Berkeley and graduate degrees in Counseling Psychology from the University of California at Santa Barbara.Dr. Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University Jennifer M. Bekki is an Associate Professor and Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems and Design program within The Polytechnic School within the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engi- neering at Arizona State University. Her research interests include topics related to engineering student persistence, STEM graduate students (particularly women), online learning, educational data mining, and the modeling and analysis of manufacturing systems. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Bioengineering and graduate degrees in Industrial Engineering, all from Arizona
Engineering Education a year later. Her research interests currently focuses on engineering doctoral students in underserved populations such as women and international students.Dr. Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University Jennifer M. Bekki is an Associate Professor in The Polytechnic School within the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research interests include topics related to engineering stu- dent persistence, STEM graduate students (particularly women), online learning, educational data mining, and the modeling and analysis of manufacturing systems. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Bioengineering and graduate degrees in Industrial Engineering, all from Arizona State University.Dr
Carolina State University Professor Elizabeth Dickey is a Professor and Associate Department Head in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at North Carolina State University. She also directs an NSF Industry/University Cooperative Research Center on Dielectric and Piezoelectric Materials, and she is the director of an NSF Research Traineeship program on Data-Enabled Science and Engineering of Atomic Structure.Dr. Kimberly S. Weems, North Carolina Central University Kimberly S. Weems is Associate Professor of Mathematics at North Carolina Central University (NCCU). Her research interests include generalized linear models and statistics education. Since joining NCCU in 2015, she has been instrumental in
Experiences of Black Graduate Students at a Southern Research University [10].This topic generated rich discussion that brought into sharp focus areas where the Fellows’preconceptions about URM students’ experiences differed greatly from the students’ reports oftheir experiences. The discussion generated ideas that Fellows could use for preparing facultymembers to be mentors and giving incoming doctoral students ideas to promote their success inthe program.In November, the process evaluator administered surveys to faculty and graduate students in thesix departments represented by the Fellows. The surveys were designed to measure perceptionsof the department climate for diversity from the perspective of both faculty and students,opportunities afforded
serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 and 2015 Best Paper Awards for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program
Paper ID #24829Intelligence and Smartness in Engineering: Gatekeepers to Diversity and In-clusionTurhan Kendall Carroll, The Ohio State University Turhan Carroll is currently a graduate research associate in the engineering education department at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. He received BS degrees in Physics and Applied Mathematics from North Carolina State University. He also worked for approximately 7 years as an engineer performing re- search in magneto-photonics. His research interests now focus access and persistence of underrepresented minority student, and low socio-economic status students in
Atlantic University in 1996 and 1994. Dr. Miguel’s profes- sional interests involve image processing, machine learning, and engineering education especially active learning, diversity, retention, and recruitment. Her teaching interests include MATLAB, circuits, linear systems, and digital image processing. She is a member of the IEEE, ASEE, SWE, and Tau Beta Pi. Cur- rently, Dr. Miguel is the Chair of the ASEE Professional Interest Council I (PIC I), and a Vice President of PICs which gives her a seat on the ASEE Board of Directors. Dr. Miguel has held several other officer positions across the ASEE including: Division Chair and Program Chair of the ECE and New Engineer- ing Educators Divisions, and ASEE Campus
has published in scholarly and practitioner-focused jour- nals on topics including evaluation design, instrument validation, and the effectiveness of policy change. After graduating from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a B.S. in Psychology Adrienne completed a Masters of Education in Curriculum and Instruction at UNC Greensboro. She taught third grade before returning to UNC Chapel Hill to complete a PhD in Education. In addition to her evaluation work Adrienne has worked on multiple research projects, taught doctoral- level research methods and statistic courses, and mentored undergraduate and graduate students.Dr. Rosabel Deloge, Educational Consultant-Independent Retired Career &
needed to do so. Thisre-coding will help inform the discussion topics and activities we design for the CoNECDsession, although the workshop will be equally shaped through conversation among the attendingparticipants. We have also identified, via network analysis, the importance of connections andinformal networks across disciplines to create support and enact change. This initial informationwill help inform our conversations in this workshop and beyond toward our ownrecommendations of change and ways to establish informal networks.Root Cause AnalysisDue to deep-rooted issues of inequity, as laid out by Gonzales, [6], Chua and many othersexamining issues of equity and diversity within engineering education and academic institutionsmore broadly
Paper ID #24750A Systematic Review of the Intersections of Engineering Identity and Finan-cial Need LiteratureMaria Luz Espino M.A, Iowa State University Maria Luz Espino, M.A. is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the Higher Education Administration program at Iowa State University. She holds a Masters degree in Educational Policy and Leadership from Marquette University and a Bachelors degree in Community and Nonprofit Leadership and Gender and Women Studies from the University of Wisconsin - Madison. She investigates issues of college access and retention of first-generation low-income students
great deal of self-care. Whenpursuing social justice work on topics I care about but have not as deeply victimized me, I sensethat I am not weighed down as deeply. In the times when I have given LGBTQ inclusionworkshops, I found I was particularly sensitive and not as easily generous to faculty whodiscounted the opinions of LGBTQ students or who microaggressed them in dialogue. I imaginemy perspective on which research questions to pursue will continue to evolve; currently I workon issues which matter deeply and intellectually to me, they relate to experiences and problems Ihave had, but they are not so extremely personal that I find myself paralyzed or despondent overthe findings.Cassandra’s reflection on the questions she asks
justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University Dr. Montfort is an Assistant Professor in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State UniversityDr. Qwo-Li Driskill, Oregon State University Qwo-Li Driskill is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Oregon State University. They hold a PhD in Rhetoric & Writing from Michigan State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Exploring Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Engineering UndergraduateExperiences through
coordinates training offered by the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT) to identify and reduce implicit bias throughout the search process. In addition, she runs a faculty devel- opment and leadership program to train and recruit diverse PhD students who wish to pursue academic positions in engineering or applied science after graduation. Dr. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder in 1992 and 1994, respectively. She went on to earn a Specialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies in 2011 and a Ph.D. in Higher Education and Student Affairs Leadership in December 2017, both from the University of Northern Colorado
Paper ID #25013Integration outcomes and cultural capital in a NSBE ChapterTasha Zephirin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Tasha Zephirin is a Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is an Executive Assistant for the National Association of Multicultural Program Advocates (NAMEPA) Inc. and has served as the Graduate Student Representative on the Purdue Engineering Advisory Council. Her research interests include exploring the role of noncurricular engineering education initiatives in the engineering experience, especially within and across
the 2017 WEPAN Inclusive Culture and Equity Award.Dr. Marie Claire Horner-Devine Dr. Claire Horner-Devine is the co-founder and co-director of three, federally funded, national programs (BRAINS, WEBS, and LATTICE) designed to accelerate and improve the career advancement of early- career women and researchers from underrepresented groups in STEM. She is also is the founder of Counterspace Consulting and creates professional development and leadership opportunities for STEM professionals, grounded in social science research and with equity, diversity and inclusion at their core. She has published this work in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, CBE – Life Sciences Education and Neuron. Dr. Horner
, Engineering has a lower percentage of women than all fieldsexcept computer science and physics, and lower percentages of underrepresented minority (URM)students (Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, American Indian or Alaska Native, and/or NativeHawaiian or Other Pacific Islander) than Physics, Astronomy, Earth, Atmospheric, and Ocean Sciences,and Agricultural Sciences [1], [3]. The underrepresentation of women in Engineering holds across allracial and ethnic groups [1]. The proportion of URM graduates in Engineering is far below therepresentation of people from these groups in the general population [4].1 University of Wisconsin-Madison
idea of multiple format representations can probably because the concept of functions, which is a centralbe employed in the development of a curriculum for teaching topic in pre-algebra mathematics, is typically presented in anCS concepts within the context of a summer camp. The abstract format rather than in a concrete context. Post-testcurriculum is designed to give students ample opportunities results from this research indicate that students who wereto learn abstract concepts. taught using multiple formats performed better at solving word A lack of interest or proficiency in CS subjects among function problems than their counterparts who did not receivestudents is
size that is more reflective of the variedpersonnel in engineering will help us create a more inclusive and well-rounded dataset foranalysis. From this study, anecdotal evidence, at least, has been generated to show that peoplenavigating engineering environments do hold implicit bias. Further work is necessary tounderstand the ways in which eye-tracking can be used to accurately detect such biases.References[1] D. Chubin, G. May and E. Babco, "Diversifying the Engineering Workforce", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 73-86, 2005.[2] G. May and D. Chubin, "A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for Underrepresented Minority Students", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 27
session: 90 minutes totalIntroduction and Ice Breakers—15 minutesWelcome and recognition of indigenous land (1 minute)(9 minutes) Who is in the room? Invite names, people’s pronouns, and how this topic (socialjustice values imbued in research methods) is relevant to them. Start with workshop facilitators.If there are many people in the crowd, we can ask people to raise their hands if: they are researchers,administrators, faculty, students, in the non-profit sector, or in the for-profit sector.Ask attendees to raise their hands if: They are currently involved in research with students; they arecurrently involved in research with faculty/staff in higher education; they are currently involved inresearch with industry, or otherwise.(2 minutes
activities to the UW community and local K-12 students involving toy adaptation for children with disabilities. Dianne holds a PhD in Genetics from Duke University, and BS in Molecular Biology and BA in Psychology from the University of Texas at Austin.Celina Gunnarsson, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCamille Birch, University of Washington Camille Birch is a graduate of the Bioengineering and Computer Science departments at the University of Washington. She developed curriculum concerning the interplay of diversity and ethics for undergrad- uate engineering students at UW and is interested in the power of education to enact change in future generations of engineers. She currently works for Microsoft in the Bay Area
conceptual understanding of oppression and privilege.IntroductionMany engineering departments are seeking to diversify their communities and establish a climateof inclusion and collaboration. College-wide efforts at the authors’ institution have beenpreviously described [1], and include initiatives to enhance students’ and faculty’s capacities toengage issues of inclusivity, equity and social justice. Associated faculty developmentprogramming and curricula reform at both undergraduate- and graduate-student levels arepushing beyond multicultural awareness/cultural diversity, or growth in cultural competency,towards understanding intersections of institutionalized systems of power, privilege, andinequity. These educational opportunities center
contemporarytheories of change as frameworks for the basis of their assertions.Course Design and DescriptionAlice, instructor: I designed this course for more senior graduate students in or with interest inengineering education research and related fields, and who are interested in developing a moretheorized understanding of the concepts of race, class, gender, diversity, and other topics relatedto broadening participation in engineering education. This is the second time I have offered thecourse.Learning ObjectivesThese learning objectives are the ones I am anticipating for the next iteration of the course, asthey have changed over the course as I discovered my own blind spots. For example, eventhough I had committed one class period to discuss Whiteness and
). Dr. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education community including serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 and 2015 Best Paper Awards for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research.Prof. Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego Michelle M
, and mean- ingful learning experiences, through learner-centered pedagogies, differentiated teaching, and emerging educational technologies. Since Fall 2016, in partnership with the College of Engineering and the LIFE team, Gemma designed and supported faculty development workshops in active learning pedagogies, provided regular consultations and also joined the UM team at Olin College’s 2017 Collaboratory Sum- mer Institute. Gemma is currently a post-graduate student in the MSc Digital Education program at the University of Edinburgh, challenging perspectives about education and technological change. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Exploring Faculty Perceptions of
goal attainment.Mr. Delano White , The Gaskins Foundation c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Numeracy: Preparing Students for Success in Algebra Abstract Algebra has been universally accepted as a gateway skill. It is a bridge to high-level math course: Geometry, Algebra II, Trigonometry and Pre-Calculus and Calculus. Students who take an Algebra course by the 8th grade are more likely to pursue careers in Engineering and other STEM fields. Students who take Algebra by the 8th grade will be able to take a Calculus course while in high school. Students who are exposed to Calculus in High School generally are more successful in their first-year mathematics courses in college. Algebra by
Paper ID #24807Unnecessarily Complicated: An Examination of Information Asymmetry inthe Transfer ProcessDustin M. Grote, Virginia Tech Dustin M. Grote currently serves as the Graduate Research Assistant for the Virginia Tech Network for Engineering Transfer Students (VT-NETS) Program with the Engineering Education Department at Vir- ginia Tech. He is also a PhD student in the Higher Education Program with an emphasis in Research, Policy, and Finance. His research focuses primarily on access issues for underrepresented/minority and low income students, community college pathways, policy, organizational and systems
can be difficult to internalizeand discuss in an open forum, the course builds towards these topics, starting out withrelatively easier topics (e.g. Mindset and Bloom’s Taxonomy) and moving towards issues ofbelonging and identity by the end of the 15-week semester.An important aspect of the course is that it is incorporated into the students’ general educationrequirements and is not an extra burden of credits taken in addition to required program andgeneral education coursework. RIT requires students to take a course that addressesidentification of ethical questions, and the Metacognition course addresses the outcomes andhas assessments that examine students’ ability to identify and address ethical scientificquestions through case study
Karis Boyd-Sinkler is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She also serves as support staff for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity where she is involved in the recruitment, outreach, and retention of engineering students. Her research interests include diversity in engineering and the role of engineering student support centers in regards to student attrition and persistence rates. Ms. Boyd received her B.S. in Engineering Science from the University of Virginia in 2014.Adam Stark Masters, Virginia Tech Adam S. Masters is a doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. They received a B.S. in Mechanical
Paper ID #24976Realities of mentoring high school students from inner city public schools vs.private schools in STEM research at an R1 UniversityMs. Christine Newman, Johns Hopkins University CHRISTINE A. NEWMAN, M.B.A. Assistant Dean, Center for Educational Outreach, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218 Phone: (410) 516-4473; Fax: (410) 516-0264; email: cnewma13@jhu.edu Professional Preparation: Virginia Polytechnic and State University B.S. Mechanical Engineering 1989 Marshall University MBA 1995 Appointments: 2010-Present Assistant Dean, Center for
Paper ID #24933Exploring the Unique Skills and Challenges Veterans with Disabilities Bringto College: A Qualitative Study in EngineeringMr. Michael Scott Sheppard Jr., Arizona State University Michael Scott Sheppard is a graduate research associate pursuing a Master of Science degree in Engineer- ing and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State University. He received a Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Science degree from Lynchburg College in 2002, after which he served in the military for six years as a Special Amphibious Reconnaissance Corpsman (SARC) at the 2nd Force Reconnaissance Company