projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element
experiments; and opportunities to present the researchoutcomes to the broader community at professional settings.The REU participants will spend a total of 10 weeks in the program. In the first two weeks, thestudents are at the academic institution receiving training for the upcoming research activities.During weeks 3-9, the students will spend the first two days (Monday and Tuesday) at theacademic institution and the next two days (Wednesday and Thursday) in industry partnersworking on the research projects. On Friday, they will come back to academic institution forprogress reports and extracurricular activities. The participants will be back at the academicinstitution in week 10 to wrap up the program. Supplemental activities including student
Undergraduate Education at the National Science Foundation, and a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Dr. Pearson currently chairs ASCE’s Formal Engineering Education Committee, and is Vice Chair of ASCE’s Committee on Diversity and Inclusion.Dr. Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Rice University Canek Phillips (P’urepecha) is a postdoctoral research associate at Rice University in the Brown School of Engineering. Canek’s research interests broadly relate to efforts to broaden participation in engineering. Currently, he is working on a project to improve mathematics education for visually impaired students.Dr. Margaret E. Beier, Rice University Margaret Beier is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Rice
, and lessons learned.Program OverviewThe goal of the KickStarter program is to improve the recruitment and retention of Latinxstudents in STEM fields and careers by enhancing CC-HSIs’ participation and competitivenessin NSF-funded STEM initiatives.Primary objectives for KickStarter are to: 1. Increase the number of CC-HSIs who compete successfully as lead grantees on NSF projects; 2. Strengthen CC-HSIs’ STEM infrastructure (i.e., their capacity to increase recruitment and retention success rates among Latinx students); and 3. Engage CC-HSIs with a broader range of partners in K-12, industry, four-year institutions, and researchers to help sustain STEM programs and improve CC-HSI federal program competitiveness.Key
based on the analysis of quantitative (surveydata, data on participation to workshops) and qualitative (observations and interviews) data. Theanalysis supports the need for student champions to develop a community of practice andmentorship and structure for peer teaching topics and content in an extracurricular setting. Futurework suggests a more structured series of design workshops.BackgroundExtracurricular Design LearningResearch has shown the positive effect of extracurricular activities and projects on designlearning. Dukart indicated strong findings that extracurricular project-based experiential learning(EPBEL) experiences can have a positive impact on satisfaction in undergraduate engineeringstudents, enhance their experience, and give
instances where this type of course is not executed properly, students are overcome withthe ambiguity of the project and are unable to attach themselves to the project and ultimatelylearn.1Hackathons are an interesting example to look at as they are similar to PBL in many aspects. Atypical hackathon approach to PBL follows an unconventional route when compared to theclassroom setting. Their primary structure is a short-form programming sprint that takes placeover 24 to 48 hours in which teams of participants focus on making a working product fordemoing at a showcase. In this environment, demoing is a mark of success as it demonstrates thatthe team has created something they are willing to show to the public. While the structure andtimeframe differ
research focuses on approaches in the design innovation process, ideation flexibility, investigations of problem-solution spaces, and concept generation and development practices of novices through practitioners. She produces theory, design principles and systems to support design, engineering and educational innovation processes, through studying experiences of individuals and teams that lead to innovative thinking and through integrating that knowledge into organizational change.Kelly Guerin, Iowa State University Kelly Guerin is an Undergraduate Research Assistant at Iowa State University. She is a junior pursuing a Bachelor of Industrial Design. c American Society for Engineering Education
. The key features of theprogram are (1) a single point of entry, (2) long-term and authentic research experiences, (3)participation in a broader impact project, and (4) personal mentoring between students andfaculty. Since its inception in 2003, the program has had 251 total student participants that havepublished 225 peer reviewed publications and 75% have continued on to graduate school.1. IntroductionA recent report analyzed what made students view their undergraduate education as being worththe cost [1]. The three largest factors were the following: • “My professor cared about me as a person.” • “I had a mentor who encouraged me to pursue my goals and dreams.” • “I had at least one professor who made me excited about learning.”All
Engineering at Kettering University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Synergies between Experience and Study in Graduate Engineering EducationAbstractVarious programs and research initiatives seek to support the success of master’s students inengineering. However, as programs can have diverse groups of students, supporting their successmay not be a one-size fits all. Our work focuses on a group we define as Returners, who spentfive or more years in industry before returning to university for a master’s degree. As part of alarger survey with approximately 300 engineering student participants who were pursuingmaster’s degrees, we asked them to evaluate the influence of their prior work experiences ontheir
inquire about a student’s sense of satisfaction surrounding intrinsic andextrinsic goals related to their engineering writing classes. Of all the motivational constructsexamined in our broader work, intrinsic and extrinsic goal orientation are the ones thatcorrespond most directly with students’ existing basic psychological needs—for stimulation,self-regard, the approval of others, belonging, and reward. It’s reasonable to understand that thepromise of satisfaction of these needs plays into a student’s motivation as he or she enters agiven class.So, what is it about engineering writing classes that students perceive to be less satisfying, onaverage, than non-writing engineering courses they are beginning at the same time? To explorethe reasons
theUniversity of Nottingham. The aforementioned NSF grant, “REvolutionizing Engineering andComputer Science Departments” with support from their respective Deans, facilitated thecreation of a course, Engineering Peace. The course brings together undergraduate students fromdisparate fields to grapple with a technical and ethical challenge: designing and building dronesfor social good [15].In the fall of 2017, twenty-four students (14 engineers and 10 non-engineers) participated in thisclass. Students had some experience in their chosen disciplines; there were no first year collegestudents. Engineers were all studying Mechanical Engineering. The population was roughlydivided between graduate students (8), 5th year seniors (6), seniors (4), juniors (5
problems that they had realized, but they hadn’t really started focusing on yet. After learning more about this provider, and the different products that they had, they realized that they might have solutions for these other ones. It was kind of innovation, both in the project we were working on, because it allowed them more options, but then also it was starting to potentially resolve other problems that you have. That just happened by opening up the world, connecting them to something different. (Ella, Senior, Industrial Engineering)Immersion in Novel Innovation EcosystemsThis type of incident involved participants experiencing new contextual elements, reflecting onthose elements, and coming to deeper
” learning-related activities, believed to spark and stimulate their learning, whilein the classroom.(17) These activities would include: reading, writing, solving problems,answering questions, participating in a discussion, etc.; and most important, students must beengaged in thinking tasks while actively involved. It is generally understood that duringactive learning, less emphasis is placed on transmission of information and more ondeveloping students’ skills. Additionally, during an active learning cycle, emphasis is placedon students’ exploration of their own abilities, including: their thinking process, their valuesystem, their intellect, and their courage to express themselves orally and in writing. Activelearning is contrasted to the
enormously in setting up,manning, and providing needed guidance to these fledgling institutions during theirearly years. The dramatic increase in oil revenues during the 70s, and 80s, coupledwith lack of skilled professionals in areas deemed necessary for growth anddevelopment of oil-related industries of the Region, has been pivotal in the start-up ofhigher education in general and engineering education in particular.There are today eight public colleges of engineering in the Region (Table 1) inaddition to several, recently established, private and semi private colleges and/oruniversities that offer engineering programs. These eight public colleges have, sincetheir inception, been guided by advisory boards made up largely from facultymembers and
, Lawrence Technological University James A. Mynderse, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. His research interests include mechatronics, dynamic systems, and control with applications to piezoelectric actuators, hysteresis, and perception. He serves as the faculty advisor for the LTU Baja SAE team.Dr. Robert W Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University Robert Fletcher joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Lawrence Technological University in the summer of 2003, after two decades of various industry engineering positions in research, and product development. Dr. Fletcher earned his Bachelor of Science
opportunities as well aschallenges. The VCU School of Engineering’s position is that the positive impact on thecommunities and the families within those communities far outweighs the obstacles that areencountered. In this paper, the approach towards a highly-coordinated student engagementcontinuum in an urban setting is presented, along with preliminary findings of the opportunitiesand obstacles faced by the community as well as the institution.The Student Engagement ContinuumDeveloping a sustainable, diverse pipeline of STEM students has become a national priority aspart of a broader approach for maintaining US global competitiveness [2]. A diverse STEMworkforce stimulates the economy, creates enabling technology that drive innovation (asmeasured by
accepted academic definition is from Bringle & Hatcher [8, p. 112]: “Course-based, credit bearing educational experience in which students participate in an organized serviceactivity that meets identified community needs, and reflect on the service activity in such a wayas to gain further understanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, andan enhanced sense of civic responsibility”. In 1995, the Engineering Projects in CommunityService Program (EPICS) became the first service-learning program integrated intoan engineering curriculum, which provided an innovative educational experiencefor engineering undergraduates at Purdue University [9]. Service-learning has since stronglyemerged as an important complement to
research and teaching interests are in industrial and manufacturing systems engineering, scheduling and logistics and engineering educa- tion.Dr. Matthew T. Stimpson, North Carolina State University Matthew Stimpson is the Director of Assessment in the Office of Undergraduate Academic Affairs at NC State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Executing COE Faculty Development at the Intersection of a Strategic Plan and Faculty Well-BeingMany colleges of engineering have strategic plans that capture the key aspects of their mission topromote excellence in the college. Often, the college’s strategic plan is based loosely on theuniversity level plan
Bouabid is currently assistant professor in the Industrial and Systems Engineering department at Khalifa University of Science and Technology in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Prior to that, he held a faculty position in the General Studies department at the Petroleum Institute, in Abu Dhabi, UAE, where he taught and was coordinator of freshmen engineering courses (ENGR101 and ENGR110). He also taught Engineer- ing Design courses (STPS201 and STPS251) and Mechanical Engineering course (MEEGG201). Prior to these appointments in the UAE, Dr. Bouabid was associate professor and Engineering Program coordina- tor at Piedmont Virginia Community College (PVCC) from 2006 to 2014, where he contributed to develop the Engineering program and to
are the principal means of delivering content in ETW. Each of these sessions is taughtby a subject-matter expert to all workshop participants in a single room. Material for the ETWseminars is drawn primarily from references 9,10,11,12 and from the broader peer-reviewedliterature on teaching and learning. With respect to the Model Instructional Strategy, seminarsare used to orient participants to the subject matter, provide learning objectives, andcommunicate basic information. These sessions are also used to stimulate critical thinking,through integrated small-group activities, questioning, and discussions (Figure 6). Figure 6: The ETW seminars provide course content in a manner that is compelling and engaging to
evolve through traditional engineering and computer science undergraduate experiences? 4. Are there differences in the entrepreneurial mindset between male and female students? 5. How does family background influence the entrepreneurial mindset?By investigating the answers to these research questions, we hope to answer the broader question:How can engineering and computer science undergraduate programs be revised to enhanceentrepreneurial mindset growth as we strive to meet the challenges of “Educating the Engineer of2020”?Instrument DevelopmentIn the initial design stage, we developed an assessment instrument based on the definition of theengineering entrepreneurial mindset proposed by KEEN [3]. Two broad sets of items weregenerated in
, ABET, ASME, and IEEE. He is also the Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology and International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing.Dr. Mel Cossette, Edmonds Community College Mel Cosette is the executive director and principal investigator for the National Science Foundation- funded National Resource Center for Material Technology Education (MatEd) housed at Edmonds Com- munity College in Lynnwood, Wash. Mel has over 20 years of experience in manufacturing education and has developed technician-training programs for industry and educational institutions. She serves on nu- merous committees and national boards, and worked in various industries prior to holding
strictly “social” or “technical.” In this paper, we briefly reviewapproaches taken to teach energy in engineering. We then examine CSPs and make the case forhow they might be used within engineering. We discuss our preliminary ideas for the course itself.The goal of this paper is to stimulate discussion within the ASEE community to improve courseeffectiveness in enhancing student learning. This project is part of a larger overall effort at theUniversity of San Diego to integrate social justice themes across the curriculum of a new generalengineering department. This paper will present our progress towards instantiating in theclassroom the broader vision laid out for our program. 1IntroductionThere is
Paper ID #21603Sustainable Development Challenge For BMEProf. Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University Dr. Joseph (Joe) Tranquillo is an Associate Professor at Bucknell University in the Department of Biomed- ical Engineering, He is also co-director of the Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management, co-director of the KEEN Winter Interdisciplinary Design Program, and chair of the Biomedical Engineer- ing Division of ASEE. Tranquillo has published three undergraduate textbooks and numerous engineering education publications, and has presented internationally on engineering and education. His work has been featured
rudimentary computer-aided designwork followed by an enabling description of the design in the patent application is all that isnecessary. However, this form of legitimate peripheral participation – as students areauthentically engaging in the patenting act in proximity to an experienced patent professional[10] – is a critical pedagogical strategy to help realize the broader goal of the development of aholistic awareness of IP concepts.One important aspect of patent drafting is claim drafting. Patent applications are divided into thewritten description (typically identified as specification), drawing (if needed), and claims. Claimsare provided in the forms of independent as well as dependent claims in a funnel approach withthe independent claims