Paper ID #12335Educating, Enlightening, and Entertaining: Audience Perceptions of the Ed-ucational Value of a Presentation Competition for Engineering StudentsKatherine Golder, British Columbia Institute of Technology Katherine Golder teaches Technical Communication for students in the Electrical and Computer Engi- neering program at the British Columbia Institute of Technology in Burnaby, BC, Canada.Ms. Darlene B Webb, British Columbia Institute of Technology Darlene Webb teaches junior and senior-level communication courses to mechanical engineering students at British Columbia Institute of Technology in Burnaby, BC
Paper ID #12419Memory Maps: Helping Engineering Students Fashion Words on the Spot inTheir Technical PresentationsMr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering communication at Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Presentations (Springer-Verlag, 2013) and founder of the web- site Writing Guidelines for Engineering and Science (writing.engr.psu.edu), which receives more than 1 million page downloads each year.Lori B Miraldi, The Pennsylvania State UniversityDr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University
afirst-year course. We believe that the pedagogical process used in this course is transferable toother educational contexts.References: 1. Allen, D., Allenby, B., Bridges, M., Crittenden, J., Davidson, C., Hendrickson, C., Matthews, S., Murphy, C., and Pijawka, D. (2008), Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: Final report. EPA Grant X3-83235101-0. 2. Wiggins, J., McCormick, M., Bielefeldt, A., Swan, C., and Paterson, K. (2011), “Students and sustainability: Assessing students’ understanding of sustainability from service learning experiences”, paper presented at the 2011 Annual American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) Conference and Exposition, 26-29 June 2011, Vancouver, Canada
. Page 26.127.4BadgingBadging, or microcredentialing, is a process by which students can be evaluated on skills and knowledgeat a more granular level than a whole course. In our current educational model, when an employerreviews the transcript of a student who received a B in a class, that employer cannot distinguish whetherthat student did everything in the course pretty well, or is particularly good at some skills yet unable tocomplete other tasks12. The concept with badges, and why there is increasing interest in the potential usein education, is the ability to measure particular skills that are encompassed in a class.Moreover, badging also works to incentivize students. In Kapp’s The Gamification of Learning andInstruction[14], the argument
: Page 26.866.4 1) definitions, classifications, and time-operations of Signals 2) convolution of continuous-time signals 3) Fourier series and transform 4) distortionless transmission and filtering 5) definitions, classifications, and response of systems 6) Laplace transform & representation of systems (e.g., transfer functions, Bode plots, pole- zero plots)We used the text Linear Signals and Systems by B. P. Lathi25 as a common reference for learningand discussing these concepts. Moreover, I recommended the text Signals and Systems MadeRidiculously Simple by Karu26 in order for students to have supplemental reading to support theirown learning.As prior research had shown27, 28, students of CTSS typically
informaladvancement structures in other labor market sectors.15-17 Of course, this does not imply thatovert and subtle processes of discrimination and bias are absent in federal agencies; just that (a)LGBT employees have baseline legal protections not guaranteed in other sectors, and (b) moreformalized advancement structures in federal agencies mean that, at least in theory, hiring,promotion, and disciplinary procedures are under greater scrutiny to align with anti-discrimination policies. As such, although organizations in the private, non-profit and educationsectors likely vary widely in their treatment of LGBT professionals, the differential experiencesof LGBT professionals in STEM agencies documented here may be equally if not more extremein other
“knowledge is a gift bestowed by those who consider themselvesknowledgeable upon those whom they consider to know nothing” 34: Page 26.1696.3 a) the teacher teaches and the students are taught; b) the teacher knows everything and the students know nothing; c) the teacher thinks and the students are thought about; d) the teacher talks and the students listen—meekly; e) the teacher disciplines and the students are disciplined; f) the teacher chooses and enforces his choice, and the students comply; g) the teacher acts and the students have the illusion of acting through the action of the teacher; h) the teacher chooses
given by professors in the humanities. As the newFYS director in 2012, the second author inherited the challenge of a program staffed primarily bythe faculty in the college of the arts and sciences. In 2011-12 there were 74 sections of the then-equivalent of FYS 112;b only three of those sections were taught by faculty from the professionalschools (one from the college of engineering and two from the college of education and healthsciences). The second author was concerned that students perceived this lack of participation inFYS by the faculty of the professional schools as a lack of endorsement for the value of liberaleducation.c She wanted the lecture to emphasize the significance of FYS as a foundation for allareas of study at the University
. Caswell, Body language for competent teachers. 1993, London ; New York: Routledge. xvii, 206 p.19. Hartley, G. and M. Karinch, I can read you like a book : how to spot the messages and emotions people are really sending with their body language. 2007, Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press. 287 p.20. Matsumoto, D., Culture and nonverbal behavior, in The SAGE Handbook of Nonverbal Communication, V.L. Manusov and M.L. Patterson, Editors. 2006, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, Calif. p. 219-236.21. Neill, S.C., Chris, Body language for competent teachers. 1993: Routledge.22. Pease, A. and B. Pease, The definitive book of body language. Bantam hardcover ed. 2006, New York: Bantam Books. xiii, 386 p.23. Riggio, R.E. and R.S
communities. In the associated lab, students would build on the previousweek’s audio processing topic and implement a MATLAB model of the cochlear implantultimately allowing them to process audio and listen to an approximation of what a user of theimplant would hear. 3.2 Data Collection 3.2.1 Contemporary Issue Report assignment and InterventionIn the assignment students wrote a research paper in which they were to: a) Investigate and describe a contemporary issue related to electrical and computer engineering or computer science, b) Discuss the issue in terms of problem, possible solutions, and trade-offs, and c) Discuss any ethical issues or societal impacts of the issue or solutions. Students were provided with a handout
. (1991). Writing in the academic disciplines, 1870-1990: A curricular history. Carbondale, IL:Southern Illinois UP.8 Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122-128.9 Butler, D. & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educa-tional Research, 65, 245-281.10 Paretti, M. C. (2011). Theories of Language and Content Together: The Case for Interdisciplinarity. Across theDisciplines, 8(3).11 Paretti, M. C. (2009). When the Teacher is the Audience: Assignment Design and Assessment in the Absence of“Real” Readers, in Engaging Audience: Writing in an Age of New Literacies, A. Gonzalez, E. Weiser, and B. Feh-ler, Editors. 2009, NCTE Press
response to feedback from “Dr. Jacobson” (see second anecdote below), we spent almost anentire meeting debating over whether or not to describe the upper-level administrator’s watch as:a) “flashy”, which was Michael’s original, immediate observation and visceral reaction, b) “whatlooks like an expensive watch”, or c) to simply leave this part of the story out altogether. Thosein favor of option “a” felt that it was important to highlight the difference between Michael’sprior life experiences and the level of privilege that such watches represent to him. At the sametime, we all agreed that the use of the word “flashy” served to set the anecdotes as immediatereactions captured in Michael’s natural voice apart from the other more formally written
Scale (SSDS), was designed to measure four sustainability-related outcomes: (a) confidence in responding to wicked problems and awareness of (b) global,(c) social, and (d) environmental responsibilities as a designer. The SSDS was implementedpre-post within a course context as part of a multi-university initiative called the WickedProblems in Sustainability Initiative (WPSI) during the Fall of 2014.The primary objective of this paper was to provide an overview of the reliability of the SSDSand to consider where the SSDS may still be improved for optimal alignment with WPSIobjectives and outcomes. Our secondary goal was to consider where WPSI may be improved inthe future in light of the survey results, which included the survey items and written
with a clear and thorough presentation of the theory and application of the principles of engineering mechanics. Emphasis is placed on developing the student’s ability to analyze problems – a most important skill for any engineer. [9, p. v, emphasis added]Our goal here is not to debunk the ES nor to call for their exclusion from the engineeringcurriculum. The ES are crucial in engineers’ toolboxes and professional formation. Our goal hereis to make visible that they a) play important normative roles and have been amazingly durableyet can be contested, b) reinforce ideologies and mindsets, and c) can blind engineers to socialinjustices and the need for engaging in SJ by addressing the SJ dimensions already inherent
innovative behaviors. Page 26.740.2Research PurposeThis paper explores whether a specific trait or tendency may be connected to innovation:empathy. This quantitative study is guided by the following research questions:RQ1: What is the relationship between the empathy and innovation amongst engineering students?RQ2: To what extent are empathic tendencies predictive of innovative behavioral tendencies?Using a model developed out of social psychology,13 we define empathy as a multi-facetedphenomenon built upon four distinct sub-constructs: (a) fantasy, (b) perspective-taking, (c)empathic concern, and (d) personal distress. Here we explore whether
(Image 4d). In creating their stories, participants were supposed to link the cracked objects’photos to any other images or texts or illustrations they liked. An iPhone application was used tofacilitate linking these images. Participants took three days to two weeks to work on their stories. Image 4 - Left to right: (a) a liquid rubber-coated ceramic cup; (b) the break; (c) the paint; (d) the storyBefore going through the process of creating the stories, the participants had mentioned that thebroken objects have little or no value and they should be discarded. However, when they cameback to share their images and stories, they had changed their minds about those objects andsome of them saw the objects as an art piece and a “representative of a
inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the newly-formed Consortium for Promoting Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by a $4.4 million grant from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. She was director of the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), a national research center that was funded from 2003-2010. Dr. Atman is the author or co-author on over 115 archival publications. She has been invited to give many keynote addresses, including a Distinguished Lecture at the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2014 Annual Conference. Dr. Atman joined the
Paper ID #13417Engineering a Humanities Education: Learning like an Engineer in a The-atre ElectiveMs. Lydia Wilkinson, University of Toronto Lydia Wilkinson is a lecturer in the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto, where she teaches courses on written, oral and visual communication. She has a Bachelor of Education, an MA in Drama and Performance Studies, and is pursuing a PhD in Drama that focuses on the intersections of engineering and theatre. Page 26.609.1 c
Paper ID #13566Communication as Both the Ultimate Interdisciplinary Subject and a Fieldof Specialization Encompassing More Than Technical Writing: Communica-tion Instruction Across DivisionsDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Department of Engi- neering & Society in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division and winner of the Sterling Olmsted Award for outstanding contributions to liberal education for engineers
enrolled in the WI section.Different instructors taught each section of the course.The textbook, written lecture material, most assignments, and most aspects of the final projectwere consistent across the two sections, though lectures differed in emphasis according to eachinstructor’s teaching philosophy and student questions. The difference between instructors is anacknowledged limitation of this investigation. In order to partially account for instructordifferences and the impact that this may have on the research results, the following methods wereused: (a) confirming data was acquired across data sources and (b) questions were explicitlyasked of students concerning classroom instructional techniques.At an institutional level, the efforts to
Paper ID #11421Undisciplined Epistemology: Conceptual Heterogeneity in a Field in the Mak-ingDr. Kacey D Beddoes, Oregon State University Kacey Beddoes is a Research Associate in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University. She received her PhD in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech, along with graduate certificates in Women’s and Gender Studies and Engineering Education. She serves as Managing Editor of Engineering Studies and Assistant Editor of the Global Engineering Series at Morgan & Claypool Publishers. Her current research interests include gender in engineering
Paper ID #11803Interactive Panel: Improving the Experiences of Marginalized Students onEngineering Design TeamsDr. Lorelle A Meadows, Michigan Technological University Dr. Lorelle A. Meadows is the Dean of the Pavlis Honors College at Michigan Technological University.Prof. Denise Sekaquaptewa, University of Michigan Denise Sekaquaptewa, Ph.D., is Professor of Psychology at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Her research in experimental social psychology focuses on stereotyping and intergroup dynamics, in partic- ular how being in the numerical minority in terms of gender or race influences academic outcomes and
Paper ID #13645Enhancing Communication Practices through Development of a Departmen-tal Civil Engineering Writing GuideDr. David A Saftner, University of Minnesota DuluthDr. Mary U ChristiansenDr. Adrian T. Hanson, University of Minnesota Duluth Professor and Department Head in Civil Engineering Department in Swenson College of Science and Engineering at University of Minnesota Duluth. Specialization is Environmental Engineering. 25 years of teaching experience in CE at a graduate and undergraduate level.Prof. Jill D. Jenson, University of Minnesota Duluth Jill D. Jenson, Associate Professor in the Department of Writing
Paper ID #12608Students Writing for Professional Practice: A Model for Collaboration amongFaculty, Practitioners and Writing SpecialistsProf. Susan Conrad, Portland State University Susan Conrad, Ph.D., is a Professor of Applied Linguistics and head of the Civil Engineering Writing Project. She has written numerous articles and books about English grammar, discourse, and corpus linguistics.Dr. William A Kitch P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Kitch is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona. Before starting his academic career he spent 24 years as a practicing engineer in both the
: Explanation 13 7 3 3 6 0 30.2% of a concept (3. b.) Conceptual: Identification 9 3 4 4 1 2 21.7% of a concept (3. c.) Total Writing Prompts in Chapter/Total End- 44/148 14/112 18/135 14/207 9/42 9/90 of-Chapter Problems Percentage of problems with 29.7% 12.5% 13.3% 6.8% 21.4% 10.0% writing prompts (%)a Total writing prompts: 44+14+18+12+9+9=106. Relative % given as sum of found promptsdivided by 106.Textbook Summaries and AnalysisAs part of our analysis, the research team also examined each textbook for features
, though, our ability to facilitate a community of practice is weakened, since the classbecomes less of a laboratory, and more of a classroom. Our job as professors of communicationis not simply to share information; it is to help students develop an identity of competentpractice, to promote citizenship in the broadest sense of the term.REFERENCES1. Johnson, I. J. (2010). Class size and student performance at a public research university: A Cross-Classified Model. Research in Higher Education 51: 701-723.2. Williams, D. D., Cook, P. F., Quinn, B., and Jensen, R. P. (1985). University class size: is smallerbetter? Research in Higher Education 23: 307-318.3. Kopeika, N. S. (1992). On the relationship of number of students to academic level
Page 26.725.3facilitate that discussion, each group identified a scribe who would take notes on themajor/common findings of the group. These ‘nuggets’ of information within each topic wereuploaded to the course website. After the discussion, students again responded to the same seriesof questions. Anonymous student responses were recorded via i-clickers (large class) or bubble-sheets (smaller class).Table 1. Questions posed to students before and after the activity. Question Response Options1) I Understand What Fracking Is……………………….. A = Strongly Agree B = Agree Somewhat
Claypool biomedical engineering book series. Joe is the author of three undergraduate textbooks. His work has been featured on the Discovery Channel, TEDx, US News and World Report, and CNN Health. He has won the national ASEE BED Teaching Award, Bucknell’s Pres- idential Teaching Award, and is currently a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Fellow and an NSF Pathways to Innovation Faculty Fellow. When not working Joe enjoys improvisational dance and music, running trail marathons, backpacking, brewing Belgian beers and most of all enjoying time with his children and wife. Page
Paper ID #13876Not engineering to help but learning to (un)learn: Integrating research andteaching on epistemologies of technology design at the marginsDr. Prashant Rajan, Iowa State University Prashant Rajan is an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of English and the Communication Studies Program at Iowa State University. He has a B. Eng. in polymer engineering from Pune University, an M.S. in materials science and engineering from the University of Cinainnati, and a Ph.D.in Organiza- tional Communication with Ph. D. minors in research methods and critical-cultural theories from Purdue University. He is
absence versus critical engagement : problematics of the crit in design learning and teaching. Art, Des. Commun. High. Educ. 2, 143–154 (2000).5. Horton, I. The Relationship between Creativity and the Group Crit in Art and Design Education The Relationship between Creativity and the Group Crit in Art and Design Education. Creat. or Conform. Build. Cult. Creat. High. Educ. (2007).6. Blair, B., Blythman, M. & Orr, S. “Critiquing the Critique”: A 2 year ADM-HEA funded project. (2008). at Page 26.1707.11 7. Using Peer Review to Help Students Improve Their Writing. The Teaching Center, University of