ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying all 10 results

Ambiguity as a key experience acceleration mechanism in a sophomore systems engineering course

Conference Session: Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alejandro Salado, The University of Arizona; David Herring, The University of Arizona
Tagged Divisions: Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

, "Teaching Them How to Fish: Industry-Focused Student Projects in Systems Engineering," INCOSE International Symposium, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 2188-2195, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2012.tb01466.x.[9] D. H. Jonassen, "Engineers as Problem Solvers," in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 103-118.[10] E. Danahy, E. Wang, J. Brockman, A. Carberry, B. Shapiro, and C. B. Rogers, "LEGO- based Robotics in Higher Education: 15 Years of Student Creativity," International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 27, 2014, doi: 10.5772/58249.[11] P. T. Grogan and O. L. d. Weck, "LEGO Product

Relevance Score: 0.4112221

Systems Thinking with a Focus on Engineering

Conference Session: Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Rafic Bachnak, Marymount University; Abhilasha Mishra, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, The Capital College
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

whole picture, recognizing that individual elements are interconnected and that their interactions shape the behavior of the entire system. By embracing this holistic view, we gain a deeper understanding of complex problems and can identify underlying patterns and relationships that might otherwise go unnoticed. B. The Ability to Predict What Happens Next: Complex systems are characterized by nonlinear dynamics, where small changes can lead to disproportionately large effects over time. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for anticipating the consequences of our actions and avoiding unintended outcomes. Systems thinking helps us identify the cause and effect within a system. By recognizing

Relevance Score: 0.40534374

Learning Engineering- A System Design Approach for Engineering Education

Conference Session: Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Abul K. M. Azad, Northern Illinois University; Jim Goodell, INFERable and IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee; Aaron Kessler Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Scotty D. Craig; Hamadou Saliah-Hassane ing., TELUQ University
Tagged Divisions: Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

hope this overview provides a thought-provoking invitation toengineering education professionals and educators. We hope it can lead to a productive sharingof knowledge that can strengthen both fields.References:[1] J. Dewey, “Education as Engineering,” New Republic, 20 September 1922, 89–91.[2] H. A. Simon, “Job of a college president,” Educational Record, American Council on Education, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 1967.[3] K. E. Willcox, S. Sarma, and P. Lippel, “Online Education: A Catalyst for Higher Education Reforms”, Final Report, Online Education Policy Initiative, April 2016. https://oepi.mit.edu/files/2016/09/MIT-Online-Education-Policy-Initiative-April-2016.pdf[4] C. Dede, J. Richards, and B. Saxberg, Learning Engineering for

Relevance Score: 0.34904152

Reflections of Decolonizing exercises in a Systems Engineering Capstone

Conference Session: Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Shamsnaz Virani Bhada, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Sarah E. Stanlick, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

/TSSJ.V17I1.2752.[9] B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, “Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research,” Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, pp. 1–271, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.4324/9780203793206.Appendix 1WPI IRB Approval and ExemptionAppendix 2Copilot Prompts and ResponsesTeam 3 Team PerspectivesPrompt 1: Analyze the emerging themes for the 6 decolonization questions and present your analysis withclear summary of how themes emerged for each question I upload 3 set of these question and theiranswers.Thank you for sharing the questions and answers. I'll analyze the emerging themes for each question andprovide a clear summary.1. Who is driving this process?Emerging Themes: • Responsibility and

Relevance Score: 0.34575427

Benchmarking of LLM Based Generative AI for CSE Undergraduate Curriculum

Conference Session: Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Garrett Goodman, Miami University; Suman Bhunia, Miami University; Peter Jamieson, Miami University
Tagged Divisions: Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

score of 88.56%, equivalent to a letter grade of B+. Table 1: Performance of ChatGPT-4 in CSE 174. Course Assessment Grade ChatGPT-4 Jamieson’s LLM Assessment Count Weight Score Prompt Taxonomy Final Exam 1 20% 86% PR; CoT; zero-shot Midterm Exam 1 1 15% 91% PR: CoT; zero-shot Midterm Exam 2 1 15% 88% PR; CoT; zero-shot Labs 10 15% 84.90% PR: CoT; zero-shot Quizzes 13 10% 85.71% PR: CoT; zero-shot Projects

Relevance Score: 0.03371746

The Impact of Systems Thinking Education on Engineering Students' Approach to Real-World Challenges

Conference Session: Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Amin Azad, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions: Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

–S90, 2019. [4] S. Elsawah, A. T. L. Ho, and M. Ryan, “Teaching systems thinking in higher education,” INFORMS Transactions on Education, vol. 22, no. 3, 2021. [5] J. R. Grohs, G. R. Kirk, M. M. Soledad, and D. B. Knight, “Assessing sys- tems thinking: A tool to measure complex reasoning through ill-structured problems,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 29, pp. 74–86, 2018. [6] K. A. Stave and M. Hopper, “Teaching and learning systems thinking: A review of influences and tools,” Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 117–139, 2014. [7] D. Papi-Thornton, “Teaching guide to map the system 2019,” 2019. [8] J. D. Sterman, “System dynamics at sixty: the path forward,” System Dynamics Review, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 2021. [9] D. H

Relevance Score: 0.02862741

Evaluating the Use of System Mapping Tools to Support Researcher Understanding of Knowledge Diffusion in the Bio-economy

Conference Session: Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Khadija Ishfaq Rana, University of Toronto; Emily Moore, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions: Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

LITERATUREREVIEW,” INTED2021 Proceedings, pp. 9289–9298, 2021, doi: 10.21125/inted.2021.1943.[12] B. Hedeler, M. Lettner, T. Stern, P. Schwarzbauer, and F. Hesser, “Strategic decisions onknowledge development and diffusion at pilot and demonstration projects: An empiricalmapping of actors, projects and strategies in the case of circular forest bioeconomy,” ForestPolicy and Economics, vol. 110, p. 102027, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102027.[13] J. P. Monat and T. F. Gannon, “What is Systems Thinking? A Review of SelectedLiterature Plus Recommendations,” American Journal of Systems Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp.11–26, 2015, Accessed: Sep. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://article.sapub.org/[14] A. Azad, E. Moore, and A. Hounsell, “Advancing

Relevance Score: 0.027054101

Assessing Systems Thinking Skills in Engineering Education: Addressing Implementation Challenges and Unintended Consequences in Ill-structured Problems

Conference Session: Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: John Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Andrea Goncher-Sevilla, University of Florida; Mengyu Li, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions: Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

casebook. 2016.[2] N. Azizian, S. Sarkani, and T. Mazzuchi, “A comprehensive review and analysis of maturity assessment approaches for improved decision support to achieve efficient defense acquisition,” Proc. World Congr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, Oct. 2009, Accessed: Jan. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCECS2009/WCECS2009_pp1150-1157.pdf.[3] B. Blanchard, W. Fabrycky, and W. Fabrycky, Systems engineering and analysis. 1990.[4] D. H. Meadows, D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens, “The Limits To Growth,” Green Planet Blues, pp. 25–29, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.4324/9780429493744-3.[5] B. Sovacool, P. Kivimaa, S. Hielscher, and K. Jenkins, “Vulnerability and resistance in the

Relevance Score: 0.024441615

Assessing Learning and Self-Efficacy in Online Modules on Systems Thinking and Systems Engineering

Conference Session: Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University; Laura Ochs Pottmeyer, Carnegie Mellon University; Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, Texas State University; Lynn Kojtek, Carnegie Mellon University; Anahita Emami; Cassandra M Birrenkott, South Dakota Mines
Tagged Divisions: Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

Paper ID #46715Assessing Learning and Self-Efficacy in Online Modules on Systems Thinkingand Systems EngineeringDr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University (CMU). Dr. Bedillion is currently a Teaching Professor and Director of Academic Operations in the CMU Mechanical Engineering department. His previous experience includes serving as an Associate Professor at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology and a researcher / manager at

Relevance Score: 0.012284441

Tinkering Towards Systems Thinking: Integrating Hands-On Design Activities in First-Year Engineering Education

Conference Session: Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cassandra M Birrenkott, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Hannah Benes, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Annelise Larson, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University; Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, Texas State University
Tagged Divisions: Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

Paper ID #46862Tinkering Towards Systems Thinking: Integrating Hands-On Design Activitiesin First-Year Engineering EducationDr. Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Micah Lande, PhD is an Assistant Professor and E.R. Stensaas Chair for Engineering Education in the Leslie A. Rose Department of Mechanical Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Dr. Lande directs the Holistic Engineering Lab and Observatory. He teaches human-centered engineering design, design thinking, and design innovation courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn and apply

Relevance Score: 0.011263475

Showing results for 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition only

Results by Year

Showing results for Systems Engineering Division (SYS) only

Results by Topic