and Environmental Science (Vol. 654, No. 1, p.012001). IOP Publishing.[17] Saka, A., Taiwo, R., Saka, N., Salami, B. A., Ajayi, S., Akande, K., & Kazemi, H. (2023). GPT models inconstruction industry: Opportunities, limitations, and a use case validation. Developments in the Built Environment,100300.[18] Zarifhonarvar, A. (2023), "Economics of ChatGPT: a labor market view on the occupational impact of artificialintelligence", Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.https://doi.org/10.1108/JEBDE-10-2023-0021[19] Gustafsson, M., Gluch, P., Gunnemark, S., Heinke, K., & Engström, D. (2015). The role of VDC professionalsin the construction industry. Procedia Economics and Finance, 21
. Tsugawa-Nieves, A. Kirn, and C. Cass, “Development and testing of an instrument to understand engineering doctoral students’ identities and motivations,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2018-June, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30319.[7] K. O. Meara and K. Knudsen, “The Role of Emotional Competencies in Faculty-Doctoral Student Relationships,” vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 315–347, 2013.[8] C. G. P. Berdanier, A. Tally, S. E. Branch, B. Ahn, and M. F. Cox, “A strategic blueprint for the alignment of doctoral competencies with disciplinary expectations,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 4, 2016.[9] C. Aitchison, “Writing groups for doctoral education
Future," Collect. Manag., vol. 44, no. 2–4, pp. 334–347, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/01462679.2018.1562396.[2] D. E. Purcell, The Strategic Value of Standards Education. Center for Global Standards Analysis, 2008.[3] D. E. Purcell, "A National Survey of United States Standards Education Content and Priorities Among Standards Education Groups," Center for Global Standards Analysis, Aug. 2010.[4] "Phase I: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering.," American Society for Engineering Education, Arlington, VA, May 2013.[5] B. Harding and P. McPherson, "What do employers want in terms of employee knowledge of technical standards and the process of standardization," Am. Soc
%), communicating clearly (12.9%), being available outside of class (7.2%), andtreating all students with respect (6.0%). Being an expert in the content area was ranked as thefirst choice for effective TA teaching by only 6.0% of students in this study, underscoring thefact that what TAs think they should be doing may be very different from what students expectthem to do.This Study:This study seeks to expand upon existing knowledge regarding what engineering students expectfrom TAs in four different ways: (a) by exploring TA support in courses within two popularengineering disciplines (mechanical and electrical engineering); (b) by using open-ended, shortanswer questions rather than close-ended Likert scale questions to allow students to fully exploretheir
.[6] E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan. 2012. Self-determination theory. In Handbook of theories of socialpsychology, P.A.M. van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, and E.T. Higgins (Eds.). Sage PublicationsLtd., 416–436.[7] C.S. Dweck. 2006. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.[8] Chang, Y., Voils, C. I., Sandelowski, M., Hasselblad, V., & Crandell, J. L. (2009).Transforming verbal counts in reports of qualitative descriptive studies into numbers. Westernjournal of nursing research, 31(7), 837-852.[9] Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview forassessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational ResearchJournal, 23(4), 614-628.[10] Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring
., Mitra. M., Prout, B., Cross. K., Shittu, H., Mohsin, M., OuroKoura, H., Collinge, M., “Summer Exchange Program: A Unique Platform to Broaden Exposure and Address Several Dimensions of Learning” Proceedings of 2018 Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, June 23-27, 2018, Salt Lake City https://peer.asee.org/31033 4. Nagchaudhuri, A., Reyna, A., Das, A., and Cuppett, J., "Introductory Experiential Learning Projects Using Soft Robotics and Embedded Systems," 18th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA), Taipei, Taiwan, 2022, pp. 1-6, doi:10.1109/MESA55290.2022.10004395. 5. Jackson, A., Mentzer, N., & Kramerbottiglio, R. (2020
faculty in engineering who were adjacent to this work and acknowledged atthe end of the paper. From the analysis, four themes were identified: (a) Counter-storytelling, (b)Structural Determinism (c) Language Origins, and (d) Community Cultural- Navigational,Aspirational, Social, and Familial Capital. Two emerging themes identified were Arrebatos andNepantla; and Hidden Curriculum. From the findings, a collective narrative was generated byweaving the stories and experiences of the authors. From the narrative, we conclude withrecommendations for future faculty development programs as they consider faculties’ non-Monolithic backgrounds, cultures, languages, and experiences in engineering education. It is thehope of this paper that more consciousness
development: Engineering, globalization, and social justice. Journal of Engineering Studies, 2(1), 29–59.Palmer, B., Terenzini, P., McKenna, A. F., Harper, B. J., & Merson, D. (2011). Design in context: Where do the engineers of 2020 learn this skill. Proceedings of the 118th Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education.Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.Strehl, E., Loweth, R., & Daly, S. (2022). Evaluation of a Hybrid Learning Block Model for Engineering Design Interview Skill Building. Advances in Engineering Education, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.18260/3-1-1153-36037Wood, A. E., &
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 12-1300).Chacon-Hurtado, D., & Sirota, S., & Hertel, S. (2022, August), Teaching Engineering for Human Rights: Lessons Learned from a case study-based undergraduate class Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--41593Chacon-Hurtado, D., Kazerounian, K., Hertel, S., Mellor, J., Barry, J. J., & Ravindran, T. (2023). Engineering for human rights: The Theory and practice of a human rights–based approach to engineering. Science, Technology, & Human Values, forthcoming (onlinefirst).Covell, K., & Howe, R. B. (1999). The impact of children's rights education: Canadian study. International Journal
Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.27347[12] Andrawis, M. (2011, June), Using Active Learning in TeachingElectromagnetics Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2—18538[13] Cheville, A., & Derr, B. H. (2016, June), Using Videos to Elicit Self-Explanations ofEmergent Electromagnetic Concepts Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.27172[14] Shao, Y. V., & Cheng, Z. (2021, July), Work in Progress: Synergy of Visualization andExperiment in Undergraduate Engineering Electromagnetics Course Paper presented at2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference.https://peer.asee.org/38199[15] González-Carvajal, E. J., &
the lab writing instructional materials before and after the introduction to the web-basedguides. Focus groups with some of the instructors included, among others, were also conductedin June 2022, January 2023 [15], and June 2023 to assess faculty implementation of the guides. (a) The front page of the instructor’s guide (b) A portion of the assessment module (c) The front page of the student’s guide (d) A portion of the data analysis moduleFigure 1. Sample pages from the Instructor’s (a, b) and Student’s (c, d) Guides3. Results and Discussion3.1 Quantitative analysis of the modules used by the participating lab instructorsTable 3 shows the results of our quantitative analysis. The instructor of ECE 214 used elevendifferent
questions students were provided with for career mapping activity alongwith (b) an example.Speed Networking: Each session consisted of a 10-minute interaction of one volunteer with twostudents. Students were encouraged to ask questions to learn about the volunteer’s profession,and the volunteer got to learn about the students’ interest, favorite subjects, career goals andprovide relevant career resources accordingly. Based on informal feedback, we found that careermapping and speed networking provided participants with similar opportunities of interactionswith volunteers. As such, we have decided to focus on either of the two activities in futureiterations of the event. However, all students and volunteers appreciated the time to discuss
process that they were taught: identifying membersof a frame or machine, drawing free body diagrams of members of a frame or machine, andsolving for forces in members of a frame or machine. The results of this survey are shown in Figure 1: Survey Results Ranking Student Confidence in Their Ability to Identify Members of a Frame or Machine (Panel A; n=22), Ability to Draw Free Body Diagrams (Panel B; n=23), and Ability to Solve for Forces in Members (Panel C; n=22).Figure 1 with the solid black bars. About 60% of the students indicated that they were somewhatconfident in identifying the members of a frame or machine and an additional 27% said that theywere confident in this step of the analysis. For the next step of the analysis, drawing free
whether an individual stays in a field[34]. Lehman et al. [32] follow the persistence of first- and second-year undergraduate studentson an annual basis for five years and consider students who remain in a CS major to becomputing persisters. Other examples of behavioral persistence include taking another course[31], enrolling in and graduating from a Master’s or PhD program [38], and staying in aprofessional position [39] in CS. In the present study, participants who exhibit behavioralpersistence are those who currently study CS and/or hold a professional position in the field. B. CS Support ProgramsCS support programs include summer camps, afterschool programs, workshops, and seminarsthat span from one to four weeks [22] and are offered by
Paper ID #42461Designing Good Practices for Recruitment, Admissions, and Program Structureof Engineering Outreach Programs to Increase Access for Marginalized andNon-Traditional Higher Education StudentsDr. Sonia Travaglini, Stanford University Dr. Sonia Travaglini specializes in the intersection of engineering and learning, and is an educator passionate about new technologies and collaboration. Sonia also enjoys supporting engineering outreach with local community colleges and schools.Aya Mouallem, Stanford University Aya Mouallem (she/her) is a PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. She received
Paper ID #42078Leveraging Familia: Equipando Padres Program Pilot for Hispanic Parentsand Caregivers of First-Generation-to-College Engineering StudentsDr. Dayna Lee Mart´ınez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Dayna is a Senior Director of Research & Impact at the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), where she leads a team of professionals who specialize in data-driven design and implementation of programs and services to empower pre-college students, parents, graduate students, and faculty members in STEM fields, with a particular focus on advancing Hispanic representation and success. With
. 2012, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.652929.[18] G. Goldschmidt, “Linkographic Evidence for Concurrent Divergent and Convergent Thinking in Creative Design,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 115–122, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2016.1162497.[19] L. T. B. Tran, N. T. Ho, and R. J. Hurle, “Teaching for Creativity Development: Lessons Learned from a Preliminary Study of Vietnamese and International Upper (High) Secondary School Teachers’ Perceptions and Lesson Plans,” Creat. Educ., vol. 07, no. 07, pp. 1024–1043, 2016, doi: 10.4236/ce.2016.77107.[20] J. Teng, X. Wang, K. Lu, X. Qiao, and N. Hao, “Domain-specific and Domain-general Creativity Differences between Expert and Novice Designers,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 34, no
Paper ID #42007Validity Evidence for the Sophomore Engineering Experiences SurveyMiss Fanyi Zhang, Purdue University Fanyi is a third-year Ph.D. student at Purdue University. She majors in Industrial-Organizational Psychology and works as a Graduate Research Assistant for the Women in Engineering program. Her area of interest focuses on conceptualizing and promoting flourishing and understanding the dynamics of positive relationships. Her current research agenda includes developing a mentor support framework and promoting the effective design of mentor training.Dr. Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University Beth Holloway is
goal line officials." Research in Sports Medicine 22, no. 4 (2014): 425-437.12. Taylor, Lee, Samuel L. Watkins, Hannah Marshall, Ben J. Dascombe, and Josh Foster. "The impact of different environmental conditions on cognitive function: a focused review." Frontiers in physiology 6 (2016): 372.13. Hocking, Chris, Richard B. Silberstein, Wai Man Lau, Con Stough, and Warren Roberts. "Evaluation of cognitive performance in the heat by functional brain imaging and psychometric testing." Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 128, no. 4 (2001): 719-734.14. Choi, Yoorim, Minjung Kim, and Chungyoon Chun. "Effect of temperature on attention ability based on electroencephalogram
directors on their role in changing a man’s world,” ESPN, Mar. 11, 2021.[8] J. Wolkin, “Red Bull Racing Highlights Female Engineers in Formula 1,” Forbes, Oct. 04, 2023.[9] D. M. Hatmaker, “Engineering Identity: Gender and Professional Identity Negotiation among Women Engineers: IDENTITY NEGOTIATION AMONG WOMEN ENGINEERS,” Gend. Work Organ., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 382–396, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x.[10] S. Alavi, “Opinion: Female-dominated liberal arts imperative in male-dominated tech world,” The Tulane Hullabaloo, Dec. 06, 2023.[11] P. Gardner and L. A. Jackson, “Are you serious? Women in Engineering,” Am. Educ. Res. Assoc. Annu. Conf., pp. 1–18, 1989.[12] B. Arthur, B. Guy, E. Armitage, M. Labarre
, Aberdeen Scotland Uk: ACM, Jul. 2019, pp. 9–15. doi: 10.1145/3304221.3319764.[2] A. Kapoor and C. Gardner-Mccune, “Categorizing Research on Identity in Undergraduate Computing Education,” in Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, in Koli Calling ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Nov. 2022, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1145/3564721.3565948.[3] A. M. Wofford, L. J. Sax, K. L. George, D. Ramirez, and C. Nhien, “Advancing equity in graduate pathways: Examining the factors that sustain and develop computing graduate aspirations,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 110–136, 2022.[4] B. Bond-Trittipo, S. Secules, and N. Kumar, “Future Career Pathway
, A. Jaiswal, T. L. Amuah, M. Z. Bula, M. S. Ud Duha, and J. C. Richardson, “Characterizing Team Cognition Within Software Engineering Teams in an Undergraduate Course,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 87–99, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1109/TE.2023.3327059.[23] S. Kumar and I. Chong, “Correlation Analysis to Identify the Effective Data in Machine Learning: Prediction of Depressive Disorder and Emotion States,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 15, no. 12, p. 2907, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122907.[24] V. Clarke and V. Braun, “Thematic analysis,” J. Posit. Psychol., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 297– 298, 2017.[25] E. G. Guba and Y. S. Lincoln, Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, 1989.[26] B
to build this version of the circuitwere successful.Figure 3: LED calculator circuit using (a) discrete components and (b) an input/output PCB [31]Intellectually challenging PBL projects that maintain a high success rate are vital for building self-efficacy among students. In the summer 2019, a PCB version of the LED calculator activity wasdeveloped that uses surface-mounted components for the 5V regulator, switches, LEDs, andresistors. See Figure 3b. By abstracting away the complex input and output circuitry, campers wereable to focus on the wiring connections between the switches, logic gates, and LED outputs,thereby increasing the success rate of building the LED calculator to 100% for the 36 students whoparticipated when the camp was
for those items was: In my School, it is easy for me to findsupport services for a) Psychological accompaniment, b) Planning my career with academiccounseling, c) Receiving academic tutoring, d) Find health and wellness support services, ande) Get involved in sports and complementary areas (leadership, diversity, and gender,participatory meetings, etc.). For this dimension of "Perceived Institutional Support," thepossible response scale of the Likert type included the possibility of answering with 0. I donot know that service. Table 1. Sample items by survey dimensions. Dimensions Sample items Sense of belonging- I feel comfortable asking a teacher for help when I don't understand the subject
course. Social forces, 87(3), 1591-1621. [27] Laschever, S., & Babcock, L. (2021). Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the GenderDivide. [28] Ivie, Rachel, and Casey Langer Tesfaye. "Women in physics: A tale of limits." PhysicsToday 65.2 (2012), 47. [29] Grant, L., Kennelly, I., & Ward, K. B. (2000). Revisiting the gender, marriage, andparenthood puzzle in scientific careers. Women's Studies Quarterly, 28(1/2), 62-85. [30] O’Laughlin, E. M., & Bischoff, L. G. (2005). Balancing parenthood and academiawork/family stress as influenced by gender and tenure status. Journal of Family Issues, 26(1),79-106 [31] Xie, Y. (2006, November). Social influences on science and engineering career decisions.In Biological, Social, and Organizational
as non-white, more than 25%have an individualized education plan, and English language learners consist of 18%. Whileworking with the teachers, we appointed youth leaders who were representative of the studentbody and displayed patience, curiosity and camaraderie with others. Youth leaders will bere-elected each year and students in lower grades have already expressed interest in participating.Below is a breakdown of the youth leader demographics. School School A School B % not male 60% 80% % not White 80% 40% Languages spoken English and Spanish English, Albanian, Spanish, NepaliStarting
-White, K. M. Soria, E. K. B. Tower, and O. G. Horner, “Factors associated with anxiety and depression among U.S. doctoral students: Evidence from the gradSERU survey,” J. Am. Coll. Heal., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1865975.[8] H. K. Allen, F. Lilly, K. M. Green, F. Zanjani, K. B. Vincent, and A. M. Arria, “Graduate student burnout: Substance use, mental health, and the moderating role of advisor satisfaction,” Int. J. Ment. Health Addict., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1–17, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/S11469-020-00431-9.[9] M. Schmidt and E. Hansson, “Doctoral students’ well-being: A literature review,” Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2018, doi: 10.1080
; Education, Feb. 2020[6] P. Abichandani, V. Sivakumar, D. Lobo, C. Iaboni, and P. Shekhar, “Internet-of-thingscurriculum, pedagogy, and assessment for stem education: A review of literature,” IEEE Access,vol. 10, pp. 351–369, 2022[7] L. Hong, L. Keel and C. McCurry, “Work-in-Progress: Enhance Undergraduate ElectricalEngineering Education with CPS/IoT Infusion,” in ASEE Annual Conference, July 2021[8] B. Burd, L. Barker, M. Divitini, J. Guerra, F. Perez, I. Russell, B. Siever, L. Tudor, M.McCarthy and I. Pollock “The Internet of Things in CS Education: Updating Curricula andExploring Pedagogy.” In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation andTechnology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2018, Association for ComputingMachinery
Taxonomy. (a) Illustration summarizing previous literature and a pre/post lecturetest study conducted by Dr. Alissa Brink. (b) The illustration depicts this study’s method inintegrating lecture learning outcomes with Bloom's Taxonomy in pre/post self-assessment toevaluate student learning from the lecture. (c) Students' scores from pre/post self-assessmentconducted before and after the lecture, categorized according to different levels of Bloom'sTaxonomy.IntroductionFormative assessment is an ongoing process to check on student’s understanding and support theirprogress. Formative assessment is a crucial tool in engineering education, known for enhancingstudents’ progress towards achieving learning outcomes. In bioengineering education
/tea.21601Davis, M. E., Cunningham, C. M., & Lachapelle, C. P. (2017). They can’t spell “engineering” but they can do it: Designing an engineering curriculum for the preschool classroom. Zero to Three Journal, 37(5), 4–11.Hammack, R., Yeter, I.H., Pavlovich, C., & Boz, T. (2024). Pre-service elementary teachers’ science and engineering teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy: Exploring the impacts of efficacy source experiences through varying course modalities. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00464-9Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1037