imagination affected during the program? a. Which engineering research practices showed the most and least gains in self- efficacy across the program? b. What community building elements supported the mode of imagination? 2. To what extent did alignment to the practices change over the program? 3. How was the mode of engagement affected during the program? a. To what extent did participants engage in each engineering research practice? b. How did engagement happen for the most and least aligned practices and what community building elements were involved?Context and ParticipantsThe context of this study is a research experience for undergraduates (REU) program designedaround the ERM model of
insulation may interchanged). The pre-and post-course surveys that will be used are provided in Appendix B. Table 3. Evaluation Plan Outcome or intention: Assessment or evaluation: Collaboratively design an Student designs will be evaluated using rubrics. Design innovative tiny house that serves as outcomes will differ for each affiliated course (e.g., a learning space and as a showcase models, drawings, presentations, calculations). of best practices related to Innovation is included as a component of the sustainable design and construction. evaluation rubric for each course. A sample project description, including rubrics, for
Annual Frontiers in Education, Boston, MA, 2002.[19] D. E. Giles and J. Eyler, “The theoretical roots of service-learning in John Dewey: Toward a theory of service-learning,” Serv. Learn. Gen., vol. 150, 1994.[20] J. Dewey, Democracy and education. New York: Collier Books, 1916.[21] M. McCall, “Leadership development through experience,” Acad. Manag., vol. 18, no. 3, 2004.[22] B. Banach, E. Foden, and V. Brooks Carter, “Educating undergraduate group workers: Increasing confidence through experiential learning,” Soc. Work Groups, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 158–170, 2019.[23] Center of Inquiry in the LIberal Arts at Wabash College, “Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education: High-impact practices and experiences from the Wabash
] P. Deshpande, C. B. Lee, and I. Ahmed, “Evaluation of Peer Instruction for Cybersecurity Education,” in Proceedings of the SIGCSE Conference, 2019.[9] F. Ning, W. Cong, J. Qiu, J. Wei, and S. Wang, “Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 80, pp. 369–378, 2015.[10] J. M. D. Hill, C. A. Carver, J. W. Humphries, and U. W. Pooch, “Using an isolated network laboratory to teach advanced networks and security,” in Proceedings of the thirty- second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE ’01, 2001, pp. 36–40.[11] D. Dasgupta, D. M. Ferebee, and Z. Michalewicz, “Applying Puzzle-Based
Paper ID #25518Preparing Engineering Students for their Profession - A Novel CurricularApproachProf. Joel Howell, University of South Florida Joel Howell is a Professor of Practice in the University of South Florida’s Electrical Engineering De- partment. His focus is to help every student within the department develop skills and competencies through experiential learning activities, including community service, involvement in student organiza- tions, internships/co-ops, undergraduate research, and study abroad programs. Prior to joining USF, Joel served as an Advanced Programs Engineer and Business Development Manager for
Paper ID #25407Examining the Relationship of Active Team-based Learning and Technologyand Engineering Students’ Research Self-efficacy in a Cybersecurity Trainee-ship ClassDr. Rylan C. Chong, Chaminade University Dr. Rylan Chong is a data scientist in the Division of Natural Sciences and Mathematics at Chaminade University of Honolulu. He earned his bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from Chaminade University of Honolulu. Dr. Chong has a master’s degree from Purdue University in Information Security. He specialized in biometric systems and human factors during his master’s degree. Dr. Chong completed his Doctor of
competitions. It hasreviewed relevant literature and discussed the work of several robotics teams at the North DakotaState University. Future work will involve conducting a more in-depth analysis of participationdata and collecting data from additional participants over time to assess the long-term benefits ofrobotic program participation.References[1] J. Dias, K. Althoefer, and P. U. Lima, “Robot Competitions: What Did We Learn?,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 16–18, 2016.[2] A.-B. Hunter, T. J. Weston, S. L. Laursen, and H. Thiry, “URSSA: Evaluating Student Gains from Undergraduate Research in the Sciences,” CUR Q., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 15–19, 2009.[3] A. Zdešar, S. Blažic, and G. Klančar, “Engineering Education in Wheeled
, he is interested in developing novel medical devices. In addition to his technical research, he is also an active member of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and conducts research in engineering education.Dr. Lily Chang, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Dr. Chang earned her PhD in Computer Science from Florida International University and her Master of Science in Computer Science from New Jersey Institute of Technology. Her primary research area involves software engineering, specifically formal specification. Dr. Chang is an associate professor and the program coordinator of the software engineering program at the University of Wisconsin - Platteville. She is a member of the American
Paper ID #27552Students’ Self-Assessment of Modern Making SkillsDr. Diana R. Haidar, Carnegie Mellon University Diana R. Haidar, Ph.D. is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. Her background spans industry work in manufacturing, research efforts towards developing nanocomposites for advanced tribological performance in extreme environments, and prototyping experience designing-fabricating-building-testing-implementing various custom experimen- tal equipment. These experiences led to a passion for using makerspace resources to bring more hands-on
Paper ID #25128Push and Pull: Integrating Industry Across the Student ExperienceKatherine McConnell, University of Colorado, Boulder/Denver Katherine McConnell is a Senior Professional Development Advisor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. She is currently a student at the University of Col- orado Denver pursuing an EdD in Leadership for Educational Equity with a concentration in Professional Learning and Technology.Julie Elizabeth Steinbrenner, University of Colorado, Boulder Julie Steinbrenner earned her PhD in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University in 2011. She is