of technology in the classroom and improving student outcomes through hands-on and interactive experiences.Debra Mascaro, University of Utah Debra J. Mascaro is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. She holds a B.A. in Physics from Gustavus Adolphus College in St. Peter, MN and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She teaches freshman design and senior-/graduate-level classes in microscale engineering and organic electronics.Robert Roemer, University of Utah Robert B. Roemer is currently a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. He received his B.S. degree
the datato supply these recommendations, and drafted this paper, all in an effort to learn the value ofassessment and subsequently enhance the upcoming 2010 program.References[1] Gattis, C., Hill, B., Lachowsky, A., A Successful Engineering Peer Mentoring Program.Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007.[2] Gibbons, Michael T., Engineering by the Numbers. Retrieved 30 November fromhttp://www.asee.org/publications/profiles/upload/2008ProfileEng.pdf[3] Kuh, George D., Kinzie, Jillian, Schuh, John H., Whitt, Elizabeth J. 2005 Student Success inCollege: Creating Conditions that Matter. Jossey Bass. San Francisco, CA.[4] Patterson, R., Aarons, T., Crede, E., Hines, K., Bile, J.L., Chelko, J., Hubbard, R., Gooden,F., Edmister
AC 2010-1457: ASSESSMENT-DRIVEN EVOLUTION OF A FIRST-YEARPROGRAMRick Williams, East Carolina UniversityWilliam Howard, East Carolina University Page 15.210.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Assessment Driven Evolution of a First year ProgramAbstractThe general engineering program at East Carolina University (ECU) was established in 2004. Inthe fall of 2007, a major curriculum change was initiated that introduced three new courses intothe first year. These courses are Engineering Graphics, Introduction to Engineering, andComputer Applications in Engineering. Each of these courses contains projects or assignmentsthat directly assess the achievement of
every Spring semesterand 3 sections every Fall semester. In the old course (Spring semester), the number of facultyvaried from semester to semester, but was typically taught by 6 – 8 faculty members. In the newcourse, seven faculty members teach the course, one from each engineering department.Assessment The research questions to be assessed is: does the new format of the course lead to a)improved retention; b) better understanding of various engineering disciplines by the students;and c) better-informed decisions by the students if they choose to change their major? To date, assessment data is available for the Spring 2009 semester (last offering of the oldcourse) and the Fall 2009 semester (first offering of the new course
. The All-in-One Guitar-Playing Robot Video and Game. Online. URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEFxJFFA5OQ2. J.-D. Yoder, B. Jaeger, and J. K. Estell, “One-Minute Engineer, Nth Generation: Expansion to a Small Private University,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, AC 2007-1599.3. J. Renaud, C. Squier, and S. C. Larsen, “Integration of a Communicating Science Module into an Advanced Chemistry Laboratory Course,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 83, no. 7 (July 2006), pp. 1029-1031.4. J. K. Estell, L. Laird, and J.-D. Yoder, “Engineering Personified: An Application of the One Minute Engineer,” 2008 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, AC 2008-171.5. J. K. Estell and J. K. Hurtig, “Using Rubrics for the
Arrangement (B) Renovated Workshop Arrangement Figure 1: Computer Classroom Arrangements – this classroom was changed from a traditional everyone facing forward (A) to a workshop arrangement with students sitting perpendicular to the front of the room (B).To improve the learning space for our students two rooms were renovated: 1.) a formerlyunderutilized room converted to a Multimodal Classroom/laboratory and 2.) a computerclassroom converted to workshop style arrangement. These two rooms are next to each other Page 15.470.5and adjacent to the Engineering Department office suite.GoalsThe key goals for both facilities
Page 15.734.2outcome of many of the early learning community experiments.Learning communities “represent an intentional restructuring of students’ time, credit, andlearning experiences to build community, enhance learning, and foster connections amongstudents, faculty, and disciplines”22 (Smith et al., p. 20). The majority of all learningcommunities can be grouped as follows: (a) curricular learning communities, (b) classroomlearning communities, (c), student-type learning communities, and (d) residential learningcommunities23. Learning communities typically have students grouped together through sometype of co-enrollment23 but can have a cross between types utilizing components of each toenhance student outcomes. The program discussed here
. ≠ 80% of the students who earned a grade of A in GNEG 1111 (which we believe indicates a reasonable work ethic) and attempted a MATH class in the Fall Semester of 2007 earned a passing grade in that MATH class. 52% of the students who earned a grade of B in GNEG 1111 (which we believe indicates a mediocre work ethic) and attempted a MATH class in the Fall Semester of 2007 earned a passing grade in that MATH class. 22% of the students who earned a grade of C or worse in or withdrew from GNEG 1111 (which we believe indicates a poor work ethic) and attempted a MATH class in the Fall Semester of 2007 earned a passing grade in that MATH class. ≠ 75% of students who attempted CHEM 1103 in the Fall
.. (1998). Introduction to engineering design & problem solving, 2 nd edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.6. Eide, Arvid R., Jenison, Roland D., Northup, Larry L., Mickelson, Steven K.. (2008). Engineering fundamentals & problem solving, 5th edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.7. Fleddermann, Charles B.. (2008). Engineering Ethics, 3 rd edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.8. Holtzapple, Mark T., Reece, W. Dan. (2005). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.9. Horenstein, Mark N.. (2002). Design concepts for engineers, 4 th edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.10. Jensen, James N.. (2006). A user’s guide to engineering
student design is shown in Figure 2. Page 15.1205.7 (A) “kidney” with filters inside Peristaltic pumps (B) Figure 2. A working model of one student group’s design of an artificial kidney. Picture (A) is the design drawing by student group and picture (B) is a design hooked up to the peristaltic
AC 2010-1195: DESIGN OF THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FORINCLUSIVITY: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREChirag Variawa, University of Toronto Chirag Variawa graduated with a degree in Materials Science Engineering from the University of Toronto in 2009. He is currently pursuing a graduate degree in Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto.Susan McCahan, University of Toronto Prof. McCahan: B.S. (Mechanical Engineering), Cornell University, M.S. and Ph.D. (Mechanical Engineering ), RPI. Dr. McCahan is currently the Chair of First Year in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto. She has been with the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at
SummerBridge Program had the following three overall objectives: (a) “to help at risk students develop asolid foundation of problem solving skills that will facilitate their advancement in theengineering math curriculum,” (b) “to help students gain a deeper appreciation for the role thatmath and science plays in the engineering field,” and (c) “to integrate first year students into thesocio-academic environment of the College of Engineering and help smooth their transition tocollegiate life.” Achievement of the objectives was evaluated with pre and post survey datacollection and math performance measures.Achievement of ObjectivesOne objective of the Summer Bridge Program was “to help at risk students develop a solidfoundation of problem solving skills
AC 2010-1358: IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EARLY WARNING SYSTEM INENGINEERING: A PARTNERSHIP WITH ACADEMIC ADVISORS ANDINSTRUCTORS ACROSS THE CAMPUSMary Goodwin, Iowa State UniversityAmy Brandau, Iowa State UniversityDeb DeWall, Iowa State UniversityBing Du, Iowa State University Page 15.675.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Implementation of an Early Warning System in Engineering: A Partnership with Academic Advisors and Instructors across the CampusAbstractRetention of engineering students has become a major concern for universities across thecountry. At Iowa State University the college of engineering loses about 10
, S. D., Macatangay, K. Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers:Designing for the future of the field. New York: Jossey-Bass.3. Duderstadt, J. (2008). Engineering for a changing world (Technical Report). Millennium Project, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.4. Spalter-Roth, R., N. Fortenberry, & Lovitts, B. (2007). The acceptance and diffusion of innovation: A cross- disciplinary approach to instructional and curricular change in engineering. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.5. Goldberg, D., Cangellaris, A., Loui, M., Price, R., & Litchfield, B. (2008), iFoundry: Curriculum reform without tears. Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, AC
: Project Task Where Students will be able to… Objective is Addressed1. Name the steps in the reverse A. Name the steps in the reverse engineering process. engineering process and identify the B. Describe the purpose of each step in the reverse purpose of each. engineering process.2. Disassemble an electromechanical C. Using an instructional video and instructor assistance, device in a systematic manner using disassemble an electromechanical device in a video instructions. systematic manner. D. Prepare materials and parts inventories.3. Organize information about a product E
AC 2010-1502: FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACHTimothy Hinds, Michigan State University TIMOTHY J. HINDS is an Academic Specialist in the Michigan State University College of Engineering Undergraduate Studies and Department of Mechanical Engineering. He is the lead instructor and coordinator for the Cornerstone Engineering program teaching courses in engineering design and modeling. He has also taught courses in machine design, manufacturing processes, mechanics, computational tools and international product design as well as graduate-level courses in engineering innovation and technology management. He has over 25 years of combined academic and industrial management
senior-physics students and confirming the improvements by measuring the effects of teaching interventions and strategies. Over the years he has successfully developed teaching and learning frameworks in physics that have led to significant improvements for students at Westlake Boys’ High School.Chris Smaill, University of Auckland Chris Smaill holds a Ph.D. in engineering education from Curtin University of Technology, Australia, and degrees in physics, mathematics and philosophy from the University of Auckland. For 27 years he taught physics and mathematics at high school level, most recently as Head of Physics at Rangitoto College, New Zealand's largest secondary school. This period also saw
AC 2010-1431: INTEGRATION OF GRAPHICAL PROGRAMMING INTO AFIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING COURSEGregory Bucks, Purdue University GREGORY W. BUCKS is a PhD candidate in the school of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his BSEE from the Pennsylvania State University and his MSECE from Purdue University. His research interests lie in the development of conceptual understanding of computer programming concepts and the exploration of the pedagogical benefits of graphical programming languages.William Oakes, Purdue University William Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program and an Associate Professor and a founding faculty member of the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue
AC 2010-1044: SHORT, HANDS-ON TEAM DESIGN PROJECTS IN A FRESHMANENGINEERING PHYSICS CLASSRichard Bennett, University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleWill Schleter, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Page 15.1063.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Short, Hands-On Team Design Projects in aFreshman Engineering Physics ClassIntroductionOne of the challenges of a first year engineering course that integrates traditional physics contentwith an introduction to engineering design is the development of suitable design projects. Anideal project is one that is challenging, fun, requires teamwork, associated with the physicsmaterial being studied, low cost, and doable in a
AC 2010-1060: THE MICHIGAN LECTURER COMPETITION: USING AMULTI-TIERED CLASS COMPETITION TO INCREASE STUDENTCOLLABORATION AND COMPREHENSIONJeffrey Ringenberg, University of Michigan Jeff Ringenberg is a lecturer at the University of Michigan's College of Engineering. His research interests include mobile learning software development, tactile programming, methods for bringing technology into the classroom, and studying the effects of social networking and collaboration on learning. He holds BSE, MSE, and PhD degrees in Computer Engineering from the University of Michigan.Marcial Lapp, University of Michigan Marcial Lapp is a graduate student in the Industrial and Operations Engineering
AC 2010-2021: A STUDENT PERSPECTIVE ON FRESHMAN ENGINEERINGDESIGN PROJECTS: DEVELOPING CORE SKILLS IN YOUNG ENGINEERSMichael Pacella, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Michael Pacella will graduate Summa Cum Laude in May 2010 with a BS degree in Chemical Engineering [Bioengineering track] from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He currently is a finalist for the 2010 UMBC Valedictorian. Michael has spent the last two years serving as a Teaching Fellow for the Introduction to Engineering Design Course at UMBC. In addition, he has been doing undergraduate research on developing and testing a kinetic model of Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii (a species of single-celled green algae
to Calculus BC.)6 1. Functions, Graphs, and Limits a) Analysis of graphs b) Limits of functions (including one-sided limits) c) Asymptotic and unbounded behavior d) Continuity as a property of functions e) Parametric, polar, and vector functions. 2. Derivatives a) Concept of the derivative b) Derivative at a point c) Derivative as a function d) Second Derivatives e) Applications of derivatives Analysis of planar curves given in parametric form, polar form, and vector form, including velocity and acceleration Numerical Solution of differential equations using Euler’s method L’Hospital’s Rule, including its use in determining
management.Motivated by a successful experience in a general chemistry course, we have implementedworkshops based on the Peer Led Team Learning (PLTL) model that engages every engineeringstudent enrolled in the introductory chemistry, mathematics, and physics courses through aguided-process and inquiry-based strategy utilizing small group settings. For this purpose wereplaced one hour of lecture with a two-hour small-group workshop. Workshops are guided byan advanced undergraduate peer leader who has successfully completed the course with a gradeof A or B. The courses included in this project are pre-calculus, general chemistry 1 and 2,mechanics, and fields and waves. We anticipate that the implementation of PLTL will result inimprovements in learning that
engineering schools have used SL as a method to achieve ABETEAC program outcomes.5, 6 The “a through k” 2009-2010 ABET EAC program outcomes that Page 15.446.3engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain are listed below: 7 a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c. an ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability d. an
path, two were on the 5-year degree path. Threefaculty members from the department agreed to participate in the program: one electrical, onemechanical, and one industrial engineer. The industrial engineering faculty member took on twoof the students. The following sections will describe the research undertaken by each of thesefour students and provide faculty observations on the effectiveness of the program on thestudents.Control of Structures under Seismic and Wind DisturbancesStructural control has been an interesting research topic of late. For example, consider the firstgeneration benchmark control problem described in (B. F. Spencer Jr. 1998). The benchmarkproblem is a three story building that is subject to an earthquake disturbance
poster design are presented in Figure 2. Designing the Poster You will design a 36” by 48” poster which will be printed for you by the college. 1) Create a document in PowerPoint. (“PDFpen” can be used on Macs. Microsoft Publisher was not able to scale the poster appropriately. If you are using Adobe Illustrator, avoid the “autotrace” tool.) 2) In PowerPoint, select Design-Page Setup-Slides Sized For-Custom. Then enter 36” by 48”. This is also where you can select Portrait or Landscape. a. The printer cannot print within 0.5” of the edge of the paper. b. Note: it is important to set the paper size before beginning to design the
) Collect data from aerator in IDEAS 4) Design a floor plan for the aquaculture facility Center 5) Design a new impeller for the chosen pump5) Use a spreadsheet to calculate: using UGNX a. Total amount of oxygen transferred 6) Test the pump performance with the new from air to water impeller in the IDEAS Center b. Amount of electricity required to 7) Develop MATLAB math model to determine: run aerator a. Fish growth c. Costs associated with aerator use b. Feed conversion d. Statistics of class performance c. Amount of electricity required to run pumps data d
of a problem-based learning module called the BiosystemsEngineering Design Challenge. The focus of the module is on designing and building a working,bench-scale device that solves a practical problem relevant to Biosystems Engineering. Itprovides an early opportunity for students to learn about engineering design, project managementand teamwork. The module aligns well with the academic policy of University College Dublin tointroduce alternative teaching and learning strategies compared to the conventional lecture.While the original aim of the module was to enhance the learning experience specifically forBiosystems Engineering students, it was considered beneficial to adopt a multi-disciplinaryapproach by allowing students from a wide variety
engineering and three from math) are tracked in theseresults. Table 1 shows a summary of the final grade distribution for all ENGR and MATHcourses for the 78 students included in this experiment. Table 1 - Final grades for ENGR 101 and MATH 155 for Fall 2009 Fall 2009 ENGR MATH A 33.33% 11.54% B 42.31% 23.08% C 14.10% 30.77% D 6.41% 6.41% F 3.85% 17.95
your Create a http://delicious.com/ blog. Your Blog must be completed! / Week 5 account and post your reference Final Week Complete the Post-Project survey (refer to links on your blog. Appendix B).. First progress report is due. Notes: Week 7 Post the report on your blog. (*) All students were required to show up on Saturday to Oral report is required. visit disabled children.Throughout this project we encouraged students to utilize available online tools forprogress report and class discussions. Thus, as