the instructor has the right to overrule thestudents’ score in case of a disagreement (which has never occurred). This method helps keep Page 14.1132.10the instructor in tune with the expectations of the class, but also helps capture those situations inwhich the material was not properly tuned for the audience.Since 2005, 63% of students have received an A on the project, 31% a B and 6% a C. Nostudent achieved less than a ‘C’ on this assignment, which comprises 20-25% of the final gradein the course. The mean score was a 91% with a standard deviation of 5.3%. These numbers,which remain more or less consistent across all of the class years
SA % a A %b D %c SD %d NE %eThe gains my students and I make in the classroom justify the amount oftime I spend preparing my Moodle course(s). 44.8 57.1 1.7 0 1.7The various class management tools (such as the gradebook, time-stamped submissions, and posting assignments) help me to stay 29.3 58.6 1.7 0 10.3organized.Working to prepare and integrate content, classroom activities, andonline assessment in a Moodle unit has improved my planning
AC 2009-2456: IMPACT OF ENGINEERING: DESIGNING A CLASS FORTECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY DISCIPLINESMani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Electrical and Computer engineering and is the also the director of Minor in Engineering studies (A technological literacy minor) at Iowa State University. He is an active member of IEEE and ASEE. His research interest include applied EM, RF systems, Optical devices, and engineering education at all levels.Ryan M. Gerdes, Iowa State University Ryan M. Gerdes received a B.S. in computer engineering in 2004, and in 2006 both a B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering, all from Iowa State University. He is currently working towards his
Technology in World Civilization course (Loendorf7, 2004)was designed to broaden the students perspective of past technologies and how they werediscovered and used. The main objectives of the course were to: (a) promote awareness oftechnological development, and (b) provide a rudimentary understanding of the social, political,economic, and cultural impact.The course content explores innovations and inventions associated with ancient as well as retrotechnologies in the fields of agriculture, weapons, time measurement, industrialization,transportation, communication, and the environment (Loendorf7, 2004). These encompass everyaspect of engineering and engineering technology including mechanical, electrical, industrial,civil, and environmental. By
Design Design Connections Connections (a) Technology Survey Courses (b) Technology Focus Courses
AC 2009-84: NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN ENGINEERING FOR NONENGINEERSJohn Krupczak, Hope College Page 14.905.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 New Developments in Engineering for Non-Engineers: Functional Analysis as a Framework for Understanding TechnologyAbstractThe National Academy of Engineering recently published: “Changing the Conversation:Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering.” The NAE states that capable andconfident participants in our technologically dependent society must know something aboutengineering. However the means by which engineers can explain engineering to non
AC 2009-1691: USING MOVIES TO EXPLORE ELEMENTS OFTECHNOLOGICAL LITERACYJohn Blake, Austin Peay State University JOHN W. BLAKE is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN. He served as department chair from 1994-2005. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Tennessee. Page 14.1328.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Using Movies to Explore Elements of Technological LiteracyAbstractTo reach the goal
AC 2009-2037: INVESTIGATION OF THE SUCCESSFUL EFFORT TO CHANGEEDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM FRAMEWORKS IN MASSACHUSETTS TOINCLUDE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYNataliia Perova, Tufts University Nataliia got her M.S. in Mathematics, Science, Technology and Engineering education from Tufts University in 2008 and M.S. in Electrical Engineering in 2005 from Tufts University and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Suffolk University. Nataliia is currently a research assistant at Harvard Graduate School of Education where she is involved in the research project on mathematics education. She is also doing research on using engineering approaches to teach science to college students.Chris Rogers, Tufts
education. However, no satisfactorymeans to address this insight area was established. Therefore it has not been integrated into thegeneral education requirements. This paper reports on subsequent work by the College ofEngineering resulting in two minors that address technological literacy. The College has chosento work from the basic description and general learning objectives developed by a recent reportsof the National Academy of Engineering and National Standards for Technological Literacy. Inorder to offer the most value in a minor and meet learning objectives in the most effectivefashion, the conclusion was reached that it is best to view the potential audience for minors intwo groups. The first group being those that will likely be working