Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying all 12 results

Reflections on Mentorship – Being the Change You Want to See in Engineering Education

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexander V Struck Jannini, Purdue University Library TSS
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Paper ID #37185Reflections on Mentorship – Being the Change You Want to See inEngineering EducationAlexander Vincent Struck Jannini, Purdue University Library TSS ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reflections on Mentorship – Being the Change You Want to See in Engineering EducationAbstractThe educational pathway of engineering is often fraught with obstacles and challenges. Whilestudents that participate in research labs get through with less difficulty, there can be instanceswhere students enter with both academic and personal issues. In this paper, I will specificallyhighlight one of my
Relevance Score: 2.236714

Work in Progress: Bridging the Gap in Doctoral Engineering Education—Critically Investigating Factors Influencing Performance Outcomes on First Doctoral Degree Milestones

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 6: Underserved Student Experiences
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicole Adia Jefferson, Virginia Tech ; Jeremi S. London, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
to understand what this process may entail.According to some graduate education scholars, there are four core elements related to graduatestudents' development of an identity congruent with the norms and values of their field:knowledge acquisition, investment, involvement, and engagement (Weidman, 2006). Knowledgeacquisition describes how students learn skills and information that will help them perform wellin their new role as a Ph.D. student, as well as gain an understanding of what academic successentails. Through knowledge acquisition, students become aware of normative expectations of thePh.D. student role and can make a realistic assessment of their personal ability to pursue theirdesired career. The student's investment reflects their
Relevance Score: 0.013272401

Work in Progress: Exploring Elements of a Mentoring and Professional Development Program in Engineering Education

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cyra Anderson, University of Michigan; Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan; Nagash Clarke, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
student development and impacted attendee awareness of the“hidden curriculum”, or the unstated enforcement of certain behavioral patterns, professional standards,and social beliefs (Miller & Seller, 1990). We also present insights about potential future opportunities forthese types of programs to potentially help students more easily navigate academic and socio-politicalcustoms needed for success. Literature ReviewMentoring and Professional DevelopmentMentoring reflects a unique relationship between individuals, one different from other interpersonalrelationships (Eby et al, 2007). Mentors provide coaching or guidance to assist mentees with careeradvancement while developing relationships to
Relevance Score: 0.013272401

Board 190: Work in Progress: A Pilot Study on Faculty Perceptions of the Impact of COVID-19 on Undergraduate Engineering Student Readiness

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emily Fitzpatrick, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Jessica Deters, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
tobetter address the research purpose. Participants were sent the interview questions prior to theinterview to allow them to gather class data and reflect on the differences beforehand. Interviewswere conducted via Zoom and were transcribed by a professional transcription service.The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis, wherein the author team identified themeswithin and across the interviews about the perceived impact of COVID-19 on engineeringstudent readiness. One author conducted the initial data analysis and identified initial themes.The author team then met to discuss to consensus. The author team found that themes withineach participant’s interview were unique from the other participant and, as a result, opted topresent the
Relevance Score: 0.0108368695

Work in Progress: A Correlation Analysis of Engagement of First-Generation College Students in Engineering

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 6: Underserved Student Experiences
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Abigail Nichole Lehto, American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE); Ning Fang, Utah State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
questions. Table 1: EIs and Associated Themes Engagement Indicators Themes Higher-Order Learning Academic Challenge Reflective and Integrative Learning Learning Strategies Quantitative Reasoning Collaborative Learning Learning with Peers Discussions with Diverse Others Student-Faculty Interaction Experiences with Faculty Effective Teaching Practices Quality of Interactions Campus Environment Supportive EnvironmentAfter EI scores
Relevance Score: 0.0108368695

Highlighting Community Cultural Wealth of Black Students Raised in the United States by Parents Born and Raised Abroad

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 4: Minoritized Student Experiences
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aimee Sayster, Clemson University ; Jessica Allison Manning, Clemson University; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University; Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
third point of reference to reflect on and givea rich description of their experience in the US. Through qualitative analysis of these cases, wewill address the question: In what ways do Black students who are first- or second-generationimmigrants from Africa and have studied abroad leverage community cultural wealth inengineering in the US?We use Yosso’s Community Cultural Wealth (CCW) framework to highlight the strengths thesestudents leverage in engineering. CCW is an asset-based framework developed to highlight thestrengths of the students from Communities of Color. There are six assets used as a guiding lensto inform research in these communities: familial, social, aspirational, navigational, resistance,and linguistic capital that students
Relevance Score: 0.009954301

Attracting Black Students to Undergraduate Engineering Programs: A Rapid Review for Broadening Participation

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 4: Minoritized Student Experiences
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Micaha Dean Hughes, North Carolina State University, Raleigh; John Roberts, UK College of Engineering
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
interest, and this discrepancy isfurther reflected during the college application process. This mismatch cultivates a system ofexclusion for minoritized students: students are led to think they can succeed during outreach,only to be told they are not allowed in during recruitment.Holloway et al. [44] listed 11 major factors used to admit or deny students during the collegeapplication review process by IHEs in the years 2006-2010: (1) “subject matter expectations (thenumber of semesters of math, science, English, social studies, and foreign language that eachstudent is required to have taken in high school), (2) overall high school grade point average(GPA) (3) core high school GPA (English, math, science, foreign language, and social studiesclasses
Relevance Score: 0.008295251

Supporting Graduate Women in Engineering: The Approach and Findings of a Year-Long Program at UIUC

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 4: Minoritized Student Experiences
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aadhy Parthasarathy, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Rupal Nigam, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Aanchal Gupta, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Tove Elisabeth Kopperstad, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Ani Pirosmanishvili, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Theresa Ann Saxton-Fox, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
anonymous surveys are used in this study to judge the impact ofGrOW. The surveys contain both self-reflection questions and quantitative questions to evaluate“success”. The self-reflection questions judge adjustment to graduate school and feelings ofbelonging and self-worth using a 5-point Likert scale. The quantitative questions gather metricssuch as GPA, number of publications, and fellowships earned. The surveys are attached in theappendix for reference.Survey 1 was distributed in August 2022, after the first event of the GrOW program. Twenty-threeattendees participated in the survey. Survey 2 was distributed in December 2022, after the fourthevent. First-year MG graduate students who had not attended any of the GrOW events were alsoinvited to
Relevance Score: 0.008127652

Work in Progress: An Investigation of the Influence of Academic Culture on Engineering Graduates' Workforce Expectations and Subsequent Work Behaviors

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 5: Motivation and Support for Success
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Philippa Eshun; Kacey Beddoes, San Jose State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
the National Science Foundation under grant EEC#1929727. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] W.C. Johnson and R.C. Jones, “Declining Interest in Engineering Studies at a Time ofIncreased Business Need.”http://www.worldexpertise.com/Declining_Interest_in_Engineering_Studies_at_a_Time_of_Increased_Business_Needs.htm (accessed Jan. 20, 2023).[2] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Civil Engineers.” https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/civil-engineers.htm (accessed Jan. 20, 2023).[3] Data USA, “Civil Engineering”. https://datausa.io/profile/cip/civil-engineering (accessed
Relevance Score: 0.0076628244

Mediating Expectations: Understanding the Influence of Grades on Professional Identity Formation in Undergraduate Engineering Students

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 5: Motivation and Support for Success
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jackson Clyde Smith; Ilham Kabir; Cassandra McCall, Utah State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
related to mental health, were not something that was discussed. Future work will includeconducting the same interviews with students from a variety of achievement levels andsocioeconomic background to get a more nuanced understanding of these groups of students andgain a greater understanding about how grades may or may not influence students’ identityformation as engineers.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNumber DUE #1950330. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] J. Heywood, The Assessment of Learning in
Relevance Score: 0.006704971

Looking into the Design of Accessible Musical Instruments for Musicians with Physical Disabilities

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 3: Student Innovative Practice
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sydney Rose Fitzgerald, Spackenkill High School; Hoda Ehsan, The Hill School
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
. tracks.Linnstrument Linnstrument Subtle finger Linnstru Can be played using a Wide range of Intended for Resembles a Linnstrument[26]. is a MIDI movements can ment single finger. Also can precise and those familiar digital tablet, 128 (less controller be detected to MIDI be played atop a table, unique music with music and with brightly customizable) controlled reflect unique controlle using a guitar strap; complexity willing to spend colored lights $1099. through music controls r, any can be used with with time learning
Relevance Score: 0.005747118

Supporting Students with Minoritized Gender Identities in Research: the Design and Assessment of an Initiative in Electrical and Computer Engineering

Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 4: Minoritized Student Experiences
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mei-Yun Lin, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Hsinju Chen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Holly M. Golecki, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Leah Espenhahn; Erin Marie Raftery; Alyssa Huang; Mayura Kulkarni
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Education, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 340–352, 09 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/s-dude-culture-students-with-minoritized/docview/2348348625/se-2[13] J. Misra, J. H. Lundquist, E. Holmes, S. Agiomavritis et al., “The ivory ceiling of service work,” Academe, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2011.[14] N. A. Fouad, W.-H. Chang, M. Wan, and R. Singh, “Women’s reasons for leaving the engineering field,” Frontiers in psychology, p. 875, 2017.[15] J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–659, 2013.[16] K. J. Cross, S. Farrell, and B. Hughes, Queering STEM
Relevance Score: 0.0047892653