Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying all 5 results

Provision of the practical learning environment via application-based projects integrated with the undergraduate engineering curriculum.

Conference Session
Technical Session M5C
Collection
2022 First-Year Engineering Experience
Authors
Surupa Shaw, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Full Papers
in Mechanical Engineering from University of New Hampshire, USA and B.Tech [Hons.] in Ocean Engineering & Naval Architecture from Indian Insti- tute of Technology, Kharagpur, India. Her research interests include Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, Heat Transfer Applications, Mechanical Design, Nanotechnology, HP/HT Rheology. She also has strong industrial experience as a Senior Technical Pro- fessional at Halliburton [Oil-well Cementing Research & Development]. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Full Paper: Provision of the practical learning environment via application-based
Relevance Score: 0.686169

WIP: Identity-Based Bias in Undergraduate Peer Assessment

Conference Session
Technical Session M1
Collection
2022 First-Year Engineering Experience
Authors
Madison Jeffrey, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Mark Mills, UM, Center for Academic Innovation
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Works In Progress
swayed by characteristics andperceptions of students, instructors must approach the practice with a complete understanding ofwhat those ratings reflect. Establishing best practices for peer assessment in how it is conducted,determining the subject matter, and how it is reviewed is integral to the growth of small learningpractices and its positive impacts on the student experience.References[1] M. Donia, T. O’Neill, & S. Brutus. (2018). The longitudinal effects of peer feedback in the development and transfer of student teamwork skills. In Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 87-98.[2] C. Brooks & J. Ammons. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer
Relevance Score: 0.3202362

WIP: Eagle ExCEL-Engineers Connect, Engage, and Learn: An At-Risk Advising Program

Conference Session
Technical Session M1
Collection
2022 First-Year Engineering Experience
Authors
Elizabeth A. Powell, Tennessee Technological University; Harry T Ingle Jr., Tennessee Technological University; Kumar Yelamarthi, Tennessee Technological University
Tagged Topics
Works In Progress
AcademicAdvising Session Guide (p.10). Manhattan, KS: NACADA The Global Community forAcademic Advising, 1994.[12] C. Holland, C. Westwood, and N.Hanif, “Underestimating the relationship betweenacademic advising and attainment: A case study in practice,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 5,2020, DOI=10.3389/feduc.2020.00145.[13] A. Khalil and J. Williamson, “Role of academic advisors in the success of engineeringstudents,” Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 73-79, 2014,https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1053985.pdf.[14] M. Uddin, “Best practices in advising engineering technology students for retention andpersistence to graduation,” The Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering,vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 2-13, 2020,https
Relevance Score: 0.27162528

WIP: Developing the next generation expert: What we learned from under-academically prepared students about academic self-efficacy in engineering and computing

Conference Session
Technical Session M1
Collection
2022 First-Year Engineering Experience
Authors
Jennifer I Clark, Montana State University - Bozeman; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Works In Progress
the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and computing students,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Rep., p. 32, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/retention-project[13] A. Bandura, Sources of self-efficacy. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1997.[14] U. Bronfenbrenner, “The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings,” in Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments, R. H. Wozniak and K. W. Fischer, Eds. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erblaum Associates, Publishers, 1993, pp. 3–44.[15] U. Bronfenbrenner, “Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective,” in Examining lives in context
Relevance Score: 0.14087406

Community-Engaged Learning in First-Year Engineering

Conference Session
Technical Session S2C
Collection
2022 First-Year Engineering Experience
Authors
William C. Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
Tagged Topics
Workshops
program. The five components of the pedagogy are [1] . 1. Engagement opportunities that meet the needs of an underserved segment of society 2. Academic connection between the engagement and the subject material of a course. 3. Reciprocal partnerships where all benefit from the collaboration. 4. Mutual learning among all stakeholders, built on a foundation of respect. 5. Reflection on the experiences and its implications for the future.Research has shown many benefits for students across many disciplines [2-6]. Withinengineering, evidence shows learning across a broad set of profession and technical skills [7-11].Graduates report easier transition into professional practice and faster advancement in industrypositions [12
Relevance Score: 0.05337106