t-test was first used to compare twogroups: (a) students enrolled in remote learning classes and (b) students enrolled in traditionalclasses. Additional independent samples t-tests were used as needed to account for course bycourse variation. Homogeneity of variance was not assumed, and Bonferroni’s correction wasused in all analyses of means to account for multiple hypothesis testing and to reduce Type 1error. Though non-parametric Mann Whitney tests are typically used for ordinal, Likert-scaledata, a recent study [33] demonstrates t-tests and non-parametric Mann Whitney tests yield nearidentical Type 1 error rates without major compromise to statistical power. Thus, independentsamples t
/ what-is-hashing/, Retrieved: Jan 2021. [7] Prashant Ram, “How to set up a private Ethereum Blockchain and deploy a Solidity Smart Contract on the Blockchain in less than 20 mins!.” https://medium.com/blockchainbistro/ set-up-a-private-ethereum-blockchain-and-deploy-your-first-solidity-smart-contract-on-the-caa8334c343d, Retrieved: Jan 2021. [8] Jake Frankenfield, “Blockchain Wallet.” https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/Blockchain-wallet.asp, Re- trieved: Jan 2021. [9] Blockgeeks, “Smart Contracts? A Beginner’s Guide to Smart Contracts.” https://blockgeeks.com/guides/ smart-contracts/, Retrieved: Jan 2021.[10] “How does a transaction get into the blockchain?.” https://www.euromoney.com/learning/blockchain-explained/ how
Class – COVID-19Edition Part 2: Planning for a Fall Like No Other”. Tyton Partners. October 2020. Available at:https://tytonpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/10.05.2020.Time-for-Class-COVID-19-Part-2-Planning-for-Fall-Like-No-Other-V2.pdf Accessed 3/5/21.[7]. Horspool, A., and Lange, C. “Applying the scholarship of teaching and learning: Studentperceptions, behaviours and success online and face-to-face”. Assessment and Evaluation inHigher Education, 37(1), 73–88. 2012.[8]. Platt, C.A., Amber, M.W., and Yu, N. “Virtually the Same?: Student Perceptions of theEquivalence of Online Classes to Face-to-Face Classes”. MERLOT Journal of Online Learningand Teaching, 10(3). 2014.[9]. Landrum, B., Bannister, J., Garza, G., and Rhame, S. “A class of
.[6] J. Somerville, "Critical factors affecting the assessment of student learning outcomes: A Delphi study of the opinions of community college personnel," Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 9-19, 2008.[7] N. Denine and N. Steven, "Multidisciplinary Team Assessment," Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007/06/24, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/2319.[8] S. Joseph and B. Daina, "Direct Assessment Measures," Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007/06/24, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/1537.[9] J. M. Williams, "The engineering portfolio: Communication, reflection, and student learning outcomes assessment," International Journal of
, 1889.[4] B. A. Aldrich, K. H. Rosenfield and M. A. Walton, "Countering Threats to Licensure with ASCE’s Engineer Tomorrow Initiative," in ASEE's Virtual Conference, Virtual Conference, 2020.[5] C. N. Musselman, J. D. Nelson and M. L. Phillips, "Engineering Licensure Laws and Rules, Today and Tomorrow," in ASEE Conferene and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011.[6] National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, "About NCEES," NCEES, n.d.. [Online]. Available: https://ncees.org/about/. [Accessed 13 February 2021].[7] National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying, "Model Law," NCEES, Clemson, South Carolina, 2018.[8] National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, "NCEES Engineering
. [4] Ingram, J.C. “Establishing Relationships and Partnerships to Engage Native American Students in Research”, in Broadening Participation in Undergraduate Research: Fostering Excellence and Enhancing the Impact, eds. M. Boyd and J. Wesemann, publishers Council on Undergraduate Research, 2009, pg. 269-280. [5] Lopez, J. D. Factors influencing American Indian and Alaskan Native persistence model: AI/AN Millennium Falcon Persistence Model, Res. Higher Educ., 59 (6), 2017, 792-811. [6] Brayboy, B., Fann, A., Castagno, A., Solyom, J. Postsecondary education for American Indian and Alaska Natives: Higher education for nation building and self-determination. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [7] Roy, J. Engineering by the Numbers, ASEE website, https
Science: Collaborative Explorations, vol. 16, no. 1, p. Article 3, 2020.[11] V. Piercey, R. Segal, A. V. Filippas, T. Chen, S. Kone, R. H. Hargraves, J. Bookman, J. Hearn, D. Pike and K. Williams, "Using Site Visits to Strengthen Collaboration," Journal of Mathematics and Sciences: Collaborative Exploration, vol. 16, no. 1, p. Article 4, 2020.[12] B. Poole, L. Turner and C. Maher-Boulis, "Designign a Student Exchange Program: Facilitating Interdisciplinary Mathematics-Focused Collbaoration among College Students," Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, vol. 16, no. 1, p. Article 13, 2020.[13] J. Bowers, B. D. Poole, C. Maher-Boulis, A. Schwartz, A. Bloomquist and E. Slate Young, "The Roles and
engineering for K-12 education,” Science Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 145-166, 2019.[7] J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 2nd ed. Sage, 2013.[8] K. B. Wendell and C. Rogers, “Engineering design‐based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 513-540, 2013.[9] M. K. Lahman, K. L. Rodriguez, L. Moses, K. M. Griffin, B. M. Mendoza, and W. Yacoub, “A rose by any other name is still a rose? Problematizing pseudonyms in research,” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 445–453, 2015.[10] M. Savin-Baden and C. H. Major, Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice
education. We encourage researchers and educators to further investigate along theline of this research. It is essential to learn and improve engineering students’ technology preferences tosolve calculus questions. 8. ReferencesFelder R. and L. Silverman. "Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education, ASEE journal ofEngineering Education, 78(7), 674-681, 1988.Rosati, P. "The Learning Preferences of Engineering Students From Two Perspectives," Proceedings ofthe 1998 ASEE, Frontiers in Engineering (FlE) conference, November 1998.Tokgöz, E., Tekalp E. N., Tekalp S. B., Tekalp H. A., Undergraduate STEM Students’ Role in MakingTechnology Decisions for Solving Calculus Questions and the Impact of These Decisions on LearningCalculus, 127th Annual
, 2018.[11] T. S. Berry, "A leadership collaborative model: Fostering community through diversestudent organization collaborations," in CoNECD - The Collab. Netw. for Eng. and Comput.Divers. Conf., Crystal City, VA, USA, 2018.[12] J. B. Napp and A. Sabharwal, "Academic libraries and the strategic vision for diversity inhigher education," in ASEE Annu. Conf. and Expo. Proc., Tampa, FL, USA, 2019.[13] K. Beck. "Display celebrating female engineers in the Engineering Library." Penn StateLibrary News. https://sites.psu.edu/librarynews/2020/03/16/display-celebrating-female-engineers-in-the-engineering-library/ (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).
specific impact of theactivities in promoting wellness, as well the use of wellness techniques and campus resourceslongitudinally after participating in the course.AcknowledgmentsThis project was supported by the University of Illinois Faculty Retreat Grant and theDepartment of Bioengineering. The authors thank the students for sharing their perspectives. References [1] X. Wang, S. Hegde, C. Son, B. Keller, A. Smith, and F. Sasangohar, “Investigating Mental Health of US College Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Survey Study,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 9, p. e22817, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.2196/22817. [2] A. Kecojevic, C. H. Basch, M. Sullivan, and N. K. Davi, “The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on mental
, and motivation.Prof. Michael Wolf, Rice University Michael Wolf is Milton B. Porter Professor in Mathematics at Rice University as well as Faculty Director of the Rice Emerging Scholars Program, an initiative he co-founded in 2012. The Rice Emerging Scholars program is a comprehensive 2-4 year program that begins the summer before matriculation for a group of matriculating Rice students whose preparation for STEM is weaker than those of their peers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Differential Effects of Bridge Program Participation on Perceived Belongingand Peer Support for STEM Degree Seekers During The COVID-19PandemicAbstractThis NSF S-STEM
Paper ID #32840”I Wish I Would Have Known. . . ”: Characterizing Engineering Students’Reflections on Their Graduate ExperiencesMr. Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Pennsylvania State University I am a second-year doctoral candidate at Pennsylvania State University in the mechanical engineering department. Member of the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL). Current research topics include graduate school attrition and student well-being.Miss Megan ElleryGabriella M. Sallai, Pennsylvania State University Gaby Sallai is currently a graduate student in the mechanical engineering department at Penn State. She is working under
Engineering Entrepreneurship, ASEE Special Issue, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 39-54.7. Dietrich, S. (2012). A Critical Examination of the Construct Validity of the TTI Performance DNA Survey for the Purpose of Differentiating the Entrepreneurially-Minded Engineer. Doctoral Dissertation, College of Technology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI.8. Pistrui, D., Bonnstetter, R., Bonnstetter, B. and Fry, C. (2011). Creating, Educating and Assessing a New Class of Entrepreneurial Minded Engineers. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, Vol. 2, No 2, Special Issue, pp. 1-14.9. Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K (2021). cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions. R package version 2.1.1 — For new features
, Dordrecht, pp. 41-122, 2012.[9] A. R. Brown, C. Morning, and C. Watkins, “Implications of African American engineering student perceptions of campus climate factors,” in 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. IEEE, pp. S1G-20.[10] A. R. Brown, C. Morning, and C. Watkins, “Influence of African American engineering student perceptions of campus climate on graduation rates,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 263-271, 2005.[11] K.H. Collins, “Confronting color-blind STEM talent development: Toward a contextual model for Black student STEM identity,” Journal of Advanced Academics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 143-168, 2018.[12] B. Berhane, S. Secules, and F. Onuma, F, “Learning while Black: Identity
point, it is essential tointegrate this content into both curricular and co-curricular efforts. It is not enough to spend asingle hour engaged in this work. It is important to find ways to encourage students to explorethese topics in more depth and to allow them to continue to engage in meaningful discussions asthey develop their personal and professional identities.References[1] B. O. Barefoot, C. L. Warnock, M. P. Dickinson, S. E. Richardson and M. R. Roberts, "Exploring the Evidence: Reporting Outcomes of First-Year Seminars. The First-Year Experience. Volume II. Monograph Series, Number 25.," National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 1998.[2] C. Boudreau and J. Kromrey, "A longitudinal
. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2018. 19(2): p. 156-168.[9] Estriegana, R., J.-A. Medina-Merodio, and R. Barchino, Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers & Education, 2019. 135: p. 1-14.[10] Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., A.V. Guevara, and R. Morales-Menendez, Virtual reality laboratories: a review of experiences. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 2019. 13(3): p. 947-966.[11] Kollöffel, B. and T. de Jong, Conceptual understanding of electrical circuits in secondary vocational engineering education: Combining traditional instruction with inquiry learning in
.[10] Martin, F., Stamper, B., & Flowers, C. (2020). Examining student perception of theirreadiness for online learning: Importance and confidence. Online Learning, 24(2), 38-58.https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2053[11] Kauffman, H. (2015). A Review of Predictive Factors of Student Success in and Satisfactionwith Online Learning, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 23, 26507.[12]Chang, M., & Ho, C. (2009). “Effects of locus of control and learner-control on web-basedlanguage learning.” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 22, no.3, pp. 189–206.doi: 10.1080/09588220902920094[13]Doherty, D. (2006) “An analysis of multiple factors affecting retention in web-basedcommunity college courses.” The Internet and Higher Education, vol.9