Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 1 - 30 of 90 in total
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Chad A. B. Wilson
Section T4A1 Meeting Two Needs: Teaching Engineering through Writing Chad A. B. Wilson Cullen College of Engineering University of Houston AbstractThis essay describes the theory behind the use of writing in engineering classes, as wellas several strategies for implementing such content-based writing. Despite thewidespread use of writing in disparate disciplines across the university, writing is notgenerally an integral component of “content” courses in engineering. In this essay, I buildon recent theories of
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Terry Creasy; Richard B. Griffin
Session T1B3 Designing, Rapid Prototyping, Casting, and Testing an Aluminum Link Richard B. Griffin and Terry Creasy Mechanical Engineering- 3123 Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3123Abstract Integrated design, rapid prototyping, manufacturing processes, and testing has beenaccomplished in a junior materials and manufacturing class. Students are given a design spaceapproximately 4 in. x 4 in. x ¼ in. Within that volume, they must design a link that may be rapidprototyped, cast, and then tested. The
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Charles D. Parker; B. Neal Whitten
(2004).B. NEAL WHITTENMr. Whitten is an Assistant Professor of Construction Engineering Technology at East Tennessee StateUniversity. Mr. Whitten also interns for the City of Kingsport, Tennessee on a part-time basis. Researchinterests include pavement management, infrastructure materials, and materials testing.CHARLES D. PARKERMr. Parker is the coordinator of the Construction Engineering Technology program at East Tennessee StateUniversity, where he is also an assistant professor. Mr. Parker’s research interests include: estimatingmethods, electrical and building codes, and school-to-work programs for high school students. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
M. M. Darwish; M. H. Akram; B. Green
Session F1D1 LT2-ET: Learning Through Technology for Engineering Technology M. M. Darwish, M. H. Akram and B. Green Texas Tech University Engineering Technology Department AbstractThe traditional instructor-centered teaching process has proven to be less effective ascompared to the use of active, cooperative learning methods. Students can learn moreeffectively when involved in the learning process. Researchers consistently have shown aparadigm shift in engineering education from traditional instructor methods to activelearning methods
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Tariq A. Khraishi
projects thatwere relevant to the class material at hand. Some of the criteria that the author used in selecting aproblem were: a) the design has to emphasize, or at least force the use of, concepts learned in theclassroom (e.g. symmetry and symmetry BCs), b) the execution of a project should not be verytime consuming.2) The second thing learned was that the implementation of PBL takes a significant portion ofthe instructor’s time.3) The instructor needs to alert students to verify assumptions made in their work, or when theysolve problems, before invoking such assumptions.4) The student groups should be required to meet with the instructor at least once and sufficientlyenough before the project deadline. The purpose of the meeting should be to
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
M. M. Darwish; M. H. Akram; B. L. Green
Session T1A1 PALM-Peer Assisted Learning Methodology M. H. Akram, M. M. Darwish, and B. L. Green Engineering Technology Department Texas Tech University AbstractEnrollments in engineering programs have not been keeping pace with expected jobgrowth in industry. Administrators have been trying hard to increase enrollments, improvethe retention rate of entering freshmen; and improve the percentage of engineeringstudents completing an engineering program in a predetermined period. The attrition rateof students in engineering programs
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Daniel J. Burroughs
is clear. We have a great demand for itfrom both the student body and from industry. It is a field that is difficult to teach wellwithout a great deal of hands-on, applied experience, and we have tried to address that inthe development of our course offerings. And while the distance learning programcreates some extra challenges, there are situation where we have learned to takeadvantage of these and use them to the student’s advantage. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education References 1. Arkin, B., Stender
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Richard Bannerot
and µ is the weight of the device in pounds (0 ≤ µ ≤ 10.00). Figure 1: Synopsis of the Golf Ball Launcher Project. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThe assessment of the design concept and the artifact was done using the criteriaidentified in Table 1. Based on a grade point average, i.e., 4=A; 3=B, etc. theassessments ranged from 0.86 to 4.25 (average =2.96 ± 0.96). Concept: originality, satisfying the goal 20% of using gravity Creativity: execution of the concept, e.g
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Yesh P. Singh; Peggy L. Talley
Shroud Rails a). Unshrouded Blade b). Shrouded Blade Figure 1. Hot Gas Path Over the Tips of Blades Some types of shrouds are designed to interlock with each other to providemechanical stiffness to the blade by forming a continuous band along the blade tips. Thez-notch hinders the blade from twisting in either direction. The shrouds also providevibrational damping to help eliminate high cycle fatigue failure and prevent dangerousexcitation when the turbine goes through a harmonic mode upon firing up or shuttingdown. Adjacent shrouds come into contact with each other during service, and over
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Jim Farison
academic background prepare you for this course? Yes - 5, No - 1 What grade do you expect to receive in this course? A - 2, B - 4 Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education The course was well organized. StA - 3, A - 2, SlD - 1 Assignments contributed to my understanding of course content. StA - 2, A - 4 I learned a great deal from this course. StA - 1, A - 5 The instructor used procedures and methods conducive to learning. StA - 1, A - 5
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Kenneth Van Treuren
Fall 2006. ME Labfigures prominently in the following ABET Criterion 3 categories1: b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data g. an ability to communicate effectively k. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for an engineering practice.The skills learned in ME Lab are a major part of the critical formation of laboratory skillsin a student’s engineering development at Baylor University. As such, students areexposed to many different techniques of measurement, data collection, and are requiredto develop communication skills, both written and oral. This paper outlines the course asit presently is being taught and highlights some of the
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
W.N.P. Hung; H-J. Sue; B.R. Varadharajan
propagation. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education References 1. Luo J.J., Daniel I.M., 2003, Characterization and modeling of mechanical behavior of polymer/clay nanocomposites, Comp Sci and Tech, Vol. 21, pp. 1607-1616 2. Zerda A.S., Lesser A.J., 2001 Intercalated Clay nanocomposites: Morphology, mechanics and fracture behavior, Journal of Pol Sci Part B, Vol. 39, No.11 pp. 1137-1146. 3. Sue H.J., Gam K.T., Bestaoui N., Clearfield A., Miyamoto M., Miyatake N., 2004, Fracture behavior
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Jeffrey Froyd; Donald A. Maxwell
load totheir truss correctly, b) truss did not meet the required dimensions and wedged in the tester, c)unit conversion (pounds vs. Newtons) errors, and d) trigonometric issues. The trusses were tobe loaded on four points and their analysis was to account for this by using a P/4, where P is theapplied load, on each loaded joint. However, some teams used P/2 instead. This explained someof the results that were greater than 50%. Teams that had trusses that were too long or too short Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationand wedged in the tester did
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Steven L. Bryant; Christopher A. Irle
. b a 1cmFigure 4. a) Example of oil rising along a finger within tube 6. b) Example of oil accumulating ata layer of fine grained sand; the accumulation is the result of capillary entry pressure in the fine- grained material exceeding the buoyancy forces. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Outline of cross-section
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Dulal C. Kar; Dennis Ma
lists their features in terms of sensitivity on the presence of an edge andnoise. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas &M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education (a) Original image (b) Edge detected by Sobel c) Edge detected by method Laplacian method Figure 1. Comparison of edge detection method. Table 1. Features of Laplace and Sobel edge detection algorithm Laplace SobelNoise Level More sensitive to noise level Better than Laplace edge
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Phillip I. Wilson; John D. Fernandez
. Blackburn, E. Tabassi, and J.M. Bone. “FRVT 2002: Overview and Summary,” Technical Report, National Institute of Standards and Technology, March 2003. 7. P. J. Phillips, A. Martin, C.L. Wilson, and M. Przybocki. “An Introduction to Evaluating Biometric Systems,” IEEE Computer, pp. 56-63, February, 2000. 8. B. Weyrauch, J. Huang, B. Heisele and V. Blanz “Component-Based Face recognition with 3D Morphable Models,” IEEE Workshop on Face processing in Video, FPIV04, Washington, D.C., 2004. 9. P. Viola and M. Jones. “Rapid Object Detection Using Boosted Cascade of Simple Features,” Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001. Proceeding of the 2005 ASEE Gulf
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Thomas J. Krueger; Ronald E. Barr
: Engineering Analysis”. Proceedings of the ASEE/EDGD 1995 Mid-Year Conference, Ames Iowa, 1995, pp 73-82.5. Barr, R. E., Juricic, D., Krueger, T. J., Wood, B. H., and Miller, L. S. Engineering Design Graphics Workbook. Schroff Development Corporation, Mission, KS. 1997. Biographical SketchesThomas J. KruegerDr. Krueger is a Teaching Specialist in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas atAustin, where he has taught since 1994. He received his B. S. from Concordia Teachers College in 1966 and hisM. Ed and Ph.D. from Texas A&M University in 1971 and 1975 respectively. Before coming to the Universityof Texas at Austin, Krueger taught at Texas A&M University, Brazosport
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Richard Hoehn; Dr. Saleh M Sbenaty
Electrical Engineering Technology Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationprogram at the Prairie View A&M University (PVAMU), I had an opportunity to prepare andpresent our program for accreditation to the TAC-ABET evaluators last fall.The program outcomes are described in the ‘Criteria for Engineering Technology Programs’ 2.An Engineering Technology program must demonstrate that graduates have: (a) an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools of their disciplines, (b) an ability to apply current knowledge and
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Jorge E. Navarro; Apolinar Zapata
calculus real life problem, there are not specificdirections like: find the area of the region bounded by the function f(x), the x-axis, theline x = a, and the line x = b. Real life calculus problems are introduced by a command:design the cheapest container which satisfies these specifications of volume and shape; orby a necessity: I have to find the center of mass of this machine part.In real life and in engineering and science courses, students need to know and be able touse calculus facts and procedures as quickly as possible. However, research1 makes itclear that how mathematics is taught is as important, or even more important than themathematical concepts being taught. Teaching mathematics through laboratory activitiesis an important way for
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Suketu Shah; Mohammed E. Haque; Gaurav Agarwal
indoor environment.c) Photovoltaic: Photovoltaic cells create electrical current from sunlight. The technology hasadvanced to the point where certain building components contain photovoltaic cells integrally.Photovoltaic cell integrated roofing panels can be purchased and installed in a manner similar tothose made out of sheet metal, while taking benefit of the ambient sunlight to generate electricity(Figure 8). Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright @ 2005, American Society for Engineering Education (a) (b) Figure 8 (a) Function of
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Todd E. Raborn
the project wereas follows: A. To promote sound engineering design techniques B. To research various light-weight materials C. To research various human-powered propulsion systems D. To promote sound engineering analysis techniques E. To research various steering, suspension, and braking systems F. To promote teamwork G. To promote communication skills H. To foster excitement in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and spaceThe project progressed in four phases. Phase one consisted of forming the team, studyinglunar vehicles, researching the moon’s terrain, evaluating NASA’s design criteria, rules,and regulations, and analyzing previous moonbuggy
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
G. Beate Zimmer; eremy S. Flores; Alexey L. Sadovski
shows a schematic of a two–layer feed–forward neural networkwith two neurons in the first layer and one in a second layer, using transfer functions f and g. Theweights are denoted by a i , j and the biases are denoted by b j . Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf–Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Input X1 Input X2 ⎛ n ⎞ Y1 = f ⎜⎜ ∑ a1,i X i + b 1 ⎟⎟ ⎝ i =1 ⎠ Input X3
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Terry Kohutek; Arun Srinivasa; Andrew P. Conkey
load totheir truss correctly, b) truss did not meet the required dimensions and wedged in the tester, c)unit conversion (pounds vs. Newtons) errors, and d) trigonometric issues. The trusses were tobe loaded on four points and their analysis was to account for this by using a P/4, where P is theapplied load, on each loaded joint. However, some teams used P/2 instead. This explained someof the results that were greater than 50%. Teams that had trusses that were too long or too short Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationand wedged in the tester did
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
John D. Fernandez
. Fernandez, J.D. (2004). Engaging students with community organizations by using computer technology, SIGITE 2004,October.3. McCracken, D., & Wolfe, R. (2004). User-centered Website development: A Human-Computer Interaction approach,Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.4. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H.(2002). Interaction design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, John Wiley & Sons,Inc., New York, NY.5. Rosson, M.B., & Carroll, J.M. (2002). Usability engineering: Scenario-based development of Human-ComputerInteraction, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Diego, CA.6. Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (1998). Designing the user interface, 4th Ed., Addison Wesley Pearson Education, Inc.,Boston, MA.Biographical
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Roop Chanda; Mohammed E. Haque
Session F1C3 A VIRTUAL TOUR OF A STEEL STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION Roop Chanda, Mohammed E. Haque Department of Construction Science Texas A&M University AbstractThe traditional methods of classroom teaching are often supplemented by alternative methods, soas to enhance the understanding of the students. These alternative methods include constructionsite visits, use of 3-D drawings and physical models. Although construction site visits are thebest way to expose students to actual construction technologies, they present
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
S. Ozcelik; M. A. Faruqi; M. A. Abudiab
Session T2A2 Effective Ethics Education M. A. Faruqi*, M. A. Abudiab** and S.Ozcelik*** * MSC 194 Department of Civil Engineering Texas A & M University-Kingsville Kingsville, TX 78363 E-mail: M-Faruqi@tamuk.edu ** 6300 Ocean Drive Department of Mathematics Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
S. Easwaran
discrete convolution fromthe perspective of the input signal to the students encountering it for the first time. It was alsopossible to teach this topic in a shorter time while enabling the students to master its concepts.The approach that was adapted and implemented by the author is as given below. The softwaretool that was designed and implemented by the author is described and discussed thereafter. Discrete ConvolutionDiscrete Convolution as a Mathematical OperationOne of the most basic mathematical operations in any field is the operation of addition. Theoperation of addition (denoted by an operation symbol +) is a mathematical operation that takesany two numbers (a and b) and produces a third number (c = a
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
James J. Dooley; Bernard L. Newman
Session T4B1 Application of A Modern Distributed Control System in a Chemical Engineering Laboratory Bernard L. Newman and James J. Dooley Department of Chemical Engineering University of Louisiana at Lafayette Lafayette, Louisiana AbstractModern distributed control systems are a valuable teaching tool in chemicalengineering and control engineering laboratories. Compared to earlier systems,the entry cost has been greatly reduced, making these systems affordable foralmost all engineering schools
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Harovel G. Wheat
Session T3D2 A Discipline-Specific Code of Ethics and Honor Harovel G. Wheat Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Texas at Austin AbstractStudent dishonesty is prevalent at large universities. With one of the largest studentpopulations in the country, The University of Texas at Austin has found academicintegrity a hot topic. While the central campus debated a university-wide honor code, theMechanical Engineering Department explored academic integrity and professional
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Randall D. Manteufel; Ramon Rodriguez; Kerry O’Connor; Jason Torres
Session T2C1 Laboratory Demonstration of Pump Energy Savings Using a Variable Frequency Drive Kerry O’Connor, Ramon Rodriguez, Jason Torres, Randall D. Manteufel Department of Mechanical Engineering and Biomechanics The University of Texas at San Antonio AbstractA team of undergraduate students have designed, built and tested a new laboratory experimentusing a variable frequency drive (VFD) to regulate the speed of a motor-pump combination in afluid piping system. The VFD allows the pump speed to vary by controlling the