. Students will use the design process as a tool to address user needs and create innovative solutions B. Students will create design solutions that reflect an appropriate balance of internal and external constraints C. Students will enhance or develop effective communication skills necessary for success in the discipline of product development D. Students will demonstrate agency as problem solvers when faced with ambiguous situations E. Students will grow as a member of this class, a member of the engineering community, and as global citizens3. Learning OutcomesNext the instructors identified learning outcomes for each course goal. As many readers willknow, learning outcomes
presentations and key note lectures and serves as referee for journals, funding institutions and associations.Camila Zapata-Casabon, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Master in Marketing and Market Research from the University of Barcelona, Spain. Industrial Civil Engineer from the Universidad del B´ıo-B´ıo. She has three diplomas in the areas of coaching, digital marketing and equality and empowerment of women. Her professional experience is linked to higher education as a project engineer and university management in the public and private area. Teacher at different universities in matters of entrepreneurship, business plans and marketing. She currently works as a teacher and academic secretary at the Faculty of Engineering
. Mumford, S. J. Zaccaro, K. Y. Levin, A. L. Korotkin, and M. B. Hein, “Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation,” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 245-287, 1991, doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(91)90016-U.[3] F. J. Yammarino, E. Salas, A. Serban, K. Shirreffs, and M. L. Shuffler, “Collectivistic leadership approaches: putting the ‘we’ in leadership science and practice,” Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 382-402, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1754- 9434.2012.01467.x.[4] D. V. Day, P. Gronn, and E. Salas, “Leadership capacity in teams,” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 857-880, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua
consider the following interrelated open-ended factors: • 2D link profile: Students are not mandated to use any particular type of 2D link profile. However, experience shows that even when no guidance is provided by the instructor on the profile, virtually every group of students employs either the dog bone or rubber band designs, as shown in Figures 2(a)-(b), respectively. • Link profile thickness: Every link is laser cut from a Nylon 6/6 sheet by a technician, so the link material is not a design parameter. However, when submitting their CAD file deliverable, students must select their link thickness from three available options: 0.062”, 0.094”, or 0.124”. A thinner
and hand-off of written reports. While there was no required coursetextbook, two texts were recommended as supplementary material, including Jeter et al. [26] forlearning objectives A and B and Tufte [27] for objective C (see Table 1).The overarching course learning objectives were mapped to specific communications skills(Table 1) that were introduced and reinforced with three steps. First, in the weekly workshops,students were introduced to a communications skill, e.g., creating a table, and specific guidelinesfor content and formatting associated with that skill (Figure 1). Then students critiqued aninstructor-provided example of technical communications according to these guidelines, first inclass as small group activity and then as part
prototyping process without significant degrading.However, we noticed that leakage around the seal generated by zip tie A was a common failure mode. Oncethe muscles are compromised, the creature is challenging to control. As an example, the syringes had to bereset frequently on leaking muscles because the air volume in the system would slowly decrease.Furthermore, actuating the syringes rapidly can be fairly exhausting for the operator after a while due to theamount of friction caused by this. The silicone tubing also can cause issues, specifically withmaneuverability, because the weight and elastic force caused by the tubes can affect the movement of thecreature.(b) Prototype ActuationBefore production of the McKibben creature, each team must first
unlikely to collaborate and share ideas with peers or apply the knowledge aftergraduation. Thankfully, the data show there is a measured improvement of 20% in student“confidence” with the material. However, the population that gained the highest boost in“confidence” was not the extremes in terms of GPA and course grade, but instead students closerto the median. In terms of student GPA, students with a GPA between 3.0 and 4.0 saw thelargest increase in confidence following interaction with the power demonstrator board.Similarly, students who earned a B or B+ in the course had the largest change in confidence;27% and 25% respectively. This growth and comfort with the course material is valuable to thestudent, enabling more direct engagement of the
80 60 46 40 33 26 12 1613 17 14 14 20 6 1 9 4 2 4 0 0 A B C D F (>50) F (>40) F (>30) F (>20) F (>10) F (<
across all disciplines.ASEE 2024 Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division References[1] W. Lu & B. Zoghi, “Designing a professional master’s program to build life-long successfulskills for engineering managers,” In 13th annual International Conference of Education,Research and Innovation, November 9-10, 2020. [Online]. Available:doi:10.21125/iceri.2020.1794. [Accessed February 4, 2024].[2] M. White, “A Brief History of Generative AI,” January 2023. [Online]. Available: Medium,https://matthewdwhite.medium.com/a-brief-history-of-generative-ai-cb1837e67106. [AccessedFebruary 4, 2024].[3] “A Guide to the Engineering Management Body of Knowledge, 5th edition,”ASEM.org.[Online]. Available: ASEM
, Louisville, Kentucky,June 2010. DOI:10.18260/1-2--16917[7] Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. Journal Clubs As Pedagogy For Interdisciplinary Graduate EducationPaper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 2008.DOI:10.18260/1-2--3665[8] Kelkar, A. D., & Ryan, J. G. Innovative Graduate Program in Nanoengineering Paper presented at 2011ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, June 2011. DOI:10.18260/1-2—18176[9] Honey, M.; Alberts, B.; Bass, H.; Castillo, C.; Lee, O.; Strutchens, M. M.; Vermillion, L.; Rodriguez,F. STEM Education for the Future - 2020 Visioning Report; National Science Foundation, Spring 2020.[10] Council, N. R., Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and
Valley Section Outstanding Faculty Award. She holds a Ph.D. degree in Bioengineering from the University of Illinois-Chicago (UIC), M. Tech (Chem. Engg.) from IIT Bombay and B. Tech (Chem. Engg.) from Laxminarayan Institute of Technology, Nagpur. She has postdoctoral research experiences from University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Delaware. Her PhD work on IVF (in-vitro fertilization) hormonal dosing policy prediction was awarded the Best Research on Women and Gender studies at UIC. She is an active member of the AIChE and currently serves on the Executive Committees of the AIChE-Environmental Division, Sustainable Engineering Forum, and the Academic Subcommittee of the AIChE-Delaware Valley Section.Miss
camp. Groups names were created by the fabrication librarian todistinguish between each of them. In the mechanical camp, we had group A, group B and groupC. In the exploration camp, we had group D, group E and group F.Makerspace sessions were led by Rebecca, with assistance from the makerspace specialist andone student worker. Three employees were needed to roam around the makerspace for eachsession, providing assistance as needed to the groups as they fabricated using various machinesand tools. There were two engineering camp counselors at each session, helping to managestudent behavior and occasionally aided in generating ideas for fabrication and using hand tools.There was no formal assessment conducted during the makerspace sessions and
Experiences of Non-traditional Students: A perspective from higher education. Studies in Continuing Education, 57-75.Bohl, A. J., Haak, B., & Shrestha, S. (2017). The Experiences of Nontraditional Students: A Qualitative Inquiry. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 166-174.Carpenter, N. E., & Pappenfus, T. M. (2009). Teaching Research: A Curriculum Model That Works. Journal of Chemistry Education, 940-945.Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., & Lents, N. H. (2016). Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 169-194.Ditta, A. S., Strickland-Hughes, C. M., Cheung, C
, it does not provide any explanation of the analysis steps. As with SPICE, it can be used to verify students’ abilities, but not for teaching analysis or for tutoring purposes. B. Learning systems integrated with textbook-style resources. This category of learning tools has seen rapid growth and adoption in the past decade. From a teaching and learning perspective these tools are among the most powerful. For example, Mastering by McGraw Hill [20], Wiley Plus [21], and ZyBooks [22]. These tools typically have links into textbook materials or are embedded within textbook resources. Some of these systems include related studies reporting improved grades [23]. However, available systems do not provide detailed step-by-step
responses:I have a good understanding of the concept of specific heat.The student responses are tabulated below. Table 2 Student responses to the survey question Likert scale responses pre-lab post-lab A strongly agree 21 33 B agree 24 19 C neutral 10 3 D disagree 0 0 E strongly disagree 0 0 sum 55 55 agree % (A+B)/sum 82% 95% improvement 13%The percentage of students agreeing with the survey
engineer. Students who value a “good”course grade as a perceived achievement, may therefore internalize these activities as importantbeings and doings.To counter such a perception, the grading scheme shown in Fig. 4(b) was implemented. In thismodel, faculty selected areas relevant to being an engineer and used these to assess across allcourse activities. Each assignment or exam yielded a set of grades as opposed to a single value,that are weighted and contribute to the final grade. In other words, a single homeworkassignment may have aspects of Engagement, Knowledge and Concepts, Engineering Skills,Communication, etc., that are evaluated and weighted, as opposed to contributing solely to a“Homework” category. In implementing this model, all
: dϕ A (ρϕu) A|B e = Γ A|B e + Sϕ (24) dxwhich can be written as: dϕ dϕ ρu (ϕB − ϕe ) = Γ − + Sϕ ∆x (25) dx B dx eAnalyzing each term in the equation above, ϕB is known since ϕB = ϕL , and ϕe can be calculatedas the average of ϕ at the two
),Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (3 teams of 4 or 5 students), and Industrial Technology (3teams of 4 students). Project team distribution in preceding years has been described in previouspublications about this undertaking [16-18].In the 2023 SBP, the engineering design projects that were assigned to the student teamsincluded (a) solar-powered pump system, desalination, and municipal water supply alternatives,for three Chemical and Environmental Engineering groups, (b) computational design of a trussbridge for two Civil and Architectural Engineering groups, (c) building and programming a line-following robot for one Electrical Engineering and Computer Science group, (d) plastic partdesign and 3-D printing for three Mechanical and Industrial
. 167-179, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790601118697[14] C. Pezeshki, R. T. Frame, and B. Humann, “Preparing undergraduate mechanical engineering students for the global marketplace-new demands and requirements,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Salt Lake City, USA, 2004.[15] E. A. Fielding, J. R. Mccardle, B. Eynard, N. Hartman, and A. Fraser, “Product lifecycle management in design and engineering education: International perspectives,” Concurrent Engineering, vol. 22(2), pp. 123-134, 2014.[16] D. Gerhard and M. Grafinger, “Integrative Engineering Design using Product Data Management Systems in Education,” in E&PDE 2009: Engineering and Product Design Education, 2009.[17] A
/s40594-023-00419-6[3] D. Gerrard, K. Newfield, N. Balouchestani Asli, and C. Variawa, “Are students overworked? understanding the workload expectations and realities of first-year engineering,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, May 2017. doi:10.18260/1-2--27612[4] U. Beagon and B. Bowe, “Understanding professional skills in engineering education: A phenomenographic study of faculty conceptions,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1109–1144, Sep. 2023. doi:10.1002/jee.20556[5] “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2022 - 2023,” ABET, https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-20 23/ (accessed Feb. 8, 2024
Paper ID #42457A Transdisciplinary Knowledge Approach Using a Holistic Design ThinkingMethodology for Engineering EducationDr. Mark J. Povinelli, Syracuse University Dr. Mark Povinelli was the Kenneth A. and Mary Ann Shaw Professor of Practice in Entrepreneurial Leadership in the College of Engineering and Computer Science and the Whitman School of Management at Syracuse University. He currently serves as an adjunct professor in the Ren´ee Crown University Honors Program at Syracuse University. Additionally, Dr. Povinelli has taught Holistic Engineering using a Holistic Desing Thinking methodology at the secondary level in
. Eng. Humanit. Eng. Soc. Entrep., vol. 3, no. 2, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v3i2.2103.[8] L. A. Cooper, D. Kotys-Schwartz, and D. T. Reamon, “Project-Based Service-Learning and Student Motivation,” in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2011, pp. 47–53.[9] B. D. Jones, “Motivating Students to Engage in Learning: The MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation,” Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 272–285, 2009.[10] J. Thompson and B. Jesiek, “Motivation of Community Partners and Advisors to Participate in Community Engagement Engineering Programs,” in 2014 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2014,p. 24.916.1
and/or socioeconomic disparities in organ transplantation (i.e. the ‘Organ Gap’); ● Engaging in structured argumentative discourse in support of/against policy proposals developed by students and their peers.MethodThe ongoing development and eventual practical application of this curriculum unit is guided byDesign-Based Implementation Research (DBIR). DBIR is a methodological approach whichseeks to (a) improve educational practice via collaborative, iterative design amongst multiplegroups of stakeholders; (b) build theoretical and practical knowledge about teaching andlearning, and; (c) and cultivate the institutional ability to sustain these changes [9]. The presentwork can be conceptually divided into a few distinct phases of
Results in a Blended Classroom,” 14th International CDIO Conference, Japan, 2018.6. M. Pérez-Sánchez, and P.A. López-Jiménez, "Continuous Project-Based Learning in Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Engineering Subjects for Different Degrees" Fluids, 5, no. 2: 95, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids5020095.7. B.J. Wie, D.C. Davis, P. Golter, A. Ansery, and B. Abdul, “Team building in a project-based learning Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer course,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2011.8. McNair, L. D., Newswander, C., Boden, D., & Borrego, M. (2011). Student and faculty interdisciplinary identities in self‐managed teams. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 374-396. https://doi.org
student activity in the TE. A) Heatmap tracking the number of tokens that students earned over the semester with each heatmap row representing 1 student’s token-generating activity. The symbols above specific dates in the timeline represent when midterm exams were administered (green star), the last quiz grades were released (blue triangle), and the last homework grades were released (red square). B) Heatmap tracking the number of tokens that students exchanged to purchase TE rewards. Rows detailing each student’s token-spending activity are matched and aligned with the heatmap rows in 2A. C) Bar chart dissecting the component purchases making up all token exchanges performed by students during the semester (n = 43). Table 4: Ledger of unique
displaced populations & victims of conflict. Confl Health. 2017 Nov 1;11:20. doi: 10.1186/s13031-017-0122-0. PMID: 29118849; PMCID: PMC5664437. 6. Najem, Y., Elhajj, I. H., Dawy, Z., Germani, A., Ghattas, H., Zaman, M., & Yazdi, Y. (2019). Humanitarian Engineering Design for Health Challenges: An Inter-faculty Service Based Learning Model. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v14i2.13391 7. Amadei B, Sandekian R, Thomas E. A Model for Sustainable Humanitarian Engineering Projects. Sustainability. 2009; 1(4):1087-1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1041087 8. Gordon, P.E., Kramer, J., Agogino, A.M
1Preparing Engineering Graduate Students to Engage in Scholarly Communications Dianna E. B. Morganti Angie Dunn ASEE Annual Conference 2 Abstract The typical engineering degree plan has several important gaps when reviewed againstthe research lifecycle. These gaps are often filled in by students learning ad hoc, by overworkedfaculty over numerous mentoring sessions, or often by the engineering research librarians inworkshops and consultations. Purposeful incorporation of a curriculum that fills those gaps,though, can
intersectional, interdisciplinary, inclusive teams,” in NSF RED PI Meeting, 2019.[4] S. Davis, N. Kellam, V. Svihla, B. Sundaram, and J. Halkiyo, “Powerful Change Attends to Power Relations,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37590[5] N. Kellam, S. Davis, V. Svihla, D. Riley, A. Pawley, and K. Cross, “Using Power, Privilege, and Intersectionality as Lenses to Understand our Experiences and Begin to Disrupt and Dismantle Oppressive Structures Within Academia,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2020.[6] N. Kellam, V. Svihla, and S. Davis, “Power Dynamics and Roles on RED Teams: Promoting Cultures of Inclusivity,” presented at
Paper ID #44003Latino/a/x Engineering Students and Nepantla: A Multi-Case Study withinthe US SouthwestDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an Associate Professor with joint appointment in the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering and the Department of Bicultural-Bilingual Studies at The University of Texas at San Antonio. His research has contributed to the integration of critical theoretical frameworks in engineering education to investigate deficit ideologies and their impact on minoritized communities, particularly Mexican Americans
/working-papers (accessed October, 2023).[10] C. S. Stocco, R. H. Thompson, J. M. Hart, and H. L. Soriano, "Improving the interview skills of college students using behavioral skills training," Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 495-510, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.385.[11] J. Akpan and C. Notar, "How to write a professional knockout resume to differentiate yourself," College Student Journal, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 880-891, 2012.[12] S. B. Knouse, "Impressions of the resume: The effects of applicant education, experience, and impression management," Journal of Business and Psychology, vol. 9, pp. 33-45, 1994.[13] I. Hunt, R. Taylor, and W. Oberman, "Advisory board engagement