student’s understanding of the nature of the work in the otherdisciplines as well as learn from the direct application of this engineering curriculum tothe task at hand. The integration of the disciplines is after all exactly what will beencountered by the students after graduation. The communication between the studentsis never more focused than in the integrated capstone project course. Each student isforced to grapple with the need to communicate clearly in writing, orally, and/or withdrawings with students who have a different frame of reference for the solution and pacefor solving a problem. For example, the electrical and computer engineering technologystudents find it strange that the mechanical engineering student requires considerablymore
concepts. The primary focus is on cross-disciplinary learning as relevant todesigning flight vehicle systems. Some development of analytical, computational andexperimental learning tools for discovery and skill-building is part of the effort. The theme is toenable development of advanced concepts. Objectives are:• Develop pedagogical resources that guide learning across disciplines for new concepts.• Acquire systematic, transferable experience on how engineers perform in such learning.Universities must look 10 to 40 years ahead and show what is possible to achieve. Recognizingthat graduates must start contributing immediately in the workforce, learners must also beenabled to build immediately-usable skills and confidence. Our project is set in the
Paper ID #15656UAS Design in Active LearningDr. Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska, Fairbanks Michael C. Hatfield is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration. He earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from Ohio Northern University; an M.S. in electrical engineering from California State University Fresno, and a Ph.D. in Electrical/Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Alaska Fairbanks.Dr. John Monahan, University of Alaska
further compressed the traditionalareas.The broader fluids curriculum, with computational material added, now had to be taught in9 vs. the original 14 semester hours. The availability of Internet resources, and the growth ofelectronic media brought many new tools and capabilities to the learner and the course designer.More recently, the integration of Distance Learning into on-campus courses has driven thedevelopment of electronic material for many courses, and is causing a rethinking of the qualityand opportunities of on-campus instruction. Page 11.873.3Table 2: Major Developments Impacting the CurriculumEvent New Capabilities
tools were added to the course, which allowed students to seesatellite orbits. These computer-based labs emphasized key concepts from class such as satellitemaneuvering, ground tracks, rendezvous, orbit propagation, perturbations, and constellationdesign. A small table-top satellite, with fully functional subsystems, was also used todemonstrate and reinforce satellite design principles introduced in the text. These principleswere then applied to a preliminary satellite design project. New assessment methods using on-line quizzes measured student learning for every lesson. These on-line quizzes required studentsto prepare for every class. Multiple assessments conducted after the initial offering of this newcourse showed students were much better
Paper ID #29261Innovative Learning Strategies to Engage Students CognitivelyDr. Chadia A. Aji, Tuskegee University Chadia Affane Aji is a Professor in the Department of Mathematics at Tuskegee University. Dr. Aji received her Ph.D. and M.S. in Mathematics from Auburn University and a Bachelor in Chemical En- gineering from Texas A&M University. Her research interests lie in the areas of numerical analysis, computational applied mathematics, complex analysis, and on improving students’ learning in STEM dis- ciplines. Dr. Aji is involved in retention activities at Tuskegee University. She helps designing strategies
- 23, 2010.[10] S. Jayaram, “Implementation of Active Cooperative Learning and Problem-based Learning in an Undergraduate Control Systems course.” Paper ID#6493, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013.[11] N. Fang, and Stewardson, “Improving Engineering Laboratory Experience through Computer Simulations and Cooperative learning.” AC2007-517, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, June 24-27, 2007.[12] A. Cheville, C. Co, and B. Turner, Improving Team performance in a Capstone Design Course Using the Jigsaw Technique and Electronic Peer Evaluation,” AC2007-748, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, June 24-27, 2007.[13] B. Boren, S. Rahimian, M. Malone, and R. Sanchez
M.S. and Ph.D. from New Mexico State University in Industrial Engineering and over 25 years experience in using and developing Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) systems and teaching topics such as Product Data Management (PDM) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM).Alexander Max Ferere, Oregon Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Engineering Pedagogy for Developing Practical Knowledge and Hands-On Skills Related to 5-Axis Milling and Computer Aided Aerospace Parts Manufacturing Using Current TechnologyAbstractThe implementation and effective utilization of advanced computer controlled machines andprocesses depends on a concerted effort by
future. Thisproject was also made possible through sponsorship from Google and Morton Salt supportingOK Go Sandbox. OK Go Sandbox is a free education resource that was developed based on OK Go’sunique music videos. Concepts of math, engineering, art, science, and illusions are outlined ineducator guides and tied to specific music videos. This resource was created through apartnership between OK Go and the Playful Learning Lab, an undergraduate research lab at theUniversity of St. Thomas. The Playful Learning Lab, frequently abbreviated as “PLL” by itsmembers, is an interdisciplinary group of over 30 St. Thomas students with majors inengineering, music, education, marketing, finance, computer science, and more. To promote the contest
are: a) students can write down mathematics ina programming-like way, using symbolic notations; b) less time spent with calculations leavesmore time for physical analysis; c) geometric visualization of results; d) learning and becomingproficient in a high-level programming language; and e) there availability of free softwareapplications, using well-documented algorithms. Derive and MathCAD are already implementedon a pocket calculator, and more extensive packages, such as Mathematica and Maple, run onany desktop computer. In several branches of mathematics, physics and engineering, computeralgebra systems have been increasingly popular as a tool for constructing proofs, solutions andvisualizing the results. Also in introductory mathematics
or to see a product of their hard work fly into space.These projects allow students to directly apply the skills and knowledge learned in theclassrooms to real engineering work. In particular, mechanical and aerospace engineeringstudents perform the structural, thermal, and mechanism design, modeling, and analysis;electrical and computer engineering students code flight and ground support software whiledesigning circuits, computer, control, and telemetry systems; operations engineering studentsperform risk analysis and quality control tasks; and students in the sciences perform thefundamental research that drive project objectives and work with science payload andinstruments. With the lab’s smaller, introductory projects, newer students are
. Students learn about the effect of the size and placement of the wing, horizontaland vertical tail on the longitudinal and lateral stability of the aircraft. In addition, the effect ofcontrol surfaces such as the elevators, rudders and ailerons on the stability and trim conditionsare emphasized.Dynamic Stability and ControlDynamic stability refers to the response of the aircraft to disturbances/inputs over a period oftime. In order to understand dynamic stability, students are introduced to the derivation of theequations of motion for rigid bodies in 3 dimensions. This is followed by a simplification wherelinearized model for an aircraft for particular steady state/trim conditions are obtained. 1. Computation of Stability and Control
to the ABET-imposed standards foraerospace engineering programs. However, the study also discovered a wide variety of methodsfor implementing the common requirements. The freshman and sophomore year curricula werefound to be highly standardized across the studied programs. Some significant differences werefound in “Intro to Aero” courses or sequences and some universities emphasized the earlyacquisition of computer programming skills more than others.It was somewhat surprising that very few universities offered a true “split” curriculum – a chanceto declare a concentration in either aeronautics or astronautics. Furthermore, the degree of splitwas found to be a continuum – from offering only separate aircraft and spacecraft designexperiences
AC 2011-379: THE ASSESSMENT OF ETHICAL AND SUSTAINABLEENGINEERING STUDIES IN UNDERGRADUATE UNIVERSITY EDU-CATIONMaxwell Stuart Reid, Auckland University of Technology Dr Maxwell Reid lectures in telecommunications engineering, and computer network engineering, at the Auckland University of Technology. He has researched and published many journal and conference papers on technology education, the role of a university as a critic and conscience of society, the need for an engineering code of ethics, and the principles of ethical and values-based decision-making in engineering. He has also published papers on effective teaching methodologies for engineering education in the post- modern period. Dr Reid is the
AC 2011-1064: TOWARDS MORE EFFECTIVE TEACHING STRATEGIESOF ITERATION AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT IN SPACECRAFT DE-SIGNHadi Ali, Purdue University Hadi Ali is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University and a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Jordan. He earned his Masters degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University majoring in aerospace systems design. He is also pursuing a Masters degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue. Hadi is a student member of AIAA, IEEE, ASME, and SAE.Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Assistant Professor in
, bestowed by graduating seniors, 11 out of 14 semesters. Waterhouse is a frequent keynote speaker and consultant on elearning, both nationally and internationally. Page 25.705.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Hybrid Course Design: Leading a New Direction in Learning Programming Languages Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityAbstract“Introduction to Computing for Engineers” is a programming course emphasizing problemsolving. The lack of practice time, in addition to the algorithm-centric nature of programming,results in an
systems design and fabrication experiencenot readily available through the usual academic curriculum. S3FL’s approach is to enhancespace systems engineering education by coupling classroom knowledge with practicumexperience involving real engineering design, analysis, test, fabrication, integration, andoperation of actual flight vehicles and payloads. Through a continuous learning process and byadapting to new challenges, S3FL has sustained itself despite the difficulties of accommodatingan increasing number of student members. S3FL has also been able to maintain effective projectleadership and technical expertise despite student turnover as well as to secure external support.The paper discusses the methods and strategies adopted by S3FL to
Paper ID #24076Impact of an Authentic Environment on Learning of Math and ScienceProf. Chadia A. Aji, Tuskegee University Chadia Affane Aji is a Professor in the Department of Mathematics at Tuskegee University. Dr. Aji received her Ph.D. and M.S. in Mathematics from Auburn University and a Bachelor in Chemical En- gineering from Texas A&M University. Her research interests lie in the areas of numerical analysis, computational applied mathematics, complex analysis, and on improving students’ learning in STEM dis- ciplines. Dr. Aji is involved in retention activities at Tuskegee University. In particular, she works
Paper ID #13398Nano-satellites and HARP for Student Learning and ResearchDr. Hank D Voss, Taylor University Dr. Hank D. Voss, Taylor University Dr. Hank D. Voss received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Illinois in 1977. He then worked for Lockheed Palo Alto Research Laboratories prior to coming to Taylor University in 1994. He is currently a Professor of Engineering and Physics at Taylor University. Some of the courses that he regularly has taught include Principles of Engineering, Intro to Electronics, Statics, Advanced Electronics, Jr. Engineering Projects, FE Review, Control Systems
, and lifelong professional development in the computing discipline associated withthe program” [12].Other professional organizations retain a commitment to lifelong learning. The AviationTechnician Education Council (ATEC) includes, as part of What We Do, states “will create highquality technicians, provides resources, continuing education and networking opportunities tolearning institutions, keeps the community informed of activities that impact technicianeducation, and promotes careers in aviation maintenance” [15]. The National Society ofProfessional Engineers includes in Part III Professional Obligations in their code of ethics“Engineers shall continue their professional development throughout their careers and shouldkeep current in their
Paper ID #18361UAS Curriculum for Students Using an Active Learning ApproachDr. Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska, Fairbanks Michael C. Hatfield is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration. He earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from Ohio Northern University; an M.S. in electrical engineering from California State University Fresno, and a Ph.D. in Electrical/Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Alaska Fairbanks.Dr
several types including course related newsstories, on-line homework, and various computer based mechanisms for communication betweenstudents and the instructor [5, 7].Teaching Methods Used in Other DisciplinesThe author is part of a Research Learning Community (RLC) at their home institution. Thepurpose of the RLC is to provide a platform to the instructors from various disciplines wherethey can share ideas and techniques used to get students involved actively in the classroom. TheRLC members come from engineering, mathematics, languages, arts, music, and law. A brief listof active learning techniques and their explanations used in these disciplines is as follows.Engineering:Following list of active learning techniques works well for engineering
knowledgeis refined through negotiations with others and evaluation of individual understanding.” Page 22.801.2 Figure-1, Cone of Learning by Edgar Dale2. Various Learning Paradigms Various learning paradigms have emerged in our quest for enhancing student learningand comprehension. Common terms used while describing these paradigms are: case studies,project based learning, interactive learning, active learning, e-learning, role playing, gaming,computer simulations etc. While some of these are synonymous, others are quite different. Theseparadigms can be broadly classified into three categories; Case Studies, Project Based
include: Engineering is Elementary (EiE) Project; Computational Think- ing/Pedagogy Project; Rocket Project of SystemsGo; World MOON Project; East Lubbock Promise Neighborhood (ELPN) Project; and Robotics. Since 2013 he has served as the president of the Nu Sigma chapter of Kappa Delta Pi: International Honor Society in Education and was the founding president of ASEE Student Chapter at Texas Tech University. He can be reached at ibrahim.yeter@ttu.edu.Mr. Casey Michael Williams, Texas Tech University I am currently a second year PhD student in educational psychology. I spent 2 years teaching environ- mental science, chemistry and biology to high school students in Kansas City through Teach For America. My interests lie
(during the pandemic) to hybrid in-person/online courses(during/after the pandemic). Please note that at the time of preparing this manuscript, theCOVID-19 pandemic is still taking place.Before (January 2019–March 2020)As described in the previous section, our AAE 35201 VL effort started with brainstorm andconceptualization (Spring 2019), computer modeling and trial implementation (Summer 2019-Fall 2019), and full implementation (Spring 2020). At the same time, we were continuouslyusing AAE 20401 VLs, which was reported in our previous publication [1]. As we wereimplementing the AAE 35201 VL, we had modified the pre-lab assignments to make sure thatwe are using VLs to the best of their capacity for student learning. We added specific
temperatures exceeded 65°F, the room soared to over 80°F.These temperatures would likely rise with the addition of 30 or more computers, the associatedmonitors, and six large plasma displays operating. It was anticipated that student learning andcomputer stability would decline under these conditions. It was also determined that there wasnot enough electrical capacity for the required computers and air conditioning. It was becomingclear that in order for the project to move forward, approval would be needed for significantroom modifications and electrical upgrades would have to be performed. The upgrades wouldrequire more departments to be involved, and the costs in addition to the actual simulator bidwould also need to be considered and approved
interests are in the areas of Flight Dynamics and Controls and believes that student aerospace design competitions are ideal avenues for students to express their creativity while complementing the knowledge gained in the classroom with hands-on experience as well as promoting greater collaboration and learning across disciplines. Dr. Gururajan’s research interests are interdisciplinary and in the fields of fault tolerant flight control, parallel & distributed computing, real time systems, experimental flight testing using small UAS and UAS, and the design/development of natural language interaction with drones. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Design and Development of a
metacognition,” in Using Reflection and Metacognition to Improve Student Learning: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy (New Pedagogies and Practices for Teaching in Higher Education), M. Kaplan, N. Silver, D. LaVaque-Manty, and D. Meizlish, Eds. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus, 2013, ch. 2, pp. 18–52.[18] B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company, Inc, 1956.[19] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge
-year engineering course—Introduction to Engineering-Blimp Section—that incorporated a very extensive design-build-test-compete (DBTC) pedagogy. This course was specifically positioned to exercise core-engineering competencies: understanding of societal needs and use of scientific andmathematical principles, technologies and fabrication, and communication principles. It alsoexercises algorithms to solve engineering problems and to develop creativity.The course incorporates numerous active learning strategies. These include projects, laboratories,lecture-based exercises, individual and team exercises with persistent feedback from both atechnical and technical communications instructor. While comparable introductory engineeringcourses at our
engineering as well as technical documentationprovided by previous groups was helpful. An important lesson was learned in how reverseengineering and proper documentation are important in engineering. For example, isolatingdifferent components of the systems such as motors, the Arduino Uni boards, and the relays tosee how the system functions without them. This helped to come up with ideas for improvementsuch as replacing the current potentiometers with better quality logarithmic potentiometers.Debugging a system should start from the simplest problems to solve then advancing to theharder problems. The project stalled twice because of a bad Arduino board, broken potentiometerconnections and improper interface between the computer and the Arduino board