Paper ID #25339Does How Pre-College Engineering and Technology Role Models See Them-selves Relate to Girls’ Engagement in the Fields? [Research To Practice]Dr. Mary B. Isaac, HEDGE Co. Mary Isaac retired from General Electric in 2007 as a Customer Service Executive, after 30 years in various technical and commercial roles in GE’s energy business, serving electric utility customers such as Excel, Constellation Energy, and Entergy. She has a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Union College in N.Y., an M.A.T. in technology education from North Carolina A&T State University in 2011, and Ph.D. in occupational and technical
Teams: The Role of Peer Influence in Robotics Engineering Activity,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 490–536, Oct. 2014.[5] R. A. Engle and F. R. Conant, “Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 20:4, pp. 399–483, 2002.[6] J. McFadden and G. Roehrig, Engineering design in the elementary science classroom: supporting student discourse during an engineering design challenge. Springer Netherlands, 2018.[7] K. B. Wendell, C. Wright, and P. Paugh, “Reflective Decision-Making in Elementary Students’ Engineering Design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 356–397, 2017.[8] A. Wilson-Lopez et
. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Ed- ucation and Outreach.Stephanie B. Adams c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Three ERCs and a National Network Node: Assessing Engineering Outcomes for Middle School Students
Paper ID #27387Board 126: Early Career Elementary Teachers’ Evolving Choices for Incor-porating Engineering into Their ClassroomDr. Jessica E S Swenson, University of Michigan Jessica Swenson is a post doctoral research fellow at the University of Michigan. She received her doc- torate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical engineering and STEM education. Her current research involves examining different types of homework problems in undergraduate engineering science courses, flexible classrooms, active learning, responsive teaching, and novice elementary engineering teacher development.Dr. Kristen B Wendell, Tufts
cycle to flexibly consider and assess varied options andminimized loss of valuable time and material resources after committing to physical prototyping. (a) (b) Figure 3: Comparing robot designs of a team in (a) treatment group and (b) control group.Most teams in the treatment group were deemed to have designed and implemented betteralgorithms for their robots. As an example, one treatment group team used a systematicexperimentation approach with various sensor combinations to select their sensing strategy andthen developed an efficient algorithm that relied on input from five IR sensors. Alternatively, theteams in the control group tried trial-and-error approaches to
. Ten teachers represented School A and one teacher representedSchool B. The majority of students in both schools were White/Caucasian, followed bymultiracial, Hispanic, and other (district level data statistics), and these patterns were observedby researchers in the classrooms (demographic data were not collected on students). In all, 265students participated in the activity.Two researchers facilitated the CALE activity in the classrooms. The activity ranged in durationfrom 30-50 minutes, depending on classroom schedules. After completing the activity in eachclassroom, researchers made field notes and discussed aspects of the activity that did and did notwork. Because the activity was in development, we refined and updated the activity as
. J. Molyneaux, “The Single Sex Debate for Girls in Science: A Comparison Between Two Informal Science Programs on Middle School Students’ STEM Identity Formation,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1979–2007, 2013.[10] S. Burket, C. Small, C. Rossetti, B. Hill, and C. Gattis, “A day camp for middle school girls to create a STEM pipeline,” Proc. 2008 Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., 2008.[11] K. Riedinger and A. Taylor, “‘I Could See Myself as a Scientist’: The Potential of Out-of- School Time Programs to Influence Girls’ Identities in Science,” Afterschool Matters, no. 23, pp. 1–7, 2016.[12] “GoldieBlox: About.” [Online]. Available: https://www.goldieblox.com/about/. [Accessed
can be found in [14]. This frameworkguided the research, including the questions asked, methodology used, and analytic decisions wemade.Research QuestionsTo investigate optimization in our specific context, we set out to answer the following question: 1. How do students and their teacher collectively optimize a multi-objective design through modeling and analysis? A. What role does risk taking play in the process and in presenting their final prototype? B. What knowledge, tools, and approaches do they use to improve their designs?Research Methods Our study takes an ethnographic perspective that is informed by discourse analysis toinvestigate precollege engineering because classroom activity
mathematics and science education: a literature review,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 11, no. 2, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1674[2] Afterschool Alliance. “STEM Learning in Afterschool: An Analysis of Impact and Outcomes,” STEM and Afterschool, 2011. Washington, D.C.: Afterschool Alliance. 1616 H Street NW Suite 820, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: 202-347-1002; Fax: 202-347-2092; e-mail: info@afterschoolalliance.org; Web site: http://afterschoolalliance.org.[3] S. Friesen, C. Sarr, A. Park, C. Marcotte, T. Hampshire, B. Martin, … J. Martin ,”Focus On Inquiry,” Calgary: Galileo Education Network, 2015. Retrieved from http://inquiry.galileo.org/[4] M.S. Donovan, and J.D. Bransford
. from MIT in civil and environmental engineering. Her current research includes investigating children’s engagement in engineering design through in-depth case study analysis.Dr. Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Assistant Professor of Ed- ucation at Tufts University. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach focus on supporting discourse and design practices during K-12, teacher education, and college-level en- gineering learning experiences, and increasing access to engineering in the elementary school experience, especially in under-resourced schools. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential
. Journal of STEM Education, 12, 23-37.Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., & Shouse, A. W. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, M. C., (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics,112(1), 3-11.Carmel, Y. H. (2016). Regulating ‘‘big data education’’ in Europe: Lessons learned from the US. Internet Policy Review. doi:10.14763/2016.1.402.Dandridge, T. M., Ehsan, H., Gajdzik, E., Lowe, T., Ohland, C., Yeter, I. H., Brophy, S. & Cardella, M. E. (2019). Integrated STEM+ C learning for K-2 aged
projects the FSAE team selected for the second module. Module oneexperiments included the following and are pictured in Figure 1: A. Cantilever Beam: using force-deflection curves to identify the materials that composed different cantilever beams. B. Sump Pump: measuring electrical power input and mechanical (hydraulic) power output of a commercial sump pump to determine efficiency. C. DC Motor Dyno: sweeping through the performance range of a DC motor used in mechatronics applications, determining speed, torque, and power output through a prony-style brake mechanism. D. Flame Lab: igniting fuel-air mixtures in a flame tube at different fuel-air ratios to measure flame speeds and relate maximum flame speed to
Grade level Lesson concept addressed lab A F Caucasian 9-12 Clean energy generation Lab 1 B M Caucasian 9-10 Newton’s second law C F African-American 5 Gas laws Lab 2 D F Asian 6-7 Engineering design process E F Asian 9-12 Lab 3 Laws of gravity F F
of the interplay of CT and STEM content will be guided bythe research questions: (a) What aspects of the integration of CT and STEM increase thelikelihood of girls acquiring CT skills? (b) What aspects of the integration of CT and STEMincrease the likelihood of girls acquiring STEM content knowledge? and © How does theintegration of CT and STEM affect minority girls’ self-perception as future technologists? Conceptual Framework. The study uses mixed methods. However, the initial phase of the study is highly explorative, and dependent on interpretation of qualitative data. The extant research on women and girls in STEM fields indicates that low participation is based on gender-socialization (societal norms, gender stereotyping and media
(Fundamental) IntroductionThe increased focus on computational thinking (CT) has grown in recent years for variousreasons, such as a general concern about (a) a lack of global competitiveness among Americanstudents and general literacy in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields (Hsu& Cardella, 2013), (b) maintaining the economic competitiveness of the U.S. (Yadav, Hong, &Stephenson, 2016), and (c) preparing students adequately for a society that is increasinglytechnological (NRC, 2011). CT can help individuals analyze and understand multiple dimensionsof a complex problem and identify and apply appropriate tools or techniques to address acomplex problem (Wing, 2010). Furthermore
Undecided Agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Figure 3. Student responses to questions 2 and 3.There were three open-ended questions at the end of the anonymous FLEET survey: A) “Do youhave any recommendations for future versions of the FLEET software?” B) “Do you have anyrecommendations for future ASNE capstone experiences?” C) “Do you have any furthercomments you wish to share?” Responses to these questions were analyzed for themes thatinformed development of the FLEET program and the surrounding educational materials.Student responses showed suggestions for future development as well as positive feedback aboutthe gameplay. Of the 46 students, nine students provided
] M. Ashley, K. M. Cooper, J. M. Cala, and S. E. Brownell, “Building better bridges into stem: A synthesis of 25 years of literature on stem summer bridge programs,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 4, 2017.[5] L. Chevalier, B. Chrisman, and M. Kelsey, “SUCCESS week: a freshmen orientation program at Southern Illinois University Carbondale College of Engineering,” pp. 7–8, 2001.[6] M. J. Grimm, “Work in progress - an Engineering Bridge Program - the foundation for success for academically at-risk students,” in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference, 2005, p. S2C–8.[7] M. Harkins, “Engineering Boot Camp : A Broadly Based Online Summer Bridge Program for Engineering
thinking and depth in student reasoning.Theoretical FrameworkIn this study, we used the legitimation code theory and more specifically semantic gravity andsemantic density, to explore abstract knowledge across specifications in the design problem, andthe relational levels among different concepts or ideas. The Legitimation Code theory (LCT) hasbeen used to support knowledge-building by enabling dialogue between theory and data or to relatetheory and practice [6]. Used in many disciplines such as biology, physics, nursing, English,cultural studies, music, and design, LCT connotes five principles that explain disciplinarydispositions, practices, and discourse: a) autonomy; b) density; c) specialization; d) semantics; ande) temporality. Each one of
NYC teachers for their participation in this study.References[1] S. Fayer, A. Lacey, and A. Watson, “STEM occupations: Past, present, and future,” in Spotlight on Statistics, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2017, pp. 1–35.[2] R. Noonan, “STEM jobs: 2017 update (ESA Issue Brief # 02-17).” US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Office of the Chief Economist, Washington, DC, 2017.[3] B. Scafidi, D. L. Sjoquist, and T. R. Stinebrickner, “Race, poverty, and teacher mobility,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 145–159, 2007.[4] W.C. Symonds, R. Schwartz, and R.F. Ferguson, “Pathways to prosperity: Meeting the challenge of preparing young Americans for the 21st
projects through which the Youth Scholars framed theirlearning about socio-technical issues. Our ultimate goal was to remove barriers to participation,preparedness, and identity development for students from populations underrepresented inengineering. In the current study, we focus on the extent to which participants gained socio-technical engineering knowledge as they engaged in program activities, and we consider theimplications for future such learning programs.These Youth Scholars learned about photovoltaics, engineering, community engagement, andcollege success; (b) collaboratively designed a community solar engineering research project thatcontributes to a larger program of research; and (c) communicated about energy policy withneighborhood
, "Beginning an engineer's journey: A narrative examination of wow, when, and why students choose the engineering major," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 556-582, 2018.[16] J. L. DeGrazia, J. F. Sullivan, L. E. Carlson, and D. W. Carlson, "A K-12/University partnership: Creating tomorrow's engineers," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 557-563, 2001.[17] P. Cantrell and J. Ewing-Taylor, "Exploring STEM career options through collaborative high school seminars," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 295-303, 2009.[18] H. M. Doerr, J. B. Ärlebäck, and A. Costello Staniec, "Design and effectiveness of modeling-based mathematics in a summer bridge
Saddle River, NJ, 2013.[11] R. W. Lent, M. J. Miller, P. E. Smith, B. A. Watford, K. Hui, and R. H. Lim,“Social Cognitive Model of Adjustment to Engineering Majors: Longitudinal Test AcrossGender and Race/Ethnicity,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 86, pp. 77–85, 2015.Available online - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.004[12] A. C. Worcester, V. M. Hickox, J. G. Klimaszewski, F. Wilches-Bernal, J. H. Chow, andC.-F. Chen, “The Sky’s the Limit - Designing Wind Farms: A Hands-on STEM Activity forHigh School Students,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 18-29, 2013[13] Friedemann Friese, Power Grid, Rio Grande Games, 2011,http://riograndegames.com/Game/5-Power-Grid[14] J. R. Church, “Season 2, Episode 1, Beakman’s World
Paper ID #25167Board 112: A STEM Training Program to Improve Middle and High SchoolVEX Competition OutcomesMr. Ryan Bobby Tang Dan, Vaughn College of Aeronautics & Technology Ryan B. Tang Dan is a senior in the Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering Master’s of Science Program at New York University Tandon School of Engineering. He currently works as an adjunct laboratory in- structor for courses such as Introduction to Robotics. Ryan is still an active member of the Vaughn College Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Competition team and works as a faculty advisor to the team. Furthermore, Ryan Tang is the head coach of the VEX
Exposition, San Antonio, TX.[13] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T. McGlamery, T. M. Nathans-Kelly, and C. G. Nicometo, “Understanding engineering work and identity: A cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–174, 2010.[14] M.E. Jordan and R.R. McDaniel Jr, “Managing uncertainty during collaborative problem solving in elementary school teams : The role of peer influence in robotics engineering activity,” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 23, no.4, pp. 490-536, 2014.[15] National Research Council, Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2013.[16] Illustrative Mathematics. Standards for Mathematical practice
Education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681. 6. Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (1996). Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. Retrieved from https://www.webtools.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ 7. Living with the Lab Faculty Team, L. T. U. (Ed.). (2018). living with the lab; boosting hands-on learning in engineering education. Retrieved from http://www2.latech.edu/~kcorbett/LWTL/home/main.html 8. Salzman, N., & Hunt, G. (2016). Modification and Assessment of a First-Year Engineering Course to Improve Students’ Calculus Readiness. First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, W1A–1 – W1A–4.
] P. s. C. o. A. o. Science and Technology, Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America's Future: Executive Report. Executive Office of the President, President's Council of Advisors on …, 2010.[2] B. L. Yoder, "Engineering by the Numbers," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017, p. 11.[3] N. R. Council, Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. National Academies Press, 2009.[4] S. E. Lopez and W. H. Goodridge, "The State of Engineering Integration in K-12 Science Standards: Five Years After NGSS (Fundamental)," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[5] S. Virani and
). The curriculum was based on the NGSS standard HS-LS1.B (Growth andDevelopment of Organisms) with additional resources created by her. The designed instructionaims to support the students’ understanding of the mechanism of the cell cycle, including the needfor DNA replication during the cell cycle and the duration of the phases of each cycle, and howdoes cancer cells’ cycle function. Rachel provided the students with necessary foundationalconcepts for further exploration of the cell division at the beginning of class. During the robotactivity, individual students acted out creating a pie chart to display the duration of the cell cyclephases using a robot. Rachel demonstrated to the students the use of the masking tape with therobot and guided
curriculum included (a) STEM hands-on activities focused on mathematicsand engineering (including mathematical visualization, engineering design process throughtowers and chain reaction machines, explorations with arduinos and circuits, and mathematicalthinking through folding), and (b) World of Work activities that centered on self- and career-exploration experiences (including career cards, games, virtual reality experiences, conversationswith and presentations from STEM professionals). The first week of the summer program thestudents focused on introductory STEM activities and explorations and alignment of their currentinterests and abilities to career pathways leading to STEM. In the second week, these activitieslaid the foundation for students
at least one criterion in the category” (1); “Adequate evidence to meet all three criteria inthe category” (2); and “Extensive evidence to meet at least two criteria” (3). The 5E ILPv2 rubricwas developed for use in evaluating teachers’ inquiry-based 5E lesson plans. The rubric containsa total of 21 items: three items for elaborate phase; four items for each phase of engage, explore,and evaluation; and six items for the explain phase. Each item is a Likert-type scale that rangesfrom 0-Unacceptable to 4-Excellent with a total of 84 points (see Appendix B).In this study, analyzing lesson plans using the rubrics provided opportunities for suggestions andfeedback for improvement to developers and it informs the development of new lessons by
engage her child in CT during integrated CT+engineering activities. The researchquestions addressed in this study are: What roles does a homeschool parent play that lead to their child’s engagement in computational thinking during (a) an integrated literacy, STEM, and CT curriculum at home, and (b) interaction with an engineering and computational thinking exhibit in a science center? MethodsResearch Design This is a qualitative study that utilized a single-case-study approach to investigate theroles that a homeschool parent plays in promoting CT in her six-year-old child. We employed acase study approach because a case study is an empirical inquiry which can provide