language.Given the diversity within this field, engineering education students’ experiences in this journeycan be very different from one another during their doctoral years. Like any other diversesettings, engineering education students may have needs in common or completely differentwhich required different ways of support.In this study, we are a group of engineering education students and alumni who speak English asour second language (ESL). Using co-operative inquiry, we aimed to reflect on our doctoraljourney in engineering education and highlight the challenges we went through and ways wewere able to overcome them. We are taking the positionality of researcher to participant toexamine our experiences. The challenges are mostly centered over
institution.Ten students earned their bachelors at UC Davis.MethodsThis paper focuses on the written reflective assignments collected in the first two years of thePEGS21 program.Qualitative analysis of written reflectionsStudying language provides insights into what a speaker might be thinking, and to discover theways that language represents and constitutes realities (Johnston, 2004). Specifically, study oflanguage-in-use provides insight into language-users’ self-perception (Rymes, 1995). For thisstudy, it was posited that the language participants used in their reflections would provide insightsinto their first-year graduate experience, particularly their self-efficacy, a term used to describeone’s sense of competence in being able to achieve (Bandura
return to their institutions(workshops), have time to practice these skills (practice writing time), and discuss how things aregoing (writing clusters). Figure 1. Dissertation Institute Main ActivitiesWorkshop Sessions: Multiple 1 or 2-hour sessions lead by experts in dissertation topics toprovide the participants with ideas, concepts, techniques and reflections about the writing habitsand process, time management, communication with advisors, and overall topics germane to thecompletion of their dissertation.Practice Writing Sessions: Significant amount of structured writing time distributed along theweek to provide students with the opportunity to apply the workshop’s lessons, practice theirwriting, and advance in
andbusy professionals targeted by the D.Tech. Beyond just a constructivist approach, the designteam was guided in particular by the valuable insights in the previously cited How PeopleLearn II. We were informed by Chp. 4 Processes that Support Learning which led to ourengaging candidates in collaborative knowledge building (e.g., by cohort construction of afield’s/process’ knowledge base using Wiki technology). We also incorporated self-regulation of learning as required by our mix of synchronous and asynchronous learningactivities. Then, to insure critical reflection, we installed frequent opportunities for self-assessment (of the quality of their information sources and subsequent analyses of theextracted material; of their writing and
effective latent variable model and instrument that reflects the factors of college students’ retention. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Creating a Successful Pathway to Graduate Studies: The Student Integrated Intern Research Experience (SIIRE)AbstractFor the health of the engineering profession and the nation, increasing the number and diversityof engineering students going on to graduate studies is imperative. The Student Integrated InternResearch Experience (SIIRE) is successfully addressing this situation, supporting students fromundergraduate through graduate school. SIIRE recruits a diverse group of first-year students tobegin in SIIRE in their sophomore year and
andcommitment from teachers. Secondly, researchers commented on the time involved in theprogram with two suggesting the program should involve multiple school visits and one sayingthe program was too “time-intensive” already. Another student suggested have funding fordemonstration or activity supplies. The feedback from researcher participants was very positiveand reflected a high level of commitment and interest in continuing the program.Teacher Feedback All ten of the participating teachers responded, “Yes, definitely!” to the question, “Wouldyou be interested in participating in Grad Student STEM Share again?” The teachers alsounanimously selected “Excellent” to describe the following components of the program. Overall value of Grad Student