, conference proceedings, magazine articles, presentations, and two handbooks. She has also received numerous prestigious teaching and research awards. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integrating Systems Thinking in Interdisciplinary Education Programs: A Systems Integration Approach Adedeji B. Badiru Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio LeeAnn Racz st US Air Force, 1 Special Operations Aerospace Medicine Squadron U. S. Air
Institute of Technology. She holds a Ph.D. from the Ohio State University and a MBA from Urbana University.Prof. Adedeji B. Badiru, Air Force Institute of Technology Prof. Badiru is Dean and senior academic officer for the Graduate School of Engineering and Management at the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). He has oversight for planning, directing, and controlling operations related to granting doctoral and master’s degrees, professional continuing cyber education, and research and development programs. He was previously Professor and Head of Systems Engineering and Management at the AFIT, Professor and Department Head of Industrial & Information Engineering at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, and
the author of several technical publications, including 17 journal papers and two book chapters. She received an NSF CAREER award in 2014. Dr. Marais has worked in engineering for two decades, first in industry and then in academia. She holds a B. Eng. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Stellenbosch, a B.Sc. in Mathematics from the University of South Africa, and an S.M and Ph.D. from the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT.Hanxi Sun, Purdue University Hanxi Sun is a Ph.D. candidate at the Department of Statistics of Purdue University. Her research focuses on nonparametric Bayesian statistics and applied statistics. Hanxi received a master degree in Statistics at
) (b) (c) (d)Figure 1: Examples of the SE princples content covered in the SE lecture: SE reduces projectcost and time 26 (a), project execution V-model 27 (b), resourse management 21 (c), and risk manage-ment 21 (d).were included in the course. 16 of the 18 students enrolled in the class were present and elected totake this first survey. At the end of the course, the capstone projects were evaluated to assess the level of SEapplication. The scope of the projects were objectively determined by the authors to decide if SEprinciples taught in the lecture were applied to the project. Course projects from the previous timethe course was taught, where no SE concepts were
Battle Damage Repair Engineer for B-1B aircraft. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Transitioning to the New ABET Student Outcomes: Architecture Development for a Systems Engineering Degree ProgramAbstractSystems engineering degree programs are accredited by the Engineering AccreditationCommission (EAC) of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Theaccreditation process includes evaluation of a program’s development and assessment of definedstudent outcomes (SO) (i.e. Criterion 3). These outcomes were recently revised by ABET forprograms seeking accreditation in 2019 and later. The systems engineering degree program atthe United States Air Force Academy has been
and the first implementation is planned for later this year. Theproject aims to (A) evaluate whether students exhibit a positive change in systems thinking afterthe systems thinking intervention, (B) assess the validity of the ST instrument adapted to thisproject and (C) assess the validity and reliability of the grading rubric developed for thisintervention. Exploratory analysis will also occur via use of meta-data available in the coursemanagement system.Phase I: Design- The Conceptual ApproachSystems thinking is a concept that dates back as early as the 1920s and is grounded in theories ofholism (attributed by Aristole, coined by J C Smuts), general systems theory, relational thinking,and cybernetics. Many well-known approaches have
items / tasksbefore formatting the final list in Step 4.Formatting rules may differ from course to course or from department to department. The mainformatting requirements used in the ECE Capstone class at Author’s Institute are [2][7]:A. Every requirement must be a complete sentence and have a unique number identifier [7].B. All the necessary and ‘must achieve’ requirements will be written as “Shall” and ‘stretch goals and requirements’ (i.e., nice to have) based on feasibility will be written as “May.” [2]C. A list of keywords and acronyms used will be added to the document.D. Requirements shall be sectionalized under appropriate headings, E.g. “General Operating Requirements”, “Added Features”, “Constraints”, “Optional Features” and
Paper ID #24057From Technology Elaboration Toward Application Innovation: An Instruc-tional Transformation in a Project-oriented Capstone Course of DynamicControl SystemsMr. Kuan-Yu Chou, National Chiao Tung University Kuan-Yu Chou received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan in 2010. M.S. degree in computer science and information engineering from National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan in 2012. He is currently working toward the Ph.D. degree in Institute of Electrical Control Engineering from National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan. His research interests include
Jing Guo, "A Systems Engineering Approach for Implementing An Electrical or Computer Engineering Master’s Capstone Course," in ASEE Rocky Mountain Section Conference, Cedar City, Utah, 2016.[2] S. B. Blachard and W. Frabrycky, Systems engineering and Analysis” (Fifth Edition), New York: Prentice Hall, 2011.[3] D. Buede, The Engineering Design of Systems – Models and Methods (Second Edition), Wiley, 2009.[4] A. P. Sage and J. James E. Armstrong, Introduction to Systems Engineering, Wiley, 2009.[5] yyy, Information retrieved from student deliverables for EE 692, Electrical Engineering Capstone,, 2015.[6] ASPCA, "Shelter Intake and Surrender," 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.aspca.org/animal- homelessness/shelter-intake-and
. Engineering Education student, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virgina •M.S. Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia •M. Ed, Education, Regent University, Virginia Beach, Vir- ginia •B. A., Physics & Computer Science, Notre Dame University of Maryland Honors, Publications, and Memberships: •American Society for Engineering Education, Member •Association for Computing Machinery, Mem- ber •ACM Special Interest Group: Computer Science Education, Member •Computer Science Teachers Association, Member •National Green STEM Educator Award •Contributing author, We Switched Ca- reers! Professional Experience •Software Programmer •Software Engineer •Systems Analyst •Project Manager •Educator •STEM Fa
Learning and Learning Assessment for Systems Engineering Education," in Disciplinary Convergence in Systems Engineering Research, ed: Springer, 2018, pp. 1151-1164.[5] R. N. Charette, "What's wrong with weapons acquisitions?," IEEE Spectrum, vol. 11, pp. 33-39, 2008.[6] J. Wade, W. Watson, D. Bodner, G. Kamberov, R. Turner, B. Cox, et al., "Developing the Systems Engineering Experience Accelerator (SEEA) Prototype and Roadmap," DTIC Document2013.[7] J. P. Wade, G. Kamberov, D. A. Bodner, and A. F. Squires, "The Architecture of the Systems Engineering Experience Accelerator," in INCOSE International Symposium, 2012, pp. 1806-1820.[8] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of
. Hutchinson, D. Henry, D. Verma, M. Clifford, and A. Pyster, Atlas: The Theory ofEffective Systems Engineers, version 1.0, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA,December 16, 2016.[5] R. K. Garrett, Jr., S. Anderson, N. T. Baron, and J. D. Moreland, Jr., “Managing theInsterstitials, a System of Systems Framework Suited for the Ballistic Missile Defense System”,Systems Engineering Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 87-109, J. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011.[6] R. Deiotte, and R. K. Garrett, Jr., A Novel Approach to Mission-Level Engineering ofComplex Systems of Systems; Addressing Integration and Interoperability Shortfalls byInterrogating the Intersititials, Missile Defense Agency, 13-MDA-7269, 29 April 2013.[7] J. Marvin, T. Whalen, B. Morantz, R