Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Nicole M. Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Carrie J. McClelland P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Linda A. Battalora, Colorado School of Mines; Emily A. Sarver, Virginia Tech; Rennie B. Kaunda , Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

principles and practices for mineral and energy resource projects at the graduate and undergraduate levels.Rennie B. Kaunda , Colorado School of Mines Dr. Rennie Kaunda is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mining Engineering at Colorado School of Mines, and a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Colorado. Prior to joining academia, Dr. Kaunda spend 7 years in the mining industry where he worked on more than 50 global projects through- out Africa, Asia, South America and North America. Dr. Kaunda’s areas of expertise are surface and underground rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, numerical modeling and artificial neural network modeling. He has published/coauthored more than 13 peer-reviewed

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shiloh James Howland, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Randall Davies, Brigham Young University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

within the Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) within the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Gregg received his PhD in Educational Leadership and Higher Education from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln with a Master of Technology Management degree and a BS in Manufacturing Engineering Technology, from Brigham Young Univer- sity. Gregg also provides consulting in leadership development and project management working with Strategy Execution and Duke Corporate Education where he provides training for fortune 500 companies throughout the world.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

/132368362/a-chemical-conundrum-how-dangerousis-dioxin[22] K. Eschner, “How Agent Orange turned this American small town into a toxic waste-ridden deathtrap,”Smithsonian. April 3, 2017. [Online]. Available: www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/times-beach-wasfounded-newspaper-promo-demolished-toxic-waste-ridden-ghost-town-180962693/[23] T. B. Wheeler, “The little river town dioxin killed,” The Baltimore Sun. Nov. 13, 1996. [Online]. Available:articles.baltimoresun.com/1995-11-13/news199663180081_dioxin-times-beach-eastern-missouri[24] “Federal buyout of Times Beach, MO., begins,” The New York Times. Sept. 7, 1983. [Online]. Available:www.nytimes.com/1983/...buyout-of-times-beach-mo-begins.html[25] “Dioxin-laced Times Beach folds,” United Press

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elisa Warford, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Moral Patterns” Child Development, vol. 47.7 pp. 1204-06, 1976.[8] M. Brabeck, “Moral Judgment: Theory and Research on Differences between Males and Females,” Developmental Review vol. 3, pp. 274-91, 1983.[9] B. Puka, "The Liberation of Caring: A Different Voice for Gilligan's 'Different Voice,’" Hypatia vol. 55.1, pp. 58-82, 1990.[10] C. Card, “Caring and Evil,” Hypatia, vol. 5.1, pp. 101-8, 1990.[11] V. Davion, “Autonomy, Integrity, and Care,” Social Theory and Practice, vol. 19.2, pp. 161-82, 1993.[12] J. Rachels, The Elements of Moral Philosophy. San Francisco: McGraw-Hill, 1999.[13] M. McLaren, “Feminist Ethics: Care as a Virtue,” in Feminists Doing Ethics, P. DesAutels and J. Waugh, eds. Lanham, MD: Rowman &

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Indira Nair, Carnegie Mellon University; William M. Bulleit, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #22934Framing Engineering Ethics Education with Pragmatism and Care: A Pro-posalDr. Indira Nair, Carnegie Mellon University Indira Nair retired from Carnegie Mellon University after 32 years. For the last 12 of those years, she was the vice provost for education and a professor in the department of engineering and public policy. She has designed and taught several interdisciplinary courses, including the ethics of science and technology, environmental science, technology and decision-making, and radiation, health, and policy. Her research has ranged over risk assessment and communication, green design

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samson Pepe Goodrich, East Carolina University; Teresa Ryan, East Carolina University; Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina University; Patrick F. O'Malley, Benedictine College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

; Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/27473[3] M. A. Vandehey, G. Diekhoff, and E. LaBeff, “College Cheating: A Twenty-Year Follow-Upand the Addition of an Honor Code,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 48, no. 4, pp.468–480, 2007.[4] R. Arnold, B. N. Martin, and L. Bigby, “Is There a Relationship Between Honor Codes andAcademic Dishonesty?,” Journal of College and Character, vol. 8, no. 2, Feb. 2007.[5] M. A. Graham and A. Others, “Cheating at Small Colleges: An Examination of Student andFaculty Attitudes and Behaviors.,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 35, no. 4, pp.255–60, 1994.[6] W. J. Bowers, “Student dishonesty and its control in college,” Columbia Univ., New York,NY. Bureau of Applied Social Research., Dec

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Corple, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David H. Torres, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Katharine E. Miller; Megan Kenny Feister, California State University, Channel Islands; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Organizational Communication with a minor in data analysis and research methodology. His research interests reside at the intersection of organizational communication, identity, design, and organizational ethics.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia; Araba Dennis, University of Virginia; Kathleen Eggleson, Indiana University School of Medicine-South Bend; Anderson Sunda-Meya, Xavier University of Louisiana; Kathryn Haas, Saint Mary's College, Indiana

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

: i. Fully Engaged Learners, ii.Consistent Viewers, iii. Sporadic Learners, iv. One-Week Engaged Learners. Similar to Smith’s[5] reliance on the Kolb and Felder-Soloman models, Roy and colleagues suggest that betterunderstanding learners is an important step to developing effective teaching methods, yet theystop short of including personality traits and other characteristics in their scope of consideration.2.2 Personality characteristics The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), notably mentioned in the introduction, is alongstanding and well know measure of personality types. The MBTI is generated using a shortquestionnaire and responses are mapped against four axes; (a) introversion-extroversion, (b)intuition-sensing, (c) thinking-feeling

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rosalyn W. Berne, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

whorates the qualities of the embryos, those who deliver the full-term babies that result). Inthis way, engineering ethics emerge from the pages of the ethics cases and academicarticles, to be enlivened inside a dynamic network of multiple people and technologiesfor the students to engage intellectually, and also with empathy. References[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (nd). Infertility. FastStats homepage. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/infertility.htm{2] “SART,” American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), May 2018. Retrieved from research/press-releases-and bulletins/SART_Data_Release_2015_Preliminary_and_2014_Final/[3] B. Saunders, “First, do no harm

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida; Laurie A. Pinkert, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

distinct from and, we argue, secondary to how individuals are orientedtoward ethics generally. Frameworks emphasize how individuals value, in terms of the practical rational andmotivational aspects of decision-making, while foundations of ethics emphasize what individuals value, orhow value priorities are structured for each individual. In the context of engineering, you might imagine ascenario where an individual engineer approaches a problem X with a certain implicit value orientation (callit A). A second engineer approaches that same problem X with a different value orientation, B. Aframework-based approach to engineering ethics might help us understand that these two engineers maymake different decisions, but they do not – and cannot – help us

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University; Jeffrey M. Catchmark, Pennsylvania State University; Eduardo Mendieta; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #22409Creating Faculty Buy-in for Ethics-across-the-curriculum: Year One of De-veloping an Ethics Curriculum in an Undergraduate Biological EngineeringProgramDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Jeffrey M. Catchmark, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Jeffrey Catchmark is currently Professor of Agricultural and

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mahsa Ghorbani, Colorado State University; Anthony A. Maciejewski, Colorado State University; Thomas J. Siller, Colorado State University; Edwin K. P. Chong Ph.D., Colorado State University; Pinar Omur-Ozbek, Colorado State University; Rebecca A. Atadero, Colorado State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

, 2005.[6] K. M. Passino, “Teaching Professional and Ethical Aspects of Electrical Engineering to a LargeClass,’’ IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 273-28, 1998.[7] D. R. Haws, “Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta‐Analysis,’’ Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 223-229, 2001.[8] T. W. Chen, A. A. Maciejewski, B. M. Notaros, A. Pezeshki and M. D. Reese, “Mastering the CoreCompetencies of Electrical Engineering through Knowledge Integration,’’ in American Society ofEngineering Education Annual Conference, New Orleans, 2016.[9] A. A. Maciejewski, T. W. Chen, Z. S. Byrne, M. A. De Miranda, L. B. Sample Mcmeeking, B. M.Notaros and A. H. Rosales, “A Holistic Approach to Transforming

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grant A. Fore, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Brandon Sorge, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Mary F. Price, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Martin A. Coleman, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Thomas William Hahn, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Julie Adele Hatcher

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

engineering education," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 327-338, 2008.[2] J. L. Hess and G. A. Fore, "A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551-583, 2018.[3] L. H. Jamieson and J. R. Lohmann, "Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring US engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society," Washington, DC: ASEE, 2009.[4] D. B. Resnik, "Ethical virtues in scientific research," Accountability in Research, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 329-343

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #22532Concerning Professional Licensure for Civil Engineering Faculty: A Matterof Best PracticeDr. Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Michelle Marincel Payne is an assistant professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She completed her Ph.D. in environmental engineering at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in environmental engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in nuclear engineering at the University of Missouri-Rolla. Michellle is inter- ested in developing opportunities for

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Tech; Ingrid St. Omer, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #22127Where Should We Begin? Establishing a Baseline for First-year StudentAwareness of Engineering EthicsMs. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Tech Natalie Van Tyne is an Associate Professor of Practice at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer- sity, where she teaches first year engineering design as a foundation courses for Virginia Tech’s under- graduate engineering degree programs. She holds bachelors and masters degrees from Rutgers University, Lehigh University and Colorado School of Mines, and studies best practices in pedagogy, reflective learn- ing and critical thinking to inform enhanced student

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth A. Debartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology; Wade Lee Robison

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #22376Risk Management and Ethics in Capstone DesignDr. Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, PhD is the Director of the Multidisciplinary Senior Design Program at the Rochester Institute of Technology, where students from Biomedical, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering work together on multidisciplinary teams to complete a 2-semester design and build project. She received her graduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University and has worked at RIT since 2000.Prof. Wade Lee Robison c American Society for

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alireza Bolhari, Islamic Azad University, Tehran; Azadeh Bolhari P.E., Angelo State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

ethical conducts in an IT context. Accordingly, an interventional research(pre-post study) is designed and data were gathered from 347 computer stations in an IT-centric company in Iran. Due to the company's codes of ethics, six categories of unethical IT-related behaviors were defined as a) surfing social media, b) checking personal emails, c)sending organizational documents without authorized tools, d) sharing video or music files inlocal network, e) stockbroking, and f) installing non-job-related software on computers. Twonon-simultaneous phases with duration of three months were examined. In the first phase, atotal number of 906 unethical behaviors were observed by means of company-wide log-systems. Subsequently, for the second phase, every

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Ann Gelles, Utah State University; Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University; Marialuisa Di Stefano, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

ethical mentoring principle; (b) elucidate participantperceptions of ethical issues in six case studies; and (c) reveal what ethical behaviors participantsexpect from their respective mentor/mentee if they placed themselves in the situation of the casestudies.BackgroundThe relationship between a faculty-advisor and a graduate student has been shown to be adetermining factor of graduate student success [1], [2]. Advising relationships are typicallyformally assigned and structured so that they can help students adjust to the departmental cultureand provide them with a role model, critical information, and an advocate for their professionalsuccess [3]-[5]. Advising, when described as exceptional or as a mentoring type of relationship,can foster a

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; William M. Marcy PE, Texas Tech University; Lakshmojee Koduru, Texas Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

scales are normed to a mean of 50.In the present sample, students clearly excelled in analytic thinking (mean 83.59) and were quiteguarded and impersonal in their positions (mean 14.87). Their sense of confidence (mean 59.76)and emotionality (mean 42.90) were somewhat above and below the mean, respectively. Twosample submissions provide examples of contrasts in these variables, and provide informalevidence of the validity of the LIWC results. Student A excels in analytic thinking and isconfident, but distant and not self-disclosing (e.g., through the use of pronouns like “I”), andexpresses little affect regarding the issues. In contrast, Student B is lower on analytic thinking,but high on self-disclosure (readily using pronouns like “I” and “me

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brendon Lumgair P.Eng., University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

the South- ern Alberta Institute of Technology in 2012. He has been a sessional instructor at the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary, where he completed his MSc. in engineering researching engineering education. His roots in industry aided him in the development of curriculum for 3 new courses by aligning industry’s desired competencies for new grads with accreditation criteria and facility constraints. The result was applied education: practical learning activities and hands-on labs that prepared students for the real world and accelerated their time-to-competency once on the job. Connect with Brendon on LinkedIn to start a conversation. c American Society

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

fordiscussing moral issues, building ethical reasoning, and making ethical decisions. In this section,the following ethical theories will be briefly reviewed: (a) Consequence-based ethics(Utilitarianism), (b) deontology (duty-based ethics), (c) virtue-based ethics, and (d) ethics of care(care ethics). In consequence-based ethics, “the morality of an action … is determined solely by itsconsequences” (Boss, 2013, p. 23). Deontology, on the other hand, has to do with the belief that“doing what is right for its own sake, is the foundation of morality” (Boss, 2013, p. 27). Virtue isdefined as: “an admirable character trait … in a manner that benefits ourselves and others” andincludes characters such as “compassion, courage, generosity, loyalty, and

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #21419Faculty Perceptions of Challenges to Educating Engineering and ComputingStudents About Ethics and Societal ImpactsMs. Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder Madeline Polmear is a PhD student in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural En- gineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research interests include ethics education and societal impacts of engineering and technology.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Architectural

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth L. d'Entremont, University of Utah; Andrew S. Merryweather, University of Utah

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

prison time and owing large fines for various chargesstemming from an emissions-cheating scandal [4], [5]. Actions do have consequences. It isbetter to learn this axiom early, rather than late, in an engineering career. Engineering studentsare reminded of this throughout the course.The engineering-ethics guidance provided to students in the course may be summarized in thefour practical points below. 1. Work hard and do a good job 2. Do the right thing a. Be able to sleep at night b. Be able to look yourself in the mirror 3. Make executives earn their salaries 4. Do NOT go to jail!The first point is fairly self-explanatory and

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel Aaron Snyder, Virginia Tech; Indhira María Hasbún, Virginia Tech; Jessica Deters, Virginia Tech; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

. C. Lucena, and C. Mitcham, “Engineering ethics and identity: Emerginginitiatives in comparative perspective,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 463–487, 2007.[26] D. D. Carpenter, T. S. Harding, S. M. Montgomery, and N. Steneck. “P.A.C.E.S. - A studyon academic integrity among engineering undergraduates (preliminary conclusions),” presentedat ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., Montreal, QC, Canada, Jun. 16-19, 2002.[27] B. E. Cox, K. McIntosh, R. D. Reason, P. T. Terenzini, “Working with Missing Data inHigher Education Research: A Primer and Real World Example,” The Rev. of Higher Edu., vol.37, no. 3, pp. 377-402, 2014.[28] G. Becker, “Creating comparability among reliability coefficients: the case of Cronbachalpha and Cohen kappa.,” Psychol. Rep

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Swetha Nittala, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tasha Zephirin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Shiloh James Howland, Brigham Young University; Dayoung Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Andrew Katz, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

much from the broader survey population (e.g.,in terms of demographic variables, school affiliation, engineering majors, etc.). But we alsoperformed some targeted recruitment focused on other attributes and characteristics, e.g.,participation in academic programs known for more or less formal coverage of engineeringethics, low or high scores on survey measures related to ethics and social responsibility, etc.The researchers used a semi-structured interview protocol focused on four main areas: “(a)general definitions (including macro-ethics), (b) experiences that influence ethical perceptionspast, present, and future (including justice), (c) ethical climate at the students’ undergraduateinstitution, and (d) elaboration on the ethical scenarios

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Mitch Cieminski, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #23665Ethics Education as Enculturation: Student Learning of Personal, Social, andProfessional ResponsibilityDr. Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma is Associate Dean for Curricular Transitions, Associate Professor in Science and Technol- ogy Studies, and Director of the Programs in Design and Innovation at Rensselaer.Mitch Cieminski, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Mitch Cieminski received a B.S. in electrical and computer engineering from Olin College of Engineering in Needham, MA in 2017. They are currently pursuing a PhD in Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

, Integrating Intellect and theCreation of Bioethics.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9(1): 25-51, 1999.[2] T.L. Beauchamp and J.F. Childress. Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Seventh Edition. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 2013.[3] D. Callahan. Bioethics and Policy: Hastings Center Bioethics Briefings.https://www.thehastingscenter.org/briefingbook/bioethics-and-policy-a-history/, 2018.[4] P. Singer, Animal Liberation. New York: Random House, Inc, 1975.[5] T. Regan, The Case of Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.[6] B. Rollin, Science and Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.[7] J.B. Callicott, “Whither Conservation Ethics?” Conservation Biology 4(1):15-20, 1990.[8] O.C. Ferrell and L. Ferrell

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Nathan E. Canney

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

exemplars of macroethics instruction which have the potential be scaled andsustained at locations beyond their existing level of use. To assist in this process, four evaluationcriteria were established: (a) likely to have a high impact on student learning; (b) strongassessment methods; (c) novel or innovative; (d) transferability (to other institutions ordisciplines); these were rated on a scale from 1 (low) to 4 (high). An overall evaluation on levelof interest / excitement for including this teaching example in further research employed a 1(low) to 10 (highest) scale. Raters could also provide open comments. The interviewees wereasked to rate at least six de-identified teaching examples, and 29 sets of ratings were completed.The five members of

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Erwin; Jason Borenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology; Wendy C. Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Colin Potts, Georgia Institute of Technology; Ellen Zegura, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #22891Undergraduate STEM Students and Community Engagement Activities: Ini-tial Findings from an Assessment of Their Concern for Public Well-beingAlexandra ErwinDr. Jason Borenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jason Borenstein is the Director of Graduate Research Ethics Programs and Associate Director of the Center for Ethics and Technology at the Georgia Institute of Technology. His responsibilities in- clude administering a Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) policy for all new doctoral students at Georgia Tech and instructing undergraduate and graduate courses on topics at the intersection of science