: Planning and Implementation (Experience)AbstractThis paper discusses the transition of an established residential Summer Bridge Program to avirtual learning experience due to the COVID-19 restrictions of summer 2020. The program aimsto increase retention of first-year engineering students through a curriculum focused on academicreadiness in math and chemistry, professional development, familiarity with campus andavailable resources, and a broad-based knowledge of engineering fields and the engineeringdesign process. Outside of the curriculum, participants build community and a sense ofbelonging with social, professional development, and philanthropic programming. With theconstraints of remote instruction, math readiness and community building were
Paper ID #33512Assessing the Pedagogical Needs to Couple Front-end Planning Tools withSustainable Infrastructure ProjectsDr. Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University Dr. Mohamed ElZomor is an Assistant Professor at Florida International University (FIU), College of Engineering and Computing and teaches at the Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustain- ability. Dr. ElZomor completed his doctorate at Arizona State University (ASU), Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. Prior to attending ASU, Dr. ElZomor received a master’s of science degree in Architecture from University of Arizona, a master’s degree
about resolving women’sunderrepresentation in male-dominated STEM fields [6]. This paper describes how alumnae ofMiami University in Oxford, OH, worked with their alma mater to form an external Women’sAdvisory Committee to the College of Engineering and Computing. The group chartered amission to “provide leadership in a collaborative environment with faculty, staff, students,alumni and others to improve recruitment, retention and graduation support for women inengineering and computing…”. Members of the Committee engage with the College regularlyand give both guidance and action to efforts related to student success for women students andfaculty.Recently, the Committee embarked on the development of a strategic plan to maximize theimpact of the
expectations as well as better support students'career goals. This work-in-progress uses preliminary student survey data to explore one suchtype of relationship – that between students’ perceptions of BME and their career plans andgoals. This report will present the findings of this initial exploration, introduce two theoreticalframeworks commonly used to study engineering student career paths, and discuss theimplications of both on the development of a future multi-institutional study of BME students.WIP Data Collection and Analysis Eighty-one BME students (54 undergraduate and 27 graduate) at a large, research-intensive, public university in the Midwest completed a short anonymous survey (IRBHUM00178033). All survey respondents were asked
Paper ID #32327Developing an Equally Effective Alternate-access Plan forVision-impaired and Blind Students Enrolled in Mechanical EngineeringTechnology CoursesDr. Nancy E. Study, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Nancy E. Study is an Associate Teaching Professor in the School of Engineering at Penn State Behrend where she teaches courses in engineering graphics and rapid prototyping, and is the coordinator of the rapid prototyping lab. Her research interests include visualization, standardization of CAD practices, design for 3D printing, and haptics. Nancy is a former chair of the ASEE Engineering Design Graphics Division
virtual offering.Traditionally, BME seniors took this laboratory course before senior design to gainmanufacturing skills and approval access to the university machine shop. During the ten-weekcourse, they would learn how to operate the drill press, lathe, mill, and laser cutter to machinetheir own digital microscope using manufacturing plans given to them and watching the teachingassistant (TA) perform a demonstration. However, the virtual offering requirement shifted themain deliverables from simply machining a device to developing the manufacturing plans tomachine said device. Although completing both is ideal, there is still great value in learning howto use your resources and learned machining knowledge to develop rational manufacturing
these processes relate, specifically, to a software venture. This paperpresents the overall instructional plan of the course and discusses each of the course’scomponents. The implementation of the project component is discussed, in particular, in detail.The design and implementation challenges that were encountered are discussed.This course was run in Spring of 2020 and started as an in-classroom course, later transitioningto an online course due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The outcomes of the course are discussed.Possible future enhancements are considered.1. IntroductionSoftware businesses have been responsible for tremendous growth and changes in society. Oncesmall startups, names like Google, Microsoft, PayPal and Facebook now are among the
projects. He received his PhD in Technology Management from Indiana State University with a specialization in Construction Management. He joined academia in 2014. His research focus is on contract administration on heavy civil projects, as well as on construction education. His teaching areas include 1. introduction to the built environment and construction management, 2. construction materials and methods, 3. construction equipment, 4. building construction cost estimating, 5. heavy civil construc- tion cost estimating, 6. project planning, scheduling, and control, 7. temporary structures, and 8. contract changes and claims. American c Society for
technology competition developed a “contingency thinking”strategy to pivot and address stakeholder’s needs despite the uncertain impacts of COVID-19.Contingency thinking is an adaptive planning strategy based on the principles of design thinkingand value assessment. This strategy is an iterative process which includes: assessing the value ofactivities, developing contingency plans with increasing fidelity, collecting feedback fromstakeholders, and incorporating feedback into the next iteration of contingency plans.Competition organizers employed this process because it reinforced the core mission of thecompetition and delivered minimum viable value irrespective of the ever-changing COVID-19implications. The contingency thinking process resulted in
Paper ID #34427Work in Progress: Building Career Goals and Boosting Self-efficacy inEngineering StudentsDr. Sonia M. Bartolomei-Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Sonia M. Bartolomei-Suarez is a Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico Mayag¨uez (UPRM). She graduated with a BS in Industrial Engineering from UPRM (1983), a MSIE (1985) from Purdue University, and a PhD in Industrial Engineering (1996) from The Pennsylvania State University. Her teaching and research interests include: Discrete Event Simulation, Facilities Planning, Material Handling Systems, Women in Academia in
woodmodels, the model of a dam, and the DaVinci bridge to name a few. The students used theirown background, strengths, and interests to develop a personalized learning module which isevident from the student abstract that accompanied the model. This paper illustrates thelesson plan, the timeline, cost, and planning for the models, the lessons to be learned fromeach model, and the appropriate method for assessment of such topics.Introduction This was a one-week module in an advanced materials class to teach the concept oftheory to practice. Essentially, the goal was to teach the students the concept that theexperiment might look very different than the original but still be able to get the desired result.Lesson Plan The students were
deploy and operate existing wind energy technology, but to evolve thetechnology to be more efficient, cost effective, and adaptable to the electricity grid. Asprogressively larger and technologically more sophisticated turbines are designed and built, bothonshore and off, and as wind plants continue to provide an ever-larger fraction of the energysupply, there are significant scientific and engineering challenges to be addressed such asmaterials and structures, grid integration, and energy storage [6], [7]. In planning for the future,universities, and members of the North American Wind Energy Academy (NAWEA), identifieda number of strategies to address the lack of university programs, most of which rely oncollaboration. These include
technologicaladvances in their prospective fields of science and engineering.The NSF Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) Site in Collaborative MultidisciplinaryEngineering Design Experiences for Teachers (CoMET) discussed here was designed to provideteachers hands-on engineering design experience covering all aspects of the sensor research forthe IoT era, from the manufacturing of a sensor, to the hardware and software that allows them tooperate. In order to support the STEM educational services for teachers and students in middleand high schools, this site program focused on the creation of lesson plans easily adapted to anyclassroom and competent teacher trainers who could ensure quality pre-service and in-serviceteacher education, by providing multi
secure information technology (IT) systems, with responsibility for aspects of Software development system and/or network development Systems architecture Technology R&D Systems requirements planning Test and evaluation Systems development Operate and Maintain Provides the support, administration, and Data administration maintenance necessary to ensure effective Knowledge
Ph.D. and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Howard University and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University. He is currently serving as professor and chairper- son of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at one of the nation’s preeminent public urban research institutions, Morgan State University. His career spans over twenty-eight years of progres- sive scholarly experience in such areas as research administration/ implementation, pedagogical inno- vation, international collaboration, strategic planning, promoting community engagement and academic program development. He instructs courses in computer vision, computer graphics, electromagnetics and characterization of semiconductor
an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Leadership and Program Management (ELPM) in the School of Engineering (SOE) at The Citadel. She joined the program in Aug 2020. She teaches project management, technical planning and scheduling, and construction management courses at The Citadel. Dr. Vesali earned her PhD in Civil Engineering from Florida International Uni- versity. She holds M.Sc. in Construction Engineering and Management from IAU, and B.Sc. in Civil Engineering from Iran University of Science and Technology. Prior to joining The Citadel, she worked at Plaza Construction, Florida Group LLC. She worked with the corporate Quality Management team and project management team for high-rise
Paper ID #33553Reflecting on 10 years of Centralized Engineering Student DiversityInitiatives (Experience)Ms. Lisa Trahan, University of California, San Diego Lisa Trahan joined UC San Diego’s IDEA Engineering Student Center in 2018 as Director of Strategic Initiatives and Assessment. Ms. Trahan leads planning and development of new student success initiatives and programs within the Center. She provides expertise to assess, improve, and evaluate the impact of the Center’s programs on student retention and success. Previously, Ms. Trahan was a Research and Evaluation Associate at The Lawrence Hall of Science, UC
, CLW (now Cassidy Turley), and Jacobs Advanced Planning Group, which seeded her interest in understanding the relationship of workers, workplaces and technology. She has held a variety of positions in engineering, architecture, interior design, and con- struction firms, which drives her interest in teaching essential communication skills to students in those fields. Gobes-Ryan is on the Board of Directors of The Environmental Design Research Association. In this organization she has also served as Co-Chair of the Workplace Environments Network (WEN) since 2000 and Co-Chair of the Communication Network since 2016. She is a member of the National Communication Association. Gobes-Ryan is a Florida Licensed Interior
in Biotechnology from Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (Zhenjiang, China).Mr. Brian Westra, University of Iowa Brian Westra is the Data Services Librarian for the University of Iowa Libraries. He assists researchers with the management and sharing of research data. Brian teaches workshops and a course on data man- agement and consults with researchers on data management plans and implementing good data prac- tices across the data lifecycle. He curates data published in the institutional repository, and works with stakeholders across the university to improve data sharing and broaden the impact of research through FAIR-aligned practices and infrastructure. American
Mentor-focused Professional Development for Investigators Initiating Discipline-based Educational Research (DBER) in Biomedical EngineeringAbstractOur work (NSF PFE: RIEF Award 1927150) initiates a discipline-based educational researchstudy of student design self-efficacy in an undergraduate biomedical engineering (BME)program. A key component of this work focuses on our own professional development asengineering education researchers, which contributes to our abilities to undertake current andfuture engineering education studies. Our professional development goal is to establish andfollow a mentoring plan that facilitates our development of engineering education research skills.We targeted three areas for
the following goals for this 3-yearcycle: (1) Excite, empower, and educate 30 undergraduate participants in traditional/advancedmetrology and NDI, (2) for the undergraduate participants to experience an immersive research-training through a related transformative project, (3) to mold the undergraduate participants asboth independent/collaborative researchers capable of effective communication, (4) for theundergraduate participants to learn to ask the right questions, formulate plans, pragmaticallyinterpret data, and (5) inspire and enable the undergraduate participants to pursue advanced studyand related STEM careers. This site was a direct response to a recurring concern raised byindustry partners and technical workforce recruiters about the
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Impact of COVID-19 on Engineering and Technology Course OutcomesAbstractStudent learning experience can be disrupted significantly if the plan of study changes suddenlylike it did due to the COVID-19 global pandemic in March 2020. The purpose of this paper is tocompare the outcomes of two courses at Indiana State University such as student grades, numberof students dropping the course, available resources, etc. before (pre-) and during (post-) thepandemic. The compared two courses are from two separate departments where one course isEngineering Economics and the other course is DC Circuits and Design. The course DC Circuitsand Design has both theory and
in career planning activities, with a focus onacademic pathways to prepare for STEM-oriented careers, implemented by the school counselingdepartment. We hypothesize that this intervention will help support students’ abilities to seethemselves as STEM people (i.e., identity) and support students’ future goals in STEM.The student cohort will be drawn from enrollees in a federally funded program called TalentSearch. Talent search programs have a primary goal of increasing post-secondary schoolattendance among economically disadvantaged students. Our plan is to provide a model forconnecting middle school STEM education and Talent Search program activities to raiseawareness, interest, and the pursuit of STEM Careers. It is expected that this
by the rows in Table 3) as we also guide participants in using backward design todevelop their individual metacognitive activities for students in their context (as depicted by the columnsin Table 3). We will also employ flipped workshops in the short course to focus on participant’sdevelopment and needs. Each of the three workshops will have homework completed prior to theworkshop to maximize collaborative work on the specific objectives for each workshop. The short coursedesign also models the use of metacognitive experiences by calling on instructors to engage in planning,monitoring, and evaluating their own understanding and processes.Before starting the workshops, participants will learn about metacognition through our existing modules
science and computer science. Specifically, this study exploreshow the same elementary teachers both implicitly and explicitly support students across twoclassroom contexts, one class section with a larger proportion of students who were tracked intoaccelerated mathematics and another class section with a larger proportion of students withindividualized educational plans (IEPs). Transcripts of whole-class discussion were analyzed forinterdisciplinary instructional moves in which teachers verbally supported the integration ofdisciplines to help students to engage in interdisciplinary activities. Findings reveal that all of theinterdisciplinary instructional moves were implicit for the class section with a large proportion ofstudents in advanced
series of interactions with the technology to introduce and thenreinforce 3D visualization skills. A case study is presented herein of how student learningexperiences with the AR sandbox have been woven throughout the undergraduate civilengineering curriculum at Villanova University. A series of progressive AR sandbox learningactivities have been implemented in freshmen and junior-level civil engineering courses, andadditional modules are planned for other courses in the sophomore and senior years. Planningand implementation of these modules has been a collaborative effort between faculty acrossmultiple disciplines within the department (geotechnical, water resources, and structuralengineering). The purpose of the AR sandbox interventions is to
class, and to develop communication skills required for the delivery of lesson plan. The goal of the STEM initiative was 1) to give undergraduate students in the Robotscourse a service-learning opportunity by participating as mentors to middle school students;and 2) to introduce middle school students to the basics of robotics. The specific course learning outcomes are i) understand how robotic systems integratesensors, actuators, and control systems to achieve specific goals; ii) program Arduinomicrocontrollers and apply skills to develop an integrated robotic systems; iii) understand howdifferent type of motors such as stepper motors, dc motors work and measure and control theirspeed to build a robot that can navigate; iv
proposal team, amajor reason our bid failed was the lack of a well-trained technology workforce and lack oftechnology education in the local schools [1]. A year earlier Southern Methodist University(SMU) started working with a local Independent School District (ISD) on a statewide grant toincrease the number of teachers in their district who are certified by the state to teach computerscience (CS) at the high school level. As an outcome of our first grant partnership, we developeda proposal to the National Science Foundation CSforAll: RPP program [2]. We met several timesover six months to develop a pilot program that we planned to base the grant upon prior towriting the grant. As a result, this past August our proposal was funded (NSF 2031515
that the minor is new and that the first cohorts were relativelysmall, the number of students completing the survey was modest (n = 15). Results indicate thatstudents were motivated to minor in Applied Computing by a desire to improve their dataanalysis skills and better prepare themselves for the job market / graduate school, as well as abelief that programming is a necessary skill for the future. A large majority of students indicatedthat their peers, instructors, and homework assignments supported their learning very well,whereas they found topics covered and course projects to be less supportive, followed by pacingof course content. With respect to career plans, a majority of students agreed that the minorprovided them with their desired
practice in a twice a week 85 minute class, we present many adjustments toScrum for use in the classroom. We describe the implementation of the top six agile techniquesused in industry (daily standup, sprint planning, retrospectives, sprint review, short iterations,planning poker) which focuses the learning experience on the most important components of agiledevelopment in addition to including top engineering practices used in industry. Additionally, wereport extensions and variants for adapting this design to existing software engineering courses atother universities. Among these variants we propose adopting class-wide teams which is atypicalat other universities for junior-level project courses.IntroductionThe agile software development is