Paper ID #44171Evaluation of the Effect of Anonymous Grading on Student Performance onHigh-Stakes AssessmentsDr. Neha B. Raikar, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Raikar is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, in the Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering department. She has taught both undergraduate and graduate-level courses. Dr. Raikar also has 3 years of industry experience from working at Unilever Research in the Netherlands.Dr. Nilanjan Banerjee Nilanjan Banerjee is an Associate Professor at University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He is an expert in mobile and
Paper ID #43732Desktop Flow Visualisation Experiments for Guided Discovery of BoundaryLayersDr. Peter B. Johnson, Imperial College London Peter is a Principal Teaching Fellow (permanent academic staff with an education focused remit) in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Imperial College London. He teaches a fluid mechanics module to undergraduate students. He is also responsible for laboratory based learning, and plays a lead role in teaching administration within the department. Additionally, Peter has a remit to innovate in educational methods, with two main focuses: discovery based learning, including developing
, and active learning in design classes.Roy B. Clariana, Pennsylvania State University Roy B. Clariana is a professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education, Pennsylvania State University, US. His research areas include measures and models of knowledge structure, natural language processing of texts, automated writing evaluation, and writing to learn. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: An Open Educational Resource to Improve Architectural Engineering Students Conceptual Knowledge When Writing-to- Learn: Investigation 1Abstract This paper presents the findings of the first of four investigations funded by the NSF
developing and assessing Professional Development programs for these students. She has been an instructor for Communication Theory and Scientific Communication at undergraduate level.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski is an associate professor of engineering practice in the Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and (by courtesy) the School of Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Purdue. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Dr. Zoltowski’s research interests include the professional formation of
Center at The Pennsylvania State University, University Park campus. She obtained her Masters degree in Education from Millersville University and her B.S. from DeSales University iJana Bontrager Auman, Penn State UniversityDr. Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University Christine Masters is the Assistant Dean for Academic Support and Global Programs and a Teaching Professor in the Engineering Science and Mechanics Department at the Pennsylvania State University. In between raising 4 great kids with her husband of 35 years, she taught large enrollment statics and strength of materials courses for 12 years and has been leading the efforts focused on support, global engagement, and academic integrity as
. Gbekeloluwa B. Oguntimein P.E., Morgan State University Dr. Gbekeloluwa B. Oguntimein received his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Chemical Engineering from Iowa State University in 1974 and 1979 respectively. He has over 30 years teaching and research experience having taught at in the departments of chemical enginDr. Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University Dr. Oludare Owolabi, a professional engineer in Maryland, joined the Morgan State University faculty in 2010. He is the assistant director of the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research (CATIER) at Morgan State Universit ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Impact of an Experimental
Paper ID #43079Smart Traffic Light System for Arterials (WIP)Dr. Cyril B Okhio P.E., Kennesaw State University Cyril B. Okhio is a Faculty at the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering & Engineering Technology, Kennesaw State University and an Adjunct Professor at Clark Atlanta University’s Dual Degree Engineering Program. He earned his B.S. (Engineering) and Ph.D. (Mechanical Engineering) degrees from and was an (Science and Engineering Research Council) SERC Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of London. He is registered as a Chartered Professional Engineer (CPEng) with the Council of Registered
‐161, 2007.[5] Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J., “What Matters to Student Success:A Review of the Literature,” National Postsecondary Education Cooperative, July 2006[6] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S.L. Laursen, T. DeAntoni, Establishing the benefits of researchexperiences for undergraduates in the sciences: first findings from a three‐year study. ScienceEducation, 88(4), 493–534, 2004[6] L. Falcon, “Breaking down barriers: first-generation college students and college success.”Innovation Showcase, 10(6), 2015.[8] A. D. Patrick, A. N. Prybutok, and M. Borrego, “Predicting persistence in engineeringthrough an engineering identity scale,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34,no. 2(A), 2018.[9] A. M
. Conducted five interviews with industry stakeholders in order to get a deeper sense of the terms and needs 3. Analyzed that data in order to arrive at a more defined list of needs, and then used that list of needs to develop a call for course proposals that would become official courses in this programFrom this data gathering and analysis with industry stakeholders, the following competenciesand skills emerged. Students need to know: A. How to develop the business idea process in a way that meets the needs of a specific marketplace B. How to develop a business plan that addresses startup, implementation, and sustaining the business C. How to navigate the ‘valley of death’ where most businesses fail D. How to
. His work has been published through the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE); he is an active member of both organizations. He holds a PhD and BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kentucky. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #42797Dr. B ”Grant” Grant Crawford P.E., Quinnipiac University Grant Crawford, PhD, P.E., F.ASEE, Colonel (retired) U.S. Army, is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering for the School of Computing and Engineering at Quinnipiac University. He is a former Director of
are summarized in tables A.1 and B.1 in appendix Aand B, respectively. Four hypotheses were presented that should be analyzed based on theproposed indicators. Although the proposed indicators for each curriculum are not similar,they imply aspects of acceptance/perception of the methodology applied to the study plan. Regarding hypothesis 1: Students in the 2019 plan (Tec21) who take a 5-week UF rated a higher average of 9.6699 than the 2011 plan (Tec20) with an average of 9.6177. However, the standard deviation for (Tec21) was higher (0.3178) than for the (Tec20) plan (0.1457). In other words, and applying the central limit theorem, on average, students in 5-week blocks of Tec21 accept continuous evaluations more; however, there
% of interactions were helpful. 60.9% of survey responses said that asimilar bot would be helpful for other projects, 8.65% disagreed, and the rest were unsure.Students reported that the Bot was most helpful for answering project specification andconceptual questions, and least helpful for explaining test cases (Figure 3b).When asked if using the Bot instead of the course forum or office hours saved time, 40.1% ofstudents answered yes, while 21.8% said no. 30.5% of students reported that using the Bot helpedthem code faster, while 36.7% disagreed. The rest of the responses were unsure.(a) Number of interactions with the Bot for each stu- (b) Student-reported Bot helpfulness per prompt cat-dent group. Most student groups used the Bot at least
- Wheeled_Self_Balancing_Robot_Driven_by_DC_Gearmotors. Accessed: Oct. 19, 2023.[2] Equipe Embarcados, "Webinar Gravado: Implementação de Controle PID com PIC16F1619," 2017. Available: https://embarcados.com.br/controle-pid-com-pic16f1619/. Accessed: Oct. 10, 2023.[3] Unknown. "PID Control on PIC16F161X by using a PID Peripheral," 2015. Available: https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/AppNotes/90003136A.pdf. Accessed: Oct. 10, 2023.[4] JJRobots, "B-Robot: The Balancing Robot." Available: https://jjrobots.com/projects-2/b-robot/. Accessed: Oct. 21, 2023.[5] H. Hassan, C. Domínguez, J. -M. Martínez, A. Perles, J. -V. Capella and J. Albaladejo, "A Multidisciplinary PBL Robot Control Project in Automation and Electronic Engineering," in IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 58, no. 3
context, and the best ways to support students’ persistence to degree completion.Dr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Walter Lee is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the director for research at the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering
hassince been eliminated because of the complexity of the figure. B) Proposed for RBDCI A) In Current DCI (Eliminated For Complexity) Image edited from [10] Figure 1: Proposed questions for concept 1 – “Different points on a rigid body have different velocities and accelerations.”Figure 2 contains four questions, two of which come from the current DCI (2B and 2D) and twowhich come from the Concept Warehouse (2A and 2C) for testing Concept 2: “The inertia of a bodyaffects its acceleration and velocity”. Again, these questions are not finalized and are likely not to beused
self-care. Students were asked to reflect in the middle of the quarter on if their plan was being followed, and to perform adjustments if necessary.(22) 4 b) “Reflection leadership assignment” which consisted of five reflection questions: (i) describe their long-term goals (>10 years), (ii) list the most important and least important personal values, (iii) describe ineffective leadership habits that were presented and discussed in class, and how they could overcome such habits, (iv) identifying major successes and failures in the next month as well as five years, and (v) describe leadership roles along with a
, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to drawconclusions. [8]” Comparison to objective b from the a-k criteria shows that a major componentwas added to this outcome – that students must demonstrate engineering judgement in drawingconclusions for experiments. This is significant due to the strong emphasis placed on engineeringjudgement by working engineers who cite such judgements as the ultimate guide to designdecisions [9]. The inclusion of engineering judgement in this student outcome, and nowhere elseexplicitly in the outcomes (except for possibly a reference to judgement in outcome 4 whichdeals with ethics) gives an indication of ABET’s views about the purpose of laboratories asgoing beyond practical necessities. It seems
media handbook for sailors and families, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://media.defense.gov/2023/Mar/02/2003171513/-1/1/0/SMP_SAILORSFAMILIES _V12%20(1).PDF. [Accessed 3/29/2024][19] Z. Kronisch, “Operational security erodes in social media age,” National Defense, May 31, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/ 2019/5/31/ndia-policy-points-operational-security-erodes-in-social-media-age. [Accessed 3/29/2024].[20] C. Shirkey, Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Group, 2008.[21] B. Rieder, Òscar Coromina, and A. Matamoros-Fernández, “Mapping YouTube: A quantitative exploration of a platformed media system,” First Monday, vol
. Minichiello and A. Iqbal, "Perceived Factors Contributing to the SubjectiveWellbeing of Undergraduate Engineering Students: An Exploratory Study," International Journal ofEnvironmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, (23), 2022. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316284.[3] D. Kim and B. K. Jesiek, "Work-in-Progress: Emotion and Intuition in Engineering Students’ EthicalDecision Making and Implications for Engineering Ethics Education," 2019. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33666.[4] N. N. Kellam et al, "Uncovering the role of emotion in engineering education within an integratedcurricular experience," in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[5] L. F. Barrett, "The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoceptionand categorization
a Member of Tau Beta Pi.Dr. Joseph B. Herzog, University of Indianapolis Joseph B. Herzog is an Associate professor in the R.B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. He chose to come to the University of Indianapolis because he is passionate about teaching, is excited about the direction of the new R.B. Annis School of Engineering, is glad to return to his engineering roots, and is happy to be close to his extended family. Previously he was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics at the University of Arkansas. He is truly grateful for his time at the University of Arkansas, and enjoyed his department, students, and the campus. While in Fayetteville, he also served as a faculty
Paper ID #42126Work-in-progress: Elevating Chemical Engineering Outreach Through CollaborativeEfforts Showcasing Fluid Flow ExperimentsDr. Neha B. Raikar, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Raikar is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, in the Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering department. She has taught both undergraduate and graduate-level courses. Dr. Raikar also has 3 years of industry experience from working at Unilever Research in the Netherlands.Dr. Fernando M´erida, University of Florida Fernando Merida is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Chemical
educator, he brings professional experience as an engineer and project management from industry and government settings.Dr. Christian B. Miller, Wake Forest University A.C. Reid Professor of PhilosophyDr. Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University Dr. Olga Pierrakos is a rotating STEM Education Program Director in the Division of Undergraduate Education at the National Science Foundation (a second stint). Olga is also the Founding Chair (2017-2022) and a Professor of Wake Forest Engineering. With a unique vision to Educate the Whole Engineer and a commitment to Human Flourishing, Olga led Wake Forest Engineering to be ranked as one of the top (14th) ”Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs” by US News Report (2023). With
received his PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University in 2001. He is the Director of the NSF NRT-LEAD program and a Professor in the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State University.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Enhancing Engineering EducationEnhancing Engineering Education: A Comparative Analysis of Low-Cost Desktop Learning Module
. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University Carla B. Zoltowski is an associate professor of engineering practice in the Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and (by courtesy) the School of Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Purdue. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Dr. Zoltowski’s research interests include the professional formation of engineers, diversity, inclusion, and equity in engineering, human-centered design, and engineering ethics.Dr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University William (Bill) Oakes is the Assistant Dean for
social and personality psychology from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2007. Prior to his career in psychology, he spent six years as a teacher, coach, and social worker. Chris is a second generation educator whose grandparents were tenant farmers in Iowa and Nebraska. He tries to emulate their hard work and persistence in the pursuit of social justice. One of his favorite childhood memories is eating his paternal grandmother’s homemade fruit pies with plenty of ice cream.Dr. Dustin B. Thoman, San Diego State University Dr. Dustin Thoman is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education at San Diego State University. He also serves as California
Paper ID #43078Work in Progress: Experiences of Uncertainty in Sociotechnical Small-GroupUndergraduate DiscussionsFatima Rahman, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach PhD student, STEM Education, Tufts UniversityDr. Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University Dr. Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University, where she also holds a secondary appointment in the department of Education. She leads a research group at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) and is a member of the Tufts Institute for Research on Learning and Instruction (IRLI). Her
Paper ID #41283Developing the Design Reasoning in Data Life-Cycle Ethical ManagementFrameworkDr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University Senay Purzer is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research is on engineering design reasoning.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University Carla B. Zoltowski is an associate professor of engineering practice in the Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and (by courtesy) the School of Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Purdue. She holds a
Test 7 13 Force analysis and balancing A1-C A1-C, Retry P9-C Test 8 14 Cam design P10-C P10-C Test 9 15 Project work days Project skills A2-C, Retry A1-C Test 10 Exam Final project report due Project skills Project skillsCourse grades were determined by the total number of skills mastered during the semester (Tab. 5A).Ohio Northern used a whole letter scale (only A, B, C, etc.). Passing the 5 required testing skills (R1-R5)along with the other Level 1 skills was required to earn a “D”. The inclusion of the computer apps andhomework skills generally improved grades from a
.Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2020). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24631Cech, E., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S., & Seron, C. (2011). Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. American sociological review, 76(5), 641-666.Chang, H. (2008). Chapter 3: Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek.Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority
. 1. 2022. doi: 10.1186/s40594-022- 00389-1.[6] R. Hirst, G. Bolduc, L. Liotta, and B. Wai Ling Packard, “Two-Year Community: Cultivating the STEM Transfer Pathway and Capacity for Research: A Partnership Between a Community College and a 4-Year College,” J Coll Sci Teach, vol. 043, no. 04, 2014, doi: 10.2505/4/jcst14_043_04_12.[7] M. A. Haider, H. Ahmed, and M. K. Pallikonda, “Empowering Economic and Occupational Freedom through the Transformation of Engineering Technology education from 2 Years to 4 Years Degrees,” in ASEE CIEC, Santa Ana, Feb. 2023.[8] H. Ahmed, “A Review on Corrosion of All Aluminum Microchannel Heat Exchangers,” in Corrosion Engineering - Recent Breakthroughs and