unresolved legal issues, such as copyright,considering the current legal system does not recognize AI as authors or inventors.Instructors are advised to facilitate an open discussion and establish a clear policy, which shouldbe outlined in the course syllabus. This policy should address the use of AI tools, articulate therepercussions of plagiarism, and underscore the seriousness of violating intellectual propertyrights. It's important to note that using AI-generated content, such as code, without properattribution or permission constitutes plagiarism and an intellectual property violation. A specificpoint of concern is that ChatGPT and similar AI tools typically do not provide appropriatecitations. This can inadvertently lead to instances of
parts with large, clear features to enhance tactilediscernability.This initiative underscores the broader imperative of inclusivity in STEM education,demonstrating that with innovative approaches, technical courses can become accessible to amore diverse student population. The success of this adapted curriculum not only enhanceseducational opportunities for visually impaired students, but also sets a precedent for rethinkingand redesigning academic programs to embrace a wider spectrum of learning needs and abilities.References[1] L. McAllister, “NX Voluntary Product Accessibility,” Siemens PLM Software, August 2009[Revised July 2019]. [Online]. Available: www.plm.automation.siemens.com. [Accessed: Jan 13,2024].[2] OpenSCAD, “About OpenSCAD