Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying all 17 results
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University; Richard A. Sun CFA, Mississippi Coding Academies; Randy Lynn
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #24867Mississippi Coding Academies: A Nontraditional Approach to ComputingEducationDr. Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University Sarah Lee joined the faculty at Mississippi State University (MSU) after a 19 year information tech- nology career at FedEx Corporation. As an associate clinical professor and assistant department head in the Computer Science and Engineering Department, she is co-founder and co-director of the Bull- dog Bytes program at MSU that engages K-12 students with computing and provides trans-disciplinary professional development to K-12 teachers in computer science and cybersecurity. She is
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
1, 2017. https://www.asce.org/question-of-ethics-articles/sep-2017/ [Accessed Jan. 28, 2019][26] American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, Practicing the principles of equitable participation. Oct. 1, 2018. https://www.asce.org/question-of-ethics-articles/oct-2018/ [Accessed Jan. 30, 2019].[27] American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, Female engineer faces workplace discrimination. Jan 1, 2008 https://www.asce.org/question-of-ethics-articles/jan-2008/ [Accessed Jan. 28, 2019][28] B. van Wee and K. Geurs, “Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations,” EJTIR, vol. 11(4), pp. 350-367, Sept. 2011.[29] A. Ezeiza, N. Garay, K. Lopez de Ipina, A. Soraluze, “Ethical issues on the design of assistive
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachel Ann Shannon, Iowa State University; Sara Kaye Jones; Mani Mina, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
cycle is comprised of four interconnected and often overlapping steps. They are asfollows: 1. Empathetic Attention - Person A actively listens to Person B 2. Empathetic Resonance - Person A experiences a shared emotional state related to the topic of conversation with Person B 3. Expressed Empathy - Person A expresses their resonance from step 2 to Person B 4. Received Empathy - Person B confirms that Person A has indeed experienced the same emotional state and that they feel understood on an emotional levelKouprie and Visser [3] proposed a framework for incorporating empathy into design. Similar tothe empathy cycle, it also has four steps: 1. Discovery - the designer discovers and enters into the user’s world 2. Immersion
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak Jr., Hope College; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
, 2002. https://doi.org/10.17226/10250. 3. B. Richmond, The ‘Thinking’ in Systems Thinking: Seven Essential Skills. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communications, 2000. 4. L. B. Sweeney and D. Meadows, The Systems Thinking Playbook. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green, 2010. 5. G.M. Weinberg, An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. New York: Dorset House Publishing, 2011. 6. D.P. Stroh, Systems Thinking for Social Change: A Practical Guide to Solving Complex Problems, Avoiding Unintended Consequences, and Achieving Lasting Results. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green, 2015. 7. W. Donaldson, Simple Complexity: A Management Book for The Rest of Us: A Guide to Systems Thinking. New York
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrew Doyle, KTH Royal Institute of Technology; Lena B. Gumaelius, KTH Royal Institute of Technology; Arnold Neville Pears, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH); Niall Seery, Athlone Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #25659Theorizing the Role of Engineering Education for Society: Technological Ac-tivity in Context?Mr. Andrew Doyle, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Andrew Doyle is a Doctoral Student at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. His doctoral research focuses on the relationship between curricula and enacted practice in Technology education. He is also interested in the Philosophy of Technology and Engineering, and the role of Technology and Engineering education for society.Dr. Lena B. Gumaelius, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Dr Lena Gumaelius has a background as a researcher in Biotechnology, in
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Clippinger, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Kathleen Jernquist, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Steven Nozaki, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Fredrick A. Nitterright, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
and her Ph.D. from Brown University.Dr. Steven Nozaki, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College Ph.D. Engineering Education - The Ohio State UniversityMr. Fredrick A. Nitterright, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College Mr. Fred Nitterright is a lecturer in Mechanical Engineering Technology at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. He received the A. A. S. in Mechanical Drafting and Design in 1989 from Westmoreland County Community College, the B. S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology in 1991 from Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, and the M. S. in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 1998. Mr. Nitterright is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education ASEE . Fred
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
–entirely online. Included in this category are synchronous models, which attempt to replicate face-to-face classroom experience online, and competency-based models that enable students to move through a course at their own pace. The institution provides advising, tutoring, and all other student support services online, as well.” It should be noted that the idea of self-paced instruction has been discussed in engineering education since at least 1971 when B. V. Koen published a paper on it in IEEE Transactions on Education. In 2001 he and K. J. Schmidt described a web based course (Koen, B. V. and Schmidt, K. J (2001). The professor and the media laboratory: a case study in web-based course
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carl O. Hilgarth, Shawnee State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Walk, S. R., “Defining Engineering and Technological Literacy,” Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference (2012). American Society for Engineering Education.4. Foltz, Z., Kaur, A., Tushaus, W. H., Mikelson, C. S., Skalak, B. V., and Mina, M., “The United States Energy Policy: As Determined by Non-experts,” Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2012). American Society for Engineering Education.5. Chenea, Paul F., Engineering management challenges, Engineering Management International, Volume 1, Issue 1, 1981, Pages 7-11, ISSN 0167-5419, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016754198190003X.6. Heywood, J., “Why Technological Literacy
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak Jr., Hope College; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin; Carl O. Hilgarth, Shawnee State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #25413Defining the Aims of Engineering Literacy with Lessons from a PioneeringAttempt to Measure Engineering Ability of Pre-University Students.Dr. John Krupczak Jr., Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technological Literacy Division; Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division; Senior Fellow CASEE, Na- tional Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010; Program Officer, National Science Foundation, Division of Undergraduate Education 2013-2016.Dr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tylesha D. Drayton, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” 2005.[5] W. Newstetter and M. Svinicki, “Learning Theories for Engineering Education Practice,” Cambridge Handb. Eng. Educ. Res., 2011.[6] P. Blikstein, Z. Kabayadondo, A. Martin, and D. Fields, “An Assessment Instrument of Technological Literacies in Makerspaces and FabLabs,” J. Eng. Educ., 2017.[7] B. Bevan, “The Promise and the Promises of Making in Science Education,” Stud. Sci. Educ., 2017.[8] S. Vossoughi and B. Bevan, “Making and Tinkering: A Review of the Literature,” 2015.[9] R. Seo-Zindy and R. Heeks, “Researching the Emergence of 3D Printing, Makerspaces, Hackerspaces and Fablabs in The Global South: A Scoping Review and Research Agenda on Digital Innovation and
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Indiana-Purdue University; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
, we briefly review how design methodologies can be categorized by three dis-tinct conceptions of logic. In so doing we also intend to portray some of the common narratives onrationality of engineering and design.2.1 Classical logicThe first category of design methodologies are those committed to three axioms of classical logic,namely, a. the law of identity which states everything is identical to itself, b. the law of contradiction (or non-contradiction) which states that contra- dictions are not acceptable, c. and the law of excluded middle which states if a proposition is not true its negation must be true.In the following we first review two major developments in this domain
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
technological literacy. 12.Tobias, Sheila Comment on John Heywood’s paper: Technological literacy and for whom?13.Trevelyan, James and Bill Williams. Literacies of entrepreneurship and value creation. 14 –16.Cheville, Alan. Technological literacy without proficiency is not possible. 17 – 18.Krupczak, John. Unfinished business for the ASEE TelPhe Division and other engineeringeducators 19.Siller, Tom. The purpose of technological and engineering literacy. 20 – 21.Mina, Mani. Why and for whom as historical reflection. 22 – 23.Drew, David. E. Moving the needle from literacy to knowledge. 24 – 25.Sychov, Sergev. V. Technological literacy and global society. 26.[2] K. Richmond Culture and General Education. A Survey. London. Methuen, 1963[3] B. Hirsch
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
teams and cancollaboratively obtain solutions. The reflection questions are:Question 1 (Rail Car) (Analyzed for 29 students): Let us think of a simple design. If you have a1kg car (in a rail gun experiment) and would like to cause an acceleration of 0.01 m/s2. Knowingthat you can create a B field of 0.0001 T, how much current would you need? Examine your answerand discuss what you think? Is it realistic, what would you change to make it more realistic? Youmay also include sketches to help readers understand your views.Question 2 (MHD Boat) (Analyzed for 26 students): This is a conceptual design problem. Ourgoal is to design a practical boat that operates on the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) principle.Let us assume that the boat is in a reasonably
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
A) and 37 werecompleted. Follow-up interviews were completed with a sub-set of 11 faculty members as part oftheir involvement in the larger study to examine their courses and co-curricular activities in moredetail (the interview protocol is included in Appendix B). These 11 in-depth [26], semi-structured [27] follow-up interviews were conducted in-person or over Skype and lasted 30-70minutes. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. The participants wereassigned a pseudonym using a random name generator to protect their confidentiality [28]. Thesecond set of interviews was designed to better understand the personal and environmentalfactors that influenced the respondents’ teaching of ESI and serves as the qualitative
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tejita Rajbhandari, Gannon University; Mark Blair, Gannon University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #25432The Historical Mandate for the Open-Source CommunityMs. Tejita Rajbhandari, Gannon University The author is a student of the Gannon University Computer Science program. She is the VP of STEM Outreach for GUBotDev, an independent company made up of Gannon University students and faculty. She is heavily involved in the use and promotion of Open-Source technology and its benefits to STEM outreach to young up-and-coming engineers. She has also been involved in promoting gender equality in the engineering fields.Mr. Mark Blair, Gannon University The co-author is an instructor at Gannon University Department of
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John W. Blake P.E., Austin Peay State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #27258Using Stories of Technology to Teach Technological and Engineering Literacyin Courses for MajorsDr. John W. Blake P.E., Austin Peay State University John Blake is a Professor of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Tennessee. He teaches major courses ranging from the introductory course for new students through upper level courses in problem solving and in mechanical engineering technology. He has also taught courses on
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Huiming Fan, East China University of Science and Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #27344Research on the Element Structure and Cultivation of Engineers’ GeneralAbility in the Chinese ContextMr. Huiming Fan, East China University of Science and Technology I am a lecturer from Institute of Higher Education, East China University of Science and Technology. I got Ph.D. degree from Zhejiang University in 2014. I was also a visiting scholar at the area of University- Industry Collaboration at North Carolina State University from 2012.12-2013.7. My research focuses on engineering education, university-industry collaboration, entrepreneurial university, etc. c American Society