Americans: A Revisionist Analysis of the ‘Model Minority’ Thesis,” Amerasia Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 23–51, Jan. 1977.[10] J. Y. Wing, “Beyond Black and White: The Model Minority Myth and the Invisibility of Asian American Students,” Urban Rev, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 455–487, Nov. 2007.[11] C. Kang, H. Jo, S. W. Han, and L. Weis, “Complexifying Asian American student pathways to STEM majors: Differences by ethnic subgroups and college selectivity,” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, p. No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified, 2021.[12] J. Chan, “Complexities of Racial Identity Development for Asian Pacific Islander Desi American (APIDA) College Students,” New Directions for Student Services, vol. 2017, no. 160, pp
suspensions to polymer solutions and biomaterials. He enjoys teaching a spectrum of courses, from introductory to advanced graduate, and has a passion for playing with physics toys in community outreach activities. He strives to promote gender equity through his engagement with the FORWARD Advocates and the Commission on the Status of Women Faculty at NDSU.Nathan Ensmenger, Indiana University Nathan Ensmenger is an associate professor in the Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engi- neering at Indiana University. His 2010 book, *The Computer Boys Take Over: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics of Technical Expertise* is a labor and gender history of computer programming. He is currently working on a global
penultimate week in the summer bridgeprogram. The workshop consisted of two main activities: (1) an icebreaker and (2) scenarioresponse. For this paper, we only analyzed responses from the second activity. In the secondactivity, we presented students with a subset of scenarios to respond to through individual writtenresponse, small group written response and discussion, and facilitated large group discussion. Weprompted them to write down how they thought they would respond to the four scenarios theywere given. The scenarios were one sentence scenarios (e.g. “Your first round of tests did not gowell and your usual studying habits are not working”) that fell into one of six categories:academic performance, faculty and staff interactions
these communities[6], p.75. The six assets are aspirational, linguistic, familial, social, navigational, and resistantcapital. Aspirational capital is the “ability to maintain hopes and dreams for the future” (p. 77)which fosters an environment that allows students the opportunity to envision themselves incircumstances beyond their present situations. Linguistic capital is the set skills, specificallyintellectual and social, that students gain through the ability to communicate in multiplelanguages or language styles. Familial capital is the familial support and past cultural knowledgegiven to an individual which also includes a larger understanding of family, such as extendedfamily and close friends. Social capital is defined as “networks of
andcurriculum to guide their students through exercises designed to introducefoundational concepts and inspire future engineers. Engineering is still an emergingcurriculum in many public K-12 schools, and the GOAL program exposes students andteachers to high-quality engineering experiences that involve making and testingsolutions. The culminating events add an additional component beyond the physicalkits and allow for direct interaction with students for both the challenge competitionsand introducing students to engineering education pathways. Evolution of Kit Design Version 1-Dragsters Version 2-PropCarts 6 | eng.umd.eduVersion 1 of the GOAL Kit utilized a purchased Rubber Band Dragster kit withadditional
. Higher Educ., vol. 69, no. 6, p. 647, 1998.[23] J. F. Sullivan, S. E. Davis, J. L. deGrazia, and D. W. Carlson, “Beyond the pipeline:building a K-12 engineering outreach program,” in FIE’99 Frontiers in Education. 29th AnnualFrontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education.Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011, 2003.[24] R. S. Al-Mansoori and M. Koç, “Transformational leadership, systems, and Intrinsicmotivation impacts on innovation in higher education institutes: Faculty perspectives inengineering colleges,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 4072, 2019.[25] C. Fitzmorris, D. Trytten, and R. Shehab, “The career pathways of non-tenure-track full-time engineering
(Brunhaver, et al., 2021). Our work is theoretically groundedby Savickas (2013) career construction theory; briefly, the theory states that a person's careerdevelops through their interpretation of life and career situations. Our rationale for using careerconstruction theory over other prominent career theories, is because it allows us to interrogatehow individuals negotiate their jobs and make sense of their professional selves in light of theirmilieu (Savickas, 2013). Our work seeks to complement existing research on the school to work transition ofengineers by studying engineers in their post-graduation career planning milieu. To that end, thepurpose of this work is to understand how the media content (e.g., websites) presented by
literature suggests that FG students are not givenaccess to important social and institutional capital specific to engineering programs that allowthem to navigate their learning and working environments similarly to their non-FG peers. WhileMoll et al. [6] stress the importance that different funds of knowledge should be seen as assets,their different funds of knowledge are seen through a deficit lens rather than assets. Additionally,most FG students might not have obtained the institutional and social capital needed inengineering that could help them better process their emotional experience [7]. Non-first-generation students (non-FG) have a larger pool and/or community who are closer to the field ofengineering which might also include how one
: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/[4] K. C. Aquino, E. Kim, C. Bilen-Green, C. M. Ray, and C. Anicha, “Working it backwards: student success through faculty professional development,” in Disability as Diversity in Higher Education: Policies and Practices to Enhance Student Success, 1st ed., New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2017, pp. 122–137.[5] S. Bassler, “‘But you don’t look sick’: Dismodernism, disability studies and music therapy on invisible illness and the unstable body,” Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy, vol. 14, no. 3, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.15845/voices.v14i3.802.[6] S. Lindsay and K. Fuentes, “It is time to address ableism in academia: a systematic review of the experiences and impact of
high school. Grossman and Porsche (2014)similarly explored influences on student STEM success using a mixed methods approach. Theyfound high school students reported their school counselors could play a supportive role inSTEM engagement through encouragement to pursue STEM and help in recognizingmicroaggressions. An association between perceived support and STEM aspirations for girlswas also revealed but not for underrepresented minorities. Together, these studies identify theimportance of school counselors in influencing STEM career trajectories and suggests apotential mechanism by which this influence can be a positive impact on future intent. However,they also indicate that there may be differences in the influence that counselors have
in Graduate Education Sylvanus N. Wosu University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering, Pittsburgh, PAAbstract Effective mentorship is a key factor for driving success in completing a doctoralprogram or achieving tenure in the professoriate. The effectiveness of a mentor-leader inengaging and empowering mentees depends on the mentor’s ability to influence desiredattitudinal or performance character changes. This takes place through relational connections forinteraction of values, attitudes, behaviors, and principles that are nurtured, constructed, andpracticed, building and supporting a mentee-mentor cultural bridge to achieve the desired goal.The mentor and mentee
2 within computing programsspecifically within the CC context. This issue has motivated the National Center for Women &Information Technology (NCWIT) Extension Services to expand its programming to CCs.NCWIT’s relevant goals focus on recruitment and retention efforts to address theunderrepresentation of women through its Learning Circles (LCs) initiative.In this paper, we make a case for the importance of CCs for shaping the computing workforceand outline the state of gender equity in CCs, as well as what we know about retention in CCs,transferring to 4-year institutions, and the unique contexts of CCs. We then describe the LCinitiative in more detail and share some lessons we have learned through this project that may beuseful to
, consider their own experiences and specific knowledges, and share theirrecommendations with the broader community.Literature reviewHidden curriculum Early scholarship around the hidden curriculum (HC) occurred within K-12 educationalsettings. Giroux [18] noted: “there is a failure to recognize the complex, intimate relationshipbetween the institution of the school and the nation’s economic and political institutions [18, p.21]. Thus, HC includes “unstated norms, values, and beliefs that are transmitted to students inboth the formal content, as well as the social relations of school and classroom life” [18, p. 22].HC does not only occur in K-12 educational settings and has also been studied in other fieldswithin higher education such as