A thematic analysis of students’ perspectives and opinions on the construction of exam support sheets Shant A. Danielian, Vikram R. Arun, Natascha T. BuswellAbstractWith large amounts content and material taught by university professors and instructors, studentsface difficulty in trying to memorize course content in order to perform well on exams. Toresolve this issue, professors often allow students to create and use support sheets, also known ascheat sheets or crib sheets, which contain useful information to aid them during an exam. Thiseases the burden of rote memorization and might reduce student stress or anxiety during theexam.The creation of the support sheet lies in the hands of the
classes at localschools.AcknowledgmentsThanks to Foaad Khosmood for the suggestion of the googly eyes.Bibliography 1. A. Denker, A. Dilek, B. Sarıoğlu, J. Savaş, Y. Gökdel, "RoboSantral: An Autonomous Mobile Guide Robot," IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Seville, pp. 459-463, 2015 2. E. Saad, M. Neerincx, K. Hindriks, “Welcoming Robot Behaviors for Drawing Attention”, International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2019 3. L. Ni, C. Schaefer, T. Buntin, “A Robotic Tour Guide Using a NAO T14 Humanoid with a Wheeled Mobile Platform”, 2nd International Conference on Robotics and Automation Engineering (ICRAE), 2017 4. S. Wang, H. Christensen, “TritonBot: First Lessons
Paper ID #31809Full Paper: [Fostering Entrepreneurship Through Targeted Adversity: ASenior Design Case Study]Mr. Nicholas Hosein, UC Davis Nicholas is a PhD candidate at the University of California Davis with a background in computer ar- chitecture, algorithms and machine learning. His current focus is advancing the electrical engineering curriculum at UC Davis to be more industry relevant in terms of skill sets taught.Prof. Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis Lee Martin studies people’s efforts to enhance their own learning environments, with a particular focus on mathematical, engineering, and design
. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 49–56.Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.Nelson, B. A., Wilson, J. O., Rosen, D., & Yen, J. (2009). Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 30(6), 737–743.Niler, A. A., Asencio, R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2019). Solidarity in STEM: How Gender Composition Affects Women’s Experience in Work Teams. Sex Roles, 1–13.Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.-H. (2007). Engineering design: a systematic approach (Vol. 157). Springer Science & Business Media.Secules, S. (2019). Making the Familiar Strange: An Ethnographic Scholarship of
with others about this. • Is this continuum helpful for conversations or interventions? • Are the categories described in a way that creates a defense (is that bad)? • Are these categories, steps, or orientations (I have used these interchangeably)? • Do I have the necessary disciplinary background to develop this (who should help me)? • How does this relate to engineering and engineering education? References [1] Fortney, B.S., Morrison, D., Rodriguez, A.J. Upadhvav, B. (2019) “Equity in science teacher education: towardan expanded definition” Cultural Studies of Science Education 14: 259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09943-w[2] Ridgeway, M. L., (2019) “Against the grain: science education researchers and social
College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, Executive Office of the President. [2] Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA (2010). Degrees of Success: Bachelor’s Degree Completion Rates Among Initial STEM Majors, HERI Report Brief. [3] National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads, The National Academies Press, ISBN: 978-0-309-15968-5. [4] Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A.-B, & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing Persistence of College Students in STEM, Science Education, 341(6153
student creativity b. Uses open-ended problems c. Uses design methodology d. Incorporates the formulation of design statements and specifications e. Provides opportunities to evaluate alternative solutions f. Allows students to evaluate design feasibility g. Provides opportunities to consider economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics, and social impact 2) My team and I have considered the following throughout the design process: a. Principles of engineering b. Principles of science c. Principles of mathematics d. Public health design constraints e. Safety and welfare design constraints f. Global
algorithm biasbased on the survey analysis. One limitation we face is that our survey data covers a relativelysmall set of questions. In future research, we would like to gather more qualitative data as well asexpand the scope of questions. We hope to develop evidenced-based instructional activities tohelp students become more aware of ethical considerations when designing automated decisionmaking systems.Bibliography: [1] Friedman, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 14(3), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1145/230538.230561 [2] Noble, S. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. [3] Study Reveals Major Racial Bias in Leading
Paper ID #31799Cal Poly EE/CPE Diversity, Inclusion and Equity ProjectDr. Tina Smilkstein, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Dr. Tina Smilkstein received her MS and PhD from UC Berkeley in 2003 and 2007 respectively. Her undergraduate work was done at Nanzan University in Nagoya Japan. After spending time in industry in Japan she returned to the US and did her graduate work. Her main interests are in integrated circuits, medical technology, and creating a successful environment for all students.Miss Jissell Christine Jose, California Polytechnic University San Luis Obispo Jissell Jose is a 4th year electrical engineering major at
Project Ponderosa – Bridging Engineering Education to Vocational Training Dr. Scott Boskovich, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768 and Dr. Chris Burns, Boys Republic, Chino Hills, CA 91709AbstractThe application of robotics and automation in industry continues to be an increasing area ofgrowth. Subsequently, this requires an increased demand for design engineering students as wellas knowledgeable users trained for equipment maintenance. However, this can becomeproblematic to adequately provide a realistic environment for both teaching design of roboticssystems as well as the maintenance. In recent years
(and faculty)feel more visible, and personal experiences on visibility. Efforts have been made, in small andlarge ways, to show students that their heritage, lifestyle, learning style, and other unique andvaluable parts of them are accepted by their classmates and never something to feel less-thanabout. For other students, we’ve made efforts to show them that it’s cool to embrace diversitythrough visibility and positive reinforcement and created work that made them have a stake inhow successfully all students are.If this is accepted as a presentation, I would like to continue the talk into a discussion with theattendees.INTRODUCTION:This paper is on the power of visibility. This paper is notscientific; It is an introduction and report on