attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313-350.[4] Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 429-449.[5] Songer, N.B. (1996). Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated networkenhanced classrooms: A case of kids as global scientists. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 297–328.[6] D. Fortus, R.C. Dershimer, J. Krajcik, R.W. Marx and R. Mamlok-Naaman, design based science and student learning, J. Research Sci. Teaching, 41, 1081-1110 (2004).[7] Roberts, P. (1995). The place of design in technology education. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in
developing and delivering acourse on engineering for non-engineers, with the hope of finding better ways to teach engineering topicsto students who usually learn very little about them. The course was innovative in three areas: gave aquantitative understanding of engineering design to liberal arts majors, it based on solving an interestingengineering problem rather than on the basics of any engineering discipline, and it was interdisciplinary,including excursions into history, literature, science, ecology, and philosophy. The problem area was thatof manned space flight, which was chosen because of its inherent fascination for many people, because itprovided opportunities to touch on a wide variety of engineering topics, and because of the
includes monitoring oftemperature, wind speed and direction and a simulated hazardous gas (carbon dioxide).Each of these projects is viewed as a system and groups are required to proceed through the first fourstages of the total design process, developing context diagrams and use cases on their selected concept.Figure 3. Engineering Design II Crane ProjectFor the conceptual stage, the use of a systematic evaluation of their ideas is encouraged through the use ofa Pugh Matrix1 in which concepts are plotted versus customer acceptance criteria and are each rated basedon an assessment of whether the concept can meet, exceed or does not meet each of the criteria. The fifthstage would be to develop system specifications to guide the physical realization
Computer Based Testing to Enhance Effective Teaching of International M.S. Students in Teaching-oriented Schools Saikat Ray Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering University of Bridgeport saikatr@bridgeport.eduAbstract Several teaching-oriented universities in the U.S.A. cater to a large number of engineeringM.S. degree seeking international students. In their home countries, many of these students undergo anexamination-oriented education system where studying intensely just before the examination is asrewarding as studying throughout the year. As a result, these students are
postsecondary study in STEM disciplines. Each state in the country is allocatedESEA monies based on a formula funding model. The 2008 funding estimate for the Title II program isapproximately 4.1 billion dollars of a 127 billion dollar education budget to the states.The Engineering Department at Roger Williams University has partnered with the Rhode IslandDepartment of Education (RIDE) and the Bristol Warren School District under an innovative partnershipcalled PRIMES (Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers and Scientists)to take advantage of the ESEA Title II, Part B opportunities. This article will discuss the background ofthe STEM pipeline challenge, nature of the joint partnership, its challenges and successes, as
A Modern but Simple Approach to Teaching Friction Sarosh Patel, Manan Joshi and Lawrence Hmurcik Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Bridgeport {saroshp, mjoshi, hmurick}@bridgeport.eduAbstract- We present an experiment for measuring friction, using interleaved sheets of paper. Ourresults support the modern theory that friction is dependent on surface contact area (A). Also, ourresults support the classical theory of friction being proportional to the normal force (N), but this isonly true over a limited range of N, where the “effective” area of contact increases in a mannerproportional to N. Outside of this
youngsters have an inquisitive mindand when nurtured have the potential for some engineering or related technical career. As we venture intothe future it is imperative that we (engineering faculty) reach out to the youngsters of every gender andethnic identity exposing them to the essence of engineering, exciting them to consider joining our ranksfor the future well-being of humankind.PHILIP L. BRACH, PH.D., P.E., F-NSPEDistinguished Professor (Emeritus), former Dean, Past President, DCSPE, current DCSPE Representative to theNSPE House of Delegates. Currently teaching and doing research in the Civil Engineering and STEM programs atUDC. He is the Past State Coordinator for DC MATHCOUNTS and has over 45 years of teaching, engineeringpractice and
1989).Author biographiesSYED S. RIZVI is a Ph.D. student of Computer Engineering at University of Bridgeport. He received a B.S. inComputer Engineering from Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology and an M.S. in Computer 5Engineering from Old Dominion University in 2001 and 2005 respectively. In the past, he has done research onbioinformatics projects where he investigated the use of Linux based cluster search engines for finding the desiredproteins in input and outputs sequences from multiple databases. For last one year, his research focused primarily onthe modeling and simulation of wide range parallel/distributed
comprehensive model for VLSI education. This was presented at theCanadian Conference on Engineering Education (C2 E2) at University of Novas Costia in1998, which received wide acclaim from the academia and industrial leaders, thereafter.The model primarily consists of five phases: 1) Fundamentals 2) Materials 3) Devices 4)Circuits and 5) VLSI system. Each phase has to be taught and learnt by students in theirentirety as depicted in Figure 1. A comprehensive testing and verification for learningassessment has been developed for all these phases in order to prepare the students for21st century.Most of the fundamentals are learnt through Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics and DigitalLogic courses. Heavy emphasis is however laid upon Silicon, which is in the
U.S. National Academies Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. 2006, National Academies Press, Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in 6 Academic Science and Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine: Washington, DC.[6] Gilmartin, S., et al., Gender ratios in high school science departments: The effect of percent female faculty on multiple dimensions of students' science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2007. 44(7): p. 980-1009.[7] Phipps, A., Re-inscribing gender binaries: Deconstructing the dominant discourse
University: Assistant Dean for Scientific Research Years of Service: 22 Languages: Arabic, and English Engineering Field: Civil Engineering Education: BS: University of Ein Shams- Egypt Master’s: University of Surrey- United Kingdom Ph. D.: University of Michigan- USATHE INTERVIEWThe two authors prepared the survey of this investigation in the personal one-on-one interviewformat. The interview with each engineering educator revolved about ten specific questions.These questions are listed next.1. What are the languages that you are fluent in?2. What is your favorite teaching language?3. Why do you consider your answer in the question above to be
Effect of Defects on Mechanical Properties of Composites: Undergraduate Research on Materials Mir M. Atiqullah Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology Southern Polytechnic State University 1100 South Marietta Parkway, Marietta GA 30060 matiqull@spsu.eduAbstractUndergraduate research in engineering and technology is gaining popularity as an added opportunity oflearning and a gateway to advanced studies. Many students find undergraduate research as a tryout forpotential graduate studies, as well as a way to establish relationship with research faculty
Teaching Engineering Design with a focus on the developing world Beena Sukumaran, Joshua Bonzella, Kevin McGarvey, Heather Klein College of Engineering, Rowan UniversityAbstractThe paper describes a program, Entrepreneurs without Borders and a project undertaken through theprogram. The program seeks to establish entrepreneurship opportunities for the developing world. Thiswill be done through student teams comprising both engineering and business majors at RowanUniversity. The engineering and business students perform a survey of local communities in thedeveloping world, identified as having a need for engineering skills by Engineers without Borders1.During this initial survey, the students
. Bergendahl, J.A. (2005) “Toward a Broader Technical Education for Engineers”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 131:4, 257-262.4. Camacho, M., and Good, R. (1989) “Problem Solving and Chemical Equilibrium: Successful versus Unsuccessful Performance”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 26:3, 251-272.5. Estes, Allen C., Ronald W. Welch, and Stephen J. Ressler (2004) “Questioning: Bring Your Students Along on the Journey”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 130:4, 237-242.6. Estes, Allen C., Ronald W. Welch, and Stephen J. Ressler (2005) “Teaching Lessons Learned: The ExCEEd Teaching Model”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Course Learning Outcome Measurements”, BestAssessment Processes VIII, Rose-Hulman, Feb. 2006. 7Biographical InformationJohn Adams completed his PhDEE at the University of Massachusetts in 1990, after which he joined theEngineering and Public Policy Department of Carnegie Mellon University as Research Faculty. Hisresearch interests include biological effects of electromagnetic fields, visualization of electromagneticfields, and the use of experiential learning techniques in teaching Electromagnetics. He presently isAssociate Professor and Chair of the Department of Electrical Engineering of Merrimack College.Charles Kochakian graduated from
conferences.IntroductionThe weakness of the traditional lecture is well established by the regular calls from the academicworld to improve the standard of teaching (1-3). The lecture method of teaching must be replacedby providing more empowerment to students in various categories of learning such as design,discovery, innovation, and creativity (4,5).The objective of this paper is to describe the effect of various types of student empowermentprojects on student performance in a civil engineering course.MethodologyA course, CE 342: Transportation Engineering repeated over four years was considered. In theyear 2000, the course was taught in the traditional lecture format for nineteen students. Theaverage grade for this student population was sixty nine out of one
"Multidisciplinarianism". in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2000. St. Louis, MO.2. Sahin, F. and W. Walter. Multidisciplinary Microrobotics Teaching Activities in Engineering Education. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2003. Nashville, TN. 5 3. Felder, R.M., Reaching the Second Tier -- Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 1993. 22(5): p. 286-90. BiographiesDr. Jennifer L. ZirnheldJennifer Zirnheld received her Ph.D in 2004 and is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department ofElectrical Engineering at the University
toeveryone to ponder and contemplate at any time and can serve as a model for researching otherdisciplines.Forty years ago, mathematicians exhibited pride in their ability to hide geometric or visual representationsof mathematical concepts. The mathematics reform of the 1990’s sanctioned the representation offunctions as single valued curves. More remains to be done. Currently, Proof Without Words is anongoing feature of the MAA monthly, The College Mathematics Journal. Examine the wonderfulcompilations, Proofs Without Words 1 and Proofs Without Words II 2 by Roger B. Nelsen. Examine alsoMath Made Visual by Claudi Alsina & Roger B. Nelson 4. While mathematicians may enjoy the puzzlesprovided by Proofs Without Words, an effective pedagogical tool
Assessing the Impact of New Teaching Methods by Predicting Student PerformanceAbstractMany teachers try new things in the classroom with the intent of making learning more effective.In most cases, assessment of the impact is anecdotal; the teacher surveys the students about thenew technique and draws conclusions based on their feedback. In order to more definitivelyprove the impact, better assessment tools are needed. In a recent study, the authors attempted topredict performance in a course and then measure the improvement due to a major change in theavailable resources for study outside the classroom in our fundamentals of engineering course.To measure the effectiveness, we used the GPA of the students at the start of the semester
Effect of Conformity and Plastic Thickness on Contact Stresses in Metal Backed Plastic Implants”, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 107, 1985, p. 193-199.[21] Bartel, D. L., Bicknell V. L., and Wright T. M., “The Effect of Conformity, Thickness, and Material on Stresses in Ultra-High Molecular Weight Components for Total Joint Replacement”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 68-A (7), 1986, p. 1041-1051.[22] Implants & Materials in Orthopedics, http://www.orthoteers.co.uk/Nrujpij33Lm/Orthbiomat.htm.BiographyR. Radharamanan: Dr. R. Radharamanan is a professor in the Department of Mechanical and IndustrialEngineering at Mercer University in Macon, Georgia. He has thirty five years of teaching, research, and
sections containingapproximately 25 students. There is a relatively even mixture of sophomore, junior and senior studentsthat enroll in the class. The pre-requisite is college algebra.The motivation for teaching Introduction to Engineering in an online format arose from threeconsiderations. First, the UNH Co-op program accommodates many students on co-op assignments acrossthe New England area. Many of these students desire to take required courses while away on their co-opassignments. Second, the online course affords convenience for student with unusual schedules and forstudents who do not live close to campus. It provides these students with the opportunity to earn coursecredits without leaving their communities. Third, offering the course in a
: Possible Scores for Student X and Student Y This approach has several features that we find desirable. First, it allows us to establish, publish,and score against an ex ante standard rather than using a student’s ex post rank to determine grades. Thismeans that a student knows where they stand in the course as soon as they receive the solutions and 4scores rather than waiting until the end of the course to see their ranking. In line with current research oneffective teaching, we have avoided a grading system that puts students in competition with theirclassmates and we keep students informed of their progress throughout the term.8 Second, if a student is
prosperity, the knowledge that NPEA provides can open significant career, discovery, andtechnology leadership opportunities. NPEA also surveys the implications of nuclear technology to instillawareness about what “responsible application” can mean.For nuclear engineering and engineering physics majors and minors, NPEA is the first in a sequence ofrequired courses that prepare students for a career involving nuclear technology. For the typically 20% ofstudents who are non-majors/minors, NPEA provides the concepts and specialized vocabulary necessary toengage with the nuclear engineering and engineering physics fields. To achieve this, the course is presentedin three units. I. Particle collision mechanics, special relativity, particle-wave duality
Changing World: Operational Concept for the Intellectual Domain of the StudentLeader Development System, 3rd edition. Office of the Dean, United States Military Academy, 2005.5 ibid, pg. 10.6 ibid, pg. 12.7 Burk, R.C. and Burk, R.K. Comparing Organic vs. Assigned UAV Support to the Maneuver Company. Presentedat the NATO Research and Technology Symposium on Platform Innovations and Systems Integration for UnmannedAir, Land and Sea Vehicles, AVT-147 Florence Italy, May 2007. Published in the proceedings.AuthorRobin Burk joined the faculty of the United States Military Academy in 2001, where she has taught as anadjunct assistant professor in both the Electrical Engineering & Computer Science and the SystemsEngineering departments. Prior to
simulations of virtual models, environments, and processes. The centerprovides a unique laboratory/classroom environment for immersive interaction with models,environments, data, and processes in engineering and the sciences. The center merges teaching andresearch activities into a powerful discovery environment in which faculty and students share a problem-solving tool for exploration of any subject using methods that are impossible in a physical laboratory.The first course that will be implemented in the classroom is our freshman engineering problemsolving/programming course using Matlab.The different phases of design and implementation of this very sophisticated classroom as well as the firstsemester teaching and learning experiences in this new
coordinated networkenhanced classrooms: A case of kids as global scientists. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 297–328. [6] D. Fortus, R.C. Dershimer, J. Krajcik, R.W. Marx and R. Mamlok-Naaman, design based science and student learning, J. Research Sci. Teaching, 41, 1081-1110 (2004). [7] Roberts, P. (1995). The place of design in technology education. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (pp. 27–38). UNESCO. [8] Baynes, K. (1994). Designerly play. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University of Technology. [9] Simon, H.A. (1999). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [10] Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT
games, ranging from introductory courses tomerging with the major. Much of this research on engineering mathematics integration focuses onprogramming, software engineering, artificial intelligence, and graphics. However, game design coursesdo not usually broach engineering mathematics theory, including mathematical foundations. Althoughpath finding, artificial intelligence, and game physics use theory and mathematics, scoring can involvemany mathematical concepts as well, as discussed in this paper.1.3 Linking Scoring to Engineering mathematicsAs discussed in Section 1.1, games may involve a large degree of numerical computation through scoringeither internally or externally. This paper demonstrates that scores can offer applications of
, UNC at Charlotte has an overall out of state ratio of just 12%.In contrast to that, for the Motorsports focus of the Mechanical Engineering department, out of statestudents represent a whopping 53%!Creating the engaging environmentMuch discussion has gone into teaching to the so called „Millennial‟ students. Their high pacedupbringing, shuttled from one activity to the next, and packed with instant feedback web access requires acompensatory education. It was decided that the Motorsports program needed to provide continuousfeedback in concert with classroom lectures. In order to fully develop the program, UNC at Charlotte hasinvested not only in supporting a large collection of race teams but has also supplemented them with acomplete race shop
. “Can Students Learn from Lecture Demonstrations?” Journal of College Science Teaching, Vol. 36, Issue 4, 2007, pp. 45-49.4. Benjamin Bloom, M. Englehart, E. Furst, W. Hill, and D. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: McKay.5. Richard Felder, “The Future of Engineering Education: II. Teaching Methods That Work,” Journal of Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 34, Issue 1, 2000, pp. 26-39.BiographiesAdam J. HalsteadAdam Halstead is a Ph.D student at the University at Buffalo. He received his B.S. in 2005 andhis M.S. in 2007, both from the University at Buffalo. His research interests lie in multifactorstress aging of electrical systems and partial
. Methods of obtainingbusiness experience are also offered.IntroductionMany university instructors have long careers in academia. Some of these instructors have had contactwith industrial companies in the form of research projects, grants, internships, and various other forms ofwork. All of these can be beneficial to the quality of teaching in the engineering classroom. Manyadjuncts and a few full time faculty members bring significant experience to the classroom. Someuniversities find value in this experience and seek out experienced professionals for their faculty. Manyuniversities find little value in “real world” experience, preferring people who focus almost exclusivelyon academic research. I happen to be one of those people who changed