role in the projects as well as the roleof the community partner. Following this the survey inquired about several skills or experiencesthe CEL projects may build. This list of skills was developed in consulting a number of sourcesincluding the UBC Centre for Community Engaged Learning (CCEL) [11] and the EngineersCanada Graduate Attributes [12]. Students are asked about challenges to their work and supportresources they have utilized, with this list being informed by CCEL. Finally, the survey asks howCOVID-19 has impacted their CEL activitiesThe survey asked about strategies students used when developing CEL projects. If the membershad not engaged in CEL projects, the survey questions focused on whether students wereinterested in pursuing CEL
, Vancouver American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 ASEE Zone IV Conference 2022 Implementing community-engaged learning (CEL) in a second- year engineering design course Tasnia Anika, Siba Saleh, Jonathan Verrett Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver CampusAbstractCommunity engaged learning (CEL) was integrated into a second-year chemical engineeringdesign course. The CEL project focused on assessing the impact of food delivery on campus onGHG emissions. Students were surveyed before and
Paper ID #35920Beyond the Vanishing Point: Using Future Self Theory and Student-AlumniInterviews to Expand Student Perspectives on Engineering Education andEngineering WorkDr. Harly Ramsey, University of Southern California Harly Ramsey is an Associate Professor of Technical Communication Practice in the Engineering in So- ciety Program at the University of Southern California. She holds a Ph.D. in English, and her training in narrative theory, cultural studies, and rhetoric informs her teaching. Her teaching and scholarship fore- ground the concept of the citizen engineer and the formation of professional engineering
regular meetings withcounselors [3], and opportunities to engage with high impact practices, such as undergraduateresearch [3]. In addition, it has been shown that offering introductory engineering courses at the2-year institution helped students effectively navigate the path to transfer when such coursesincluded a survey of engineering careers as well as information about transfer planning and degree[3]. Additionally, faculty guidance on major-specific educational planning and transfer destinationselection was critically important to transfer success [3], as well as outreach and recruitmentactivities in which faculties from 4-year institutions visit the community college to present themajor and their scholarly interests [2]. The existing
students’ perceptions within their teams (measuring Autonomy,Psychological Needs Scale1 to measure motivation (Fall 2019). The recent classroom-based study in Relatedness and Competence). The survey was administered first in week 3, at the • Measure and visualize the level of awareness of class instructor on cognitivethe Spring 2021 semester utilized an industry tool formerly owned by fable+ and administered by beginning of the semester, after students had just started working in their teams but diversity and psychological safety and how this impact the learning dynamicsICQ Global Australia. The author from Pertamina University used the same tool in the senior
torecognize the different ways they can be leaders allows them to engage more deeply inexperiential learning and leadership opportunities, as well as achieve better outcomes aftergraduation [4]. This study seeks to understand student experiences in co-curricular spaces wheremany of these skills may be developed. The study focuses in particular on diversity andinclusivity in order to ensure access to these development opportunities. This work presents theperspectives of a variety of individuals on their experiences in co-curricular engineering spaces.MethodologyThis study seeks to understand the experiences of a variety of students. Given this, aninterpretivist paradigm is used in framing the study [5]. The experiences shared by participantsmay
purposes reported an enhanced learning experience at aChinese public university. Further, Hurst, Wallace, and Nixon [3] surveyed undergraduatestudents and concluded that students believe social interactions increased their enjoyment oflearning, interest in topics, and level of responsiveness. Beyond academic success, engineers ofthe 21st century must effectively engage with peers [7], and as noted by Passow [7], teamworkand communication are among the most valuable skills in the engineering industry. Byresearching these benefits, educators can capture and incentivize the positive attributes ofstudents’ interactions. Further, such research often requires methods, like SNA, forcharacterizing interactions of the research participants.Social Network
presentation, attendees will learn how Wikipedia was integrated into the writingcurriculum for engineering students, examine the impact of this group project on students'perceptions about their writing, communication, and collaborative skills, and identifyconnections between Wikipedia writing principles and engineering ethics.
passion for the engineering profession among students. Theseprograms often adopt engaged pedagogies that integrate technical and non-technical (e.g., ethicsand communication) competencies into the curriculum. A major goal of such an integrativeapproach to engineering education is to present students with a more holistic vision of theengineering profession, and communicate to students that skills necessary for good, responsibleengineering are integrative by nature. Therefore, it is relatively natural that instructors oftenassess the efficacy of these pedagogies in their classes in terms of how these pedagogies affectstudents’ ethical perceptions and the development of their ethical competencies. As a result,some first-year engineering instructors
explores the spatial strategies that were most effectivefor four BLV students engaged in solving a tactile spatial task which is found on a recentlydeveloped Tactile spatial ability instrument [22]-[23]. Findings from this study can be used toinform the development of improved spatial interventions for BLV individuals.Data Collection MethodsIn order to more accurately measure spatial thinking in BLV populations, the Tactile MentalCutting Test (TMCT) was developed as a fully accessible adaptation of the Mental Cutting Test(MCT) [24], an instrument that is commonly used by researchers in the field of spatial ability[25]-[26]. The TMCT requires subjects to tactilely interpret a small three-dimensional plasticobject with a laminated paper plane
designs andproducts that are safe, sustainable, and resilient to the impacts induced by a changing climate.The students will also learn about and apply the concept of creating restorative solutions that notonly minimize the negative impacts of a project but also restore the assets of the community andenvironmental resources [11]. The updated PEOs call for teaching the students systems thinking,and the need and means for pursuing professional development to adapt to constantly evolvingengineering technologies and profession. Understating and integrating the needs and values ofunderrepresented communities was a key development in the updated PEOs. The PEOs alsoplace an emphasis on equitable and inclusive communications with all stakeholders. TheCE
activists,” a group who organized toprotest what they considered to be their company’s lack of serious involvement in addressingclimate change, given Amazon’s economic power and global reach. Students at the master’s andundergraduate level have engaged with this case and written reflective papers to identify ethicaldilemmas and pathways to change within current global structures as well as professionaldocuments providing industry with recommendations. This current paper argues the multiplebenefits of bringing social justice issues of relevance to engineering students in a technicalwriting course.IntroductionEmployee activism in high-tech companies includes mid and upper-level management andengineers who have spoken out on a variety of issues both
acceptance process based on skills important to research, de-emphasizing or eliminating aspects like GPA, experience, or reference letters that may have a disproportionate impact on some groups of students. 3. Support students by providing summer research skill courses, training their mentors, and providing cross-cohort social/learning opportunities.In this paper, we will focus on the evaluation of program aspects outside of the two summercourses.ContextInstitutionAt our large, research-intensive institution, undergraduate research experiences were prioritizedas part of the latest overall institutional strategic plan [11]. In concert with this strategic plan, afund was created by the Office of the Vice President Academic and
expectation thatonly those on the Instructor and Design paths attend this module. After completing this moduleparticipants should be able to:• Evaluate the effectiveness of their course delivery during and after course completion.• Assess areas in pedagogy that require improvement.• Revise course pedagogy to address areas that require improvement.A key practice in multi-campus courses is ongoing evaluation of the student experience [8].When problems do occur with one or more cohorts, the impact is rapid and can create significantdiscontinuities in student communities of inquiry. This module introduces a tool based on theCoI survey for quickly evaluating and contrasting student experience at each location while alsointroducing journaling and self
identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics2. an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a
data indicates a positive impact on student attitudes and engagement with thecontent. This project is supported by NSF grant # 1912047.IntroductionVirtual reality (VR) has rapidly moved from being an expensive novelty to an easily accessibletechnology making inroads into a variety of domains including the military, scientific,entertainment and training domains. A timeline of the development of VR is given in [1], [2], [3]which traces the changes in technology from stereoscopic viewers to the current very powerfulstandalone VR headsets providing highly realistic immersive experiences. In recent years, thevisual immersion is being augmented by the ability to interact with the virtual environment usingwands or controllers and even fingers. In
also be compared to other factors within ideation to gain a greater understanding of howintergroup interactions affect various aspects of engineering design. With this, educators will beable to better support both creativity and equity within their classrooms and promote effectivedesign skills through student interactions.Introduction and BackgroundBrainstorming is a critical component of engineering design activities, and its outcomes often havesignificant influence on the solutions engineers ultimately converge on. As a result, there issubstantial interest in engineering education and design communities to better understand theprocesses involved in brainstorming, the outcomes it produces, and the ways different approachesor techniques might
framing theCourse Learning Objectives (CLOs), plan assessment activities and methods to assess if theCLOs are met, and planning learning experiences and instruction which includes lecturematerials. With the change in the mode of instruction from in-person to online, assessmentmethods, and learning experiences need to be restructured while ensuring that the CLOs are met.The overall course design process is vital while trying to rethink the assessment strategies andcourse material delivery.Figure 6: Elements of Course Design. UDL approach (Rose et al. 2002) focuses on acknowledging the variability in learners anddesigning course materials, delivery, student engagement and assessments while providingequitable opportunities to all learners. The