the same effect as the proposed wording. But by arbitrarily excluding the concept ofsustainable development from the Code, the ASEE Board took a step backwards in the evolutionof contemporary engineering codes of ethics and missed an opportunity to underscore itsleadership role in the area of sustainable development that dates to 1999. Indeed, The Code iscurrently listed as only one of four “ASEE Board of Directors Statements” along with statementson Engineering Ethics Education, Diversity, and the aforementioned Statement on SustainableDevelopment Education.The removal of sustainable development from the code may seem like a mere matter ofbureaucratic consensus, with all the original potential for student engagements with
. Brown, S., et al., Open Channel Flow Misconceptions and Ontological Categories. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2014. Vol.140(3): p. p.04014001(10).8. Burgher, J.K., et al., New Hands-on Fluid Mechanics Cartridges and Pedagogical Assessment, in 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2013, American Society for Engineering Education.9. Pan, S.Q., et al., A mini-Delphi approach: An improvement on single round techniques. Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 1996. 2(1): p. 27-39.10. Tugwell, P., et al., Health Research Profile to assess the capacity of low and middle income countries for equity-oriented research. BMC Public Health, 2006. 6: p. 151.11. M