networks from among those we discussed in class (e.g.Bluetooth, 802.11, Passive RFID, etc.) and some that were not discussed but the studentsdiscovered on their own (e.g. Zigbee, WISP, etc.). Figure 2(b) shows the results of theassessment of their network choice. While one of any number of protocols could satisfy thedesign requirements, in the assessment we were looking to see that students provided a clearjustification for their selection of network. For example, some students justified their networkselection by pointing to the environment in which these sensors will be installed, a hospital. Theobservation was made by many students that in a hospital there are extra limitations on the use ofthe RF spectrum so as to not cause interference with
instructor has allowed thestudents to choose, as part of their semester project work, ‘teaching-to-learn’ topics that studentsteach to one another, where the topics of choice help to better represent the student demographicsand interests in the classroom.8 Additionally, the instructor has chosen in recent semesters toreplace the final exam for the course with a project, where each student writes a proposal for asenior design project that (a) addresses a need typical of a severely disabled child at Heartspringand (b) can be accomplished within two semesters. The Heartspring context gives the ECE 571students tremendous leeway when choosing the application area and design form factor. Thefollowing sections describe the details of the assignment and the
sustainability components are incorporated into ethics education ofengineers it will allow students to a) identify the differences in ethical standards and implementation in different countries; b) identify the differences in ethical practice and the root causes and the cross impacts of these practices in an international environment; c) apply the principles in making ethical decisions.A major aim of a standard code of ethics is “to respect the inherent dignity of the individual”38.Civil engineers selecting materials and equipment in designing constructed facilities introducethe supply chain issue in a globalized economy. Current supply chains can cause desperationand death for many people, especially those living in developing countries
. As illustrated in Figure 1, the focus ofthis problem-based activity is to promote students’ learning in the core concepts related toHyper-Text Transfer Protocol Secure, or HTTP over SSL. The learning objectives for thisparticular activity are: (a) review firewall, network design and web server configurationprocesses; (b) identify differences between HTTPS and HTTP; (c) migrate a website from HTTPto HTTPS; (d) acquire, activate and install certificates; (e) identify potential vulnerabilitiesrelated to data security; (f) define best practices related to HTTPS implementation; and (g)delineate optimal encryption method. Figure 1 presents the MEA.Once the learning objectives were identified, the next step in the process was to apply the
Paper ID #16333Where are they Now? Analyses of Alumnae DataDr. Andrea L Welker, Villanova University Dr. Andrea L. Welker, PE, is a professor in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University. Dr. Welker teaches a variety of geotechnical undergraduate and graduate classes, including soil mechanics, foundation design, geoenvironmental engineering, and geosynthetics. Her re- search focuses on the geotechnical aspects of stormwater control measures and the use of recycled materi- als in plastic pipes. In addition to teaching and performing research, she is the assessment chair and study
% 22.12% 20.00% 16.35% 8.65% 10.00% 0.96% 0.00% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Figure 2: Incoming Mechanical Engineering Freshmen Math ConfidenceFigures 3 and 4 show what the students thought they would earn in their first college mathcourse, Pre-calculus and Calculus 1, respectively. Blue indicates an A, red was a B, and greenwas a C. The top of each bar shows the number in each category. The horizontal axis (finalgrade) compares the students’ expectations (colored column), clearly showing the reality of therigor of college math courses. For
Issues in Higher Education, June 24, 2014, http://diverseeducation.com/article/65138/8. South Africa National Planning Commission, “Diagnostic Report.” June, 2011.9. South Africa National Planning Commission, “National Development Plan 2030 Our Future-Make it Work.” 2012.10. NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, SP-2007-6105, http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20080008301.pdf11. Carmen C. and Groenewald B., “Initiation and Development of International Collaboration Among the Future Space Workforce Via the Design and Development of a STEM Tool,” 63rd International Astronautical Congress Proceedings, Naples, IT, Oct. 2012.12. Groenewald
the unique experiences that women faculty face as a gender minority in academicengineering programs. By situating this study within the context of three selective doctoral grantinginstitutions, this study was unique in that it uncovered how institutional processes and programs directlyinfluenced the success of women faculty in engineering. Although women at all three universities facedsimilar challenges including gender bias, work/family conflict, and the “two-body problem,” interviewees’perceptions of the effectiveness of the policies and programs differed significantly by site. This studyprovided insights into how women faculty perceive many of these programs as well as the factors thatinfluence the decision to utilize the policies that
Science & Engineering Capabilities, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology - Workforce/Education Subcommittee, (2004).[2] Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., (2007).[3] Mizelle, N. B., Irvin, J. L. Transition from middle school into high school. Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association, (www.nmsa.org).[4] DoD Research and Education Program for HBCU/MI Equipment/Instrumentation Grant, Proposal No. 64685- EG-REP from January 2014 to January 2015.[5] State Higher Education
Through Humanistic And Global Perspectives. Paper presented at 1999 Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina. https://peer.asee.org/7632.5. Parkhurst, R., & Moskal, B., & Lucena, J., & Bigley, T., & Downey, G., & Ruff, S. (2006, June), A Comparative Analysis Of Online And In Class Versions Of Engineering Cultures Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. https://peer.asee.org/672.6. Jesiek, B. K., & Chang, Y., & Shen, Y., & Lin, J. J., & Hirleman, D., & Groll, E. A. (2011, June), International Research and Education in Engineering (IREE) 2010 China: Developing Globally Competent Engineering Researchers Paper presented at 2011 Annual
Paper ID #15180The Roles of Engineering Notebooks in Shaping Elementary Engineering Stu-dent Discourse and Practice (RTP)Jonathan D. Hertel, Museum of Science Jonathan manages the Examining the Efficacy of Engineering is Elementary (E4) project (an NSF-funded study of the efficacy of the EiE curriculum), overseeing and organizing a research effort that involves 240 teachers in the different states. He also provides evaluation support for the Engineering Adventures and Engineering Everywhere projects. He holds an Ed.M. in learning and teaching from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. In 2013-2014, he was named a
based on key principles in the domain.8 Novicestypically start by trying to find the correct equation based on surface features.8Although there have been numerous studies characterizing experts and comparing experts tonovices, there has been less longitudinal research to explain how these important aspects of AEdevelop.10 Schwartz, Bransford, and Sears (2005) have proposed a theoretical model of AEdevelopment (See Figure 1). 7 This model assumes that AE development is a continuous processthat includes axes for growth along two dimensions: (a) innovation and (b) efficiency. Schwartz,Bransford, and Sears (2005) have hypothesized that these two dimensions co-evolve in what theyhave called the “optimal adaptability corridor” (OAC). 7 The OAC
, District of Columbia. https://peer.asee.org/59902 Mariappan, J., & Newell, J. A., & Schmalzel, J. L., & Ramachandran, R., & Sukumaran, B., & Marchese, A. J.(1999, June), The Sophomore Engineering Clinic: An Introduction To The Design Process Through A Series OfOpen Ended Projects Paper presented at 1999 Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina.https://peer.asee.org/79463 Simone, M., & Jansson, P. M., & Riddell, W., & Farrell, S. (2008, June), Communication In A Project BasedLearning Design Course Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.https://peer.asee.org/33184 E. Constans, J. Courtney, K. Dahm, J. Everett, C. Gabler, R. Harvey, L. Head, D. Hutto, H. Zhang Setting
Paper ID #15019Disciplinary Influences on the Professional Identity of Civil Engineering Stu-dents: Starting the ConversationMiss Cassandra Jo Groen, Virginia Tech Cassandra is currently a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, VA. Her research interests include student engineering identity development, communication practices and discourse strategies, power negotiation, and student artifact development. She earned her Masters (2011) and Bachelors (2009) degrees in Civil Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in Rapid City, SD.Dr. Denise Rutledge
of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 285-295.17. Kim, K. H., & Coxon, S. V. (2013). The Creativity Crisis, Possible Causes, and What Schools Can Do. In J. B. Jones & L. J. Flint (Eds.), The Creative Imperative (pp. 53-68). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.18. Rollo May: The Courage to Create. New York: Nortin, rev. ed., 1994.19. U. Bertram, W. Preißing, “Navigieren im offenen System: Unternehmensführung ist ein künstlerischer Prozess,”, Leonberg: Container Verl., 2007.20. J. A. Fodor, “A theory of the cild’s theory of mind,” in Cognition, vol. 44, 1992, pp. 282-296.21. S. H Schwartz, “Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries,” in M
observable, an anonymous survey was administered andstudents were asked to self-report on their awareness of their higher-order cognitive thinking.While such self-reporting surveys have limitations, the results of this initial work in progresssuggest that under this model, students are more aware of their learning, they spend more timereviewing and evaluating their solutions, and they report that self-grading and self-correctingleads to an improved understanding of the material. Future work will expand this initial casestudy into a longitudinal study designed to test the impact of this model on student learning whencompared to a control group.References [1] R. Kelley and B. Dooley, “The technology of cheating,” in IEEE Intl. Symp. on Ethics in
lathe machines before they could use these machines to build their projects. (The mills and lathes have controls which are much more complicated than those of the drill presses or bandsaws.) Two issues were identified. Firstly, although the machine shop technicians demonstrated safe practices during the training, this was not handson training for the students. Secondly, there were two months between the end of the training and the start of the project work. During this time, students could forget some of the procedures. Other researchers have reported similar findings (Haynie, 2009.) To resolve both of these issues, the machine shop technicians developed mill and lathe exercises, show in Appendices A and B. The students have one month
M3 M1 M7 M2 M2 M3 M2 M4 M4 M4 M5 M5 M5 (a) (b) (c) Fig. 5 Final Product Family of Lamps: (a) Office Lamp
such as transportation, electricitygeneration, etc.) which encompasses about 10% of typical Fig. 2. Student responses to survey multiple questions regarding A) the efficiacy of using commonly known structures to gain a sense of scale, B)annual use[8] . Over 80% of the students found that basing the their awareness of environmental concerns after the projects conclusion, andreservoir foundation on areas that were familiar to them aided C) how accurate they feel their reservoir design would compare to actualthem in understanding the volume of reservoir volume that requirementswas required. This is important to note from both a design
(summary of the Water, Earth, and Biota initiative as a 2000highlight for Geosciences), Geotimes, 46(7), 25-26.4. Hooper, R., and E. Foufoula-Georgiou (2008), Advancing the Theory and Practice of Hydrologic Science, EosTrans. AGU, 89(39), doi:10.1029/2008EO390005.5. CUAHSI (2010). Water in a Dynamic Planet: A Five-year Strategic Plan for Water Science(http://dx.doi.org/10.4211/sciplan.200711).6. Shaw, S. B., and M. T. Walter (2012), Using comparative analysis to teach about the nature of nonstationarityin future flood predictions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16(5), 1269–1279, doi:10.5194/hess-16-1269-2012.7. Meselhe, E., McCorquodale, J.A., Shelden, J., Dortch, M., Brown, T.S., Elkan, P., Rodrigue, M.D., Schindler,J.K
Paper ID #17224Digital Business Framework: Shaping Engineering Education for Next-Genin the Era of Digital EconomyProf. Victor Taratukhin, Stanford University Victor Taratukhin received his Ph.D. in Engineering Design in 1998 and Ph.D. in Computing Sciences and Engineering in 2002. Victor was a Lecturer in Decision Engineering and Module Leader (IT for Product Realization) at Cranfield University, UK (2001-2004), SAP University Alliances Program Director (2004- 2012). He is Managing Director, Competence Center ERP at European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS), University of Muenster, Germany (2012-present) and
Business BU 100 Introduction to Business 3 AC 101 Financial Accounting I 4 MG 101 Principles of Management 3 MK 103 Principles of Marketing 3 MK 213 Principles of Sales 3 MG 210 Entrepreneurship 3 OA 201 Business Communications 3 Manufacturing MN 133 A New Product Development 2 MN 133 B Lean Six Sigma Fundamentals 2The 25 credit Manufacturing Technology Certificate program (see Table 1 for detailedcurriculum with advising notes
navigate these situations.Example skill exercise: Following a discussion of the term “affective”, students are asked tocomplete the following series of activities. 1. Recall the most challenging situation you encountered this semester. This can relate to this course, other courses or experiences outside school. 2. In your group of two, take turns to share the details of the specific experience with your partner. Focus on the following aspects to facilitate a productive reflective process: a. What was the situation? What led up to it? What did you do/ say? What did other people do/ say? What happened afterwards. b. How did you experience the situation? How did you feel in the beginning
- project management, 17 - business and public administration, and 18 -leadership.Given the background related to individuals’ needs for autonomy and the importance thatengineers possess both technical and non-technical skills, the following research questionsmotivated this study:(1) To what extent do top-ranked environmental engineering programs allow students to make choices in their courses (such as free electives and technical electives)? a. How do choice opportunities in EnvE compare to chemical and civil engineering degrees? b. How do choice opportunities in EnvE compare to non-engineering degrees in chemistry, math, and physics?(2) What is the balance of required technical and non-technical courses in top
” courses in the winter term, designated CE487x, arementored by sub-discipline faculty experts in 4 different sub-discipline areas. Each individualstudent is mentored in a part of the system design. The four sub-discipline courses are • CE487E – Environmental and Water Resources Design • CE487G – Geotechnical Design • CE487S – Structural Design • CE487T – Transportation and Land Development DesignKeeping in mind the mentoring structure in Figure 1 and course structure in Table 1, Figure 2depicts an example of how students from some of the ten teams might be organized in theirteams and courses. Figure 2. Organization of student teams in coursesTeam B in the figure corresponds to the sub-discipline assignments in Figure
Academy ofEngineering. August.7 Borrego, B., Froyd, J. E. & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey ofAwareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments. Journal of Engineering Education, p188 8 Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal ofOperational Research, 177, 1333-1352.9
undergraduates in research projects is assessing the extent that theprograms are achieving their goals to motivate student interest in pursuing careers and advanceddegrees in STEM-related fields. The generation and use of data to modify and improve theprograms is often neglected. The purpose of this study was to gather data to understand variousaspects of undergraduate students’ summer research experiences in wireless communications andto consider successful aspects and areas for modification or improvement. We sought tounderstand the undergraduate students’ perceptions about their summer research projects, as wellas the contexts of their experiences with respect to the following aspects: (a) their researchprojects; (b) their methods of learning from
resources, andprocess planning. The specific ABET ETAC student outcomes for Engineering Technology are4: a. An ability to select and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to broadly-defined engineering technology activities b. An ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require the application of principles and applied procedures or methodologies c. An ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; and to apply experimental results to improve processes d. An ability to design systems, components, or processes for broadly-defined engineering
”, but Criteria 5 (b) on curriculum requirements does define engineering designas “a decision-making process (often iterative), in which the basic sciences, mathematics, and theengineering sciences are applied to convert resources optimally to meet [ the client’s] statedneeds.”6 As a decision-making process, engineering design includes the act of judgment7.Decisions are arrived at through judgment; it is judgment that recognizes when a decision is to bemade and the reason for making each decision1. Engineering judgment cannot be taught directly, since its application requires the contextof the unforeseen, the in-process, contingent, and indeterminate. What educators do is putstudents in situations that call for the practice of engineering
distinct preference for the SMSE ideationspace: “I liked using the ideation space b/c there is more room to communicate with otherstudents, as well as the professor.” Other students had a positive perspective on both spaces: ”Ithink both spaces were fine, but more individual in office and a lot of peer help as well asprofessor’s help in ideation space.”Still, large spaces do have negative aspects: “I feel others are distracted if there are lots ofstudents making noise in the ideation space”; “[the] office is quieter”. One situation noticed byboth faculty and students was the tendency for students to cluster around the professor creating asituation similar to a wall-less office: “I believe that when the office hours were done in theideation space