, worked for the DuPont Co, and has been at WPI since 1980. His current interests are in educational research: the process of student learning, international engineering education, and educational assessment. Collaboration with two colleagues resulted in being awarded the 2001 William Corcoran Award from Chemical Engineering Education. He served as 2004 chair of the ASEE ChE Division, has served as an ABET program evaluator and on the AIChE/ABET Education & Accreditation Committee. He has also served as Assessment Coordinator in WPI’s Interdis- Page 20.34.1 ciplinary and Global Studies Division and as
thefundamental source of human conflict in this new world will not be primarily ideological orprimarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflictwill be culture.” 2 As described above, attention to the “soft skill” of global competency forengineers is now a visible and growing component of engineering education and practice. Theestablishment of the International ASEE Forum in 2012, for example, speaks to the importanceof and attention to this area.However, just as the meaning of engineering varies across both time and nation, the idea of“global competency” differs from one academic institution to another. For the purposes of thispaper, we align our understanding of global competency with the definition offered
4Cultural Dimensions of International Business, 2005, Prentice Hall) are also integrated.G. Hofstede studied questionnaires received from employees at IBM branches across the world and useddata from 40 countries in order to define a suite of national cultural indices (Geert Hofstede, Culturesand Organizations: Software of the Mind, 2010). Hofstede initially defined four bipolar dimensions andlater added an additional two dimensions. According to Hofstede, the four fundamental “mental(software) programs” we assimilate early in life are a function of our cultural environment and consist offour primary cultural dimensions: (1) Power Distance; (2) Individualism; (3) Masculinity; (4)Uncertainty avoidance. The (PDI) reflects how equally power is
and future class offerings.Bibliography(1) Mitcham, Munoz, Humanitarian Engineering, Synthesis Lectures on Engineers,Technology and Society 2010, 87 pages, (doi:10.2200/S00248ED1V01Y201006ETS012)(2) Onyije & Francis ,“Technology Solution for the Marginalized” European Scientific JournalJune edition vol. 8, No.13, 2012(3) website: https://www.msudenver.edu/strategicplanning/missionvaluesvision(4) website: https://www.asme.org/(5) D. Weichert, B. Rauhut, R. Schmidt, Educating the Engineer for the 21st Century, ISBN:978-1-4020-0096-6 (Print) 978-0-306-48394-3 (Online)(6) R. Caldwell, "Project Design Handbook," Tango International, Cooperative for Assistanceand Relief Everywhere, Inc. (CARE), 2002(7) M. Bauer, Quantitative Assessment of
communication and teamwork skills.ABET therefore now proposes improvement for the knowledge, skills and professional values for thegraduating students. In addition, analysis of the industry studies, together with the review of theABET accreditation criteria and study of engineering education reveals that the industryemployers and the students are looking for significant changes to the current philosophy anddelivery of engineering education [5]. These issues can be summarized as follows: 1. Engineering curricula does not provide sufficient integration of engineering science and technical topics to industrial practices. 2. Programs at times do not provide sufficient design experiences to students. 3. Graduates lack communication skills as well