Degrees in Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)1. The Undergraduate Research Experience is at the centerof the LSAMP Scholar experience at CUNY and non-CUNY sites. Each year over 140 Scholarsare engaged in a mentored research experience with a CUNY faculty member1.It is well documented the importance and benefits of STEM students having some type ofinternational experience2, 3. Additionally, higher education is moving forward with embracing theconcept of educating engineers as a global citizen4. Therefore in 2008 an approach wasimplemented to allow LSAMP scholars to integrate an International Experience into theirundergraduate studies. The multi-pronged approach consists of, 1) collaborating with existingprograms within the NSF
Paper ID #16076Capacity Building for Engineering Education in War-Affected CountriesBahawodin Baha, University of Brighton Dr Bahawodin Baha is a principal lecturer at University of Brighton in England since 1989, where he has been teaching and conducting research in electronic engineering. Besides his teaching in the UK, he has been helping Higher Education (HE) in Afghanistan since 2005 and has conducted many projects on improving higher education in Afghanistan. Recently, he was on sabbatical leave for two years and was technical advisor at the Ministry of Commu- nication and Information Technology (MICT) in
with thesematerials. It is primarily a call to consider how students engage in their college experience,and to search for proper tools that can be deployed to stimulate learning.In moving forward, there are numerous tools available to select from, including the modelspredicated on cooperation; i.e., working together to accomplish shared goals. Withincooperative activities, individuals seek outcomes that are beneficial to them and also benefitall other group members. (2, 3) Cooperative learning researchers and practitioners have shownthat positive peer relations are essential to success in college. The positive interpersonalrelationships promoted through cooperative learning are regarded by most as crucial totoday’s learning communities. They
member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), serving as the past Program Chair for the Minorities in En- gineering Division. He has served as a chair, vice-chair, program chair, and program committee member for numerous conferences of ASEE.Dr. Jinan Ziade, I have a PhD in Organizational Leadership with emphasis in IST from University of Phoenix, and an MBA from the same university. I have over 7 years of extensive leadership experience in advertising, marketing, strategies, and project team lead. Currently serving as Program Chair of Guild volunteer at St. Jude Medical Center and working with Memorial Foundation on philanthropic endeavors. My research interest include knowledge of cultural
Paper ID #14810Engineering Economics International Experience for Community College Stu-dentsProf. Paulina Z. Sidwell, McLennan Community College Paulina Sidwell is an Assistant Professor at McLennan Community College, teaching a wide variety of engineering and math courses since 2012. Originally from Monterrey, Mexico, she attended New Mex- ico State University, where she played Division I tennis while getting her B.S. in Industrial Engineering. At graduation she was honored with the Outstanding International Student Award and the Joe and Van Bullock Medal of Honor to Outstanding Female Student-Athlete. She also received
process and helps foster entrepreneurial communities through leadership development. Alexis is also responsible for new program generation, leading the organization’s program assessment initiative and building cross-university ecosystem knowledge through the 3DS Academic Council. Before joining 3 Day Startup, Alexis was the former Lead Organizer of 3 Day Startup Creighton, a locally run 3DS program where she was instrumental in launching the first program in the Midwest. She has also worked in the nonprofit sector for four years, in venture capital advising and vetting startups, and with an international startup called Appconomy.Dr. Mary G. Schoonmaker, Western New England University Dr. Schoonmaker is an Assistant
Paper ID #15928Models for International Collaborative Undergraduate Engineering ProgrammesDr. Kathleen Meehan, Virginia Tech Kathleen Meehan earned her B.S. in electrical engineering from Manhattan College and her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Illinois under the supervision of Prof. Nick Holonyak, Jr. She worked as a member of technical staff at Lytel, Inc., following graduation. At Polaroid, she was appointed a Senior Research Group Leader, responsible for the design of laser diodes and arrays. After leaving Polaroid, she was employed at Biocontrol Technology. She moved into academia full-time in 1997 and worked
Paper ID #16338Sustainable Undergraduate Engineering 3-D Printing LabProf. Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University - Pueblo NEBOJSA I. JAKSIC earned the Dipl. Ing. degree in electrical engineering from Belgrade University (1984), the M.S. in electrical engineering (1988), the M.S. in industrial engineering (1992), and the Ph.D. in industrial engineering from the Ohio State University (2000). He is currently a Professor at Colorado State University-Pueblo teaching robotics and automation courses. Dr. Jaksic has over 60 publications and holds two patents. Dr. Jaksic’s interests include robotics, automation, and
experience in the field of engineering higher education leading 32 accreditations processes in engineering and technology worldwide. Responsible for the experiential training program in engineer- ing. Researcher on the impact of the engineering education in students, faculty and companies. Conducts quality office and educational innovation at UTEC. Coordinating the design of curricula, academic per- formance; international call for engineering specialists to cover teaching positions. English proficiency and advanced German.Dr. Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Sanger is a professor in the School of Engineering Technology in the College of Technology of Purdue University. His focus and passion is
Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. http://doi.org/10.1177/10283153062870024. Terenzini, P., & Upcraft, M. (1996). Assessing programs and service outcomes. In M. L. Upcraft (Ed.), Assessment in student affairs : a guide for practitioners / (1st ed., pp. 217–239). San Francisco : Jossey- Bass Publishers.5. Volkwein, J. F., Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., Strauss, L. C., & Sukhbaatar, J. A. V. Z. A. N. (2004). Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 318-328.6. Paige, R. M., Jacobs-Cassuto, M, Yershova, Y. A., et al. (2003) Assessing
. With which college/school are you affiliated? C. What program are you attending? D. How did you find out about the international program? (Check all that apply.) General Questions for All SA programs As a result of participating in this international program: 1. My confidence and ability to live abroad or interact with people from other cultures has been strengthened. 2. I have a greater appreciation for other nations or cultures. 3. I have a deeper understanding of my own culture. 4. I have a deeper understanding of my own discipline. 5. My respect and love for people different from me has grown. 6. Please write a paragraph explaining the impact that your study abroad program has had on your overall
curricula for introducing the LEWAS into multiple courses at Virginia Western Community College and Virginia Tech. He also has international collabora- tion experience in first-year course development, engineering education research, and real-time watershed monitoring.Mr. Daniel S. Brogan, Virginia Tech Daniel S. Brogan is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Working under Dr. Vinod K. Lohani, he has had a leading role in the development and implementa- tion work of the Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) Lab for more than three years. His dissertation research involves the development and classroom integration of the Online Wa- tershed Learning System
Admitted 59% 59% 59% 58% 60% 60% 58% 57% 57%Table 3 presents the data related to applicants admitted by field of Education and Training. Asit can be verified, Engineering and related Technical fields is a field with a high admissionrate, when compared to the remaining fields.Table 3 – Applicants admitted in the Fields of Education and Training (CNAEF). Fields of Education and 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Training (CNAEF) Major Groups Science, Mathematics and 3851 3270 3380 3181 3205 2945 3186 3819 4238 4207 Computer Science Engineering
classroom: Research into edX's first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8. 2. Lebron, D., and H. Shahriar (2015). Comparing MOOC-Based Platforms: Reflection on Pedagogical Support, Framework and Learning Analytics. 2015 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 167–74. 3. Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-Constructive-Interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105. 4. Chi, Michelene T. H., and Ruth Wylie (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–43. 5. Hsiao, I.-Han, and F. Naveed (2015). Identifying Learning
as the director Shirpur campus and at College of Engineering Pune (COEP) as the founder head of the innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. Recently, his paper won the Best Teaching Strategies Paper award at the most respected international conference in the area of engineering education
Industrial ParkFLEAP travels, the students not only received a real-world understanding of renewable energyand sustainability, but received invaluable lessons related to international culture, politics,international perspective, travel, and language.Learning ObjectivesExperience-based learning is a widely accepted form of learning. One of the many examples ofexperience-based learning is that of education abroad programs. According to Kolb’sexperiential learning theory, experiential learning is "the process whereby knowledge is createdthrough the transformation of experience16.” There are four steps in the learning cycle: 1)Concrete Experience 2) Reflective Observation 3) Abstract Conceptualization 4) ActiveExperimentation. It is fairly simple to
literacies on the part ofemployees and employers. The use of communication technology can be found among thefour ‘mega trends’ that Shuman et al.[1] specifically identify for the field of engineering,alongside changes forced by the fragile world economy, student and professional mobility,and the increasingly loud voice of the social imperative. This poses challenges foreducational institutions which, beyond helping students become subject experts, need to takethe responsibility for preparing them to ‘deal with global communicative practices online, inall their complexity’[2]. This trend toward developing skills needed to fully operate in highlyglobalised and cross-cultural settings as a necessary top-up to ‘technical core competencies’[3]has become
international and intercultural contexts withengineers who define problems differently from themselves1, 2, 3. To meet those workforcedemands and needs, Virginia Tech offers a program which integrates an on-campus, semester-long experience with a two week international experience in a course for first year engineeringstudents. This study focuses on understanding the range of learning experiences from theperspectives of enrolled students that occurred during the two week international module.Throughout the two weeks students traveled through Italy, Switzerland, Germany, and Franceengaging in local culture and customs during visits with engineering businesses and universities.These visits, intentionally selected by the program faculty director to align
similarities and use this awareness to develop stronger relationships.2. Develop professional skills such as team working, communication, leadership, etc.3. Familiarize students with the technical jargon used in each nation in their respective language.4. To build strong working relationships among UTEP and CETYS faculty participating in the program.5. Learn about the challenges of sustainability in the modern world.6. Use life cycle assessment as a technique to measure environmental impact of infrastructures, processes, or services.7. Understand the principles of design for sustainability, with an emphasis on the built environment.8. Be involved in community-driven
program,it awards a highest degree of Bachelors in Engineering with Honors (BEngH).6 Additionally,this program was found to be much less technically rigorous than either the English MEng orAmerican BS engineering degrees. This absence of rigor in terms of higher level math andscience skills and advanced engineering techniques results in a student graduating with a skill setquite different than most American institutions would consider applicable for an engineering BSdegree. It is more in line with an American Associate of Science degree (AS). However, asecond type of engineering degree program exists at some Scottish universities and appears to bemuch better aligned to the USA degrees, as shown in Figure 3. While it takes five years tocomplete
competencies of both domestic and international students by immersing mentoring program participants in crosscultural activities. One of the objectives of this study is to assess the participants' “ability to think and act in interculturally appropriate ways” upon engaging in a mentoring program organized by a Women in Engineering department. Participants’ knowledge, skills and attitudes will be evaluated and presented using 3 of the 6 intercultural constructs developed by the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU). Triangulation methodology is utilized, including questions adopted from a Likert scale survey (developed by the University's Center for Instructional Excellence and Global Learning programs) and a participant case study
for their stay at TU Dortmund University the above mentioned necessity toprepare students for a global working environment was an important issue leading into therealization of this course. Apart from the possibility to develop respective competences dur-ing overseas stays we see great potentials in the use of online technology for building transna-tional student working groups and by this designing international as well as interculturallearning environments. The developed online course is an example how to design such cours-es with respect to both intercultural and technical competence development as equal courseobjectives.In summer 2014, the preparatory online course was delivered for the first time in a 3-weekformat. An updated second 4
blossomed to a collaborative research relationship over thecourse of four years. In addition to conducting annual study abroad programs at QUT, studentsinvolved in this program have continued to perform research with their home university whilecollaborating with the host university. Bi-directional student exchange for research internshipsand technical publications have materialized from this relationship.This paper will present the mechanics and logistics associated with conducting an annual,international study abroad program. It will describe the structure of the program as well ascomparison to similar programs. The paper will also describe how the relationship grew beyonda course-based program to a collaborative research-based partnership. The
continue to use the term herewell before the final development as it served as an important stage in the project developmentprocess.A field visit was made to the center in order to conduct the beta-test. The aim of the beta-test wasto evaluate three key components for the success of the project: students’ interaction with andcomfort in using the tablet, students’ ways of utilizing and challenges in using the platform, andstudents’ feedback on the course content and its structure.The one-week field visit was structured for the following purposes: 1. Introduce and familiarize the students with the use of the tablet and the platform 2. Conduct class sessions of the modules developed 3. Perform hands-on activities that could assist in learning
with a global issue US-based engineering course with international project Service learning program – engineering focused (e.g., Engineers without Borders) Service learning program – non-engineering focused University housing with an international focus Study Abroad Course with a global focus – engineering based Course with a global focus – non-engineering based Internship, co-op, or technical research project conducted internationally Dual-degree program with an international university Other – provide detailsWe administered the instrument to all incoming freshmen engineering students in for the Fall2015 term and graduating seniors for both Fall 2015 and Spring 2016 terms. (Because of a largeco-op program, seniors graduate in December, May
programs, students from different universities often operate with some separation (e.g. living in separate residential spaces, different excursions during weekends). Thus, the graduate students with the University of Michigan saw an opportunity for outreach to continue to Liberian undergraduate women especially after the USAIDfunded summer program was put on indefinite hiatus while also fulfilling the desire by University of Michigan SWE members to have international experiences, and to strengthen these experiences by means of crosscultural peer collaborations. 3. LSWE SUCCESS a novel way to build an international community of women engineers through peertopeer collaboration In August 2015, five undergraduate female engineering
Vocational University Leadership Innovation Institute (VULII), a Vietnamese engineering education and academic leadership development program. In this role, he and the VULII team have led or coordinated numerous workshops in Vietnam to help eight institutions and their leaders improve engineering education programs. Related activities have in- cluded helping engineering programs prepare for international accreditation/recognition and professional development activities for rectors and senior leadership. He has been active in the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) in the Mechanics Division and the Engineering Technology Division, currently the Chair of the Engineering Technology Division. He serves on the
Paper ID #15031Creating International Experiences for First-Year Engineers Through theEWB Australia Challenge ProjectDr. Thomas J. Siller, Colorado State University Tom Siller is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Col- orado State University. He has been a faculty member at CSU for 28 years.Mr. Alistair Cook, Colorado State University PhD Student in Education Sciences focusing on Engineering for Global Development as a context to teach engineering professional skills to undergraduate engineering studentsDr. Gearold R. Johnson, Colorado State University Gerry Johnson is a Senior
Introduction to Solid State Lighting Visible Spectrum and Eye Experiment 2: Humans vs. Machines Response Experiment 3: Properties of Red, Green, and Blue LEDs History of Lighting Product Design What is an Led? Experiment 1: Properties of Narrow and Wide Angle LEDs Effect of Temperature on LEDs Power Electronics Efficiency and Cost of Lighting Applications of Solid State Design Project: Wearable LEDs LightingThe additional aims of the OIP, which were not formalized in the course specification, wereto introduce students to Scotland and its history through a series of cultural tours, to supportthe development of oral English skills and technical English
women is exemplified in the recent study carried out by ActionAid International, which examined the state of Liberian undergraduate women in urban areas. The results show that these women often face sexual intimidation by faculty and instructors, women are often excluded from student organizations, there exists a lack of institutional support for female organizations at the universities, and that the women do not feel safe in the university due to low security standards1,2. The situation is even direr for the female engineering students with less than 10% of the engineering student population being women3. Furthermore, there is only one female engineering professor within the Division of Engineering at the University of Liberia. Thus, women