Paper ID #43433Reducing Student Aversion to Strategic NetworkingDr. B. Michael Aucoin, Texas A&M University B. Michael Aucoin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University, an Adjunct Instructor in the School of Leadership Studies at Gonzaga University, and President of Electrical Expert, Inc. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Reducing Student Aversion to Strategic NetworkingAbstractStrategic networking is an important practice for both students and professionals, and it is essentialfor those
Paper ID #43424Exploration of Career and Ethical Challenges of Analytics and GenerativeArtificial Intelligence in an Engineering Leadership CourseDr. B. Michael Aucoin P.E., Texas A&M University B. Michael Aucoin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University, an Adjunct Instructor in the School of Leadership Studies at Gonzaga University, and President of Electrical Expert, Inc.Zhendi Zhang, Texas A&M UniversityMiles O. Dodd, Texas A&M University Miles Dodd is currently pursuing a Master’s degree in Engineering Technology at Texas A&
presentations and key note lectures and serves as referee for journals, funding institutions and associations.Camila Zapata-Casabon, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Master in Marketing and Market Research from the University of Barcelona, Spain. Industrial Civil Engineer from the Universidad del B´ıo-B´ıo. She has three diplomas in the areas of coaching, digital marketing and equality and empowerment of women. Her professional experience is linked to higher education as a project engineer and university management in the public and private area. Teacher at different universities in matters of entrepreneurship, business plans and marketing. She currently works as a teacher and academic secretary at the Faculty of Engineering
. Mumford, S. J. Zaccaro, K. Y. Levin, A. L. Korotkin, and M. B. Hein, “Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation,” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 245-287, 1991, doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(91)90016-U.[3] F. J. Yammarino, E. Salas, A. Serban, K. Shirreffs, and M. L. Shuffler, “Collectivistic leadership approaches: putting the ‘we’ in leadership science and practice,” Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 382-402, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1754- 9434.2012.01467.x.[4] D. V. Day, P. Gronn, and E. Salas, “Leadership capacity in teams,” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 857-880, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua
collaboration boundaries to understand how they can supportengineering students’ development of leadership competencies. This is work-in-progress, andpart of a larger project that aims at exploring students’ development of global competencies. Thecurrent paper advances our understanding of boundary crossing that occur within an engineeringdesign team, and it asks: a) what boundaries were encountered in globally situated engineeringdesign projects in a Canadian University and, b) how can these boundaries enable students tomake productive progress in their global leadership skills?Theoretical PerspectivesThe study was guided by three theoretical perspectives namely: 1) Vygotsky’s socialconstructivist perspective allowed for the study of students
Paper ID #43910Educating the Whole Engineer: Leveraging Communication Skills to CultivateEthical Leadership CharacterMrs. Farnoosh B. Brock, Prolific Living Inc. Farnoosh Brock went from electrical engineer and project manager at a Fortune 100 to an entrepreneur, published author (4 books), speaker and trainer in 2011. She has coached and trained hundreds of professionals at all levels of the organizations in their Mindset, Leadership and Communication Skills. She delivers her workshops at universities such as Johns Hopkins, Duke and Wake Forest and has spoken her message at many places such as Google, Cisco, MetLife, SAS
%. We assigned “grades” of A, B, C, D, or F based on the traditionalbreak lines (A > 90, 90 < B < 80, 80 < C < 70, 70 < D < 60, and F < 60). With these results, wecould look at the "grade distribution" and set goals for the percentages of A & B grades (i.e. >0.80) versus C, D, and F (< 0.80) that one might desire.In addition to analyzing each survey response, we also analyzed the data resulting from eachquestion individually. We computed the average score for each question and compared the scoresacross universities, and within university programs, comparing control populations with thosewho had a teamwork intervention of some kind.Data Analysis MethodsWe make statistical comparisons using the parametric, two
Identity and Statement; Forward Look at Personal Action Plan ● Ethics ● Professional Development ● Personal Action PlanThe discussion also includes a reflection assignment each week to ensure that students areintegrating concepts from both the modules and the discussion into their educational plans.The online modules establish the foundations for the course (Foundation Modules), provide anopportunity to explore the field of engineering (Exploration Modules) and support engagementwith advisors, alumni and mentors (Engagement Modules). A complete list of online modules isprovided in Appendix B. The modules require students to complete a pre- and post-reflection,asking them to access prior knowledge, describe a personal learning goal for the
—those that had a negative, pessimistic culture [13].B. How Does Feeling Happy at Work Impact Engineers? The literature I reviewed on happiness and productivity in general shows a correlationbetween the two. Zelenski, Murphy, and Jenkins’ research on the happy-productive workerthesis found happy workers to be more productive; and that positive affect had a strongrelationship with productivity [4]. Similarly, Oswald, Proto, and Sgroi concluded that happinessmakes people more productive [3]. This conclusion was informed by their research that showedrandomly-selected people a clip from a comedy movie, then measuring their productivity on astandardized task. Their productivity was then compared to the productivity of a control groupwho did
functional in teams? A meta-analysis,” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 288-307, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.007.[13] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum, 1985.[14] D. Reeve, C. Rottmann, and R. Sacks, “The ebb and flow of engineering leadership orientations,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[15] W. J. Schell and B. E. Hughes, “An approach to understand the role of identity in engineering leadership,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[16] B. Tallman, W. J. Schell, T. A. Sybesma, M. B. Kwapisz, B. E. Hughes, C. Bozic
). From a broaderperspective, experience that increases professional formation as engineers is known to be a keyfactor in student success [3]. Extra-curricular reinforcement of interest and application ofcurricular learning also tends to support the completion of engineering degrees and thusavailability of potential workforce [4]. Engineering students are more likely to find collegiateand professional successes when leadership skill development is implemented early andrepeatedly during their learning [5, 6].The authors were led to the present effort by (a) the opportunity to address DoD interest in bothleadership and innovation skills, (b) the college’s prior positive experience with peer mentoringand with undergraduate research, and (c) the
entries and generated codes independently, beforecollaborating and negotiating meaning of a finalized set of codes. The codes were grouped intofour main themes: identity, traits, support behaviors, and outcomes. Identity was furthersubdivided into: core values, motivations, career, and relationship. Both authors independentlyblind-coded the data entries with the finalized set of codes.4 Findings and DiscussionThe analysis examined 331 excerpts categorized by 56 distinct codes. Generated codes wereremoved if they were applied to less than three instances or did not contribute additionalmeaning to the emergent themes, resulting in 43 finalized codes (Appendix B). Half of the dataentries are from the perspective of the primary node, who was also
research design. Therefore, we find various studiesdemonstrate the importance of teaching research design to engineering students [17],[18].The rationality model is one of the most well-known decision-making models. Therefore, itbecomes necessary to look at it in-depth to understand it better. Below are the fourcomponents of the rationality model of decision-making: a. Intelligence: when to make a decision b. Design: analysing earlier actions, making possible plans c. Choice: choosing the best possible plan based on merit d. Review: assessing past choicesIt is interesting to note that this model is very similar to the four-part structure of 'researchdesign’ which, being central to innovation, is already a part of the engineering
minutes sharing observations and advice, helping tocontextualize the learning by connecting it to their world of practice. Finally, as the ELL periodends, each team’s second-year student team coach conversationally delivers feedback to the first-year team leader (scaffolded by a feedback form shown in Appendix A); that first-year team leaderthen has five days to submit a personal reflection on their ELL experience and feedback (via areflection prompt shown in Appendix B).Each ELL activity is self-contained (i.e., not part of an ongoing, semester-long challenge or project),with each primarily focused on one or two Capabilities [2]. The decision to situate the ELLlearning activities into this short-duration format represents a trade-off in
closed-ended than normal. We will likely expand on this question in later weeks. In Friday's Team Creativity session, we talked about the importance of a team developing a superordinate identity, or a shared team identity that's above individual identities. Your team was asked to generate a company name and slogan or logo. For this week's entry, simply respond with your company name, and complete the statement below using the provided choices. Creativity is _____________ aspect of leadership. A - an essential B - an important C - just like any other D - barely an E - not at all an8. In last week's entry, you were asked to complete the sentence "Creativity is ___________ part of leadership,' using one of the choices
openness to newways of thinking and knowing.Kendall et al. [3] articulate an expansive definition of Engineering Leadership that incorporatesmany of the dimensions of complexity inherent in wicked problems: “Engineering Leaders (a) employ the full range of engineering skills and knowledge in the design of socio-technical innovations, while (b) seeking to understand, embrace, and address the current and future impact of their work in context by (c) actively fostering engaged and productive relationships with diverse stakeholders, including themselves and their team, the users of their technologies, and those impacted by their engineering work”.We argue that systems thinking is an important engineering leadership
Paper ID #41656ASEE 2024 Paper—Examining Cultural Elements to Enable ChangeDr. Marnie Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., P.Eng. is a Teaching Professor in Chemical Process Design in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds an M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education and a PhD in Chemical Engineering. She is currently the William and Elizabeth Magee Chair in Chemical Engineering Design. She leads the process design teaching team. Her current research focuses on engineering design and leadership, engineering culture, the engineering graduate
Paper ID #41595AI’s Visual Representation Gap: Redefining Civil Engineering Workspacesfor Early-Career WomenMiss Elizabeth Volpe, University of Florida Elizabeth Volpe, EIT, LEED-GA, is a Ph.D. candidate in the Simmons Research Lab located in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research interests include inclusive engineering, leadership, the experiences of early-career women in engineering, and improving sustainability, diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice within engineering education and the engineering workforce. Elizabeth
://www.kornferry.com/insights/featured-topics/diversity-equity- inclusion/the-benefits-of-inclusive-leadership[9] M. Adams and X. Zúñiga, “Getting Started: Core Concepts for Social Justice Education,” in Teaching for diversity and social justice, 3rd ed., M. Adams and L. A. Bell, Eds., New York, NY: Routledge, 2016.[10] J. A. Leydens and J. C. Lucena, Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice. in IEEE PCS Professional Engineering Communication Series. IEEE Press, 2018.[11] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x.[12] J. Saldaña, The
Paper ID #43844Assessing Student Engagement, Success, Leadership and Teamwork Skillswith Respect to Team Role Selection and ExecutionDr. Edward Latorre, University of Florida https://www.eng.ufl.edu/eed/faculty-staff/edward-latorre-navarro/ ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Assessing Student Engagement, Success, Leadership and Teamwork Skills with respect to Team Role Selection and ExecutionAbstractThe importance of working in teams throughout the engineering education curriculum has beenwell documented in research. Therefore, most engineering curricula conclude with a team-basedcapstone design
Paper ID #43772Work-In-Progress: Understanding ”Engineering Leadership” within EngineeringConsulting FirmsJessica J. Li, University of Toronto Jessica is a Professional Engineer currently pursuing her PhD in Industrial Engineering with the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. Jessica’s research explores how professional services organizations can support or hinder leadership development in their staff. Jessica holds a Bachelor’s of Applied Science in Chemical Engineering from the University of Toronto and previously worked as an engineering consultant in the