the outcomes demonstrated by students viathe evaluative components, grades were assigned ranging from A (attainment of all outcomes ata proficient level) to B- (attainment of 1 outcome at a proficient level).Student ProjectsThroughout the course, students were asked to maintain and continuously update a coursejournal. This journal consisted of entries similar to a diary in which students would reflect uponthe broader impacts topic being discussed and record their level of personal interest andalignment of personal values with the goals and impact of that specific broader impacts (BI)activity. The intent here was for the students to identify an area of BI activity that aligned withtheir interests and motivations right from the beginning
agents for change”[7].Several studies describe the elements of interdisciplinary education including Borrego andNewswander who review the graduate-level IGERT programs at 98 institutions and indicate thatthe national efforts for interdisciplinary graduate education include: (a) grounding in multipletraditional disciplines, (b) integration skills and broad perspective of the interdisciplinarydomain, (c) team work, and (d) interdisciplinary communication [5]. Boix Mansilla’s workincludes development of rubrics which can be useful to assessing students’ interdisciplinarywork. The performance criteria promoting interdisciplinarity in the rubrics include: (a) beingwell grounded in the disciplines, (b) advancing student understanding, and (c) showing
Science, Mathematics and Engineering Mentor- ing from the White House; the 2008 Hewlett-Packard/Harriett B. Rigas Award from the IEEE Education Society; the 2013 Distinguished Educator Award from the ASEE Electrical and Computer Engineering Division; and was named an IEEE Fellow in 2014. Dr. Schrader earned her B.S. in electrical engineering from Valparaiso University, and her M.S. and Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Notre Dame.Dr. Darryl P. Butt, University of UtahTimothy AndersenDr. Tammi Vacha-Haase, Boise State University Tammi Vacha-Haase currently serves as the Dean of the Graduate College at Boise State University. She received her Ph.D. in 1995 from Texas A&M University. Dr. Vacha
abilities increased while taking the EECS communication course. (a) Depicts the pre- andpost-class distributions by communication genre, with the box height indicating the mean response and thewhiskers representing the standard deviation. For each genre, the average self-assessed score increased aftertaking the course. (b) Shows the distribution of the students’ self-assessed change in abilities by genre.While in a couple cases, students actually reported a decrease in their perceived abilities, the majority ofstudents reported an increase.improvement in their communication skills (approximately 55%) with those who would at leastmoderately recommend the Communication Lab to a friend (approximately 90% reported 3-5/5).While there might be several
electricity outlet. The cell temperature of an HCPV module impacts its electricaloutput [5, 6]. Thus, HCPV needs a cooling system to maintain the temperature of the solarmodule. The cooling system can keep the temperature between 50°C and 80°C [7, 8], manydifferent kinds of cooling system have been shown in literature in the past[9-11]. Passive andactive cooling systems are two types of general cooling method for HCPV cooling.The passive cooling system uses a metal heat sink to cool down the panel. Many types ofresearch show the ability to use passive heat sink to keep panel efficiently (especially in500suns) [12-19], the passive cooling fin structure can be shown in Figure 3 [19].Figure 3. Schematic of a finned heat sink: (a) front view and (b) 3D
abstracting overall themes that honor our uniqueperspectives while capturing broader areas of focus for enriching graduate education.ReferencesAdams, R. S., Allendoerfer, C., Bell, P., Chen, H., Fleming, L., Leifer, L., Maring, B. & Williams, D. (2006, June). A model for building and sustaining a community of engineering education research scholars. Paper presented at the 2006 Annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Chicago, Illinois. https://peer.asee.org/1003Adams, R. S., Allendoerfer, C., Rhoulac Smith, T., Socha, D., Williams, D., & Yasuhara, K. (2007, June). Storytelling in engineering education. Paper presented at 2007 Annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Honolulu
., Lee, Y.-G., & Hill, L. B. (2016). Building a better future STEM faculty: How doctoral teaching programs can improve undergraduate education. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.9. Adams, K. A. (2002). What colleges and universities want in new faculty: Preparing future faculty occasional paper series. Washington, D.C: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/pff/pdfs/PFF_Adams.PDF10. Austin, A. E., Campa III, H., Pfund, C., Gillian-Daniel, D. L., Mathieu, R., & Stoddart, J. (2009). Preparing STEM doctoral students for future faculty careers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Spring(117), 83
throughout the academic cycle. “...students frequently question their identity, relationships, direction and worth during transition to school which produces turmoil and crisis. Stress of relocation, separation from family and friends, new people, academic challenges, discrepancy between expectations and reality, loneliness, and lack of support all significantly relate to attrition” (Lee, D., Olson, E. A., Locke, B. Michelson S. T. & Odes E, 2009, p. 5).Students past the initial transition face stressors related to making progress in research orprojects, successfully completing academic milestones, and job hunting. Even the most resilientstudents can be negatively impacted by these stressors. In the worst case
Paper ID #19000Getting Great Recommendation Letters: A Practical GuideDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engi- neering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands- on
Paper ID #19005Choosing Between Graduate Program Offers: A Practical GuideDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engi- neering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands
Paper ID #18954Building and Sustaining a Successful Graduate Degree in TechnologyDr. Mohammad A. Zahraee, Purdue University Northwest (College of Technology) Dr. Mohammad A. Zahraee is Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology and Associate Dean for Graduate Studies in College of Technology at Purdue University Northwest. He holds Bachelor Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Southern Illinois University, MS in Structural Engineering and PhD in Engineering Mechanics, both from University of Illinois at Chicago. Mohammad joined Purdue Univer- sity Calumet in 1989 and was the Head of the Manufacturing Engineering
Paper ID #18996Applying to Graduate School in Engineering: A Practical GuideDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engi- neering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands
Paper ID #17657A Graduate Research on the Cost Effective Analysis and Environmental Im-pact of Using Industrial Byproducts as Supplementary Cementitious Materi-als in Building ConstructionDr. Fazil T. Najafi, University of Florida Dr. Fazil T. Najafi For more than forty years, Dr. Fazil T. Najafi has worked in government, industry and education. He earned a BSCE in 1963 from the American College of Engineering, in his place of birth, Kabul, Afghanistan, and since then came to the United States with a Fulbright scholarship earning his MS in civil engineering in 1972 and a Ph.D. degree in transportation in 1977. His
Paper ID #17970An Interdisciplinary Graduate Course for Engineers, Plant Scientists, andData Scientists in the Area of Predictive Plant PhenomicsProf. Theodore J. Heindel, Iowa State University Theodore (Ted) Heindel is currently the Bergles Professor of Thermal Science in the Department of Me- chanical Engineering at Iowa State University; he also holds a courtesy professor appointment in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering. He directs the Experimental Multiphase Flow Lab- oratory at ISU, which houses a unique instrument for performing X-ray visualization studies of large-scale complex fluid flows. This
Paper ID #20006Training Students with T-shaped Interdisciplinary Studies in Predictive PlantPhenomicsProf. Julie A. Dickerson, Iowa State University Julie Dickerson is a Professor at Iowa State University in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECpE). She served as a program officer at the National Science Foundation in the Advances in Biological Informatics Program and the Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology Program in the Biology Directorate as the lone engineer. She has also served as the Chair of the Bioinformatics and Computational Biology program at Iowa State University. She holds a
Roles. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education (pp. 397–456). Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-4512-3_8 3. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364 4. Jazvac‐Martek, M. (2009). Oscillating role identities: the academic experiences of education doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903068862 5. Allen, T. D., & Eby, L. T. (2011). The Blackwell Handbook of Mentoring: A Multiple Perspectives Approach
Paper ID #19151Practitioner Experience Meets Graduate Academic Research: How Intersec-tions Guide the Work of Returning Engineering Ph.D. StudentsDr. Jaclyn K. Murray, University of Michigan Jaclyn K. Murray is a Research Fellow at the University of Michigan in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Her interests include creativity in design, student learning, and the integration of engineering design into secondary science courses.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the
Wentworth get a first-rate undergraduate education, as well as a minimum of twosemesters working in a co-op, student feedback often includes being under-prepared for graduateschool. To fix this deficiency among the electrical and computer Engineering and computerscience and networking majors, a consortium of faculty designed, executed, and evaluated a seriesof extra-curricular graduate school seminars to (a) gauge student interest in graduate school, (b)prepare students for the graduate school application process, and (c) inform students of theiroptions for graduate degrees and programs.This work-in-progress shares data and lessons-learned from the first round of seminars: wedescribe their organization and proceedings, as well as the results of
/Innovation_Through_Diversity.pdf , accessed February 12, 2017. 5. Association of Public and Land Grant Universities, http://www.aplu.org/about-us/history- of-aplu/what-is-a-land-grant-university/index.html, accessed February 12, 2017. 6. Hurtado, S. M., K. Eagan, T. Figueroa, and B. Hughes. "Reversing underrepresentation: The impact of undergraduate research programs on enrollment in STEM graduate programs." (2014). 7. Institute for Higher Education Policy, “Supporting First-Generation College Students through Classroom-Based Practices”, September 2012.
for rapid and global sharing of ideasthroughout the program. These allow collaboration to begin before travelling and to continueafter the trip. It is also essential in global education to recognize the needs of participants. GPPwas founded on the belief that global competency is incredibly important, but that graduatestudents cannot afford the time spent for such a trip over a whole semester. Finally, weencourage people to go. There is no substitute for physically walking around a new place,hearing conversations in another language, and experiencing life somewhere else in the world.References 1. L. B. Denney, M. Sanchez-Pena, and J. B. Main, “Examining how international experiences promote global competency among engineering graduate
are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] J. S. Shippmann, R. A. Ash, M. Batjtsta, L. Carr, L. D. Eyde, B. Hesketh, J. Kehoe, K. Pearlman, E. P. Prien, and J. I. Sanchez, "The practice of competency modeling," Personnel psychology, vol. 53, pp. 703-740, 2000.[2] B. J. Brummel, D. E. Rupp, and S. M. Spain, "Constructing parallel simulation exercises for assessment centers and other forms of behavioral assessment," Personnel Psychology, vol. 62, pp. 137-170, 2009.[3] D. E. Rupp, A. M. Gibbons, A. M. Baldwin, L. A. Snyder, S. M. Spain, S. E. Woo, B. J. Brummel, C. S. Sims, and M. Kim, "An Initial Validation of Developmental Assessment
essentially only the opinion of the researcher.Element B: Documentation and analysis of prior solution attempts5 Documentation of plausible prior attempts to solve the problem and/or related problems isdrawn from a wide array of clearly identified and consistently credible sources; the analysis ofpast and current attempts to solve the problem—including both strengths and shortcomings— isconsistently clear, detailed, and supported by relevant data.4 Documentation of existing attempts to solve the problem and/or related problems is drawnfrom a variety of clearly identified and consistently credible sources; the analysis of past andcurrent attempts to solve the problem—including both strengths and shortcomings—is clear andis generally detailed and
the STEM Workforce, A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2014, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB- 2015-10).[3] Wendler, C., B. Bridgeman, F. Cline, C. Millet, J. Rock, N. Bell & P. McAllister. 2010. The Path Forward: The Future of Graduate Education in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.[4] Hancock, S. & Walsh, E. 2016. Beyond knowledge and skills: Rethinking the development of professional identity during the STEM doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 37-50.[5] Litalien, D. & F. Guay. 2015. Dropout intention in Ph.D. studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources
the systematic literature review Exclusion Criteria a Papers that do not detail the number of participants and/or teams b Papers that do not discuss participant details c Papers that do not discuss team sizes d Papers that do not outline variables observed/accounted for e Papers that do not outline their methods for data collection f Papers that do not outline methods of data analysisArticles were not excluded on the basis of quality nor the country of focus. Detailed informationabout each study was recorded in a data exaction sheet. The following variables were included inthe data extraction sheet: author, publication date
Paper ID #20606Technical Review of Companies able to Support the Education and NavalInstallations’ Renewable Energy Goals through the use of Tidal and Hydro-Kinetic Energy DevicesLt. George Tyler Fischer, U.S. Navy Raised in Dayton, Ohio, Lieutenant Fischer entered Officer Candidate School in October 2009. After re- ceiving his commission in 2010, he was designated as a Civil Engineer Corps Officer. Lieutenant Fischer’s first tour was with Naval Mobile Construction Battalion THREE, serving as the Intelligence Officer and Detachment OIC during deployment operations supporting CJTF-HOA in humanitarian and civic assis
Paper ID #17999From Industry to Graduate School: How Returners (Re)Learn How to WriteDr. Diane L. Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University. Her research in- terests include returning graduate students in engineering - those who have significant industry experience before deciding to pursue their graduate education.Ms. Molly H. Goldstein, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Molly Goldstein is a Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette with a research focus on characterizing
Paper ID #19042Energy Science and Engineering Graduate Education at Tokyo TechProf. Jeffrey Scott Cross, Tokyo Institute of Technology Jeffrey S. Cross received a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Iowa State University in 1992. He has worked in Japan at Fujitsu Lab Ltd., National Institute for Inorganics Materials, and at Tokyo Tech for over 20 years and is fluent in Japanese. Jeffrey is Prof. in the School of Environment and Society, Dept. of Transdisciplinarity Science and Engineering and graduate coordinate for the Energy Science and Engineering Major. He teaches online courses on academic writing and on education
Paper ID #18069Lessons Learned: Student Perceptions of Successes and Struggles in One-Year Master’s Programs in EngineeringMs. Alexa Kottmeyer, Pennsylvania State University Alexa Kottmeyer is a Ph.D. candidate in Educational Psychology at Penn State. She has an M.Ed. in Mathematics and taught high school math. Currently, she works as a Graduate Assistant with the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. Her research interests include the roles of conceptual and procedural knowledge, as well as the role of multiple representations, in high school and college level STEM learning and