, "Leadership Education for Engineers: Engineering Schools Interest and Practice,"in ASEE Annual Conference, 2012.3 A. Osagiede, M. F. Cox and B. Ahn, "Purdue University's Engineering Leaderhsip Program: Addressing the Short-fall of Engineering Leadership Education," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, 2013.4 A. Ferreras and L. Crumpton-Young, "The Development of a Curriculum to Instill Engineering Leadership &Management Skills in Undergraduate Students," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.5 S. Kumar and J. K. Hsiao, "Engineers Learn "Soft Skills the Hard Way": Planting a Seed of Leadership inEngineering Classes," Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18-23, 2007.6 J. M. Williams, J. Ahmed
Student Outcomes wouldunderstandably be different, regardless of their type of externship. For this reason we chose toask students to what degree they were challenged in the areas of the Student Outcomes with theassumption being that the more they were challenged, the more opportunity they had to learn.For these questions a five corresponded to very strongly, a four to strongly, a three to average, atwo to weakly, and a one to not at all. A modified version of the ABET Student Outcomes wasutilized with a-k appearing to the respondents as: a. Use math and/or science to solve engineering problems. b. Design or conduct a scientific experiment to include analyzing or interpreting data. c. Take part in the design or construction of a
-Hill.7 Grady, J. (1993). System Requirements Analysis. San Francisco, CA., McGraw-Hill.8 Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. 10th ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons (p. 83).9 Blanchard, B. S. & Fabrycky, W. J. (2011). Systems Engineering and Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall (p. 34). Page 24.335.15
motivation. In G. Gabbard, B. Litowitz & P. Williams (Eds.), Textbook of Psychoanalysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 39-52). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.11. Fielden, S. L., Davidson, M. J., Gale, A. W., & Davey, C. L. (2000). Women in construction: The untapped resource. Construction Management & Economics, 18(1), 113-121. doi: 10.1080/01446190037100412. Fielden, S. L., Davidson, M. J., Gale, A. W., & Davey, C. L. (2001). Women, equality and construction. Journal of Management Development, 20(4), 293-305.13. Ford, J. K., & Noe, R. (1987). Self-assessed training needs: The effects of attitudes toward training, managerial level, and function. Personnel Psychology, 40(1), 39-53.14. Gale, A. W. (1994). Women in non
called a mod-10 counter. The ten's place ofthe minutes (second digit from the right) counts 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and then repeats, which is calleda mod-6 counter. The hour counter counts 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and repeats. Oneway to design the clock is to break it up into smaller parts as shown in Figure 3 below. Page 24.1340.5 Minutes One’s Place a q0 z b q1 y BCD-to- c
Design of a Closed Loop System 2.4.1 Armature Controlled DC Motor Now observe the following DC motor. When we apply an input in the form of Voltage(va), we expect it to rotate. The angular velocity (ω) tells how fast the shaft is rotating at anygiven time. The angle theta tells the accumulated angle. The second image displays a DC Motorwhere inertia (J) and damping factor (b) are displayed. Figure 2.11: DC Motor with Variables 2.4.2 Armature Controlled DC Motor Equations Page 24.173.11 Figure 2.12: DC Motor SchematicWriting the time domain equation leads to
” courses that we define as follows. An important course (orbottleneck course, bn) is one that has an in-degree or out-degree larger than three, or a combinationof the two that is larger than five: bn(GC ) = I deg − (v) > 3 ∨ deg + (v) > 3 ∨ (deg − (v) + deg + (v)) > 5 v∈Vwhere I is the indicator function, i.e., I[b] = 1 if expression b is true, and 0 otherwise. Theseimportant courses represent bottlenecks to graduation, where failure can lead to the inability toprogress in a timely manner.Longest Path and number of Long Paths. In a curriculum graph, the longest path represents thelongest chain of prerequisites through a curriculum. An example involves a typical engineeringmathematics sequence, such as
-Bass higher and adult education series. Wiley, 2010. 4. Louis Deslauriers, Ellen Schelew, and Carl Wieman. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031):862–864, 2011. 5. David C. Haak, Janneke Hille Ris Lambers, Emile Pitre, and Scott Freeman. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034):1213–1216, 2011. 6. Karl A. Smith, Sheri D. Sheppard, David W. Johnson, and Roger T. Johnson. Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-Based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, pages 1–15, January 2005. 7. Eann A. Patterson, Patricia B. Campbell, Ilene Busch-Vishniac, and Darrell W. Guillaume. The effect of
a test problem on that topic. It is important tonote that the homework problem is usually a larger problem requiring at least 2-3 hours of work.However, all the tools, solved sample problems, software to check the solution, and more areavailable to the students.The topic test is usually one problem to be solved in a 20-30 minute class time and it is given toall students who have passed that topic. Although fast-paced, this method affords students anopportunity to pass a test on a consolidated segmented amount of material in a synchronizedtimeframe. To pass the course, each student needs to pass at least 7 topics for a grade of “C” with8 and 9 topics for grades of “B” and “A” respectively.Additional Bonus Topics have also been offered to
- 4), 25-36.6. Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. J. (1994). Teaching and the case method: Text, cases, and readings, Harvard Business Press.7. Hoag, K., Lillie, J., & Hoppe, R. (2005). Piloting case-based instruction in a didactic clinical immunology course, Clinical Laboratory Science 18(4), 2005, 213-220.8. Richard, L. G., Gorman, M. E., Scherer, W. T., & Landel, R. D. (1995). Promoting active learning with cases and instructional modules, Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 375-381.9. Raju, P. K., & Sankar, C. S. (1999). Teaching Real‐World Issues through Case Studies, Journal of Engineering Education, 88(4), 501-508.10. MIT Engineering Leadership Program. What is Engineering Leadership
of its importance for engineers working in a globalenvironment. PhD diss., Department of Educational Administration, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, 2010.Accessed 1/3/2014 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedaddiss/35/.2 Lohmann, J. R., Rollins, H. A., & Hoey, J. J. (2006). Defining, developing and assessing global competence inengineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31 (1), 119-131.3 Hunter, B., White, G.P., Godbey, G., What does it mean to be globally competent? Journal of Studies inInternational Education, Vol. 10, No. 3, 267-285 (2006)4 Parkinson, A. (2009). The rationale for developing global competence. Online Journal for Global EngineeringEducation 4: 1-15.5 Parkinson, A.P. Engineering Study Abroad
. Stover DeRocco, B. Maciejewski, J. McNelly, C. Giffi and G. Carrick, "Boiling Point? The skills gap in U.S. manufacturing," Deloitte, 2011.[8] S. Sitek, P. Claghorn, B. Docalovich, S. Feinstein, T. L. Hansen, W. Larsen, J. Rashad, K. Roy, C. M. Ferraro and J. Homer, "Birdging the Skills Gap Help - Wanted, Skills Lacking: WHy the Mismatch in Today's Economy," American Society for Training and Development, Alexandria, VA, 2012. Page 24.142.17[9] J. Manyika, M. Chui, B. Brown, J. Bughin, R. Dobbs, C. Roxburgh and A. Hung Byers, 15 "Big data: The next
track to completing the final challenge. B. Week 2In the second week of the course, the idea of lean concepts in Systems Engineering wasintroduced. Students were provided examples of where lean concepts have helped enterprisesand the general idea of making a process lean. The lecture was in anticipation of the start of thelean simulation the next week. Page 24.813.6 Figure 2. The LEGO Mindstorms Maze Navigation Challenge. Table 3. LEGO Mindstorms Suggested Tutorials Week Suggested Supplementary Tutorials in Preparation for Class
. M = 4.23, Med. = 4 , SD = 0.77 2.1.b. Explain basic logic gate operations. M = 4.49, Med. = 5, SD = 0.63 2.1.c. Program a PIC microcontroller in various numbering systems using mathematics and M = 4.11, Med. = logic operations. 4, SD = 0.82 2.2. Use STATUS flags to operate programmable intelligent computer (PIC) controlled M = 4.09, Med. = devices
/Main/arduinoBoardLilyPad.[4] Ashcraft, C. et al. 2012. Girls In IT: The Facts.[5] Barnes, T. et al. 2008. Game2Learn: Improving the engagement and motivation of CS1 students. ACM GDCSE. (2008).[6] Black Girls Code: www.blackgirlscode.org. Accessed: 2013-03-11.[7] Byrne, D. 1971. The attraction paradigm. (1971).[8] Clark, R.M. 1990. Why Disadvantaged Children Succeed. Public Welfare. (1990), 17–23.[9] Cockburn, A. and Williams, L. 2000. The costs and benefits of pair programming.[10] CompuGirls | School of Social Transformation: http://sst.clas.asu.edu/about/compugirls. Accessed: 2013- 03-08.[11] Csikszentmihalyi, M. et al. 1996. Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure.[12] DiSalvo, B. and
and Practice. New York Garland Pub. (Inc, 1992).19. Facione, P. A. Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae CA Calif. Acad. Press Retrieved April 1, 2004 (2011).20. Beyer, B. K. Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking. (ERIC, 1987). at 21. Norris, S. P. Synthesis of research on critical thinking. Educ. Leadersh. 42, 40–45 (1985).22. Norris, S. P. The generalizability of critical thinking: Multiple perspectives on an educational ideal. (Teachers College Press, 1992).23. Willingham, D. T. Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach? Arts Educ. Policy Rev. 109, 21–32 (2008).24. Yinger, R. J. Can we really teach them to think? New Dir. Teach. Learn. 1980, 11–31 (1980).25. Paul, R. W. Critical Thinking
?____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 24.520.11______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix B: Student Feedback SurveyENGINEERING MEASUREMENTS LAB SURVEYPlease provide your thoughts on some of the novel aspects of this lab. Strongly Strongly Statement Agree Neutral Disagree Agree Disagree A3 Report The A3 report was a good way to convey results. There was adequate information
theoretical introduction to provide the students with all the information needed from circuit design, software development, or digital signal processing. In the lab guide introduction, we also offer the students with an overall motivation to conduct that particular experiment, as well as the challenges that will be tackled. B. Pre-lab: Before each experiment, the students should answer a series of 5 quick questions. The pre-lab’s role is to allow the students to recapitulate the key points of the theory that will be needed during each experiment. C. Procedures: This section of the laboratory guide contains the procedures that each student/group must take in order to complete the experiment. We provide a
bellow and these were gathered through thedocuments and trainings provided by FCC, ITU, and Asia Pacific Telecommunity (APT). Alsoan informal survey of the related courses in other institutes was done to exclude those topics thatare currently covered in other courses. The suggested study of radio spectrum policy is best donein four major topics of: a) Introduction to radio regulation b) Licensing and assignment c) Spectrum management and interference d) Technical data and EMC analysis Page 24.712.4IV. Frequency Licensing and assignmentRadio communications have become an increasingly vital part of the
is a risk of damage whenmodifying a multi-layer machine-soldered circuitboard. The final option was to use a RaspberryPito receive communications and pass them on to theArduino. This is the option that was chosen,because it allows for expandability (such as addingcomputer vision for autonomy), and it allows morecommunications options than just packetized serial.The RaspberryPi Model-B provides a 700 MHzARM11 CPU, a Broadcom VideoCore IV GPUwith OpenGL support, and two USB 2.0 ports.6 Figure 6. RaspberryPi BoardAnother important step in choosing hardware was to decide the body style of the robot and themethod to be used for mobility. Since the goal of this project was to create a
Mol fraction of methanol, xA or yA a) The pressure at which vaporization begins b) The composition of the first vapor bubble at equilibrium with the saturated liquid c) The composition and temperature of the residual liquid when 25% of the initial liquid has been evaporated. Figure 1. Story problem examples
://www.digikey.com3. D. Vyas, “Microcontrollers: options and trends in today's market,” in ACM Proceedings International Conference and Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology, Mumbai, India, 2010, pp. 1019-1019.4. D’Souza, J., Reed, A., & Adams, K. (2014). Selecting Microcontrollers and Development Tools for Undergraduate Engineering Capstone Projects. Computers in Education, 24(1), (In press)5. M. Slade, M. H. Jones, and J. B. Scott, “Choosing the right microcontroller: A comparison of 8-bit Atmel, Microchip and Freescale MCUs,” Faculty of Engineering, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, Tech Rep. http://hdl.handle.net/10289/5938 , Nov. 2011.6. Daniel Cross-Cole, ‘ECET 365 Course Overview’ document, DeVry University, available
and personal reflections on the philosophical basis of a. What is engineering? b. How can we train engineers for the ever-‐changing future developments? c. What are the most fundamental concepts and skills that every engineer should know? d. What are the discipline specific concepts and important skills that students need to acquire? e. Is it possible to train engineers (with all of the skills, concepts, and knowledge base) in 4 year (perhaps 5 including industrial experiences
of the Technology and Society (T & S) Division and as the ASME district B leader. He also serves as the treasurer and secretary for the ASEE Engineering Ethics Dvision.Ms. Nadia Sunny, Grand Valley State University Nadia Sunny is pursuing a Master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering at Grand Valley State University, Michigan. She received her Bachelor’s in Chemical Engineering from Bangladesh University of En- gineering and Technology in 2004 and Master’s in Business Administration from Institute of Business Administration, Dhaka University in 2008. She has a diverse work experience in mechanical fabrication company, urea process plant, telecommunication equipment vendor and bank. She received excellence awards
1: Case Study I: Grade Distribution - On-campus and On-line Grade On-campus (N=6) Online (N=27) A to A- 6 (100%) 3 (11%) B+ to B- 0 7 (36%) C+ to C- 0 10 (37%) D+ to D- 0 2 (8%) F 0 5 (18%)Attendance of the face-to-face students was consistently high and engagement of students wasabove that typically observed in on-campus classes. The face-to-face students adopted a strategyof working independently and
and Senior Project Courses, Paper 7199, 120th ASEE Annual Conference.3. Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D., Swan, B. R. Anthony, D. K. (1995). A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America. Journal of Engineering Education, (84)2, 165-174.4. McKenzie, L. J., Trevisan, M. S., Davis, D. C., and Beyerlein, S. W. (2004). Capstone design courses and assessment: A national survey. Proc. American Society for Engineering Education Conf. Salt Lake City, UT.5. Howe, S., (2008). Focused follow-up to 2005 national capstone survey. Proc. American Society for Engineering Education Conf. Pittsburgh, PA.6. Duston, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D. (1997). A review of literature on teaching engineering
, 359- 372.29. Peck, C. A., J. Donaldson, & M. Pezzoli, 1990, “Some benefits nonhandicapped adolescents per- ceive for themselves from their social relationships with peers who have severe handicaps,” Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 241-249.30. Los Angeles Unified School District, Division of Special Education, 2013, “LAUSD Progress In The Provision Of Special Education To Students with Disabilities Over The Last Decade (2003-2013),” http://sped.lausd.net/about/lausd-progress-provision-special-education.31. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.32. Miles, M., and Huberman, M. (1984). Qualitative data
.; Powers, S. (2006) Improving Science Literacy Through Project-Based K-12 Outreach Efforts that Use Energy and Environmental Themes. Presented at 2006 ASEE Annual Conference. 10. Krohn, J. L.; Apple, S. C. (2003) Energy and the Environment: An Energy Education Course for High School Teachers. Presented at 2003 ASEE Annual Conference. 11. Fleischer, A. S., Wemhoff, A. P., Ural, A., O'Brien, J. C., Alaways, L. W. (2010). Development and Execution of a Successful Mechanical Engineering Outreach Program for Middle School Girls. Proceedings of the Northeast Regional American Society of Engineering Education Conference. 12. Brown, R.; Masanet, E.; Nordman, B.; Tschudi, B.; Shehabi, A.; Stanley, J. (2007
University of Wisconsin-Platteville are required to complete a large number of diverse writing assignments. Theycomplete ten laboratory courses, many of which require weekly lab reports. Senior-level coursesare focused on design, and students prepare many technical design reports in these courses; alarge design paper is the final deliverable for the capstone Senior Design course. Moreover,given the undergraduate-only nature of the university, all student writing is assessed by facultymembers. The traditional model for grading student writing is to mark up the writing withcorrections and suggestions for improvements and assign a grade between 0 and 100%.Despite the extensive practice students carry out and despite the frequent, thorough, and well
development principles to provide students structured engagement, such as incorporating the “predict, observe, explain” technique. 3. Deliver the Interactive Virtual Laboratories in classes using the studio architecture recently implemented at the home institution. 4. Assess the perception and effectiveness of the Interactive Virtual Laboratories through a. Classroom observation, student surveys, and instructor and student focus groups b. Measurement of learning gains on the Throttling Valve question and the Technician question, two conceptual questions that have been historically difficult for students 5. Incorporate the Interactive Virtual Laboratories as resources in the AIChE