Paper ID #47977Industry Sponsored Applied Capstone Projects: Experiences in Sourcing Projects,Course Redesign, and Sponsor EngagementProf. Daniel G Rey, Texas A&M University Daniel Rey is a 1990 graduate from Texas A&M as an Industrial Distribution major. He spent 30 years in industry, including wholesale distribution as well as the manufacture and sale of oilfield and refinery process chemicals, where he achieved roles of increasing responsibility in sales, marketing, operations, and general management. Three years ago, he transitioned back to Texas A&M and serves as an Associate Professor of Practice in the
measurement of engagement and learning outcomes. Such efforts will enableeducators to tailor instructional strategies more effectively, ultimately advancing pedagogicalpractices in engineering education. Overall, the integration of both virtual and hands-onmodalities emerges as a promising approach to optimize student outcomes in increasinglydynamic academic settings.REFERENCES[1] Ajeigbe, O. J., Oni, T. A., Sunday, O. J., Adesope, O., Oje, O., Van Wie, B. J., ... & Thiessen, D. B. (2024, June). Work-In-Progress: Enhancing Engineering Education: A Comparative Analysis of Low-Cost Desktop Learning Module Impact on Student Engagement and Outcomes. In 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[2] Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R
) between thevertices correspond to prerequisites. That is, the course on the source end of the directededge is a prerequisite for the course on the destination end. Directed edges drawn as dashedlines correspond to co-requisites. The complexity of each curriculum was computed using aunitless graph-theoretic metric imposed by the pre- and co-requisite relationships betweenthe courses in a curriculum. This metric, referred to as structural complexity, involves twofactors. First, each course c in a curriculum is assigned a blocking factor which is simplythe number of courses a student is precluded from taking, due to pre- and co-requisiteconstraints, until they have successfully completed course c. In Figure 1 (b), the blockingfactor of the Calculus
,” Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 119–140, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10648- 015-9355-x.[3] R. M. Felder, G. N. Felder, M. Mauney, C. E. Hamrin, and E. J. Dietz, “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. III. Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes,” J of Engineering Edu, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 151–163, Apr. 1995, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00162.x.[4] A. Godwin, “Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative Research,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 78, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.21061/see.64.[5] J. W. Creswell and V. L. P. Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications, 2017.[6] R. B. Kline, “Assessing statistical
Paper ID #47193Engineering student mental health status across gender identities: Analysisof data from the Healthy Minds StudyEmma Vick, University of Kentucky Emma has a Bachelor’s of Science in Chemical Engineering from the University of Kentucky.Dr. Sarah A Wilson, University of Kentucky Sarah Wilson is an assistant professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Kentucky. She completed her bachelor’s degree at Rowan University in New Jersey before attending graduate school for her PhD at the University of Massachusetts.Dr. Joseph H Hammer Associate Professor of Counseling
low help-seeking intention, splitting them intothose with low and high perceived control and confidence. This suggests that some first-yearengineering students feel capable of seeking help but may avoid professional treatment despitesignificant mental health issues. These findings highlight the importance of person-centeredanalysis in identifying diverse mental health belief groups, which can guide targeted interventionsfor engineering students.AcknowledgmentsThis study was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation. (NSF Award#2225567).References[1] Godwin, A., Benedict, B., Rohde, J., Thielmeyer, A., Perkins, H., Major, J., … Chen, Z. (2021). New Epistemological Perspectives on Quantitative Methods: An Example Using
about how well they will perform on an upcoming task. It is influenced by self-efficacyand perceptions of task difficulty. Subjective task value encompasses several components: a)intrinsic value (the inherent enjoyment or interest in the task), b) attainment value (the personalimportance of doing well on the task, often linked to one's identity), c) utility value (theperceived usefulness of the task in achieving future goals), and d) cost (the perceived negativeaspects of engaging in the task, such as effort, time, and potential loss of alternative activities).EVT suggests that individuals are more likely to engage in tasks where they expect to succeedand that they value highly. Conversely, low expectancy and value can lead to task
supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2215408 and 2215788. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] P. Freire, Education for critical consciousness, vol. 1. Bloomsbury Publishing, 1973.[2] P. Gurin, B. R. A. Nagda, and X. Zúñiga, Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory, and research on intergroup dialogue. Russell Sage Foundation, 2013. Accessed: Jul. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=OAlRAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq= gurin+intergroup+dialogue&ots=hTQB0UuxyT&sig
/19407882.2017.1331854.[8] K. Rainey, M. Dancy, R. Mickelson, E. Stearns, and S. Moller, “Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM,” IJ STEM Ed, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 10, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6.[9] T. J. Weston, E. Seymour, A. K. Koch, and B. M. Drake, “Weed-Out Classes and Their Consequences,” in Talking about Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education, E. Seymour and A.-B. Hunter, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 197–243. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_7.[10] D. G. Holland, R. P. Harper, and E. Seymour, “Influences Beyond College that Shape Revised Choices,” in Talking about Leaving Revisited: Persistence
; Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32754.[10] K. V. Treuren, C. Fry, and B. Norris, “The Importance of Research in Student Formation,” in Conference Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[11] M. Ita, G. Kaletunç, and K. Swindle-Reilly, “Designing a Biomedical Engineering Course to Develop Entrepreneurial Mindset in Students,” Biomedical Engineering Education, vol. 3, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s43683-022-00101-3.[12] A. M. Jackson and C. A. Bodnar, “Narrative Inquiry in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review,” in Conference Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, 2023.[13] N. N. Kellam, K. S. Gerow, and J. Walther, “Narrative analysis
graduation rates across all quintiles. The p-values confirm the statistical significance of thesefindings.The impact of increasing curricular complexity by one unit ranges from -0.053034 in Q1 to -0.023975 in Q5. Setting curricular complexity to zero results in a positive shift, with the highesteffect of 0.015886 in Q5, suggesting that reducing complexity could significantly improve gradu-ation rates.4.3 Distribution of Covariates Across QuintilesThe boxplots and bar charts shown in Figure 4.1 illustrate the distribution of curricular complexity,standardized high school GPA, and other covariates across GPS quintiles. 10 (a) Distribution of Complexity Across GPS Quintiles (b
from family as engineers. b. Family is part of a student’s community in engineeringA person’s community in engineering often defines how successful they will be in their career,or how many challenges they will be able to easily overcome. When we asked students abouttheir community in engineering, four out of five mentioned that their family is part of theircommunity. Family members were “motivational” or supportive by providing words ofaffirmation especially when students were facing challenges. For example, Rogelio, discusseshow his mom is motivational, and also how his school counselor was pivotal in helping him toovercome challenges. Rogelio: Yeah, I would say, other than my school counselor, I would say no, but my mom is
Development, 16(1):16–31, 2022. 6 B. Cook and N.Pullaro. College graduation rates: Behind the numbers. American Council on Education, 2010. 7 A. Slim, G. Heileman, M. Akbarsharifi, K. Manasil, and A. Slim. Causal inference networks: Unraveling the complex relationships between curriculum complexity, student characteristics, and performance in higher education. In 2024 ASEE Annual Conference Exposition, Portland, Oregon, June 2024. ASEE Conferences. 8 S. Wilbers and J. Brankovic. The emergence of university rankings: a historical sociological account. Higher Education, 86(4):733–750, 2023. 9 S. Gallagger. The future of university credentials: New developments at the intersection of higher education and hiring. Harvard
, “Small world: Crafting an inclusive classroom (no matter what you teach),” Thought Action, pp. 51–61, 2011.[14] B. M. Dewsbury, “On faculty development of STEM inclusive teaching practices,” FEMS Microbiol. Lett., vol. 364, no. 18, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx179.[15] T. L. Killpack and L. C. Melón, “Toward Inclusive STEM Classrooms: What Personal Role Do Faculty Play?,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 3, p. es3, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0020.[16] S. B. Daily, J. Sperling, M. Gray, M. Gupta, A. Arnold, and K. Perri, “Addressing Gender Disparities in Computing Majors and Careers: Development and Effects of a Community Support Structure,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content
maker spaces making the crocheted samples. b. I got a tour or did a training on some equipment at a maker space but have not used it 3. What did you like best about the since then activity? c. I have used a makerspace for a course, but not on my own d. I use a makerspace on my own 4. Was there anything about this activity a couple of times a semester that could be improved? e. I use a makerspace on my own on a regular basis 3. Please describe your past experience with crochet and knitting. For example, do
] B. E. Lovitts, “Who Is Responsible for Graduate Student Attrition--The Individual or the Institution? Toward an Explanation of the High and Persistent Rate of Attrition,” Apr. 1996. Accessed: Mar. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED399878[2] National Science Foundation, “Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering (GSS) 2022,” Fall 2022. Accessed: Mar. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/surveys/graduate-students-postdoctorates-s-e/2022[3] N. Sellami, B. Toven-Lindsey, M. Levis-Fitzgerald, P. H. Barber, and T. Hasson, “A Unique and Scalable Model for Increasing Research Engagement, STEM Persistence, and Entry into Doctoral Programs,” CBE—Life Sci
interventions are compared tocivilian students also participating in the PLTL interventions and to their fellow military studentsnot participating in PLTL interventions. Commitment to engineering pathways is determined byassessing the number of military students who maintain their status in engineering pathways.Peer Leader Selection and TrainingPeer leaders were recruited from the undergraduate population who had recently completed thespecified engineering courses with an A or B grade. Once the peer leaders are hired, theycomplete a 10-hour self-paced course where they learn about themselves as individual learnersand student leaders, how to communicate with a diverse group of students in an onlineenvironment, and how to provide effective feedback on an
] M. Somerville, D. Anderson, H. Berbeco, J. R. Bourne, J. Crisman, D. Dabby, H. Donis- Keller, S. S. Holt, S. Kerns, and D. V. Kerns, The Olin curriculum: Thinking toward the future, IEEE transactions on Education, 48, 1, pp. 198-205, 2005.[3] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. Brodeur, and K. Edstrom, Rethinking engineering education, The CDIO approach, 302, 2, pp. 60-62, 2007.[4] D. Davis, M. Trevisan, P. Daniels, K. Gentili, C. Atman, R. Adams, D. McLean, and S. Beyerlein, A model for transferable integrated design engineering education, World Federation of Engineering Organizations, pp. 1-15, 2003.[5] C. B. Zoltowski and E. J. Delp, "Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP
, 2020.[11] M. Borrego, J. C. Stains, S. E. Miller, and M. T. Smith, "Assessing the effectiveness offaculty professional development for transforming STEM education," J. Higher Educ., vol. 89,no. 5, pp. 637-664, 2018.[12] J. Tomkin et al., "A model of pedagogical change: The case of ENGR 101," Int. J. Eng.Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 636-647, 2019.[13] K. Charmaz, Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. London, U.K.: SAGE, 2014.[14] B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies forQualitative Research. Chicago, IL, USA: Aldine, 1967.
–984, 2011, doi: 10.1002/tea.20439.[10] D. W. McMillan and D. M. Chavis, “Sense of community: A definition and theory,” J. Community Psychol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 6–23, Jan. 1986, doi: 10.1002/1520- 6629(198601)14:1<6::aid-jcop2290140103>3.0.co;2-i.[11] G. Crisp and I. Cruz, “Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature Between 1990 and 2007,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 525–545, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2.[12] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “The National Effective Teaching Institute: Assessment of Impact and Implications for Faculty Development,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 121–134, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01049.x.[13] W. B. Johnson
Appendix B for the full measures used). The table also shows the different subscales for some of these instruments. The collective self-esteem instrument was adapted from [9] to read “chemical engineer” as the group. Each measure used a seven-point Likert scale from (1) strongly agree to (7) strongly disagree. For the growth mindset questions, we decided to use the two questions used in the work of Cannings et al. [2] as these were the questions we asked our faculty previously [13]. 1. You have a certain amount of intelligence, and you really can’t do much to change it. 2. Your intelligence is something about you that you can’t change very much. Table 1: Instruments and subscales used in survey and
-responsive-teaching-competencies/15. T. Meidl and B. Baumann, “Extreme Make Over: Disposition Development of Pre-ServiceTeachers,” Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, vol. 8, no. 1, 2015, doi:https://doi.org/10.54656/oqxw7982.16. M. McCarthy, “The Paradox Of Authentic Relationships in Service-Learning InvolvingProspective Teachers,” Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, vol. 13, no. 2,2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.54656/pofn6589.17. C. Wilcoxen, A. Steiner, and J. Bell, “Strengthening Preservice Teachers’ Understanding ofCulturally Responsive Classrooms Through Exposure, Immersion, and Dialogue,” Journal ofCommunity Engagement and Scholarship, vol. 14, no. 1, 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.54656/flxy2991.18. D. W. Stokes and P
Paper ID #47898Integrating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into a Thermal-Fluid Sciences CourseNancy J. Moore PhD, North Carolina State University The author is a Teaching Associate Professor at North Carolina State University in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department. She teaches undergraduate courses in the thermal-fluid sciences and is the course coordinator for Thermal-Fluid Sciences. Her pedagogical research supports her teaching methods and philosophy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Integrating the Entrepreneurial Mindset into a Thermal-Fluids CourseAbstractAt
Paper ID #48892Modification of a 1-Person Submarine for Remote Control OperationMr. Vamsi Sripada, University of Bridgeport Vamsi Sripada is a Engineering Assistant at University Of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, Connecticut. Vamsi’s work is related to Electrical and Electronic Systems focused on the projects in Extreme Environment Lab under the supervision of Dr. Jani Pallis and received his MSc in Electrical engineering Degree in Dec 2023.Mohammad Omar AL-Torzi, University of Bridgeport Mohammad Al-Torzi received his Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Bridgeport. His academic background
Paper ID #45998GIFTS: Addressing Bias in Engineering Design with a Classroom ActivityProf. Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University Jill Davishahl is Associate Professor and First Year Programs Director in the Engineering + Design department at Western Washington University. Jill’s teaching, service, and research activities focus on enhancing the first year student experience by providing the foundational technical skills, student engagement opportunities, and professional skill development necessary to improve success in the major. Her current research focuses on creating inclusive and equitable learning environments
Paper ID #49305Incorporating Entrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML) into a ComputerNetworks CourseDr. M Ajmal Khan, Ohio Northern University Dr. Khan is an Associate Professor in the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department at Ohio Northern University (ONU), Ohio, US. He completed his Ph.D. in Wireless Security and Data Networks. He has taught courses in the areas of Cybersecurity, Computer Networks, Network Security, Penetration Testing, and Wireless and Communication Networks. His research focuses on Cybersecurity, IoT Security, Machine Learning, Relay Networks, and Physical Layer Security
Paper ID #47818Investigating Instructors’ Experiences in a Neurodiversity-Focused AI TrainingProgramProf. Andrew Begel, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Andrew Begel, PhD is an Associate Professor in the Software and Societal Systems Department at Carnegie Mellon University. Prior to this, he spent over 16 years as a Principal Researcher at Microsoft Research. Andrew’s goal is to create inclusive workplaces where all people, especially those with disabilities and the neurodivergent, can be successful, without discrimination. His recent work has helped people on the autism spectrum gain employment and facilitate social
Paper ID #47811Novel Mechatronics as a Multidisciplinary Introduction to Engineering FundamentalsLeendert Schrader, Saint Louis UniversityDr. Danahe Marmolejo, Saint Louis University Dr. Danahe Marmolejo, an Assistant Professor in Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at Saint Louis University’s School of Science and Engineering since 2022, specializes in Thermodynamics and Process Systems Engineering. With a background in Chemical Engineering, she teaches engineering courses, primarily for first—and second-year students. Her current research focuses on improving engineering education and fostering an entrepreneurial mindset in
Paper ID #45504Cultivating Global Citizens Through Engineering Education: A Frameworkfor Sustainable DevelopmentProf. Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University Bala Maheswaran, PhD COE Distinguished Professor Northeastern University 367 Snell Engineering Center Boston, MA 02115 ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Cultivating Global Citizens through Engineering Education: A Framework for Sustainable Development Bala Maheswaran College of Engineering Northeastern
Paper ID #49344Bridging Theory and Practice: A Case Study in Engineering Design EducationMs. Joanna Joseph, The University of Arizona ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Bridging Theory and Practice: A Case Study in Engineering Design EducationAbstractThis paper discusses the student preference with respect to learning material and modality ofinstruction in an upper-level engineering course. This project was conducted by assessing thecourse curriculum from a pedagogical perspective, surveying students on usage of courseresources, and determining VARK modalities of each student. The concept of learning styles hasbeen