Carolina University. Page 14.281.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Bioprocess Engineering Curriculum Development and AssessmentAbstractEast Carolina University’s new general engineering program is built around the goal ofexcellence in undergraduate education. The faculty of the program are encouraged to pursuenovel approaches to engineering education in order to achieve this goal. The newly createdconcentration in bioprocess engineering provides an excellent opportunity to develop andimplement a novel curriculum based upon proven pedagogical approaches designed to engagethe students and improve their mastery of
Engineering education. Resource. July (pp. 13-15).4. Wells, J.H. and Taylor, T.A. (1996). First principles in Biological Engineering education. Resource. April (pp. 12, 22).5. Lauffenburger, D.A. (2003). Biological Engineering, The New Fusion of Biology and Engineering at MIT. http://web.mit.edu/be/about.html.6 . Gharib, M. (2003). Personal Communication.7. Ornstein A. C and Hunkins, F.P. (1988) Curriculum--foundations, principles, and issues. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.8. Anderson, J. A. (1998). Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.9. National Academy of Engineering. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. National Academy of Sciences, 2005. http
associatedwith its implementation at undergraduate level. A three-pronged approach has been prepared forcurriculum implementation; a bioinformatics course that would provide students with boththeory and practical aspects of subject, course-embedded modules containing bioinformaticstopics that can be integrated into selected science and engineering courses, and trainingworkshops for faculty and curriculum development. A multipurpose bioinformatics laboratorywill be established to support the bioinformatics curriculum, research and outreach activities. Anintroduction to bioinformatics course has been developed and in-place for offering in Spring2007 semester. The contents of the course-embedded modules will be focusing on principlesand/or application of
material at http://www.ucd.ie/nova/podcasts/) and other partnerinstitutes addressing issues such as business plans, intellectual property, marketing finances andlaw. Core curriculum will be supplemented by localization and examples drawn from BE andexisting entrepreneurship courses (e.g. engineering.illinois.edu/news/index.php?xId=071509120742). The “Innovation” team has formed and had an initial meeting to share ideas. Progress willcontinue in 2011.Activity 5. Course Development: What is Biosystems Engineering? The proposal described this course as a BE seminar course for all partners, focusing on keyglobal issues about which biosystems engineers have expertise, specifically, water, air, biologicalresources, energy, and food. The goal
-Tenured Fac- ulty (2000), Henry Lutes College of Engineering Excellence in Teaching Award (1999), and several other teaching awards. Dr. Nokes has published over 60 peer reviewed articles and four book chapters and has received over $10M in grant money from sources including the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and industrial support. Nokes holds one patent. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Transitioning students into BAE from a common first year engineering curriculum – A work in progressAbstractIn Fall 2016, a new First Year Experience (FYE) was implemented for all incoming engineeringstudents at the University of Kentucky
).References1 Whysong, C. Y., J. Lo, and P. Mallikarjunan, “Improving Ethics Studies through a Spiral Themed Curriculum inBiological Systems Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, June 18-21,2006.2 Whysong, C. Y., J. Lo, and P. Mallikarjunan, “Improving Ethics Studies through a Spiral Themed Curriculum:Implementing Ethics Discussion at the Sophomore Level,” in Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference,Honolulu, HI, June 24-27, 2007.3 Bruner, J. The Process of Education, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960.4 Holtzapple, M.T. and W. D. Reece. Concepts in Engineering, New York, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc., 2005.5 Boyer, R. Concepts in Biochemistry, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley &
therefore indeveloping a new curriculum will be to provide students with knowledge and skills that spanacross basic sciences, engineering mathematics and technology. Addressing this challenge isthe top priority for this institution, which is surrounded by a medical center that has the highestdensity of universities, clinical facilities, biomedical research facilities and health careinstitutions in the world6. With its 42 member institutions, this medical center is a hub for worldclass biomedical cutting edge research. Amongst these institutions is a top ranked cancerhospital conducting research that has significant commercial and technological value and aUniversity Health Science Center, which is nationally recognized as a leader in BioSecurity
do not typically consider the public experts in their ownright. The service-learning approach is intended to develop “humility” from the start of anengineering student’s career (ultimately, Lima wants an engineer to think of him/herself as afacilitator, not “the DESIGNER”). Playgrounds were also deliberately chosen because theengineering standards that drive the engineering design process for playgrounds are notcomplicated, and because playgrounds are something that every student has experience with (it isdifficult to design something that you know little to nothing about).Over the course of a semester, students first learn about playground design, playground safetystandards, and engineering design; they are placed into groups and they visit
and project management into engineering technology programs. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition, Session 1348.73. Alford, E. and T. Ward. 1999. Integrating ethics into the freshman curriculum: an interdisciplinary approach. Proceedings of the 1999 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition. Session 2561.74. Marshall, J. and J. Marshall. 2003. Integrating ethics education into the engineering curriculum. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition. Session 1675.75. Davis, M. 1992. Integrating ethics into technical courses: IIT’s experiment in its second year. 1992 ASEE
technology.Heidi Diefes-Dux, Purdue University Heidi Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education (ENE) at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE). She is the chair of the ENE Graduate Committee and she is a member of the Teaching Academy at Purdue. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. from ABE in 1997. Her research interests include open-ended problem solving, evaluation of education technology, and first-year and graduate curriculum development.Jenna Rickus, Purdue University Dr. Rickus joined the Purdue faculty in 2003 as an Assistant Professor in
discussed and showed that collaboration is “doable and critical to success”. Baker-Doyle3 described how teachers (especially new ones) can develop their Intentional ProfessionalNetworks for support. Research by Stump et al.4 indicated that collaborative learning strategieshelped students increase their self-efficacy in learning course materials. In the area of roboticseducation, Ren et al.5 surveyed over twelve syllabi from different universities and suggested aproblem/project based approach to foster creativity and insight about robotics in students. Other Page 23.341.2researchers also concurred in this approach such as Cappelleri6 , Correll
?CFID=27703138&CFTOKEN=51989935.5. Husted, S., Ramirez-Corona, N., López-Malo, A., and Palou, E. 2014. Creativity and its assessment in a design and development of food products and processes course. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18. Available (January 28, 2016) at: https://peer.asee.org6. Koen, B. V. 2003. Discussion of the Method: Conducting the Engineer’s Approach to Problem Solving. New York: Oxford University Press.7. Ramírez Apud, T., Gutierrez Cuba, J. V., Ramirez-Corona, N., López-Malo, A., and Palou, E. 2015. Arguing to solve food engineering problems. Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education
processamong students. Qualitative approaches were used and the research design includedextensive field observations, focus group interviews, student questionnaires, andportfolios assessments. Results of the study showed that the use of an experiential andteam-based learning model in the freshman engineering design course enhanced bothprocess- and construct-based creativity dimensions among students during the course ofthe study.I Introduction and BackgroundSince 1932, curriculum design and development in engineering education in the UnitedStates has traditionally been guided by ABET, the recognized accreditation agency forapplied science, engineering, technology and computing programs. The EAC of ABETrequires engineering programs demonstrate that
collaborations between engineering and biology faculty are beginning to occur andare likely to continue to strengthen. Currently, engineering faculty are helping the biologists inusing systems approaches to model certain biological phenomena. . Also, biology faculty areteam teaching to add depth and variety to the Modern Engineering Materials course. TheBioengineering program in the College of Engineering has dedicated a new faculty position thatwill be jointly appointed with the Biology Department. The Computational Science andEngineering program is also planning to assign one of its faculty positions as a joint positionwith Biology. Page 22.896.7
. Christianson, D.C. Davis, M.S. Trevisan, D.E. Calkins, and M.D. Cook. 1999. Assessing students’ design capabilities in an introductory design class. 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Session 13b1: 8-13. ASEE: Washington, D.C.5. Lima, M. and W.C. Oakes. 2006. Service learning: Engineering in your community. Great Lakes Press: Wildwood, MO.6. Mankin, K.R., K.M. Boone, S. Flores, and M.R. Willyard. 2004. What agriculture students say motivates them to learn. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture (NACTA) J. 48(4): 6-11.7. Saviz, C.M., K.C. Schulz, W.J. King, and R.H. Turpin. 2001. Assessment measures to enhance teaching and curriculum effectiveness. 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
students include‘inventing something new,’ ‘making a difference in the world,’ and ‘achieving financial security’(6).Gender also affects student career aspirations. A survey of over 1,200 undergraduate engineeringstudents found male students were more likely to list inventing something new and achievingfinancial security as life aspirations while female undergraduates reported making a difference inthe world as a life aspiration (6). Gender differences were also noted in the motivation ofengineering undergraduates. For instance, one study reported that intrinsic psychologicalmotivations were less common in female students (8). The same study identified a connectionbetween student activities and motivations. Engineering undergraduates that
).The Agricultural & Biological Systems Engineering Capstone Course at UNLThe BSE department at UNL was one of the first programs of its kind in the country when it wasestablished in UNL. Our program is ABET accredited and has been ranked in the top 10programs of its kind by US News and World Report4. The department houses two engineeringdegree programs: agricultural engineering and biological systems engineering. Within each ofthese programs students specialize in one of three emphasis areas.Agricultural Engineering emphasis areas: • Machine Design • Soil & Water Resource Engineering • Test EngineeringBiological Systems Engineering emphasis areas: • Biomedical Engineering • Environmental Engineering • Food & Bioproducts
). Agrowing body of data supports the conclusion that active learning is indeed superior to thetraditional lecture format, both in terms of student retention and student performance(Natl.Acad.Sci, 2009; AAAS, 2011; PCAST, 2012; Singer, 2012). Recent efforts at ColoradoSchool of Mines to integrate biology into our engineering curriculum have led to a revisedfoundational biology course that has rigor and relevance for our engineering students. The movefrom traditional lecture to an active learning environment was key in our efforts to engage ourstudents, with the intent of improving our students’ comprehension of biology. Our course re-design involved a three-pronged approach in which we: (1) renovated a classroom to create astudio environment with wet
preconceptions ofthe problem. This study needs to be repeated to overcome some of the study’s currentlimitations. However, the preliminary results do suggest that this approach could be useful tohelp new college students understand the integrative nature of engineering and gain a betterperception of the profession.ReferencesBowen, E., Prior, J., Lloyd, S., Thomas, S., & Newman-Ford, L. (2007). Engineering moreengineers—bridging the mathematics and careers advice gap. Engineering Education, 2(1),23- 32. doi: 10.11120/ened.2007.02010023English, L. D., Hudson, P. B., & Dawes, L. A. (2011, January). Middle school students'perceptions of engineering. In STEM in Education Conference: Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics in Education
can affect results. The process can provide some objective measures, but the dataacquisition would be intense both for students and for faculty. It is likely that specifically focused datagathering would provide almost as much insight as would an exhaustive NPT and post path analysis. Theanalysis suggests that good students can learn in any curriculum. What is not yet clear is the ability ofvarious curricula to retain students.Key Words: stochastic differential equation, network environ analysis, input-output models, compartmentmodeling, network particle tracking, ecological network.BackgroundEngineering education is facing the need to increase the number of graduating engineers. To this end,several innovative educational approaches such as
competitiveness. To address these shortcomings, the engineering programs have tobe innovative to bring meaningful learning experiences to the students. One such measure toreformulate the approach to the learning process through implementation of spiral theme basedcurriculum.The Biological Systems Engineering (BSE) Department at Virginia Tech is undergoing significantcurriculum change through implementation of such a spiral theme based curriculum. The primary focusof the spiral curriculum is to provide opportunities for learning in repeating themes based on authenticproblems in the profession of engineering with increasing complexity over the years. Jerome Bruner, inhis book The Process of Education (1960), proposed that a learning curriculum ought to be
Engineering Education, 2012 interactive Fundamental Agricultural Resource Materials (iFARM)BackgroundA few academic programs in applied agricultural disciplines have incorporated critical thinkinginto their curriculum. Even though it is challenging to stimulate interests in the subject mattersfor information-driven introductory courses, our experience has shown that it is indispensable toimprove a critical-thinking skill of undergraduate agricultural students. However, innovativeapproaches that foster learner’s critical thinking in agricultural engineering education are rarelyfound in practice.Developing well-designed learning materials improves both teaching and learning in an onlineenvironment1. In addition, rich media would help overcome the
- Page 25.461.13 505.6. Anwar S. Work in progress-measures and evaluation in engineering technology (MEET): A TC2K outcomes- based assessment framework. 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2005; Session S1C: 9-10.7. Petrova R., Tibrewal A., and Sobh T.M. An electronic web-based assessment system. Journal of STEM Education. 2006; 7: 44-57.8. Bloom, B S (ed.) (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, and the classification of educational goals— Handbook I: Cognitive Domain New York: McKay.9. Hamilton, J.G., and Klebba, J.M. Experimental learning: A course design process for critical thinking. American Journal of Business Education. 2010; 4: 1-12.10. Dickie, L.O. Approach to learning, the cognitive demands
institutions and numerous disciplines, including Agricultural and BiosystemsEngineering, Chemical Engineering, Plant and Soil Sciences, Agricultural Economics, GrainScience, Microbiology, Education, and Agricultural Communications. In addition to monthlyconference calls, four face-to-face meetings of all faculty involved in program development havebeen held. Each of the four partner schools held a meeting on their campus, which includedfaculty professional development and tours of bioenergy program facilities and initiatives. Thefirst and second meetings focused on curriculum planning and course development and the thirdand fourth meetings focused on program implementation. One additional face-to-face meeting isplanned before the expiration of the
Food Engineering Program Outcomes. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA June 23 – 26.5. Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman: New York.6. Coll, C. 1997. Psicología y Curriculum: Una Aproximación Psicopedagógica a la Elaboración del Curriculum Escolar. Paidós: México D.F.7. Lastra, E. and Garibay, J. M. 2009. Modelo Institucional para la Evaluación y el Mejoramiento del Aprendizaje de los Estudiantes. Universidad de las Américas Puebla. Cholula, México.8. Allen, M. J. 2003. Assessing Academic Programs in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass, San
, 23(1), 51-55. 5. Gregorc, A. F., & Ward, H. B. (1977, February). A new definition for individual. NASSP Bulletin. Page 25.226.12References:Armstrong, Thomas. (1994). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development.Barrows, Howard S. (2000). Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education. Springfield, IL:SIU School of Medicine.Barrows, H. S. (1996). “Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview.” InL.Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory andpractice (pp. 3-12). San Francisco
quizzes. The rationale was to become more efficientat grading consistency improving time management and reducing the amounts of hardcopymaterials. Student submissions are graded electronically with touch screen technologies.Graded materials are recorded, archived to an ABET Continuous Improvement and ProgramAssessment (CIPA) database, and returned to the students electronically by an email system.Student evidence is important for timely updates to course and curriculum outcomes matrices,one of the assessment methods recently published in the department’s CIPA manual. Timelyfeedback to students on their course performance is very important. Areas addressed include thetraditional engineering problem solving approach, along with computer solutions
Dynamic Temperature Conditions in Inactivation Kinetics", Progress on Quantitative Approaches of Thermal Food Processing, New York, New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2012. Published.Outcomes 1. Both undergraduate and graduate engineering students are proficient in MATLAB and Simulink, making them more competitive for jobs. 2. Slides and course syllabus are posted for free use at the website: http://tang.eece.wustl.edu/MATLAB_WUSTL.htm 3. Journal articles published (on Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Inverse Problems in Science & Engineering) or ) by student using the methods learned in the course. 4. BE 835 selected in 2012 as a required course for graduate students in the department
14.902.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Network Particle Tracking (NPT) for Ecosystem Thermodynamics and Risk AnalysisAbstractNetwork Particle tracking (NPT), building on the network environ analysis (NEA)foundation, represents a new development in the soft realist epistemological trajectorydefined by numerous studies that have defined existential subsystems and coherencerelations among the systems. Three ecosystem models are evaluated usingconventional NEA approaches and with NPT. Compartments in a model with highindirect effects and Finn’s cycling index showed a lack of correlation amongcompartments between NEA storage/throughflow versus particle repeat visitsnumbers/particles in compartments
efforts – from university, industry, and federal sources – and for his efforts has received departmental, college, and national teaching honors including the Farrall Young Edu- cator Award (2004) and the Massey-Ferguson Gold Medal Teaching Award (2016) given by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. He has also been an invited participant in the National Academy of Engineering’s 2013 Frontiers in Engineering Education Conference. Raman chairs the ABE Engineering Curriculum Committee and in that role oversaw the successful 2012 ABET accreditation visit for both the Agricultural Engineering (AE) and Biological Systems Engineering (BSE) degree programs. Upon arriving at ISU in 2006, he led the development of the