] C.C. Happel and A. Cicchino, “Enhancing Faculty Engagement: The Role of CTLs in Providing Peer Mentorship for New Faculty,” The Journal of Faculty Development, 37(3), pp. 84-88, 2023.[15] M.J. Johnson, K.H. Kim, S.M. Colarelli, and M. Boyajian, “Coachability and the development of the coachability scale,” Journal of Management Development, 40(7/8), pp. 585-610, 2021.[16] NSF, “NSF I-CORPS,” https://new.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/i-corps. [Accessed January 14, 2025].[17] K. Nearing, J. Rainwater, S. Neves, P. Bhatti, B. Conway, B., N. Hafer, ... and M. Wasko, "I-Corps@ NCATS trains clinical and translational science teams to accelerate translation of research innovations into practice,” Journal of Clinical and
transition of the new teachers into the CoP. Getting funding for capacity building and professionaldevelopment support for the instructors, is a priority and continues to be one of the key challenges in our work,aimed at improving on both their engineering knowledge and skills hence improving the content delivery in class.References[1] D. A. Delaine et al., “A systematic literature review of reciprocity in engineeringservice‐learning/community engagement,” J. Eng. Educ., 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20561.[2] P. Lumb, “Strategic International Partnerships: Global North and Global South Discourses,” Comp. Int.Educ. Éducation Comparée Int., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 110–126, 2023, doi: 10.5206/cie-eci.v51i2.15155.[3] B. I. Omodan, “Building reciprocal
letter in thisacronym stands for a different stage/component of the meeting. These includes (B) bridging in,presenting findings or introducing an activity to pique interest in the topics that will be coveredin the meeting, (O) introducing objectives, informing participants what they will get out of themeeting, (P) pre-assessment, learning what participants know about the topics that will becovered, participatory learning, guiding participants to actively reflect as topics are introduced,and post-assessment, learning what participants understood about the topics covered, and (S)summarize the meeting, reminding participants what the objectives were and how these werefulfilled.Curriculum contentsThe workshop includes contents related to seven
reflections for DT learning and the promotion of DT transfer.References[1] Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., and Leifer, L. J., 2005, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” J. Eng. Educ., 94(1), pp. 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.[2] Levine, D. I., Agogino, A. M., and Lesniewski, M. A., 2016, “Design Thinking in Development Engineering,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 32, pp. 1396–1406.[3] Brown, T., 2008, “Design Thinking,” Harv. Bus. Rev., (86), pp. 84–92.[4] Royalty, A., Chen, H., Roth, B., and Sheppard, S., 2021, “Developing a Tool to Measure the Transfer of Design Practice from Training Contexts to Applied Contexts,” Design Thinking Research : Interrogating the Doing, C. Meinel
sources. Studentswere asked to highlight their edits in a different color to distinguish their improvements,document all prompts, and compile references used for fact-checking. Additionally, studentswrote a half-page reflection on their experience using GenAI, discussing its utility, challengesencountered, and reliability. This reflection was completed without the assistance of GenAI toprovide an authentic analysis of their learning process. See Appendix B for the instructionsprovided to the students.Assignment 2 - Take-Home Quiz: For the second assignment (2.5% towards the final grade),the instructor asked the students to read and analyze two articles: How Generative AI WillChange the Jobs of Architects and Civil Engineers [2] and What Does
, 2017. 7. D. Riley, A. Slaton, & A. Pawley, “Social justice and inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering,” in Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2014. 8. K. L. Tonso, “The impact of cultural norms on women,” Jrnl. of Engr. Ed., vol. 85, no. 3, pp: 217-225, 1996. 9. American Society for Engineering Education, Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers, 2019. 10. National Science Board, “Science and engineering indicators 2018,” National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/, 2018. 11. Z. Leonardo, Race, Whiteness, and Education. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 2009. 12. M. Omi, and H. Winant
learning for college credits.” 1999. [5] B. A. Jimenez, “A phenomenological study of adult learners’ experiences with the portfolio form of prior learning assessment,” 2015. [6] L. Moss, “Prior learning assessment and recognition (plar) and the impact of globalization: A canadian case study,” 2007. [7] Y. Onder, N. Bhide, D. Radhakrishnan, and J. DeBoer, “Rethinking spatial visualization assessments: Centering recognized prior knowledge in 2d/3d curriculum development,” 06 2023. [8] W. S. Pearson, Enhancing adult student persistence: The relationship between prior learning assessment and persistence toward the baccalaureate degree. Iowa State University, 2000. [9] E. J. Murphy, “Prior learning assessment: A review of bloom’s
, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2025-2026/.[14] “A student guide to biodesign,” stanford.edu. Accessed: Jan. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://biodesignguide.stanford.edu/[15] J. Hess and N. Fila, “The development and growth of empathy among engineering students,” in ASEE’s 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, June 26–29, 2016. ASEE, 2016.[16] S. Goldman, M. P. Carroll, Z. Kabayadondo, L. B. Cavagnaro, A. W. Royalty, B. Roth, S. H. Kwek, and J. Kim, “Assessing learning: Capturing the journey of becoming a design thinker,” in Design Thinking Research, H. Plattner, C
. 548-549, (2007).[6] A. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour, “Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development,” Science Education, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 36–74, 2007.[7] B., Debarati, V.K. Lohani, D.S. Brogan, T.G. Westfall, J.E. Taylor, S.L. Emanuel, M. Verghese, and N. Falls, “Benefits for Undergraduates from Engagement in an Interdisciplinary Environmental Monitoring Research and Education Lab.” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, USA: June 2017.[8] L.M. Osbeck and N.J. Nersessian, “Epistemic Identities in Interdisciplinary Science,” Perspectives on Science, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 226–260, March
: Harper and Row, 1954.[3] B. M. K. Hagerty, J. Lynch-Sauer, K. L. Patusky, M. Bouwsema, and P. Collier, “Sense of belonging: A vital mental health concept,” Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 172– 177, 1992, doi: 10.1016/0883-9417(92)90028-H.[4] T. L. Strayhorn, College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A Key to Educational Success for All Students, 2nd ed. Routledge, 2018.[5] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, Self-Determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications, 2017.[6] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being,” Am. Psychol., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78
science teacher education. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 1-38.Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (Eds.) (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.Milam, E. L., & Nye, R. A. (2015). An introduction to scientific masculinities. Osiris, 30(1), 1– 14.Miller, R. A., Vaccaro, A., Kimball, E. W., & Forester, R. (2021). “It’s dude culture”: Students with minoritized identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000165Park, J., Young, K., Salazar, C. & Hayes, S. (2020). Student–faculty interaction and discrimination from faculty
, “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students,” Eng. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Apr. 2011. [5] E. Cech and T. Waidzunas, “‘Engineers who happen to be gay:’ lesbian, gay, and bisexual students’ experiences in engineering,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education 2009, Austin, TX, USA, 2009. [6] B. E. Hughes, “‘Managing by Not Managing’: How Gay Engineering Students Manage Sexual Orientation Identity,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 385–401, 2017. [7] K. F. Trenshaw, A. Hetrick, R. F. Oswald, S. L. Vostral, and M. C. Loui, “Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students in engineering: Climate and perceptions,” in 2013
Anasazi in Long House Valley’, Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, no. suppl_3, pp. 7275–7279, 2002.[2] D. M. Beskow and K. M. Carley, ‘Agent based simulation of bot disinformation maneuvers in Twitter’, in 2019 Winter simulation conference (WSC), 2019, pp. 750–761.[3] DeMara, R. F., N. Khoshavi, S. Pyle, J. Edison, R. Hartshorne, B. Chen, et al. “Redesigning Computer Engineering Gateway Courses using a novel Remediation Hierarchy,” in Proc. of American Assoc. for Engr Education Annual Conference (ASEE-16), New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26 – 29, 2016.[4] Paradiso, J. R., T. Muhs, and B. Chen, ‘Merging Human and Non-human (System) Data to Describe Students’ Adaptive Learning Experience in
, or being willing to use her creativity to generate more ideas.The latter two hindering prompt codes identified instances in which the PSTs offered (a)variables Savannah could or should modify to generate Idea 2; and (b) specific ideas Savannahcould or should consider using. The difference between the two is the level of specificity, e.g.,the idea to change the number of blades (Offer Variables) versus the idea to have three blades(Offer Design Ideas). The more hindering of these two is the latter, which is like offeringexamples during brainstorming—a practice to be avoided [7], and one that is evident in thetranscript excerpts from PST 12. The former, Offer Variables, may also be hindering in that itmay prevent Savannah from deciding on
Psychol, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 26–47, 2011, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.538646.[16] L. Bardach, S. Oczlon, J. Pietschnig, and M. Lüftenegger, “Has achievement goal theory been right? A meta-analysis of the relation between goal structures and personal achievement goals,” J Educ Psychol, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 1197–1220, 2020, doi: 10.1037/edu0000419.[17] L. E. Baranik, L. J. Stanley, B. H. Bynum, and C. E. Lance, “Examining the construct validity of mastery-avoidance achievement goals: A meta-analysis,” Hum Perform, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 265–282, 2010, doi: 10.1080/08959285.2010.488463.[18] C. Huang, “Achievement Goals and Achievement Emotions: A Meta-analysis,” Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 359–388, 2011, doi
,” 2023.[2] W. E. Kelly, “General Education for Civil Engineers: Sustainable Development,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 75–83, 2008, doi: 10.1061/ASCE1052-39282008134:175.[3] L. White, “Engineers and the making of a new humanism,” in Dynamo and virgin reconsidered : essays in the dynamism of Western culture, 1968, pp. 143–149.[4] S. C. Florman, The Civilized Engineer, 1st ed. St Martin’s Griffin, 1987.[5] W. B. Stouffer and J. S. Russell, “Too Liberal or Not Liberal Enough: Liberal Arts, Electives, and Professional Skills,” 2003. [Online]. Available: http://soe.stanford.edu/programs/undergrad/undergrad.html[6] Y. Ben-Haim, “Why The Best
includes the following components: 1) in-lecture discussionsof specific healthcare disparities and inequities that exist that relate to the organ system beingdiscussed, 2) discussion questions designed to help students learn to socially contextualizetechnical problems in BME, 3) three equity and ethics assignments, and 4) two team projects: a)one asking teams to design a brain computer interface and address any potential disparities orsocietal impacts that may results and b) one asking teams to develop and engaging andinformative infographic about a specific healthcare disparity. A sequential mixed-methods pre-and post-semester approach employing quantitative and qualitative methods was used to assess teeffectiveness of this curriculum. Results
Paper ID #48726Unraveling Intersecting Hispanic and Latin´e Engineering Student Identitiesto Understand Sense of Belonging at a Hispanic Serving InstitutionMelissa Lepe, University of California, Irvine Melissa Lepe is a Ph.D. student at the University of California-Irvine. Her research interests include aircraft sustainability, aeroacoustics, and engineering education. Through her work at the UCI Aircraft Systems Laboratory and the STREAM Laboratory, she has worked on merging her interests in aviation and education to promote inclusivity, equity, and diversity in the aerospace field.Spencer Currie, University of
stage which signal to engineers that they are transitioning from a novice to an expert? R2. How do mid-career engineers approach workplace challenges as compared to new engineers? R3. Do new engineers feel prepared for the challenges faced in entering the workplace? b. If so, what aspects of their education helped them prepare? c. If not, how could their education have better prepared them?Research Methods This section provides information on the study population, data collection, and how thedata will be analyzed.Study Population Individuals contacted for participation in this study had to meet three criteria: have fourto twelve years of experience working as an engineer, currently
industry collaboration:Case study of Japanese companies in the UK,” International Journal of Technology Transferand Commercialisation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 43–61, 2013.[7] B. Hillebrand and W. G. Biemans, “The relationship between internal and externalcooperation,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 735–743, 2003.[8] A. Parkhe, “Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction costexamination of interfirm cooperation,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, no. 4, pp.794–829, 1993.[9] M. Perkmann, V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Broström, P. D’Este, R. Fini, A.Geuna, R. Grimaldi, A. Hughes, S. Krabel, M. Kitson, P. Llerena, F. Lissoni, A. Salter, andM. Sobrero, “Academic engagement and commercialisation: A
of Sociology, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1691–1730, May 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/321299.[15] Y. J. Xu, “Attrition of Women in STEM: Examining Job/Major Congruence in the Career Choices of College Graduates,” Journal of Career Development, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 3–19, Jul. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316633787.[16] S. Kong, K. Carroll, D. Lundberg, P. Omura, and B. Lepe, “Reducing gender bias in STEM,” MIT Science Policy Review, vol. 1, pp. 55–63, Aug. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.38105/spr.11kp6lqr0a.[17] S. A. Hewlett et al., “The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology,” Harvard Business Review Research Report, vol. 10094, pp. 1–100, Jun. 2008.[18] N
different identities intersect to inform international graduate students’experiences could be the focus of future studies, as well. Finally, it would be a worthy study tofurther investigate the impact of holistic wellness, or lack thereof, on international graduatestudents’ academic performance as well as their persistence and attrition decisions. ReferencesAdams, T. B., & Bezner, J. R. (2000). Conceptualization and Measurement of the Spiritual and Psychological Dimensions of Wellness in a... Journal of American College Health, 48(4), 165.Almaawali, M. S. (2024). Wellness Practices of Minority International Students: A Grounded Theory Study. Journal of International Students, 14(3
reinforcedifferent technical communications skills and that both course types may be needed to provideopportunities for student growth in the middle years.References[1] Donnell, J. A., Aller, B. M., Alley, M., & Kedrowicz, A. A. (2011, June). Why industry saysthat engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says. In 2011asee annual conference & exposition (pp. 22-1687).[2] Sageev, P., & Romanowski, C. J. (2001). A message from recent engineering graduates in theworkplace: Results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 90(4), 685-693.[3] Buckley JM, Trauth A, Burris D, De Rosa A. Implementation of a stand-alone, industry-centered technical communications course in a mechanical
thementor’s perspective; here we present them side by side for cross comparison. Although therewere a different number of respondents from each group, we attribute differences in results to aneffect stemming from the transition to becoming a mentor. Mentees and mentors were asked thesame questions except for one additional question for the mentors. In the results and discussionsection, figures where questions are labeled with the letter “a” represent the question beginningwith “Being mentored ...” while those labeled with “b” represent the same question beginningwith “Being a mentor ... “.Figure 1: Results from survey Question 1; a Likert scale. Results indicate the percentage ofparticipants, from the perspective of a mentee (left) and from the
Paper ID #47390BOARD #161: Lessons Learned- Facilitating conversations around GenerativeAI and its Impact on Society among faculty from different disciplines in aJesuit UniversityDr. Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University Yen-Lin Han is Professor and Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Seattle University. Dr. Han received her BS degree in Material Science and Engineering from National Tsing-Hua University in Hsinchu, Taiwan, and her PhD in Mechanical Engineering and MS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California.Dr. Wan D. Bae, Seattle University Wan D. Bae is a Professor of Computer
Paper ID #46461BOARD #162: Lessons Learned: Designing Powerful Questions to FosterEmpathetic Mentorship for Engineering Faculty through a Faculty ProfessionalDevelopment WorkshopMr. Gadhaun Aslam, University of Florida Gadhaun Aslam is a PhD Candidate & Graduate Assistant in the TWISTER Lab within the Department of Engineering Education at University of Florida (UF). His research interests include extracting data from institutional websites to understand the trajectory of engineering education, exploring student learning experiences using multi-modal tools (e.g., eye tracking and physiological electrodermal sensors
. (2024). Participatory design curriculum promotes engineeringdesign, critical thinking, and creativity for students from kindergarten to 12th grade. Psychologyof Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication.https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000652[3] D.G. Hendricks, M. Mollica, H. Feldner, A. Caspi, J. Mankoff, S. Israel, G. Zatloka, and K.Steele. “HuskyADAPT: A Project-Based Accessible Design Course.” American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference. (2020)[4] L. R. L. R. G. H. A. C. N. T. A. Litzinger, "Engineering Education and the Development of Expertise," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 123-150, 2011.[5] L. C. D. G. P. D. E. I. B. D. K. E. S. François St-Pierre, "One-Step Cloning and Chromosomal
Teachers.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2012.9. B. Chesnutt, C. Faber, and D. Mountain. “Development of a hybrid community of practice course model to prepare pre-service teachers to teach engineering in K-12 (Work in Progress).” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2022.
., Nora, A., & Castaneda, M. B. (1993). College Persistence: Structural Equations Modeling Test of an Integrated Model of Student Retention. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 123–139.[5] Sami Rollins, Alark Joshi, Amruth N. Kumar, Stan Kurkovsky, and Tracy Camp. 2021. Best Practices for Designing and Implementing NSF S-STEM Scholarship Projects. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.[6] Markle, Robert S., et al. "Supporting historically underrepresented groups in STEM higher education: The promise of structured mentoring networks." Frontiers in Education. Vol. 7. Frontiers Media
. Jenior, B. Chun, S. Nagdas, J.J. Saucerman, G.L. Kolling, A. Wallqvist, and J.A. Papin. “Identifying metabolic adaptations characteristic of cardiotoxicity using paired transcriptomics and metabolomics data integrated with a computational model of heart metabolism,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. e1011919, 2024.[5] J. Nielsen, C.B. Tillegreen, and D. Petranovic. “Innovation trends in industrial biotechnology,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. P1160-1172, 2022.[6] M.C. Dunn and P.E. Bourne. “Building the biomedical data science workforce,” PLoS Biology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. e2003082, 2017.[7] N. Comandante-Lou, M. Khaliq, D. Venkat, M. Manikkam, and M. Fallahi-Sichani. “Phenotype- based probabilistic