Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying all 4 results
Conference Session
Technical Session I
Collection
2018 FYEE Conference
Authors
Aysa Galbraith, University of Arkansas; Heath Aren Schluterman, University of Arkansas; Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas; Brandon Crisel, University of Arkansas
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference Sessions
attitudes that are a concern in Fall and those 1111 and requires some extra work on assignments for expected to be influenced by their first semester in FEP. honors credit. GNEG 1121 Introduction to Engineering II: GNEG TABLE I 1121 is the most common second course taken by FEP QUESTIONS SELECTED FROM PITTSBURG FRESHMAN ENGINEERING ATTITUDES SURVEY. students, and students who have completed GNEG 1111 Q Question and qualify to take calculus I or higher math may enroll 6 The future benefits of studying engineering are worth the effort
Conference Session
Technical Session II
Collection
2018 FYEE Conference
Authors
Davida Scharf, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference Sessions
require supporting evidence  Clarification of a career path REFERENCES[1] S. Peuker, and N.A.G. Schauss, “Improving student success andretention rates in engineering: An innovative approach for first-yearcourses,” June 2015. In Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition. See also supporting materials athttp://discovery-press.com/discovery-press/studyengr/NewResource/0.asp[2] R.E. Wertz, S. Purzer, M.J. Fosmire, and M.E. Cardella, M. E.“Assessing information literacy skills demonstrated in an engineeringdesign task,.” 2013, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102,no. 4, pp.577-602.[3] Q. Zhang, M.. Goodman, and S. Xie, “Integrating library instructioninto the course management
Conference Session
Technical Session II
Collection
2018 FYEE Conference
Authors
Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Thomas Jaworski P.E. P.E., New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference Sessions
winter.Example 2: AVERAGE Q# QUESTION RATING (1 – 5) The widget activity has increased my interest 1. 3.4
Conference Session
Technical Session II
Collection
2018 FYEE Conference
Authors
Richard Tyler Cimino, ExEEd Department, Rowan University; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, FYEE Conference Sessions
revisedinstrument of moral judgement,” J. Ed. Psych., vol. 91, pp. 644-659, Dec. 1999.[9] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. Kenny Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, A. D Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-baseddesign teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” in 121st ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014, [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/23130. [Accessed: Mar. 29, 2018].[10] J. Rest, S. J. Thoma, D. Navaez, M. J. Bebeau, “Alchemy and Beyond: Indexing theDefining Issues Test,” J. Ed. Psych., vol. 89, pp. 498-507, Feb. 1997.[11] Y. Dong, “Norms for DIT-2: from 2005 to 2009.” Center for the Study of EthicalDevelopment, U. Ala