Collection

2020 ASEE North Central Section conference

Authors

Nicole L Kamm, The University of Toledo

, and lab reports. It requires making the student aware of the definition ofacademic dishonesty, the employed preventative measures and consequences. The institutionitself must maintain strict adherences to its own stated policies, and support the pursuit ofgrievances.This paper presents many specific ideas that have proven to be successful in eliminating theneed of having to author and file student letters of academic dishonesty. This paper is limitedto academic dishonesty deterrents for courses completed in the traditional classroom1|Pageenvironment. The issue of academic dishonesty in an online environment, is reserved for a laterdiscussion.IntroductionThe issue of academic dishonesty in college classrooms has ramifications for many parties

Collection

2020 ASEE North Central Section conference

Authors

Bhuvana Ramachandran, University of West Florida; Chathapuram Ramanathan, University of West Florida,; Mohamed Khabou, University of West Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

. Female students link engineering to problem solving,analytical thinking, innovative, creative thinking, decision making, and teamwork. Notsurprisingly, the top reason listed (75% of respondents) for their friends not choosing engineeringas their field of study was their lack of confidence in their abilities, especially in courses requiringadvanced knowledge of mathematics. Past research shows that for female students, the key driversof subject choice are how good they are at the subject (94%), the subject syllabus (92%) andwhether the subject teacher is knowledgeable (91%) while 87% believe whether the subject teacheris fun is also important. Some respondents mentioned that the female students were intimidated by the sheernumber of men