]. Available: https://engineering.wfu.edu/[10] A. Bielefeldt, “What’s in a Name? General, Interdisciplinary, and Integrated Engineering Programs,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore , Maryland: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023, p. 44022. doi: 10.18260/1-2--44022.[11] B. Newberry and J. Farison, “A Look at the Past and Present of General Engineering and Engineering Science Programs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 217–224, 2003, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00762.x.[12] R. Grondin, “Newberry and Farison Redux: A Survey of General Engineering,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2012, p. 25.976.1-25.976.10. doi: 10.18260/1-2
engineering education. Journal ofCleaner Production, 345, 131129.[2] Faulkner, W. (2000). Dualisms, hierarchies, and gender in engineering. Social Studies ofScience, 30(5), 759–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030005005[3] Cech, E. A. (2013). The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticizationand meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices. In Philosophy ofEngineering and Technology (pp. 67–84). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_4[4] Leydens, J. A., & Lucena, J. C. (2017). Engineering justice: Transforming engineeringeducation and practice. Wiley eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118757369[5] Martin, M. J., Diem, S. J., Karwat, D. M. A., Krieger, E. M., Rittschof, C. C., Bayon, B
in a Hybrid Workplace,” Harv. Bus. Rev., vol. 3, no. 109, pp. 1–8, 2021.[7] M. B. Azad and N. Rodriguez, “Team Science: Defining and Achieving Success,” Clin. Invest. Med., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. E1-4, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.25011/cim.v44i2.36476.[8] T. M. Bisbey, K. C. Wooten, M. Salazar Campo, T. K. Lant, and E. Salas, “Implementing an evidence-based competency model for science team training and evaluation: TeamMAPPS,” J. Clin. Transl. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, p. e142, 2021, doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.795.[9] S.-A. Brown et al., “Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams,” Am. Heart J. Plus Cardiol. Res. Pract., vol. 32, p. 100306, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100306.[10] B
rich-club phenomenon in collaborative research grant networks,” Scientometrics, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 2429–2446, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04621-1.[5] K. S. Louis and J. Murphy, “Trust, caring and organizational learning: the leader’s role,” Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 103–126, Feb. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-07-2016-0077.[6] K. M. King et al., “A Community-Academic Partnered Grant Writing Series to Build Infrastructure for Partnered Research,” Clinical and Translational Science, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 573–578, Sep. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12327.[7] K. Hall, B. A. Stipelman, A. L. Vogel, and D. Stokols, “Understanding Cross
prototyping aproposed solution. This allows students to break through the perceived mysterious process ofresearch and become active participants alongside creating trust in the academic system.AcknowledgementsThis work was funded in part by the Strategic Instructional Innovations Program in the Academyfor Excellence in Engineering Education in the Grainger College of Engineering at the Universityof Illinois Urbana Champaign.References[1] S. Kim, C. Laschi, and B. Trimmer, “Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics,”Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 287–294, May 2013, doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.002.[2] H. Lim, H. S. Kim, R. Qazi, Y. Kwon, J. Jeong, and W. Yeo, “Advanced Soft Materials,Sensor Integrations, and Applications
medicine a. Apply statistical analysis and machine learning tools to different datasets and understand their limitations b. Justify design decisions, inputs, and constraints c. Recognize biases or underlying assumptions within datasets and that their use may pose risks to certain populations d. Organize and present data visually to an audience The data skills were developed with input from, reviewed by, and approved by the department’s faculty andexternal advisory board. The list of skills also maps to those identified by industry leaders in other research[13]. During development, the consensus was that the rapid emergence of AI/ML represented a motivation andframing of the need for our students to
faculty,” White paper from, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=22934704e33b3b01b6fe b5797b087a075afb5cb2[5] R. D. Black, L. A. Weinberg, and M. G. Brodwin, “Universal Design for learning and instruction: Perspectives of students with disabilities in higher education,” Except. Educ. Int., vol. 25, no. 2, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.5206/eei.v25i2.7723.[6] CAST, Inc, “The UDL Guidelines.” Accessed: Dec. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://udlguidelines.cast.org/[7] “Learning in the Time of Coronavirus.” Accessed: Jan. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHYecYtM3fs[8] M. W. Ok, K. Rao, B. R. Bryant, and D. McDougall, “Universal
. 4, pp. 451-483. 2001.[18] E. A. Fleishman, D. M. Mumford, S. J. Zaccaro, K. Y. Levin, A. L. Korotkin, and M. B. Hein, "Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation." The leadership quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 245-287, 1991.[19] D. A. Nadler, "Executive team effectiveness: Teamwork at the top," Executive teams pp. 21-39, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.[20] A. H. Eagly and L. Carli. “Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 2007.[21] J. B. Rosener, “Ways women lead,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 119-125, 1990.[22] A. H. Eagly, S. J. Karau, and M. G. Makhijani, "Gender and the effectiveness of leaders
Paper ID #49062How a Cornerstone Course Impacts Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial SkillsProf. Catalina Cortazar, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Catalina Cort´azar is a Faculty member in the engineering design area DILAB at the School of Engineering at Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (PUC). Catalina holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Science with a focus on Engineering Education from PUC, an MFA in Design and Technology from Parsons The New School for Desing, an MA in Media Studies from The New School, and a bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering, with a concentration in Structural Design.Gabriel
., &Altman, T., & Jacobson, M. S., & Goodman, K., “WIP: A Layered Mentorship Program (LMP)for Engineering Student Success and Retention,” Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual AnnualConference Virtual Conference, 2021, July.[3] McPheron, B. D., “Work-In-Progress: Applying Peer Mentorship in a First Year EngineeringCourse to Improve Student Learning and Retention Outcomes,” Paper presented at 2022 ASEEIllinois-Indiana Section Conference, Anderson, Indiana, 2022, April.[4] Geller, H. E., & Golding, P., & Gonzalez, A., & Perez, A., “Enhancing EngineeringEducation through Mentorship,” Paper presented at 2024 ASEE-GSW, Canyon, Texas, 2024,March.[5] Nabi, G., Walmsley, A., Mir, M., & Osman, S., “The impact of mentoring in
History of Society of Women Engineers (SWE) at Berkeley”.[9] “The National Science Foundation: A Brief History - About NSF | NSF - National Science Foundation.” Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://new.nsf.gov/about/history/narrative[10] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. Cambridge University Press, 2014.[11] “Women in STEM: Representation Matters | U.S. Department of Commerce.” Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.commerce.gov/news/blog/2024/03/women- stem-representation-matters[12] “Updates on NSF Priorities | NSF - National Science Foundation.” Accessed: Apr. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/updates-on-priorities
) discuss this method, b) provide an analysis of the impacts of theprojects undertaken through its use, and c) provide case study examples of the conversionprocess from advisement to partnership within the engineering programs at select institutions.The Project Unlock Method™, coupled with the KEEN Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM)framework, provides a pathway for engineering programs to leverage the expertise and insight ofindustry in their programs and curriculum. By shifting IABs from reactionary advisory roles toactive partnership roles, the approach demonstrates how academic-industry interactions canbecome more adaptive and impactful. This paper also shares current efforts from a ProjectUnlock ™ training involving over 15 institutions that have now
Paper ID #47035WIP: A Multi-tiered Strategy to Increase Freshman RetentionMrs. Samantha Corcoran, Wichita State University College of Engineering SAMANTHA CORCORAN has a BS and MS in industrial engineering with experience in manufacturing, lean improvements, and quality control. She served the Wichita State University College of Engineering as Assistant Dean before joining the engineering faculty. She co-founded WSU GoBabyGo, created an Assistive Technology and Accessible Design undergraduate certificate, and is the program lead for the Shocker Design Experience.Janelle Birkner, Wichita State UniversityDr. Gary Brooking
, August. Flipping classrooms, sowing seeds and developing confidence: teaching engineering judgement to undergraduate engineering students. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. [3] Glaser, B. and Strauss, A., 1967. Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology the journal of the British sociological association, 12(1), pp.27-49. [4] Charmaz, K., 2008. Reconstructing grounded theory. The SAGE handbook of social research methods, pp.461-478. [5] Bruhl, J.C., Klosky, J.L., Mainwaring, T. and Hanus J.P. (2017), Accelerating the development of engineering judgement in students through inquiry-based learning activities, In 2017
teaching first-year students data flow diagrams. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028468Iqbal, S., Ashfaq, T., & Taib, C. A. B. (2022). A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON ORGANIZATION PERFORMANCE IN GLOBAL HIGHER EDUCATION: AN AFFINITY DIAGRAM APPROACH. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 4(1), 688– 701.Marshall, S. J. (2018). Internal and external stakeholders in Higher Education. Shaping the University of the Future, 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7620-6_4McNamara, M. (2012). Starting to untangle the web of cooperation, coordination, and collaboration: A framework for public managers. International Journal of Public
. 2015, p. 26.877.1-26.877.16.[7] H. G. Murzi, T. M. Chowdhury, J. Karlovšek, and B. R. Ulloa, “Working in large teams: Measuring the impact of a teamwork model to facilitate teamwork development in engineering students working in a real project,” Int J Eng Educ, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 274–295, 2020.[8] N. C. T. Van Tyne and J. D. Ortega, “How Can We Make This Work? First Year Engineering Design Team Development in Virtual vs. In-Person Environments,” presented at the 2022 First-Year Engineering Experience, Jul. 2022.Appendix A: Notes Sheets Example1. Engineering Design Related Foundations of Engineering I & II Student Learning OutcomesLearning Use a structured design approach to analyze problems
validate the drones’ performance in GPS-free environments. • Applying real-time navigation algorithms and analyzing flight data to optimize performance. • Manufacturing drone components using Fairfield University’s 3D printing facilities, emphasizing cost efficiency and customization.Figure 2 illustrates key stages of the drone navigation project, including drone assembly, sensorintegration with IMU and optical flow sensors, and outdoor flight testing. These images highlight thehands-on nature of the project and the students’ active involvement throughout the process.Figure 2: (a) Drone assembly process. (b) Sensor integration setup. (c) Outdoor flight testing.This project not only demonstrated the students
Paper ID #47602Implementing a Tool for Structured Roles in Hybrid Collaborative LearningEnvironmentsMr. Chenyan Zhao, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Master of Science student in Computer Science at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Research interest in Automatic Short Answer Grading using AIMr. Yuxuan Chen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Yuxuan Chen is a Master of Science student in Computer Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His primary research interests focus on computer science education and artificial intelligence. He is dedicated to enhancing student learning experiences
Instructional Innovations Program (SIIP) for the funding for thisproject.References[1] P. Bambrick-Santoyo, Driven by data 2.0: A practical guide to improve instruction, 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass, 2019.[2] O. Viberg, M. Hatakka, O. B¨alter, and A. Mavroudi, “The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education,” Computers in human behavior, vol. 89, pp. 98–110, 2018.[3] V. Park and A. Datnow, “Ability grouping and differentiated instruction in an era of data-driven decision making,” American Journal of Education, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 281–306, 2017.[4] L. Sanchez, J. Penarreta, and X. Soria Poma, “Learning management systems for higher education: a brief comparison,” Discover Education, vol. 3, p. 58, 2024.[5] K. Ahmad, W. Iqbal, A. El
Engineering Mathematics Education," [Online]. Available: https://engineering-computer-science.wright.edu/research/the-wright-state-model-for- engineering-mathematics-education. [Accessed May 2021].[10] B. P. Self and J. M. Widmann, "Demo or Hands-on? A Crossover Study on the Most Effective Implementation Strategy for Inquiry-Based Learning Activities," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[11] E. P. Douglas and C. C. Chiu, "Implementation of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Engineering," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 3, 2013.[12] E. Davishahl, T. Haskell and L. Singleton, "Getting your Hands Dirty in Integral Calculus," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
Paper ID #47802Improving Employer Engagement in a Manufacturing Professional WorkforceDevelopment ProgramDr. Zhen Zhao, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Zhen Zhao is a Postdoctoral Associate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His research interests include developing scalable, collaborative, hands-on engineering curricula, skilling up manufacturing workforces, and growing engineering student competencies in mentorship and leadership.Dr. John Liu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. John Liu is the Director and Principal Investigator of the MIT Learning Engineering and Practice (LEAP) Group, which
accreditation challenges and ensure educational excellence. It also opens new pathways for fostering global partnerships and shaping policies that promote innovation, quality, and equity in education across borders.. References[1] M. Iqbal Khan, S. M. Mourad, and W. M. Zahid, “Developing and qualifying Civil Engineering Programs for ABET accreditation,” Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jksues.2014.09.001.[2] J. A. Memon, R. E. Demirdöǧen, and B. S. Chowdhry, “Achievements, outcomes and proposal for global accreditation of engineering education in developing countries,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2557–2561, 2009, doi: 10.1016
, we found that QISE knowledge is perhaps its own form of networking;students indicated that what you know was more important to them than who you know. This caninform future QISE outreach efforts to focus outreach efforts on concentrated learning programs.We hope our insights will lead to scalable programs that can bring QISE to everyone. References[1] R. Peng, B. Dorn, A. Naeemi and N. Jafarinaimi, "Interactive visualizations for teaching quantum mechanics and semiconductor physics," 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, Madrid, Spain, 2014, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044207.[2] L. Nita, N. Chancellor, L. M. Smith, H. Cramman, and G. Dost
work will utilize statistical techniques to mitigate theeffects of these missing data. Additionally, the surveys will be shortened significantly for ourfuture iterations, as many students reported that the length of the survey caused them to struggleto complete it.Our future work will also include further quantitative and qualitative analysis that goes further indepth on each of the mental health categories included in the survey and comparisons acrossyear, section of the course, instructor, and demographic information.References[1] Y. Ganesan, P. Talwar, N. Fauzan, and Y. B. Oon, “A Study on Stress Level and Coping Strategies among Undergraduate Students,” Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 37–47
Evaluation of Students’ CAD Models,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11040145.[13] H. E. Otto and F. Mandorli, “Dormant deficiency: a novel concept to direct cause–effect CAD model analysis,” Res. Eng. Des., Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00163-023-00423-5.[14] L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, and B. S. Bloom, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, Complete edition. New York: Longman, 2001.
," Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 186, pp. 604-612, 05/01 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.001.[7] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, "Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, pp. 914-925, 2013.[8] A. L. Campbell, I. Direito, and M. Mokhithi, "Developing growth mindsets in engineering students: a systematic literature review of interventions," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 503-527, 2021/07/04 2021, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1903835.[9] J. Xu and W. Xu, "Hot topics and frontier evolution of growth-mindset research: a bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace %U
students in learning activities?,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 5034–5038, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.816.[8] E. Alpay and S. Gulati, “Student-led podcasting for engineering education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 415–427, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2010.487557.[9] T. Lucas, B. Kotla, and L. Bosman, “Creating a Nature-Inspired Entrepreneurially Minded Manufacturing Podcast to Bolster Technical Communication Skills,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Dec. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/creating-a-nature-inspired-entrepreneurially-minded- manufacturing-podcast-to-bolster-technical
refine our iterative research design to better support studentlearning outcomes. This work aligns with the NSF's focus on improving the quality ofundergraduate education and preparing students to meet the complex demands of the engineeringprofession with both technical expertise and ethical insight.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers and ASEE session chair fortheir time and input into this paper. This work is supported by National Science FoundationGrant #2314334. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] D. A. Martin, E. Conlon, and B. Bowe, “A Multi
deeper insight into how assessmentformats shape learning experiences. Accordingly, these findings contribute to ongoing efforts todesign assessments that not only evaluate knowledge but also foster problem-solving andteamwork skills essential for engineering practice.References[1] B. Gilley and B. Clarkston, “Research and Teaching: Collaborative testing: evidence oflearning in a controlled In-Class study of undergraduate students,” Journal of College ScienceTeaching, vol. 043, no. 03, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.2505/4/jcst14_043_03_83.[2] P. G. Zimbardo, L. D. Butler, and V. A. Wolfe, “Cooperative college examinations: moregain, less pain when students share information and grades,” The Journal of ExperimentalEducation, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 101–125, Jan
survey of the research,” in 2013 ASEE annual conference & exposition, 2013, pp. 23–1200. Accessed: Jan. 02, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://aktuelt.osloskolen.no/SysSiteAssets/laringsteknologi/dokumenter/the-flipped- classroom-a-survey-of-the-research.pdf[3] B. Kerr, “The flipped classroom in engineering education: A survey of the research,” in 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), Sep. 2015, pp. 815– 818. doi: 10.1109/ICL.2015.7318133.[4] C. K. Lo and K. F. Hew, “The impact of flipped classrooms on student achievement in engineering education: A meta-analysis of 10 years of research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 523–546, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20293