programs and STEM workforce diversity Focusing attention on connections between stereotype threat and STEM education program outcomes for underrepresented populationsQSR – Why Qualitative/Quantitative Systematic Review? The value of cross-discipline knowledge transfer Methodical review of promising practices, comprehensive analysis of findings Identification and classification of key factorsHow the Current Study Employs QSR: Methods – QSR protocol and keyword concept map, critical appraisal, and data extraction Analysis - Iterative translation of themes and concepts, backward mapping Initial Findings – identification, environment, capitals and processStereotype Threat Reduction Framework (STRF
program year togather more in-depth information about their experience. Interview questions focused on theirexperience in the program, their relationship with the staff and mentors, and how TechHive hasaffected them in terms of their interest in STEM and comfort with using technology. Interviewswere conducted with 11 TechHive participants in the spring, focusing on the previous year in theprogram.PersonalMeaningMapsTo explore how the program has impacted participants’ perceptions of technology andengineering, Personal Meaning Mapping was utilized. Personal Meaning Mapping is a technique 3similar to concept mapping that uses open-ended interviews both