Paper ID #43409Essentials of the Nurse+Engineer: Qualitative Methodology Applied to FoodsSystems in Environmental EngineeringDr. Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE, BCEE, DLAAS, FAAN(h) joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving for ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Professor Oerther is internationally recognized for leadership of engineers
. Gbekeloluwa B. Oguntimein P.E., Morgan State University Dr. Gbekeloluwa B. Oguntimein received his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Chemical Engineering from Iowa State University in 1974 and 1979 respectively. He has over 30 years teaching and research experience having taught at in the departments of chemical enginDr. Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University Dr. Oludare Owolabi, a professional engineer in Maryland, joined the Morgan State University faculty in 2010. He is the assistant director of the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research (CATIER) at Morgan State Universit ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Impact of an Experimental
]. b. Organic Evolution of the Two-Part FormatThe next planning committee was formed in January of 2022 when it was determined that theConference would be in person. The planning committee, led by co-chairs Lynn Albers (Multi),Micah Lande (ERM), and Bala Maheswaren (EPP), met regularly and decided to revisit the eighttopics previously prepared for 2020. The committee combined the eight topics into four andplanned a two-part ITH whereby the first half involved a roundtable discussion of the four topicsand the second half was led by a team conducting an NSF-funded study on ProfessionalDevelopment for Faculty. The two-part format worked well and the use of a two-minute video tointroduce the four topics for Part 1 was well received [4]. The same
consensus indescribing the “ideal” environmental engineer centered around desired skillsets and knowledge.Effective communication skills, which integrate both technical communication as well asinterpersonal skills, were identified as critical. Respondents defined technical communicationskills as encompassing the ability to write and present professional reports, while interpersonalskills comprised abilities to: a) consider stakeholder input and feedback as valuable andnecessary to the project’s success; b) adapt written and oral communication to diversestakeholder audiences; and c) practice empathy when communicating project updates andimpacts to stakeholders.Strong consensus also emerged around the shared perspective that the ideal
highlight the importance of each ofthese contexts from practical and ethical perspectives, they are then introduced to the Biblicalconcept of Christian stewardship. The SaS framework defines Christian stewardship as theresponsibility Christians have to actively manage and make use of the resources God hasentrusted to them in a manner consistent with God’s commands and character. This idea can bemost succinctly captured by 1 Corinthians 4:2, which states “Now it is required that those whohave been given a trust must prove faithful” [13]. In order to tie the concept of sustainability tostewardship, students are then presented with a theological progression, with items 1-9thoroughly supported with Biblical references (included in Appendix B). This
tolerance aredeterminants of these future capacities, but the results suggest that: (a) these capacities mayrequire more personalized or experiential learning opportunities than provided by the Ohio StateEmPOWERment Program, (b) these skills are more rooted in prior experience, or (c) they maydevelop over a longer time frame. This latter possibility calls for longitudinal studies that last formore than a year. Future work could investigate the underlying factors and potentialinterventions that may enhance graduate students' capacities to network and tolerate risk.7 References[1] National Academy of Engineering and E. National Academies of Sciences and Medicine,Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges
such asAnalysis of Variance (ANOVA) and paired sample t-tests to identify significant changes in studentresponses over time. By integrating these diverse methods, the study aimed to provide a holisticunderstanding of the effectiveness of sustainability education in engineering programs.Population The study's population consisted of undergraduate engineering students enrolled in specificcourses at institution A and institution B over four semesters. At Institution A, students were fromthe course CIVL 3230 Introduction to Environmental Engineering. At institution B, the coursesinvolved were MENG 425 Renewable Energy in the spring semester and MENG 313 FluidMechanics and MENG 418 Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) in the fall
sustainableprosthetic foot. The design constraints included design size and weight restrictions, requirements onmaterials used and manufacturing technique implemented when made directly in a low-resourced country.Students considered the use of recycled materials and down-stream effects to marginalized people affectedby material choices like recycled plastics [18]. They developed knowledge in various manufacturingprocesses such as the Jaipur foot as a labor-intensive method in low-resourced areas [19] and learned of the Whole Systems Mapping a. b. c. d.Figure 3. Sustainable Prosthetic Feet Manufacturing. The students were A
Paper ID #42483Students’ Metacognitive Regulation Strategies in Written Reflections withinThird-Year Introductory Environmental Engineering CourseAnu Singh, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Anu Singh is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education Research at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. She completed her M.Tech in Digital Communication and her B.Tech in Electronics and Communication Engineering in India. Her research interests include self-regulation, metacognition, reflection, and argumentative writing in engineering.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in
; Exposition.https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32629.Deloitte (2020) The Deloitte Global Millennial Survey 2020: Resilient generations hold the keyto creating a “better normal.” Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. London, EnglandDriscoll, A. (2008) Carnegie's Community-Engagement Classification: Intentions and Insights,Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40:1, 38-41, https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.1.38-41.Fan, C., Johnston, M., Darling, L., Scott, L., & Liao, F. H. (2019). Land Use and Socio-Economic Determinants of Urban Forest Structure and Diversity. Landscape and UrbanPlanning, 181(September 2018), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.012.Haywood, B. K., Parrish, J. K., & Dolliver, J. (2016). Place‐based and data‐rich citizen
courses offers a promising approach to equipfuture engineers with these crucial skills and the necessary mindset to develop sustainable andequitable solutions for the future. By engaging in projects, engineering students learn to grapplewith real-world, multidimensional challenges, to adapt and innovate—a crucial mindset foraddressing the multifaceted issues faced by engineers [18].One of the early definitions for PBL [19] involves five distinct aspects: a) student-drivenproblem-solving where they propose their problems or choose from options, fostering ownershipand engagement, b) integration of a range of educational activities, c) a tangible deliverableoutcome, such as a presentation, prototype, or research report, demonstrating
, with the added benefit of building community and a sense ofservice for the students.References 1. Dvorak, B. and Volder, A. (2010). Green roof vegetation for North American ecoregions: a literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning 96: 197-213. 2. Shafique, M., Kim, R., and Rafiq, M. (2018). Green roof benefits, opportunities and challenges – a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 90: 757-773. 3. Brenneisen, S. (2006). Space for urban wildlife: designing green roofs as habitats in Switzerland. Urban Habitats 4: 27-36. 4. Castleton, H.F., Stovin, V., Beck, S.B.M., and Davison, J.B. (2010). Green Roofs; Building Energy Savings and the Potential for Retrofit. Energy and Buildings 42(1
% increase. The data provide aquantitative way to assess the areas where learning was expanded, as well as areas whereadditional work is needed. The zero initial values for the number of crosslinks (NCL) suggeststhat students may not be connecting concepts as easily as may be desired, especially in an upperdivision course that the micromoments were implemented in. (a) (b) Figure 2: Examples of (a) baseline and (b) updated concept maps created in Cmap tools. It is also important to note that the students who worked together not only with themicromoments but also in creating the concept maps were able to significantly increase thenumber of crosslinks in their concept maps. Students #2 and #7 went from having nocrosslinked terms to having 17
to make their own decisions about the design. Teams were provided with a 7-weekschedule at the beginning of the project as a part of the guidelines document (shown in AppendixA). Groups turned in weekly team reports with a filled-out material cost sheet and correspondingCAD drawings on the online learning management system as early as week 3, enabling groups tobegin building their structures or collecting materials. A complete list of the materials providedcan be found in Appendix B. Weekly tasks were often divided between members such thatreasonable progress was made on individual unit processes, experimentation, CAD development,materials checkoffs, and building. The instructor communicated that important decisions shouldbe made by the
CoursesTo classify whether courses align with the previously stated definition, a tiering system wasutilized to divide courses into comprehensible categories of how a course includes sustainabilityor could include sustainability within its curriculum.The tiering system comprises four levels: "A-Tier," "B-Tier," "C-Tier," and "D-Tier." Each tier isaccompanied by a specific definition that serves as a guideline for classifying coursesaccordingly:A-Tier courses are highly centralized or encompass concepts of sustainability. They are coursesbuilt around the foundation (or a foundation) of sustainability and how it applies to theengineering, technical, or sociocultural topic discussed in the course.B-Tier courses have a primary focus on some engineering
college or university fully prepared you fora sustainability-focused career. What would that look like? The whiteboard was then subdividedinto two main areas with students adding their post-it responses to the prompt based on whethertheir chosen career path was academic or non-academic, and whether the variousclasses/experiences/support were already offered by their college/university, or not offered (seeFigures 1A and 1B).Figure 1. A) Example of a Slido poll used for students with student responses indicated. B) The engagementwhiteboard with questions and specific whiteboard prompts for students to place sticky notes on.Thematic AnalysisStudent responses to the survey questions and whiteboard prompts were compiled and enteredinto a spreadsheet
, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12051789.[10] A. A. Sewagegn and B. M. Diale, “Empowering Learners Using Active Learning in Higher Education Institutions,” in Active Learning: Beyond the Future, 2019.[11] E. Ribeiro-Silva, C. Amorim, J. L. Aparicio-Herguedas, and P. Batista, “Trends of Active Learning in Higher Education and Students’ Well-Being: A Literature Review,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. April, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844236.[12] A. H. Aubert, R. Bauer, and J. Lienert, “A review of water-related serious games to specify use in environmental Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 105, pp. 64–78, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.023.[13] “Decisions for the Decade
. 97, (4), pp. 433-447, 2008.[2] B. K. Jesiek et al, "Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors,"Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 8, (1), pp. 1, 2014.[3] E. De Graaff and W. Ravesteijn, "Training complete engineers: global enterprise andengineering education," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 26, (4), pp. 419-427,2001.[4] H. W. Rittel and M. M. Webber, "Dilemmas in a general theory of planning," Policy Sci., vol.4, (2), pp. 155-169, 1973.[5] M. T. Hora, R. J. Benbow and B. B. Smolarek, "Re-thinking soft skills and studentemployability: A new paradigm for undergraduate education," Change: The Magazine of HigherLearning, vol. 50, (6), pp. 30-37, 2018.[6] N. C. Kawa et al, "Training
Observed Learning Outcome). New York, NY: Academic Press, 1982.[11] T. Olsson, “Qualitative Assessment in Engineering Education, The Swedish Council for the Renewal of Higher Education Project No. 053/99, Final Report,” April, 2005.[12] P. Lundgren, “Effects of Elective Oral Examinations in a Semiconductor Devices Course for Computer Engineering Students,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 294-299, 1998.[13] A. Crannell, “Collaborative oral take-home exams,” In Assessment Practices in Undergraduate Mathematics, MAA Notes Number 49, ed. B. Gold, S. Keith, and W. Marion, Washington D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America, 1999), pp.143-145, 1999.[14] J.P. East and J.B
hurricane disaster in Texas and Florida compared with Puerto Rico," BMJ Glob Health, vol. 4, no. 1, p. e001191, 2019, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001191.[19] L. J. Butler, M. K. Scammell, and E. B. Benson, "The Flint, Michigan, water crisis: A case study in regulatory failure and environmental injustice," Environmental Justice, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 93-97, 2016.[20] O. Oladeji et al., "Air Pollutant Patterns and Human Health Risk following the East Palestine, Ohio, Train Derailment," Environ Sci Technol Lett, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 680-685, Aug 8 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00324.[21] M. Lejk, M. Wyvill, and S. Farrow, "Group assessment in systems analysis and design: A comparison of the performance of streamed
Paper ID #41976Sustainability in Engineering Graphics and Bicycle-Powered BlendersDr. Dustyn Roberts, University of Pennsylvania Dustyn Roberts is a Practice Associate Professor at the University of Pennsylvania. She received her BS in Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University, her MS in Biomechanics & Movement Science from the University of Delaware, and her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from New York University.Jarrett Stein, University of PennsylvaniaTex Kang, University of Pennsylvania ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 (Work in Progress
Paper ID #41248Infusing Sustainability into Diverse Courses and Programs Using Open SourceEngineering for One Planet (EOP) Teaching ResourcesCynthia Anderson, Alula Consulting Cindy Anderson (she/her/hers) is a sustainability consultant with Alula Consulting, and a strategy consultant for Engineering for One Planet with The Lemelson Foundation. Cindy specializes in innovative sustainability-focused research and curriculum projects for academic institutions, non-profits, government and corporations. Cindy has taught thousands of people through courses and workshops, around the world and online, in the fields of biology