institution, fostering a moreintellectually stimulating academic environment. This can help enhance a university's reputationas a center for research and learning and attract high-achieving students and faculty, therebyraising the overall academic profile of the institution. Furthermore, these programs can lead toexternal funding opportunities and collaborations with industry and other universities,expanding the institution's reach and impact [8]. The research conducted in these programsoften leads to publications and presentations, further contributing to the scholarly community[9].Finally, URPs contribute to student retention and success in STEM fields. Russell et al. [10]found that students who participate in undergraduate research are more likely
Paper ID #42079Artificial Intelligence in the Construction Industry: A Competency-BasedExamination Through Expert LensProf. Hector Buyones-Gonzalez, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Hector Buyones Gonzalez is a professor in the School of Engineering’s Construction Engineering program at Universidad Andres Bello and Universidad Autonoma de Chile in Santiago, Chile. He earned his degree in Civil Engineering and Civil Construction, as well as a Master’s degree in Construction Management. With extensive experience coordinating and executing construction projects across diverse sectors—including the oil industry (refineries
evident that there must exista combination of intrinsic value (stimulating curiosity and internal drive) and extrinsic value(making the learning experience instrumentally useful) to best engage a student in the coursecurriculum [18]. Intrinsic value can be activated through a personalized education, increasingmotivation in a student’s learning journey [19], and extrinsic value can be activated through self-guided inquiry, which leads to higher content retention and usefulness of the course [20]. With aself-guided education approach, wellness courses can be modified to accommodateundergraduate students’ desires to have more time to discuss their personal wellness journey[21]. At Bryn Mawr College, a health and wellness program for undergraduates
meeting and used discussion questions to stimulate students’ critical thinking,problem-solving, engineering design, teamwork, and communication. At the end of the program,all eight students participated in the Undergraduate Research Showcase hosted by the GraduateSchool of the University of Louisville with a poster presentation. Faculty and graduate studentsnot involved in the site events were invited as judges. Awards were given to the top three posterswho received the highest scores. Fig. 1 Project list for student selection TABLE 1. Engineering Fundamental Modules for Mentoring Theme Approach Wee
Education, vol. 12, no. 12, Oct. 2016. [7] R. Paul and L. Elder, Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life. Foundation for Critical Thinking. Indianapolis, IN: FT Press, 2020. [8] F. Patacsil and C. L. S. Tablatin, “Exploring the importance of soft and hard skills as perceived by it internship students and industry: A gap analysis,” Journal of Technology and Science Education, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 347, Sep. 2017. [9] R. V. Adams and E. Blair, “Impact of time management behaviors on undergraduate engineering students’ performance,” SAGE Open, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 215824401882450, Jan. 2019. [10] H. J. Passow and C. H. Passow, “What competencies should undergraduate engineering programs
students the opportunity to altertheir perceptions of climate change (NAS, 2017).ENGINEERING FOR HUMAN RIGHTS The College of Engineering at the University of Connecticut launched a new major inMultidisciplinary Engineering (MDE) and has developed corresponding human rights andsustainability required courses, including “ENGR/HRTS 2300: Engineering for Human Rights.”This 3-credit seminar enrolls undergraduate students interested in the broader socialimplications of engineering and technology. The faculty who designed and teach this coursedefine engineering for human rights as “a paradigm that draws on a universal set of principlesto shape individual ethical obligations and the norms of the profession to mitigate risk, enhanceaccess to the
Paper ID #42620A introductory-level, student-taught biomedical neuroengineering course for1st year undeclared engineering undergraduate studentsNyota Prakash Patel, University of VirginiaDeepika Sahoo, University of VirginiaDr. Shannon Barker, University of Virginia Dr. Shannon Barker is an Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Director at UVA BME ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Background and MotivationEngineers are required to conceive, design, and maintain products, processes, and systems acrossmany sectors to meet societal needs [1]. Projects often require training in fundamentals andacross
teaching approach, weleverage the insights of the HPL framework to explore how undergraduate engineering studentsinteract with data skills in relation to the HPL elements when reflecting on their own data skillslearning experiences. Our interview protocol, guided by the HPL framework, delves into studentperspectives on self-reflection, knowledge acquisition, and assessment related to data skills.4. METHODS4.1 Participant Recruitment and Selection.In this study conducted at a southeastern United States institution, 177 students completed arecruitment survey. All interested mechanical engineering (ME) students were automaticallyselected, as only a small number of participants were ME students. Meanwhile, interestedaerospace engineering (AE) students
found that graduate students had enrolled as they learnedabout their assignment as a go-between for their faculty mentors and undergraduate studentsparticipating in summer research programs. Essentially, they saw the workshop as just-in-timetraining that assisted them in developing the confidence to answer questions and providefeedback to their junior peers. Because of this perceived need, we reviewed resources availablethrough the Center for the Improvement of Mentoring Experience (CIMER), to better align ourworkshop to the needs of participating graduate students. The two main ideas that emerged fromthis exercise were the case study and the phases of mentoring.Social wealth of mentors and protégés. It was clear from each workshop that
participate among a group predominantlycomposed of black women.A second anecdote from the 2022 pilot involves students’ perception of environmental justicecareer paths. One student remarked that as a result of the internship, they might no longerconsider environmental science as a possible career path. They thought that the data collection,data management, and data analysis experiences indicated that the career path might not besomething they were interested in. On the one hand, this could be an artifact of the way theinternship was programmed. For some students with little or no experience with programming,statistics, or field work, the program may not have been designed with enough support. This mayhave affected this particular intern’s confidence
University. Abimelec received his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez (UPRM) in 2016. After working in the aerospace industry, he returned to the UPRM for his MS in Mechanical Engineering in 2017, where he pursued ways to tailor ideation methods to interdisciplinary teams as part of his thesis work, and had the opportunity to teach undergraduate ME courses. His previous efforts and experiences in engineering education helped shape his overall goal of fostering human-centered education systems, which led him to pursue his PhD at ASU.Dr. Mayra S Artiles, Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the
power study is provided in a later section). The inclusioncriteria for the study are: (1) Currently enrolled as an undergraduate student at SHSU; (2) 18+years old; (3) Freshman; (4) Should possess a basic level of technological proficiency; Exclusioncriteria: (1) Unwilling or unable to provide the informed consent forms; (2) Unwilling to completethe assignments; (3) Unavailable during the entirety of the study; (4) Unwilling to attend follow-upsurveys or interviews.This study requires collecting and storing data from human subjects for subsequent analysis. TheInstitutional Review Board (IRB) determined this study doesn’t require IRB oversight. This planincludes obtaining informed consent from all participants, ensuring they are fully aware of
leading and largest MSIs in theU.S., thus rendering and reflecting the sample to be representative of the minority population.The recommendations provided are preliminary, and future research could explore additionaldemographics and engage a more diverse student population. Furthermore, future studies couldexplore if different cohorts, such as undergraduates and graduates, or student nationalities, suchas international students and local students, have a significant impact on their motivations. Thiscould contribute to a broader understanding and support a larger and more representative sampleof students across various educational institutions.Conclusions and RecommendationsThe findings of this study revealed that several academic, financial, and
science and engineering university in China, held the first conference onengineering ethics. Experts and scholars from multiple universities, including SouthwestJiaotong University and Dalian University of Technology, participated in the conference andprovided prospects for China's engineering ethics industry, such as building a curriculumsystem, improving status, and integrating with engineering education. At present, the overall quality of engineering activity teams in our country is difficult toensure, and engineers who enter society have not fully realized their true value, and their rolein enterprises is not prominent. Engineering students from science and engineering universities,as potential targets for engineers, are closely related
Paper ID #43863Enhancing Engineering Capstone Design Preparedness: A Systematic CurriculumApproachDr. Pun To (Douglas) Yung, Syracuse University Douglas Yung is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering at Syracuse University and serves as the Director for the Bioengineering undergraduate program. He completed his B.S. in electrical engineering and mathematics at UCLA in 2003 and later pursued a Ph.D. in bioengineering from Caltech in 2008. Following this, he spent time at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California as a NASA Postdoctoral Fellow, working on sensor development
India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014–2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018. He is serving as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET). He is interested in conducting engineering education research, and his interests include student retention in online and in-person engineering courses/programs, data mining and learning analytics in engineering education, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of
task-oriented metrics in place. Ngai et al. [3]introduced a learning AI-based platform for wearable computing, consisting of a user-friendlyconstruction platform, a hybrid text-graphical programming environment, and a sample syllabusguiding students through basic concepts in wearable computing. The study observed heightenedattention and engagement in the learned topics, attributed to participants' interest in the AI-basedplatform.Wong and Looi [4] investigated swarm intelligence education employing a feedback-based AImodel. Their study delved into how feedback mechanisms can enhance participants' learningexperiences. In particular, they found that feedback provided by the AI model enabled learners toreceive immediate correction, reinforcement
activities [16].Another author, Baumol [17], gives us a different lens through which to view innovation andentrepreneurship education in relation to the technical focus of an engineer’s education:“Education for mastery of scientific knowledge and methods is enormously valuable forinnovation and growth…. but can impede heterodox thinking and imagination….On one side,education provides technical competence and mastery of currently available analytic tools tofuture entrepreneurs and others who will participate in activities related to innovation andgrowth. On the other side, education can stimulate creativity and imagination and facilitatetheir utilization. But the following hypothesis is at least tenable: educational methods that areeffective in
thatthere is no standardization in teaching professional skills. Some scholars, such as Neeley, havetried to map conceptual efforts of integrating professional skills into undergraduate engineeringcurricula [4]. There are several different models for how these courses appear in undergraduateprograms. Some schools use a powerful embedded model where there are programs anddepartments that specifically address and teach professional engineering courses, while otherschools rely on outsourcing these courses to liberal arts colleges to fulfill humanities and socialscience electives [3]. The main issue with relying on liberal arts colleges is that the courseofferings are generally not related to engineering as a professional practice. By utilizing
, Engineering,and Medicine—is undertaking to raise awareness of, stimulate interest in, and inspire action oncultural, ethical, social, and environmental responsibility in engineering (CESER). It outlines thehistory of the consideration of these impacts by the profession, cites some current efforts,summarizes NAE’s earlier programs, and details the development, goals, and status of the newprogram.Importantly, the paper also serves as a call for the membership of the ASEE to share theirknowledge and experience, and provide their input on the effort at the 2024 annual conference.The CESER advisory committee is formulating its initial activities and would welcome input onsuggested areas of focus and opportunities to bring attention to crucial issues
engineering faculty’s lack offamiliarity with non-ABET professional skills, like entrepreneurial mindset and cultural agility,the difficulty of making changes in technical classes, and the limitations in assessing professionalskills. The researcher aims for the recommendations derived from this pilot study to raiseawareness of professional skill development within engineering curricula, fostering collaborationwith industry, and stimulating further research into enhancing the engineering curriculum with afocus on these essential skills.IntroductionTo succeed in the 21st-century workplace, engineering graduates need more than technical skillsor risk losing their jobs to automation [1, 2]. Professional skills complement a technicaleducation and are part
Tragedy of theCommons. Early findings show positive engagement with both the Pisces Game and SpectrumGame, with many students describing these two as particularly impactful and enjoyable. VirtuePoints yielded results that surprised many students, and there are indications that clarifying andamending the scoring system for the game may promote better understanding of how it cansupport self-reflection on virtues.IntroductionEthics education in undergraduate engineering programs has long been a source of struggle forengineering educators [1]. The need for ethics education in engineering in Canada is driven byEngineers Canada through the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board to promote adherenceto the Washington Accords and encourage high quality
underrepresented groups in engineering by exploring their experiences, engaging in critical questioning, and offering support. Outside of academic studies, Jameka serves as an ambassador for her department, reviewer for ASEE, and active volunteer for a Columbus STEM non-profit See Brilliance. Jameka has been recognized by her undergraduate institution for her commitment to achieving the vision of the Ronald E. McNair Scholars Program and most recently by her department for her scholarship as a graduate researcher. Jameka strives to be a well-rounded scholar and exhibit her dedication to people and scholarship.Dr. Monica Cox, The Ohio State University Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is Professor in the Department of Engineering Education
school students participated in a week-long summer camp thatfocused on electrical and computer engineering (ECE) concepts and practices. The five-daysummer camp consisted of hands-on activities, tours of different laboratories in ECE disciplines,and a group project that spanned the whole week where students built circuits using theSparkFun Inventor’s kit. During the group activity, the students were organized into eightgroups, and each group was mentored by an undergraduate mentor who facilitated thecollaborative hands-on activities. The middle school students completed validated and reliablepre and post-surveys adapted from the Student Attitudes Toward STEM (S-STEM) Survey andthe Group Work Skills Questionnaire Manual. The S-STEM survey is
PhD student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at UBC. Her research focuses on equity issues in engineering education, particularly looking at the impacts of engineering outreach programs on historically marginalized groups in STEM.Shouka Farrokh, University of British Columbia Shouka Farrokh is an undergraduate student pursuing Psychology at The University of British Columbia. She contributes as a research assistant in Engineering Education projects focusing on STEM Outreach initiatives.Dr. Katherine Lyon, University of British Columbia Katherine Lyon is Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Sociology at the University of British Columbia. Katherine’s research merges sociology of education
from Gen AI Engineering UG programs should prepare students to address ethical 2 6.50 0.53 6, 7 considerations about applying Gen AITable 2. Industry Likert-scale questions on responsibilities of engineering undergraduate programs.DiscussionRecall the Gen AI application that recommends actions to managers based on levels of employeeengagement from surveys. In lecture, we adapt and bring such an application into the classroom fordiscussion. What if the instructor has a dashboard that provides real-time assessments of studentengagement, and recommended next-step actions to the instructor to adapt? Even when presented asa benefit for the
engineering students to engage with curricular and extra-curricular activities related toelectricity access, making it a pivotal area for educational focus. In 2022 and 2023, the NationalScience Foundation sponsored two workshops with the goal of identifying approaches to enhanceand expand electricity access education at the undergraduate engineering level in the U.S.,primarily within the electrical engineering discipline. In this paper, we summarize and synthesizethe insightful discussion from the second workshop, supplemented by results from in-workshoppolling of the participants. We identify perceptions of the state of electricity access education inthe U.S., and identify needs and barriers for improving related curricular and extra
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Envisioning and Realizing a State-wide Data Science EcosystemAbstractThis paper describes the vision, strategy, plan, and realization of a state-wide rigorous datascience educational ecosystem. The need for developing data science degree programs andeducation has been well-established and, in our state, a blue-ribbon panel with industry,academic, and government representatives defined the needs of the state. Additionally, a well-established “think and do tank” published several reports on the importance of data scienceeducation and graduates. As we began to develop our programs separately, it occurred to us thatwe were in a small enough state that, if we chose to do so, we could work
opportunities that have emerged from the pandemic years? And how can we build enoughbelief in positive assumptions to inspire engineering leaders to try something new?The leadership director and external consultant set forth four key objectives. The MichiganEngineering Positive Leadership Program would enable participants to 1) learn about keyprinciples of positive leadership; 2) develop shared language and practices around positiveleadership; 3) conduct, share, and reflect on experiments with positive leadership principles inday-to-day life; and 4) expand and deepen connections with colleagues. The director andconsultant then curated content from the consultant’s broader positive leadership curriculum togenerate five major units of study that aligned
insight into the exciting possibilities that industrial engineering holds by providing anenvironment where education, exploration, and enjoyment are met. For future summer camps,we plan to change the true/false questions to matching or multiple-choice to capture students’understanding more thoroughly.Conclusions The ENCHANT summer camp successfully introduced middle school students toconcepts in Industrial Engineering and Robotics through interactive learning methods, whichincluded both general topics and current research topics. Participants engaged in four activitiesthat stimulated their curiosity about the field of engineering and discussed complex engineeringconcepts including optimization, robotics, trust in automation, and autonomous