Paper ID #26859Statistical Analysis and Report on Scale Validation Results for the Engineer-ing Ethical Reasoning Instrument (EERI)Peter Wesley Odom, Purdue University - Department of Engineering Education Wesley is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His primary research interests surround assessment technologies, the psychology of student learning of STEM subjects, ethics, and international community development.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of
motivation andteaching. Research in preparing and supporting faculty as they transition pedagogical paradigmsinto those that engage and cultivate students in an active learning environment is of current needand will grow as more active learning spaces are designed and built.The faculty development program was a deliberate collaboration bringing together the expertiseof three campus units - the College of Engineering, the Center for Teaching Excellence, andInstructional Technology Services. Titled the Active Learning in Engineering Program (ALEP),the researchers created a comprehensive faculty development program that consisted of fivemain components: (a) a learning management system online community, (b) a workshop series,(c) community of scholar’s
in 2010. At the University of Alabama, Fridley has led efforts to establish several new programs including new undergraduate degree programs in construction engineering, architectural engineering and environmental engineering, a departmental Scholars program allowing highly qualified students an accelerated program to earn their MSCE in addition to their BS degree, the interdisciplinary ”Cube” promoting innovation in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army
theconstruct validity of the instrument with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The scalecontained three factors representing the three presences: teaching (TP), social (SP), and cognitive(CP). The TP consisted of 10 items (Items 1, 4-8, 10, 12-13, 17). The SP consisted of 3 items(Items 3, 11, 16). The CP consisted of 5 items (Items 2, 9, 14-15, 18). The total variance was67.63%. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted as well. The fit index was χ2/df=1.74,RMSEA=0.071, CFI=0.98, NFI=0.96, and NNFI=0.98. The key to the instrument and the associatedscoring method are listed below. Mean scores are calculated on a five-point basis: A=5, B=4, C=3, D=2,E=1.A=Deserves an award in this area; excellent,B=Very Good,C=Good,D=Does not perform well
that all but two of the participants agreed or strongly agreed thatthe use of LC-DLMs helped promote interactive forms of engagement such as discussion withpeers, asking and answering questions and clarifying understanding with peers through robustdiscussions. A key feature of the venturi LC-DLM is the changing diameters. We were interestedin how participants’ ability to see the changing diameters in the venturi LC-DLMs helped themunderstand key concepts about velocity changes, energy transformations and pressure changes.Appendix B shows the descriptive statistics of participant responses on three items about thechanging diameters. Results from Appendix B show that the changing diameters in the venturiLC-DLMs fostered robust understandings of
Engineering, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://engineering.purdue.edu/ABE/academics/advising/abe-degree-requirements.[10] Iowa State University, Agricultural and Biological System Engineering, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.abe.iastate.edu/undergraduate-students/agricultural- engineering/ae-curricula/.[11] Texas A&M University, Biological and Agricultural Engineering, n.d. [Online]. Available: https://baen.tamu.edu/academics/undergraduates/degree-programs/[12] B. Sharma, B. Steward, S. Ong, and F. Miguez, ‘'Evaluation of teaching approach and student learning in a multidisciplinary sustainable engineering course', Journal of cleaner production, vol. 142, pp. 4032-40, 2017.[13] M. Mumford, L
IL Female Male IN MD MO NV TN WI Figure 1: Number of Applicants for 2018 Cohort broken by various categoriesAs shown in Fig. 1, nearly half of the applicants were from outside the State of Texas. Likewise,over one third of the applicants were from underrepresented population groups mainly Hispanicand African American.3.2 Students selection processA multiple criteria methodology was adopted in making selection decision of the REUparticipants. Those criteria included: a) having a major in a STEM field. b) Cumulative GPA of3.0 or more (out of 4.0) c) at least one semester remaining after the summer program, and d) U.S.citizenship or permanent resident
learning objective?)Each external weight is calculated by subtracting the score (e.g. importance, test, or quizzes)provided by the teacher from one, shown in equation (4). S is on an interval from [0-1]. 𝑊𝑛𝐸 = 1 − 𝑆 (4)Students who receive high scores will have lower external weights, as a perfect score of one willresult in an external weight of zero (𝑊𝑛𝐸 = 1 − 1 = 0). Thus, the core feature weight for a specificmathematical expression will decrease as students perform better in class and on exams. Figure 6: Map weight change exampleFigure 6 describes a simplified DIME map, where A, B, and C represent mathematical expressionswhere the student
were hardware basedhands-on activities and others were software based simulations.Hardware based hands-on included amplitude modulation (AM), demodulation, and sampling byTelecommunication Instructional Modelling System (TIMS). Software-based simulationexercises included filter design and signal synthesis to strengthen understanding of the frequencyresponse.Evaluations were based on student performance of the new laboratory assignments, course grade,and student surveys (course evaluations). Recent offerings of this course taught in the traditionalway by the same instructors resulted in only 53% of the students receiving a “B-” or higher gradefor the course. In the first iteration of new laboratory exercises, the number of students whoreceived
cycle is comprised of four interconnected and often overlapping steps. They are asfollows: 1. Empathetic Attention - Person A actively listens to Person B 2. Empathetic Resonance - Person A experiences a shared emotional state related to the topic of conversation with Person B 3. Expressed Empathy - Person A expresses their resonance from step 2 to Person B 4. Received Empathy - Person B confirms that Person A has indeed experienced the same emotional state and that they feel understood on an emotional levelKouprie and Visser [3] proposed a framework for incorporating empathy into design. Similar tothe empathy cycle, it also has four steps: 1. Discovery - the designer discovers and enters into the user’s world 2. Immersion
had a pre-defined deadline and little to no communicationhappened between the students and the instructor during the assigned deadlines. An importantlesson learned from the first time offering of this project was the need to have a bettersupervision over the teams’ workflow and create an environment for a better and moretransparent team communication. Since most groups consisted of members located on differentcampuses, there were occasions that the team members were completely blindsided on theprogress of the project by the other members. (a) (b) (c) (d)Figure 2. Sample of student's work on compressor mechanism (a, c) 3D design and (b) 3D
. J. Molyneaux, “The Single Sex Debate for Girls in Science: A Comparison Between Two Informal Science Programs on Middle School Students’ STEM Identity Formation,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1979–2007, 2013.[10] S. Burket, C. Small, C. Rossetti, B. Hill, and C. Gattis, “A day camp for middle school girls to create a STEM pipeline,” Proc. 2008 Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., 2008.[11] K. Riedinger and A. Taylor, “‘I Could See Myself as a Scientist’: The Potential of Out-of- School Time Programs to Influence Girls’ Identities in Science,” Afterschool Matters, no. 23, pp. 1–7, 2016.[12] “GoldieBlox: About.” [Online]. Available: https://www.goldieblox.com/about/. [Accessed
using Fermi- Dirac statistics; identify and analyze current flow mechanisms in pn junction diodes, solar cells, and transistors. Students will analyze nanoscopic materials such as graphene and other interesting 2-dimensional materials.The course topics include: 1) Properties of Light 6) Crystal Properties a) Spectral Irradiance and Blackbody a) Hard Sphere Model and Density Radiation b) Crystal Lattices and Miller Notation b) Photoelectric Effect and the Photon 7) Quantum Theory of the Solid State Concept a) Energy-Band Theory 2) Nuclear Atom
, where the black area represents the area wherepeople can walk, and the green area represents the walls or areas where people cannot walk. Thelayout mimics our Computer Science department where green areas are the closed rooms wherepeople do not go frequently and do not need to be simulated. In NetLogo, turtle are the agents thatcan move around so we will use it to create our occupants: instructors and student agents.Instructors will be positioned in a particular location (their office or a common area) and studentswill enter from an entrance seeking for an instructor to meet. After meeting, instructor studentswill leave the area. Instructors are represented in blue color with the human figure and students inred color. Figure 2 (b) shows a
role," Psychological science, vol. 24, no. 9, p. 1831, 2013.[7] Y. Maeda, & Yoon, S. Y., "A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT: R)," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 69-94, 2013.[8] C. L. Miller, Bertoline, G. R., "Spatial Visualization Research and Theories: Their Importance in the Development of an Engineering and Technical Design Graphics Curriculum Mode," Engineering Design Graphics Journal, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 5-14, 1991.[9] L. L. Thurstone, "Primary mental abilities," Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 108, no. 2813, p. 585, 1948.[10] E. Towle, J. Mann, B. Kinsey, E. J. O
Requirements: • One numeric indicator showing the temperature in °CFunctional Requirements: • Designed operating temperature range: 0°C to 100°C • Implement thermistor equation that converts RT to T. • Temperature measurement range: 25°C to 75°C with accuracy within +/- 5°CAn example of the screen capture of a student’s LabVIEW front panel and block diagram are shownbelow in Figure 1. For this project, students needed to implement the equation characterizing therelationship between resistance and temperature for the thermistor. Figure 1(b) includes aMathScript Node that determines the resistance of the thermistor (based on the voltage dividerconfiguration) and implements the mathematical equation of the thermistor for calculatingtemperature
, b) training videos teaching viewers toconduct classroom observations using a protocol, and c) a series of sample classroom videos andvalidation keys for each of the sample videos. This paper serves as a user manual for the Toolkit,which can be accessed at http://bit.ly/diyclassobtoolkit.Introduction“Improving Student Experiences to Increase Student Engagement” (ISE-2) was funded by theNational Science Foundation, through EEC-Engineering Diversity Activities, at Texas A&MUniversity. The primary grant activity in ISE-2 is a development program for faculty teachingfirst- and second-year Engineering courses. The development program focuses on reducingimplicit bias and deficit thinking related to students and increasing active learning in
adjustable connection which can be attached to the load frame to demonstratethe 3 different conditions of fixed-fixed, pined-pined, fixed-pined. `4 a) b) Figure 6: a) Fixed connection and b) pinned connectionsA nylon member was tested under the load frame to demonstrate the effect of fixity on bucklingfor first-year students. Figure 7 demonstrate the specimen tested under 3 different fixity at endconnections. a) b) c) Figure 7: Nylon specimen tested for demonstration of the effect of fixity on
. The basic The bench-top measurement device circuit for this experiment is shown in Fig. 2.used here is an Agilent Digital Storage The input voltage is a square wave generatedOscilloscope (DSO-X 2024A). This devices by a bench-top function generator. Studentscan be connected to a PC through USB for measure the voltage across the resistor using adownloading the data points. bench-top oscilloscope, download the data points to a computer, and use Excel curve-II. B. Digilent Analog Discovery 2™ fitting feature to calculate the time constant of DAD2 is used both as a power source the
rope), but moment is a relatively abstract concept to them.Additional frustration is encountered due to the term "moment" since it conflicts with thestudents' prior knowledge from their physics course. There, they encountered the concept ofmomentum. This prior knowledge often leads to two misconceptions: 1. Since momentum is formed from the root "moment" with the addition of a derivational morpheme (-um), students assume that the concept of momentum presented in Physics is the same as the concept of moment in Physics. 2. The term moment has different meanings: (a) brief period of time, or (b) effect produced by a force acting at a distance on an object. Since "moment" is homographic and students have
17engineering diploma programs since July 2017 [1] by the Maharashtra State Board ofTechnical Education (MSBTE), Mumbai and being offered in the 452 technical institutionsgeographically spread miles apart across the whole state of Maharashtra (see figure 1). University/Board of Technical Education (Certifying Body) Institution ‘a’ Institution ‘b’ Miles apart geographically separated institutes Institution ‘n’ Figure 1. Centrally Controlled University Affiliated College System of IndiaOf the several innovations, a major one that was incorporated in this new curriculum modelwas the seamless integration of the separately offered ‘laboratory course’ (seen in thecurricula of some universities), as part of the whole
): anability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and useengineering judgment to draw conclusions [formerly student outcome (b)] [4].In many of the universities, courses similar to our control system design course do not includelaboratories. Likely reasons for this is the cost to purchase, maintain, and upgrade experimentalapparatus; facilities requirements that can include compressed air and/or hydraulics in addition toelectric power; and the lab space to house the traditional control system equipment, which canhave a fairly sizable footprint. Given the low demand, there are a limited number of vendors whosell control system lab equipment and, hence, the range of apparatus that is available is alsolimited
Paper ID #25162Teaching an Undergraduate Manufacturing Course using a Design-based Teach-ing ApproachDr. Bahaa I. Kazem Ansaf, Colorado State University, Pueblo B. Ansaf received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering /Aerospace and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Baghdad in 1992, 1996 and 1999 respectively. From 2001 to 2014, he has been an Assistant Professor and then Professor with the Mechatronics Engineering Department, Baghdad University. During 2008 he has been a Visiting Associate professor at Mechanical Engineering Department, MIT. During 2010 he has been a Visiting
94.0% 6.0% B) ENGR 275 Dynamics Studying plotENGR 275 only ENGR 382 only C) ENGR 382 SCADA Studying plot Figure 4: Pie Charts of Summative Question 5 Responses Did you study by yourself, with others, or both? It has answers - 1: Self, 2: Others, and 3: Both. A) Shows the results from Dynamics B) Shows the results from both classes combined C) Shows the results from SCADAThe last set of questions on
lengthdownstream of airfoil leading edge. Figure 12: Close-up view of velocity contours for 00 (Top) and 140 (Bottom) Next, the student began designing the slotted airfoil in 2-D and conducting a parametricinvestigation. The design of the slot hinged upon four major parameters, namely A) angle of slotrelative to the horizontal, B) draft angle of slot, C) slot width on suction side, and D) position ofslot in terms of chord length percentage. The four parameters can be seen in fig. 13.Figure 13: 2-D view of slotted airfoil with geometric parameters. A: Slot angle to horizontal. B: Draft angle of slot. C: Slot width on suction side. D: Slot position in percent chord length The student suggested that since the baseline airfoil
MB LPDDR2 (shared with video) 1, 2, or 4 MB LPDDR3 (shared with video) Ethernet Ports 10/100 fast ethernet 10/100/100 gigabit ethernet Wireless 2.4 GHz 802.11n, Bluetooth 4.0 n/a USB Ports 4 USB 2.0, 1 USB micro B (for power) 2 USB 2.0 A, 1 USB 3.0 Storage MicroSD (though can boot from USB MicroSD, eMMC Medium flash drive or external hard drive with a change in boot configuration) Power Supply 5V, 2.5 A max (micro USB B) 5V, 3A max (3.5 mm Barrel Connector)Software and
− ℎ1 Fig. 1: a) Schematic and b) 𝑇-𝑠 diagram for an ideal vapor-compression refrigeration cycle.The actual vapor compression cycle is an alteration from the ideal cycle due to irreversibilities andsmart planning by engineers to protect the system components. At the inlet to the compressor, therefrigerant is slightly superheated to ensure that no liquid enters the compressor. The actualcompression is not reversible or adiabatic so it is not isentropic. State 3 is slightly subcooled toensure pure liquid enters the throttling valve. A 𝑇-𝑠 diagram more representative of an actualrefrigeration cycle is given in Fig. 2. Fig. 2: 𝑇-𝑠 diagram for an actual refrigeration cycle. The solid line represents the ideal cycle and the dashed the
Clinical Scholars with a selection of clerkships, andlearning communities have been shown to increase retention in engineering programs,particularly among at-risk groups [9].The immersion experiencesBefore their summer clerkships begin, the academic deans of the school of medicine call forvolunteer mentors from among the 3rd year students. Clinical Scholars are assigned to thosestudents to best leverage their schedule of clerkships, providing 3-4 clerkships for each Scholar,each of 1-4 week duration. Scholars have a new medical student mentor for each clerkship.Clinical Scholars join their teams as “observers” rather than as “learners.” This is important (a)to not dilute the instructional quality and hands-on time for the medical students, (b) to
mechatronic aspects of the design. Figure 1 shows fourof the eight final prototypes that were generated in the fall 2018 EMSD class. (b) (a) (c) (d) Figure 1: Sample student projects. Students explored a wide variety of concepts, including aCNC wire bender (a), a robot for beach cleanup (b), an automated grilled cheese maker (c), and a mobile drawing robot (d).The EMSD course serves as both a capstone for undergraduate students and an elective forgraduate students. As such, there are two distinct populations in the course with varying degreesof
structured as follows. For each concept underconsideration the following selections were offered: 1. Select one of the following: (a) This concept should be included in this list: Yes/Maybe (b) This concept should NOT be included in this list If the negative choice is made, no further questions are asked. 2. Select the option that best describes the level of understanding of this concept: (a) Almost no students understand it (b) About 25% of students understand it (c) About half of students understand it (d) About 75% of students understand it (e) Almost all students understand it The level of understanding is a measure of the difficulty of the concept. 3. Select the option that