Paper ID #46636Development of a Unique Bioengineering Laboratory Curriculum Focusedon Material Characterization of Musculoskeletal TissuesProf. Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware Dr. Jenni Buckley is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Delaware. Her teaching practice is focused on product design, (bio)mechanics, CAD, and technical communications; and her recent research work is centered on DEI and curriculum development related to hands-on design and laboratory experiences.Aisley Bergdoll, University of DelawareKyle Alexander Crawford, University of DelawareNikos Demetris Demetriou, University of
dentalmaterial wear simulators [7], for shear-bond characterization in building materials [8], or for thetransition temperature of materials like polystyrene [9]. Here, we envision a teaching exercisewhere teams of students follow a mock ASTM Consensus Standard to test a set mechanicalproperty (e.g. peel strength). Mechanical properties are useful to nearly every engineeringdomain. Unknown to students at the start of the exercise, each test setup will accommodatedifferent “adulterations” leading to different results (Appendix Figure 1). This method isintended to outline the potential limitations associated with following a consensus standard orprotocol. The goal for the students is precise execution of the mock standard and identification ofassociated
of knowledge, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) emphasizes the need to assess other competencies such as teamwork andcommunication to ensure comprehensive student learning [8].Despite their potential benefits, group exams have presented challenges, such as unequalparticipation and difficulty in evaluating individual contributions [4]. These limitations haveencouraged ongoing research into the optimal assessment formats for engineering students[9,10]. Appropriately, this work-in-progress study contributes to this ongoing discourse byinvestigating the impact of individual versus group exams in a junior-level biomedicalengineering mechanics course at a large R1 university. Insights from this research will drive
Paper ID #49091Work in Progress: Exploring the Impact of a Pre-Capstone Health EquityDesign Sprint on Students’ Conceptions of Health EquityLeah Rebecca Thomas, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityJenna Yasmin Altaii, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityDr. Christopher Arena, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Chris is a Collegiate Associate Professor at Virginia Tech in the Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics Department. He teaches needs identification and senior design. Additionally, he is co-founder of VoltMed, a company dedicated to treating brain tumors wDr. Ashley R Taylor
went about each of the tasks in a different way depending on which device you were working on.”However, the students recommended changing stents for another device because they did not feelthere was much to stents mechanically or for customer input. In the future, greater emphasis onengineering considerations of stents, such as biocompatibility and materials, could be introduced.VoC Videos: For the most part, students found the VoC videos informative and insightful. Inaddition, the interview transcripts helped students review for understanding and easily pullquotes when needed. As one student explained: “I found the breast pumps [video interviews] definitely to be the most useful because they had a lot of personality to what they
time and frequency domains.• Insulin regulation mechanism: Matlab/Simulink activity in which students explore feedback control of physiological systems and sensitivity to adjustment of parameters.Thematic Analysis MethodologyThe effectiveness of Flash-labs will be evaluated using a thematic analysis approach, followingestablished methods, with themes identified solely based on collected data without pre-existingcode sets [6-7]. Thematic analysis provides a way to systematically analyze qualitative data.Thematic analysis is performed as a five-step process: data acclimation and familiarity; line-by-line coding; initial theme identification; further theme expression; review of themes based on thecomplete data set. At this stage in the
Paper ID #45737Work In Progress: A framework for evaluating student cognitive and affectivereflections in BME studio learningStephanie Fuchs, Cornell University Dr. Stephanie Fuchs is an Active Learning Initiative (ALI) Postdoctoral Associate in the Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at Cornell University. She received her Ph.D. in Biological Engineering from Cornell University, where she focused on developing glucose-sensitive materials for electronics-free insulin delivery devices. As an ALI postdoc, her work focuses on developing and implementing engineering studio modules for core BME courses and developing tools
basic neuroscience and engineering-based technologies/methods used forbrain study and treatment. The course learning objectives and topics are shown in AppendixTables 1 and 2. Student and faculty instructor support arrangements are included in Appendix A.Instructor-Led and Guest Lectures: Each instructor-led lecture presented a course topic andrelevant physiological background, current state of research/design, clinical examples,social/ethical implications, and small-group and whole-class discussion. During discussion,participants were presented with a hypothetical case study or mock patient case to gauge theirunderstanding of the material and prompt deeper thought. For hypothetical scenarios, studentsdiscussed ethical dilemmas, regulatory
of Medical Physiology [11]. Main topics in thecourse include fundamentals of cell membranes, ion transport, and excitability; musclecontraction; cardiovascular physiology and control mechanisms; and respiratory physiology. Thecourse is divided into four units of 3-4 weeks duration, and a summative test is administered atthe end of each unit. A previously described pre-/post-course concept inventory [12] isadministered to assess learning gain during the semester. The concept inventory is a ten-questionmultiple choice quiz administered through a web-based audience response system. The questionsare designed to assess core concepts in homeostasis, cell and tissue excitability, musclecontraction, the cardiovascular system, and the respiratory
Paper ID #36693Story-Driven Learning in Biomedical Engineering: Quantifying Empathy inthe Context of Prompts and PerceptionsDr. Stephanie Jill Lunn, Florida International University Stephanie Lunn is an Assistant Professor in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and En- gineering Education (SUCCEED) and the STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International Uni- versity (FIU). She also has a secondary appointment in the Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences (KFSCIS). Previously, Dr. Lunn served as a postdoctoral fellow in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at
. Afterwards, she earned a master’s degree in Materials and Manufacturing in the Department of Mechanical Engineering (INME) in the UPRM. Yareni commitment for an inclusive and diverse community in the campus led her to serve as Spokesperson in the International University Community at UPRM. Yareni has worked as an Instructor for the Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory, and of engineering courses, as Graphics Engineering and Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, in the Department of General Engineering at UPRM. Her interest in human biology, led her to serve as an instructor of the Biosensors and Biological Geometric Design courses, and as a research assistant in the Biocompatible Materials Research Group at UANL. She has been
Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications," Chemical Review, vol. 119, pp. 5298 - 5414, 2019.[10] S. D. Vrieze, T. V. Camp, A. Nelvig, B. Hagstrom, P. Westbroek and K. D. Clerck, "The effect of temperature and humidity on electrospinning," Journal of Material Science, vol. 44, pp. 1357-1362, 2008.[11] J. Pelipenko, J. Kristl, B. Jankovi ́c, S. Baumgartner and P. Kocbek, "The impact of relative humidity during electrospinning on the morphology and mechanical properties of nanofibers," Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, vol. 456, pp. 125-134, 2013.[12] S. Tripatanasuwan, Z. Zhong and D. H. Reneker, "Effect of evaporation and solidification of the charged jet in electrospinning of poly(ethylene
, ethics, inclusivity, andsocial justice has been linked to more cutting-edge problem-solving, that incorporates thetechnical with the social, cultural, economic, political, and historical aspects of those affected bythe problem; thereby generating more broadly applicable, accessible, and socially just solutions[1-10].Despite BME’s dramatic impact on individuals and society, the social factors and structures thatshape engineering problem-definition and solution processes are mostly unknown to students[11-12]. This may be especially true in the fundamental courses such as cell biology,biomechanics, or physiology, where focus is on covering the core technical material. Becausethese courses are often required, they have great influence on what BME
] Because ofthe effectiveness of these hands-on techniques, there have even been studies evaluating the designof biomechanics labs that could be done in an online or hybrid class format.[3]The inclusion of numerical techniques in solving the complex mechanics problems inherent inbiomechanics problems has also been of interest in studies on biomechanics classes. One suchstudy effectively incorporated finite element analysis (FEA) into a design project in anintroductory biomechanics course.[4]In developing my own new Biomechanics course, I aimed to incorporate multiple learningmodalities for interacting with the course material which incorporated hands-on labs, exposure toscientific literature and inquiry-based projects. Inclusion of diversified
Paper ID #43339Board 14: Work in Progress: Exploring the Integration of Bio-Inspired DesignInventions in Biomedical EngineeringEisa A. Khawaja, Alpharetta High School Eisa Khawaja is currently a senior at Alpharetta High School in Alpharetta, Georgia. He plans to pursue a degree in mechanical engineering. He is also interested in Artificial Intelligence and participated in an AI Scholars summer program.Dr. Hoda Ehsan, The Hill School Hoda is Chair for Engineering and Computer Science Department and the Director of Quadrivium Design and Engineering at The Hill School. She holds a Ph.D in Engineering Education from Purdue
timeframe or the narrow expertise of their peers. These insights suggest that a modifiedsession format for the senior students should be developed, prototyped, and iterated over futuresemesters. One such change was implemented during the online learning semesters of thepandemic where the Show and Tell was adapted into an online discussion post in Piazza. Here,each team (all classes mixed together) could upload a representative figure or image of theirprototype to assist with their call to action. Posts were also tagged with a category(instrumentation, mechanics, materials, imaging, optics, sciences, fabrication, testing, marketing)to facilitate matching expertise with the problems. Each student was required to individuallyrespond to another group's
Paper ID #37504Board 25: Work in Progress: Teaching Fundamental Design Principlesthrough Integration of Knowledge and Curriculum DesignDr. Adel Alhalawani, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Adel Alhalawani’s teaching interests include engineering design, biomechanics, statics and mechanics of materials, biomaterials and design of manufacturing. His research has focused on bio-glass based adhesives for orthopedic applications and dental-based adhesives.Prof. Renee D. Rogge, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Bill Weiner, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Alan Chiu, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
duringonline examinations by comparing activity logs for student work during examination periods. Thetool was developed during the COVID-19 shutdowns of spring semester 2020 and was successfulin detecting significant incidents of academic misconduct in an undergraduate biomedicalengineering class. The background, context, use, mechanisms, functionality, and potential impactof the tool are explored with the hope that the approach may be expanded and applied to enhancethe integrity of various areas of higher education in the future.KeywordsMisconduct, Assessment, Online, Remote, Examination, Tool, Integrity, Collaboration, Cheating,ScreeningIntroduction / BackgroundWhether it is due to the COVID-19 pandemic, or the looming prospect of artificial
with minimal collaboration opportunities. This course was alsochosen because biomedical engineering is a rapidly growing and emergent field [10] thatchallenges educators to prepare students for its evolving landscape. Lastly, tissue mechanics wasselected because it consists of complex concepts that students have difficulty understanding suchas mechanics of materials. The initial data collection consisted of a survey administered toundergraduate biomedical engineering students in the selected tissue mechanics class. Thesurvey consisted of questions that inquired about the current conditions of the course. The surveyinstrument of questions included such items as: “Why do you think these topics have beendifficult and what about them do you find
Paper ID #48788BOARD # 21: Work in Progress: A Revised Biomedical Engineering Program:Building Student Engagement and Competency through Design, Aligned Courses,and Flexibility.Dr. Julian M Lippmann, University of Miami Julian Lippmann has been a Lecturer in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Miami for 4 years, where he teaches Biomedical Design, Biofluid Mechanics, and Solid Modeling with SolidWorks. Prior to this, he was an Assistant Teaching and Research Professor at the University at Buffalo, SUNY in the Department of Biomedical Engineering for 9 years. He holds a Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. in
Dr. Robert Mauck and uses her background in orthopedic engineering to develop courses in the biomechanics and biomaterials space. Dr. Bansal teaches 4 classes a year including BME 221: Biomaterials, EGR 201: Mechanics of Solids, BME 530: Introduction to Tissue Biomechanics, and EGR 101: Engineering Design and Communication. She is the co-director of the Biomedical Engineering Education & Teaching Laboratory (BEETL) at Duke.Kat M Lazar, Duke University Kat Lazar is a PhD Candidate in Biomedical Engineering at Duke University. She works in the labs of Joel Collier and Ashutosh Chilkoti to develop protein-based biomaterials to address diseases of the immune system. She obtained her bachelor’s in chemical and
have worked with device design or who know about engineering). Ihonestly think this elective could benefit those who are in the engineering school as well- demarking specific times for the sessions (end times for the sessions were often unclear)I might suggest a groupthink exercise to really get to understand the teamwork involved in theseprojects. For example, figuring out ways to get to the moon. No calculations necessary, just conceptualthings that are slowly added on. I imagine a discussion where someone talks about fuel, navigationsystems, materials to withstand pressure and heat, software systems, mechanical backups in case ofpower loss, life support etc.Appendix C: Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering Student Evaluation of
educational challenges. However, AI has gradually integrated overthe past few decades, with significant advancements in engineering education. Colloquially, AIinvokes visions of a supercomputer with adaptive behavior and other capabilities, enablinghuman-like cognition and functional abilities. The scope of AI in the education sector goesbeyond the understanding of AI and has seen increased applications in many areas of teaching[7]. It includes embedded systems like robots that enhance learning experiences, as seen in earlychildhood education [8]. Online education, too, has evolved from simple materials to adaptivesystems that learn and adjust based on user behavior [9]. AI's integration spans administration,instruction, and learning aspects [10].In
Georgia Nathaniel Hunsu is an assistant professor of Engineering Education. He is affiliated with the Engineering Education Transformational Institute and the school of electrical and computer engineering at the university. His interest is at the nexus of the resDr. Dominik May, University of Wuppertal Dr. May serves as a Professor for Technical Education and Engineering Education Research at the School of Mechanical Engineering and Safety Engineering at University of Wuppertal. His work revolves around generating both fundamental and practical knowledge that defines, informs, and enhances the education of engineers. His primary research thrust centers around the development, implementation, practical utilization
relate to the back to the book, which is not my preferred method, but sometimes I do it like that”Jake demonstrates awareness of his preferred learning style ("hands-on learner") and can reflecton how he best processes information (i.e., metacognitive knowledge). When faced with contentthat does not align with his learning preferences, he adjusts by engaging with the material in a lesspreferred but necessary manner, indicating a use of metacognitive regulation to plan and monitorhis learning process. Similarly, James’ description reflects both metacognitive knowledge andregulation: o Routine: “So I'm very much like a just start off with the first thing that comes to mind. So, like I guess for tissue mechanics, like I don't
Tissue Biomechanics elective. IDEAL was introduced as a novelstructure for the final challenge problem of the course and was able to further engage students with thecourse material [16]. Unlike the other challenge problems of the semester, this project was an individualassignment. Through this challenge problem, which included a unique storyline with fictional characters,students were asked to analyze 1) clinical reports, 2) witness recollections, and 3) gait analysis and combinethat with knowledge of bone mechanics in order to determine the mechanism of injury and person-at-faultin a fictional forensic investigation. In Spring 2021, the gamification was enhanced by introducing astudent-controlled Investigational Interface, which released
circuit design, programming, CAD,and 3D printing, our BME students have no curricular exposure to other forms of mechanicalprototyping. To address this deficiency, we developed and implemented a new elective PhysicalPrototyping for Design course. The purpose of this course is to introduce and practice basicfabrication techniques that are useful for both SD and students’ engineering competencies ingeneral. The class was first offered in Fall 2022 (3-credit hybrid lecture-lab) in a College ofEngineering Makerspace where students had supervised access to machining equipment andtools. Students gained experience working with different materials (wood, metals, hard plastic,soft plastic, fabrics), fasteners (screws, bolts, rivets), measurements tools
Extracardiac Soft Robotic Device for the Failing Heart: Mechanical Coupling and Synchronization,” Soft Robotics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 241–250, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1089/soro.2016.0076.[1] M. Hammond, V. Cichella, and C. Lamuta, “Bioinspired Soft Robotics: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Directions,” Curr Robot Rep, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 65–80, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s43154-023-00102-2.[2] N. Elango and A. A. M. Faudzi, “A review article: investigations on soft materials for soft robot manipulations,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 80, no. 5–8, pp. 1027–1037, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7085-3.[3] L. Cecilia, Soft robotics: trends, applications and challenges.[4] F. Ilievski, A. D
the College of Engineering. Holly studies biomaterials and soft robotics and their applications in the university classroom, in undergraduate research and in engaging K12 students in STEM. Holly received her BS/MS in Materials Science and Engineering from Drexel University and her PhD in Engineering Sciences from Harvard University.Dr. Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Jenny Amos is a Teaching Professor in Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She is a AIMBE Fellow, BMES Board of Director Member, ABET Commissioner, two-time Fulbright Specialist in engineering education and has won multiple awards and recognitions for her teaching and scholarship of teaching. Outside
, S. Thomas, M. Subramoniam, J. Arun, S. Naveen, and S. Madhu, "A Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for Biomedical Applications," Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1159-1183, 2024.[3] C. Wu, B. Wan, A. Entezari, J. Fang, Y. Xu, and Q. Li, "Machine learning-based design for additive manufacturing in biomedical engineering," International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 266, p. 108828, 2024.[4] H. Chen, Y. Liu, S. Balabani, R. Hirayama, and J. Huang, "Machine learning in predicting printable biomaterial formulations for direct ink writing," Research, vol. 6, p. 0197, 2023.[5] P. G. Jacobs et al., "Artificial intelligence and machine learning for improving glycemic