Page 19.6.5 Figure 3: Q&A interactions occurred on the Piazza System2.3 Pedagogy of Inverted, Interactive and International LearningAbove all, the inverted learning process goes beyond the popular flipped classroom approach [2-5]. In a typical flipped class, the instructor assigns preview materials to students based on whatshe/he thinks they need to learn. Students complete the homework before schoolwork begins;then the instructor goes through key materials during the class time with a mixture of lecturesand/or exercises. The homework and schoolwork materials are same/similar in nature and aremostly based on what the instructor thinks students need to learn. With inverted learning, theinstructor first assigns pre-class study
. Page 19.2.33.1 Detailed Schemes in the Research There are different and more numerous types of questions and answers betweenlearners and teaching staff in the distance learning environment. Fig.1 shows anexample of questions and answers (denoted Q/As) from learners (denoted S1 to S4) andteaching staff (denoted T), respectively. For instance, there may be a volley of answersfor Q3 if it is assumed to be of the highest priority at a certain time during the process oflectures/seminars. It is more effective to timely enhance dynamics between learners andteaching staff by making the usage of shared space mobile Q/A integration. It is alsopossible for any S to get an answer for each question uploaded if it can be found andmatched in the knowledge
students required an alternative route (a program in Mexico oradditional training to achieve the scores necessary for admission consideration). Table 2 belowshows the three groups. Page 19.19.9Table 2: Application Group Table Post Post GRE Post GRE Degree Student * Group Department Confirmed Accepted Note TOEFL V Q Programs 1 100 151 152 1 Computer Science & Engineering MS Spring 2015 2
Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration,” Q. J. Econ., vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 1279–1333, Nov. 2003.[3] Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Phase II, Committee on Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. 2005.[4] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 87–101, Jan. 2005.[5] L. Springer, M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan, “Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 21–51
entitled: StrategicAlignment of Electrical and Information Engineering in European Higher Education Institutions.Bibliography1. Project website http://www.saleie.co.uk2. EAEEIE-organization http://www.eaeeie.org/?q=node/163. “Report on existing programmes orientated to the key global challenges.” SALEIE Project Report. Maincontributors: Marian Poboroniuc (Romania), Anthony Ward (UK), Nina Bencheva (Bulgaria), GheorgheLivint (Romania), Noel Jackson (UK), Ernest Cachia (Malta), Antoanela Naaji (Romania), Dimitar Dimitrov(Bulgaria), Yoana Ruseva (Bulgaria), Dorin Popescu(Romania), Dorian Cojocaru(Romania), Laura Grindei(Romania), Gert Jervan(Estonia), Jean-Marc Thiriet(France).http://www.saleie.co.uk/Deliverables/Deliverable3_1.html4. “SALEIE – WP3
. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Nilsson, C-H. (1997) Technology Management - A multi-disciplinary Master Program in Lund, Proceedings of6th International Conference on Management of Technology, June 25-28, Göteborg, Sweden. Nilsson C.-H., Johnsson C., Jun J., Yang Q., Luo S. (2012): “SME creation facilitation process at theuniversities”, West lake International Conference on Small and Medium Businesses (WLICSMB), Hangzhou,China, October 2012Nilsson C.-H., Johnsson C., Helmersson H. (2013): “Evaluation of a Cross-Cultural, Cross-Faculty Course –iMDE international Market-Driven Engineering Using Traditional Course Evaluation and PERTEX”. 22ndNordic Academy of Management Conference 2013, Reykjavik, Iceland, August 21-23, 2013Rittel, Horst W. J., and Webber
the inability to make edits toprevious posts. Piazza provides the option for wiki-style Q&A posts initiated by either studentsor faculty. When a student has a course-related question, one of the instructors or other studentscan respond. Students can collaborate to co-edit responses or make changes in their own posts toclarify or add details. Piazza includes the use of many social media strategies such as includingkeyword hash tags, adding "likes" to favorite posts, tagging of individual posts that areparticularly useful and archiving messages for later review. The freeform nature of discussionwithin this platform worked well for the diverse needs of a large enrollment class and moreclosely simulated a natural dialog that might take place