Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Faye Wachs, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Harmony Nguyen, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Deanna Miranda Barrios; Lily Gossage, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Brooke Jones

?. Science Education, 98(3), 443-460.[5] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving Engineering: A Multi‐YearSingle Institution Study. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 6-27.[6] Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities. (2019). 2019 Fact Sheet: Hispanic HigherEducation and HSIs.[7] T. Strayhorn, College Students’ Sense of Belonging. 2018. doi: 10.4324/9781315297293[8] Gopalan, M., & Brady, S. T. (2020). College students’ sense of belonging: A nationalperspective. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 134-137.[9] E. Litzler and C. Samuelson, “How Underrepresented Minority Engineering Students Derivea Sense of Belonging from Engineering,” Jun. 2013, p. 23.674.1-23.674.20. Accessed: Aug. 11,2021. [Online

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James McAllister, University of Arkansas

, pp. 10.18260/1-2—28083. https://peer.asee.org/28083.[3] K. Muller, E. Buss, and B. Lax, “Arduino kits, bakeware, and LEGOs…Oh my!” OLAQuarterly, vol. 20, no. 4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7710/1093-7374.1779.[4] W. Wang, K. Kimberly, and F. Wang, “Meeting the needs of post-millennials: Lending hotdevices enables innovative library. Computers in Libraries, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 4-9,2017. https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/meeting-needs-post-millennials-lending-hot/docview/1891749560/se-2?accountid=8361.[5] M.R. Buchman and D.M. Dorsch, “Building strategic partnerships with non-maker entities tofoster a maker culture,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on AcademicMakerspaces, Cleveland. 2017. https://assets.pubpub.org/23eiwydy

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology; Dave Kim, Washington State University-Vancouver; Ken Lulay, University of Portland; John Lynch, Washington State University

Transfer in anIntroductory Engineering Laboratory Course,” in Proceedings of the 2016 American Society ofEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[8] D. Kim, W. Olson, “Using a Writing-transfer Focused Pedagogy to Improve Undergraduates’Lab Report Writing in Gateway Engineering Laboratory Courses,” IEEE Journal of TechnicalCommunications, 63 (1), 64-84, 2020.[9] K.B.Yancey, K. B. (Ed.) Delivering College Composition into the Future, The Fifth Canon.Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2006.[10] Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL): http://owl.purdue.edu[11] Civil Engineering Writing Project: http://cewriting.org[12] Monash University: https://www.monash.edu/rlo/assignment-samples/engineering/laboratory-reports[13] Penn

Conference Session

Transfer Programs at Two-Year Colleges in Engineering and Engineering Technology

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mara Lopez, Arizona State University; Caroline Vaningen-Dunn

Institutions: 2017-18,” Mar. 2019Fluharty, C., & Scaggs, B. (2007). The rural differential: Bridging the resource gap. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2007(137), 19-26.Garcia, G. A., & Okhidoi, O. (2015). Culturally relevant practices that “serve” students at a Hispanic Serving Institution. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 345-357.Garcia, G. A. (2018). Decolonizing Hispanic-serving institutions: A framework for organizing. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(2), 132-147.Garcia, G. A., Núñez, A. M., & Sansone, V. A. (2019). Toward a multidimensional conceptual framework for understanding “servingness” in Hispanic-serving institutions: A synthesis of the research. Review of Educational Research

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Maeng; Amanda Gonczi; Robert Handler; Hamid Nadir, University of Virginia; Whitney McCoy

practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109-1121.Kwon, K., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sari, A. R., Khlaif, Z., Zhu, M., Nadir, H., & Gok, F. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy matters: Exploring the integration of mobile computing device in middle schools. TechTrends, 63(6), 682-692. doi: 10.1007/s11528-019-00402-5Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Metz, S. (2014). Engineering a new world. The Science Teacher, December 2014.Moore, T. J., & Hjalmarson, M. A. (2009). Developing measures of roughness: Problem solving as a method to document student thinking in engineering. International Journal

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Shakour, Clemson University; Kapil Chalil Madathil, Clemson University; Eliza Gallagher, Clemson University; Karen Johnson, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Jonathan Beck; Rebecca Short, Clemson University; Tim Ransom, Clemson University; Gayatri Anoop, Clemson University

. Educ. J., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2, 2021.[4] Frady, K. K., Madathil, K. C., Gramopadhye, A. K., Dillard, B. P., & Rivers, H. E. (2015, June). CA2VES, an NSF Regional Center, Enhancing the Talent Pipeline to Support the Advanced Manufacturing Industry. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26- 319).[5] R. Trotter, J. Schensul, and K. Kostick, "Theories and methods in applied anthropology," Handb. Methods Cult. Anthropol., pp. 661–693, 2015.[6] J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2013.[7] J. E. Steigerwald and A. L. Steigerwald, “Try, Try, Again: Do Multiple Quiz Attempts Really Benefit the Student?,” ATEC J., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 15–19, 2018.[8] D. Manson

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jutshi Agarwal, University of Cincinnati; Samieh Askarian, University of Cincinnati; Gregory Bucks, University of Cincinnati; Teri Murphy, University of Cincinnati

leave the sciences, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.[2] W. Gaskins, Changing the learning environment in the College of Engineering and Applied Science: The impact of educational training on future faculty and student-centered pedagogy on undergraduate students, Proquest LLC, 2014.[3] B. Geisinger and D. Raman, "Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914-925, 2013.[4] R. Marra, K. Rodgers, D. Shen and B. Boque, "Leaving engineering: A multi‐year single institution study," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6-27, 2012.[5] J. Wright and D. Wilson, "It’s not just what TA's know: Exploring the role of teacher

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Fluids, Heat Transfer

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiamin Zhang, Auburn University; Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Cornell University; Matthew Ford, University of Washington; Eric Burkholder, Stanford University

the model matches theexperimental data. Finally, we ask the participant to compare the two proposed models anddiscuss how they would model the phenomenon given the two models. (a) (b) (c) Figure 1: Schematics in the heat transfer assessment (a) Blood vessels in a human hand (from Complete Anatomy App 30 ), (b) Resistor network model (Model 1), (c) Finite element model (Model 2).Figure 2 provides a summary of the sequence of provided information and questions in the heattransfer assessment. The color coding reflects the decisions relevant to the assessment that arepart of the 29 decisions identified by Price et al. 26 Each item in the table in the middle of thefigure

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carrie Dossick, University of Washington; Kirk Hochstatter, University of Washington; Alireza Borhani, University of Washington; Lucky Pratama, University of Washington; Bijesh Gautam, University of Washington; Ahmed Abdel Aziz; Hyun Woo Lee, University of Washington; Sanaz Saeidi

], 2011.Available: http://bim.psu.edu/Project/resources/default.aspx [Accessed: December 15, 2021][2] B, Succar, “BIM ThinkSpace episode 24: Understanding Model Uses,” BIM Think Space,2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.bimthinkspace.com/ [Accessed: December 15, 2021][3] A.C. Badrinath, Y.T., Chang & S.H. Hsieh, “A review of tertiary BIM education foradvanced engineering communication with visualization,” Visualization in Engineering, vol. 4,no. 1, Oct., pp. 1-17, 2016[4] J. Liu, and M. F. Hein. "Visualizing construction: a course in digital graphics for constructionmanagement students." In Sulbaran, T. and Cummings, G., Proceedings of the 43rd AnnualConference of Associated Schools of Construction (ASC), University of Southern Mississippi

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katrina Donovan, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Jon Kellar, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Michael West, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cassandra Birrenkott, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Stuart Kellogg, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Deborah Mitchell, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Matthew Whitehead, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

. Tzou, L.D. Conner, and M. Guthrie, M. “5th–7th Grade Girls’ Conceptions of Creativity: Implications for STEAM Education.” Creative Education, 8(02), pp. 255-271. 201720. B. Magerko, J. Freeman, T. Mcklin, M. Reilly, E. Livingston, S. McCoid, and A. Crews- Brown. “Earsketch: A Steam-based Approach for Underrepresented Populations in High School Computer Science Education.” ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 16(4), pp. 14. 201621. J. Vanscoder, “3D Printing as a Tool for Teaching and Learning in STEAM Education.” Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 188-191. March 201422. S. Pauls. “Biomimicry

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - the Best of NEE

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Emily Stratman, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] S. A. Ambrose, “Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge,” Bridge, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 16-23, June 2013.[2] S. M. Ndethiu, “Meta-cognition and graduate tributes' development: Engineering student's reflections on their strengths, weaknesses and strategies,” Int. J. Arts Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 329-337, Jan. 2018.[3] J. A. Turns, B. Sattler, K. Yasuhara, J. L. Borgford-Parnell, and C. J. Atman, (2014). “Integrating reflection into engineering education,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., (Indianapolis

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stu Thompson, Bucknell University; Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Jason Forsyth, James Madison University

politicalthought that focus more on collectivism and the structural aspects of society. Thus, the focus onthe individual may arise, in part, from the values upon which the KEEN program is built.To look more broadly at the dataset, we also asked how does the popularity of the 24 EML tags(i.e. how often a term is used to tag a card) compare with the overall mapping to the 27 NSFconvergence tags. The complete comparison between the use of KEEN tags on the x axis andmapping score (from 0 to 6) representing the level of alignment of our Convergence Frameworkwith the KEEN tags on the y axis is included in Appendix B, Figure 9. As can be seen there is apositive correlation between the popularity of tags on the x-axis (that is how often they are used)with the

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 8: Effective Teaching and Learning in Post-Pandemic Classrooms and Other Curricular Innovations

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Asad Azemi, University of Wisconsin - Platteville; Xiaoguang Ma, University of Wisconsin - Platteville; Fang Yang, University of Wisconsin - Plattevile; John Goomey, University of Wisconsin - Platteville; David Andersen, University of Wisconsin - Platteville

experience has also revealed how virtual teams and onlineteaching can be improved.Finally, like other institutions, we observed an enrollment drop during the pandemic. Thegeneral assumption was that the decline was related to the delivery preferences of students, andby moving to a face-to-face format, the enrollment will recover. This turned out to be not anentirely correct assumption. Furthermore, even after switching to a face-to-face delivery format,many students requested distance/online delivery options. We intend to investigate thisincidence further.REFERENCES[1] Evstatiev, B, T.V. Hristova, “Adaptation of Electrical Engineering Education to the COVID- 19 Situation: Method and Result,” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Symposium

Conference Session

ERM: Problem Solving and Conceptual Understanding

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rakhi Batra, The Ohio State University; Syedah Atiq, The Ohio State University

://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/5050[26] B. Adelson, “When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise.,” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 483, 19850101, DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.10.3.483.[27] C. L. Corritore and S. Wiedenbeck, “What do novices learn during program comprehension?” Int. J. Human– Computer Interact., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 199–222, Jan. 1991, DOI: 10.1080/10447319109526004.[28] F. Hauser, J. Mottok, and H. Gruber, “Eye Tracking Metrics in Software Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference of Software Engineering Education, New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2018, pp. 39–44. DOI: 10.1145/3209087.3209092.[29] P. Ren, A. Barreto, J. Huang, Y. Gao, F. R. Ortega, and M

Conference Session

ERM: Year of Impact on Racial Equity

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremi London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Yareni Lara-Rodriguez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Cynthia Paschal, Vanderbilt University; Rebecca Atadero, Colorado State University; Sarah Vigmostad, The University of Iowa; Desen Ozkan, Tufts University; Amanpreet Kaur, University of Pennsylvania; Courtney Smith-Orr, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Nicole Jefferson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

quality engineer in the manufacturing processes for a biomedical devices' company in Puerto Rico. Currently, she is a doctoral student at the Department of Mechanical Engineering and her research focuses on bioengineering. She has participated in several events in Puerto Rico and Mexico as a mentor and woman in STEM to encourage young girls and women to pursue STEM careers.Cynthia B. Paschal (Associate Professor, Associate Dean) Paschal is the Senior Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education in the School of Engineering at Vanderbilt University. A biomedical engineer, her background is in medical imaging technologies and their application to the study of cardiopulmonary physiology. Her interests include approaches to

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Ivey, The University of Memphis; Aaron Robinson, The University of Memphis; Katie Bowman, The University of Memphis

educational partnerships with industry benefit students and companies: the clinic program, November 2019, Forbes Magazine.5. Marosi, K., Steinburst, B., Increasing the Retention of Under-Represented Students in Engineering Through Connections with an Industry Advisory Committee, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2012 265.769.1 25.769.6.6. Washington, A., Burge, L., Mejias, M., Jean-Pierre, K., Knox, Q., Improving Undergraduate Student Performance in Computer Science at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) through Industry Partnerships February 2015 Pages 203–206 https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677277.7. Seymour E, Hunter A-B, Laursen SL, DeAntoni T. Establishing the benefits of research experiences for

Conference Session

LEAD Tech Session #2: Assessing and Evaluating Engineering Leadership Development.

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olivier de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Reza Rahaman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Joel Schindall, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

://www.asee.org/TUEE_PhaseI_WorkshopReport.pdf[9] Crawley, Edward, “Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Leadership Program: Developing Engineering Leaders of Tomorrow”, MIT Faculty Newsletter, Volume XXI, No. 4, March-May 2009, URL: http://web.mit.edu/fnl//volume/214/crawley.html URL accessed 23 February 2022[10] Schindall, Joel, “Progress Report on the Bernard M. Gordon – MIT Engineering Leadership Program” , MIT Faculty Newsletter, Volume XXV, No. 2, Nov-Dec 2012, URL: http://web.mit.edu/fnl/volume/252/schindall.html URL accessed 23 February 2022[11] Palmer, J. C., Birchler, K. D., Narusis, J. D., Kowalchuk, R. K., & DeRuntz, B. (2016). LEADing the way: A review of engineering leadership development programs. In 123rd ASEE Annual

Conference Session

ERM: Design!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Titiksha Singh, The State University of New York, College at Buffalo

, “Exploring the Effects of Problem Framing on Solution Shifts: A Case Study,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, Washington, Jun. 2015, p. 26.734.1-26.734.29. doi: 10.18260/p.24071.[4] T. F. A. C. Sigahi and L. I. Sznelwar, “Exploring applications of complexity theory in engineering education research: A systematic literature review,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 232–260, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20438.[5] B. Castellani and F. Hafferty, Sociology and Complexity Science: A New Field of Inquiry. Berlin: Springer, 2009.[6] R. Jiao et al., “Design Engineering in the Age of Industry 4.0,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 143, no. 7, p. 070801, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1115/1.4051041.[7] K

Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session: Student Success

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

MacKenzie Reber, Grove City College; Yun Dong, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Subhanwit Roy, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

implement to achieve these outcomeshave been a primary focus of recent literature, there is a lack of understanding regarding thechallenges new engineers face while attaining these outcomes. It is crucial to understand thechallenges new engineers face to mitigate these obstacles and better prepare engineering studentsto enter the workforce. This research aims to (a) identify the specific challenges newly hiredengineers face and the actions they take to overcome these challenges during the socializationperiod, and (b) identify aspects of undergraduate education that new engineers believe can beimproved. Researchers interviewed 26 participants from four of the largest aerospace anddefense organizations in the United States, and their responses were

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yilin Feng, California State University, Los Angeles

benchmarking, or both? b. In what areas will you compare your airport performance with the benchmark? c. List all the performance ratios, as well as needed data, you would use to measure and compare your airport performance with the benchmark. d. Will your answers to questions a to c change if you were the manager of Van Nuys Airport instead?”2. The instructor monitored each group discussion every other day and graded students’participation based on the number and quality of their comments.3. Each student was required to share their team’s answers at least once during the online meetingto gain full participation credits.Practices Used in CourseBesides the course structure, the instructor also applied

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Konstantinos Apostolou, McMaster University; Amin Rajabzadeh, McMaster University

, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2018.[13] D. M. Himmelblau and J. B. Riggs, Basic Principles and Calculations in Chemical Engineering, 9th ed., Pearson, 2022.[14] M. Liberatore, Material and Energy Balances, https://www.zybooks.com/catalog/material-and- energy-balances/#toggle-id-1: zyBooks, 2018.[15] "LearnChemE," [Online]. Available: https://learncheme.com/. [Accessed 2022].[16] "AIChE Concept Warehouse," [Online]. Available: https://newjimi.cce.oregonstate.edu/concept_warehouse/CW.php.[17] J. Verrett, R. Qiao and R. a. Barghout, "Foundations of Chemical and Biological Engineering I," [Online]. Available: https://www.oercommons.org/courses/foundations-of-chemical-and- biological-engineering-i/view.[18] "Pressbooks

Conference Session

ERM: Exploring Educational Technology in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Dickson; Rafal Jonczyk; Elif Gunay; Janet Van Hell, Pennsylvania State University; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma

. 105-116, Apr. 2022. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/48660127[3] S. M. Ritter and N. Mostert. “Enhancement of Creative Thinking Skills Using a Cognitive-Based Creativity Training,” J. Cogn. Enhanc., vol. 1, pp. 243–253, Oct. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3[4] N. Vargas Hernandez, L. Schmidt, and G. E. Okudan. “Systematic Ideation Effectiveness Study of TRIZ,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 135, no. 10, 101009, Oct. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024976[5] C. B. Masters, M. Schuurman, G. Okudan, and S. T. Hunter. “An investigation of gaps in design process learning: Is there a missing link between breadth and depth?” presented at the 115th annual Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf., Pittsburgh, PA, June

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 2 - Community Engagement without Frontiers

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Leidig, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); William Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Steve Crowe

increaseinclusiveness”, In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 357–372).Cambridge University Press, 2014[6] P. A. Leidig and W. C. Oakes, “Model for project-based community engagement”, International Journal for Service Learningin Engineering, 2021, Vol 16, No. 2, pp. 1-13.[7] R. Graham, The global state of the art in engineering education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018.[8] P. A. Leidig and W. C. Oakes, “Engagement in practice: project-based community engagement model preliminary casestudies”, American Society of Engineering Education annual conference, 2021.[9] A. Furco, “Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education”, In B. Taylor and Corporation for NationalService (Eds

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Faye Wachs, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Brooke Jones; Deanna Miranda Barrios; Lily Gossage, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Harmony Nguyen, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

the low sense ofbelonging that STEM students tend to report can be a factor contributing to the gap betweenURM and non-URM students who complete their STEM degrees [5]. It is important tounderstand URM students’ sense of belonging in STEM because it is often tied to students’success in the academic setting. Knowing how much students feel they belong in their respectivedepartments and fields can further inform interventions in higher education as this is linked tostudent success in the academic setting. B. Addressing the Consequences of Barriers Faced by URM Students in EngineeringDifferent interventions have been implemented to mitigate the consequences of the barriersURM students typically face. One academic support intervention is

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

participants in this study and thecontributions of our research team.References[1] Pearson, G. (2008). Changing the conversation: messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12187.[2] Kaufman, James C. (2016). Creativity 101. Springer.[3] National Academy of Engineering (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10999[4] Bailey, R., & McFarland, M. E. (2018). Prototyping and the engineer of 2020. The International journal of engineering education, 34(2), 567-573.[5] Leydens, J. A., Moskal, B. M., & Pavelich, M. J. (2004

Conference Session

ERM: Lessons Learned from COVID (COVID Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ona Egbue, University of South Carolina, Upstate; Rania Al-Hammoud, University of Waterloo; Arshia Khan, University of Minnesota Duluth

Engineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), 2020: IEEE, pp. 1-5.[6] A. Ayuningtyas, A. S. Honggowibowo, S. Mulyani, and A. Priadana, "A Web-Based Aircraft Maintenance Learning Media to Support Learning Process in Aerospace Engineering Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic," in 2020 Sixth International Conference on e-Learning (econf), 2020: IEEE, pp. 55-60.[7] M. Barr, S. W. Nabir, and D. Somerville, "Online Delivery of Intensive Software Engineering Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic," in 2020 IEEE 32nd Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), 2020: IEEE, pp. 1-6.[8] B. Evstatiev and T. Hristova, "Adaptation of Electrical

Conference Session

Pedagogy in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sidney Stone, The University of Toledo; Breanne Crockett; Kevin Xu, The University of Toledo; Matthew Liberatore, The University of Toledo

. Gillies, C. A. Hooley, and B. D. Sinclair, "Developing and evaluating animations for teaching quantum mechanics concepts," 13 European Journal of Physics, vol. 31, no. 6, p. 1441, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/31/6/010.[14] P. S. Steif and A. Dollar, "Study of usage patterns and learning gains in a web-based interactive static course," (in English), Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 321-333, Oct 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01030.x.[15] N. Hubing, D. B. Oglesby, T. A. Philpot, V. Yellamraju, R. H. Hall, and R. E. Flori, "Interactive learning tools: Animating statics," 2002, pp. 1-10, doi: https

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia Maloney, Texas Tech University; Bingbing Li, California State University, Northridge; Meng Zhang, Kansas State University; Weilong Cong, Texas Tech University

applications, as well as those that use group work, willdisproportionately help underserved engineering populations like women and people of colorsucceed. Fitting with the above finding, undergraduates noted that they perceived that they hadincreased in teamwork, communication, and computer programming skills. These gains wereparticularly high in female students and students of color.Introduction:Additive manufacturing (AM) is a type of manufacturing process during which materials such aspolymers, metals, and ceramics are deposited in a layer-by-layer stratigraphy to create a three-dimensional part based on the schematics of a computer-aided design (CAD) [1-5]. Additivemanufacturing is now a widely used process in industry [6], higher education

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danilo Leal, Universidad Andres Bello, Vina del Mar, Chile; Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile

. Theauthors also would like to acknowledge the financial support of the School of Engineering,Universidad Andres Bello.References[1] Cabrera, A. F., and La Nasa, S. M. 2000. Understanding the college choice of disadvantaged students. New Directions for Institutional Research. (No. 107): 23-29.[2] Hossler, D., and Gallagher, K. S. 1987. Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College & University. (Spring): 207-221.[3] Kotler, P., and Fox, K. F. 1985. Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.[4] Paulsen, M. B. 1990. College Choice: Understanding Student Enrollment Behavior. ASHE- ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6. Washington

Conference Session

Instrumentation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ciprian Popoviciu, East Carolina University; Colby Sawyer, East Carolina University

: https://www.multitech.com/brands/multiconnect-mdot [Accessed: 26 Jan 2022].[12]. Raspberry Pi Foundation, “Teach, Learn, and Make with”. [Online]. Available: https://www.raspberrypi.org/ [Accessed: 25 Jan 2022].[13]. Maksimović, M., Vujović, V., Davidović, N., Milošević, V., & Perišić, B. 2014. “Raspberry Pi as Internet of things hardware: performances and constraints”. design issues, vol.3, no.8, pp.1-6.[14]. Patnaik Patnaikuni, D. 2017. “A Comparative Study of Arduino, Raspberry Pi and ESP8266 as IoT Development Board”. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, vol.8, no.5, pp.2350–2352.[15]. Industries, A. “Adafruit LoRa Radio Bonnet with OLED - RFM95W @ 915MHz”. Adafruit