Paper ID #39458Board 15: Work in Progress: Cultivating Growth of Systems Thinking Habitof Mind over a Five Course Fundamental SequenceDr. Lisa Weeks, University of Maine Lisa Weeks is a lecturer of Biomedical Enginering in the Department of Chemical and Biomedical En- gineering at the University of Maine since 2017. She teaches several of the core fundamental courses including hands on laboratory courses.Prof. Karissa B Tilbury ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Cultivating Growth of Systems Thinking Habits of Mind over a Five Course Fundamental
Harding and McPherson suggested that over 80 percent ofemployers desire an applicant pool of engineers with fundamental knowledge of finding,applying, and developing standards [2].Our study design is functionally an approach to apply principles of Bloom’s Taxonomy to theeducation of consensus standards. All current standards curricula at the UIC, and most of thatidentified in biomedical engineering education literature [3, 4, 5] focuses on recognition andunderstanding (i.e., the lowest levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy). Capstone design courses mayrequire the incorporation of standards during the design process or verification testing butapproach and standard rigor can be widely varied. Recognition of appropriate standards is quitevaluable for engineers
Paper ID #37014Work In Progress: Professional Development Through High-Impact Experi-encesDr. Charles Patrick Jr., Texas A&M University Dr. Charles Patrick Jr. currently serves as a Professor of Practice in the Department of Biomedical Engi- neering at Texas A&M University. He serves as Director of the Undergraduate Program and administers the Ideas to Innovation Engineering Education Excellence Laboratory. He is involved in Texas A&M’s Center for Teaching Excellence, the Institute for Engineering Education and Innovation, and the College of Engineering’s Faculty Engineering Education Group. His research focuses
, up to 14.82% in 2023as compared to MATLAB’s rank of 15 with an index score of 0.92% [2]. While there are manywho argue that all programs should be language agnostic or varied and that computationalfundamentals are universal and therefore adoption of a particular language is unimportant, wesee a benefit in consistency of language throughout the program as this reduces the timestudents spend at the beginning of a semester re-learning the fundamentals of a new tool andgives them more time to actually program. The author has observed students with experiencein the same language used in a course save 3-4 weeks ramping up on the language, tools, andlibraries as compared with a student who has previously used the course language in apreceding
Footprints from hops________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Lab 6: Writing Music with Harmonies! Due 03/21/2023 at 5 pm This is a personal experience, but you can chat with your friends. And enemies.IntroductionSo my dream for this was to have y’all write your own music with the harmonies that you’dsolve for using these programs, but unfortunately I don’t enough MATLAB magic to create suchmajesty. Future me will level up and hopefully be able to
the project report, and receive another round of feedback from the instructor. The ability to effectively communicate is 20% of the total project grade, which is broken down into the following categories: organization, articulation, visual aids, and writing style.• SO6: an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions. o Molecular Engineering: Homework assignments and an exam provide students an opportunity to outline a potential experimental plan to assess if their proposed molecular design from computational to in vitro testing would be valid. Examples include: Design a positive/negative selection
)Q32 When I have to perform a task, I prefer to o master one way of doing it. (1) o come up with new ways of doing it. (2) Page 10 of 13Q33 When someone is showing me data, I prefer o charts or graphs. (1) o text summarizing the results. (2)Q34 When writing a paper, I am more likely to o work on (think about or write) the beginning of the paper and progress forward. (1) o work on (think about or write) different parts of the paper and then order them. (2)Q35 When I have to work on a group project, I first want to o have "group brainstorming" where everyone contributes ideas. (1) o brainstorm individually and then come together as a group to compare
Paper ID #41706Integrating Active Learning, Case Studies, Cytotoxicity Testing, and EthicalConsiderations in Biomaterials Education: A Novel ApproachDr. Shivaun D Archer, Cornell University Shivaun Archer is the John and Janet Swanson Senior Lecturer in the Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering at Cornell University and a Faculty Teaching Fellow in the James McCormick Family Teaching Excellence Institute (MTEI). She teaches lab courses covering nanobiotechnology, cellular, molecular, and tissue engineering, as well as physiology.Dr. Mridusmita Saikia, Cornell University Dr. Mridusmita Saikia is a Lecturer at the Meinig
Paper ID #38190Board 16: Work in Progress: Designing a course to equip Bioengineeringgraduate students with effective and equitable teaching skillsCallan E. Monette, Stanford University Callan Monette (she/her/hers) is a fourth-year Ph.D. candidate in Bioengineering at Stanford Univer- sity. She believes that communicating science in an accessible and equitable way is an essential skill and responsibility for every scientist, and she is committed to building these skills and creating training opportunities for scientists and engineers at every experience level to practice and value inclusive ped- agogy. Callan is a
Paper ID #41245Implementation and Evaluation of Experiential Learning to Reinforce Research& Development Skills in a Biopharmaceutical Process Development CourseDr. Deborah Sweet Goldberg, University of Maryland, College Park Deborah S. Goldberg is a full-time senior lecturer in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is passionate about teaching and mentoring students to prepare them for diverse careers in bioengineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Implementation and Evaluation of Experiential Learning to
different learning style, auditory, compared to the usual reading and writing learning style we usually do. This helps me stimulate a different part of my brain and engage with the course material in a new view, which helps me retain the information better as this was a unique learning experience. • While the heart on its own doesn’t sound very musical, describing it as music is a good way to remember certain concepts. • Being able to listen to the sound manifestation of blood flow in the heart was really helpful and allowed me to better interpret the physiological processes we had learned in class. • I am sure that approaching the heart from this new angle will help me retain much more of the
Paper ID #42632Bridging Extracurricular Skill Needs in Bioengineering Capstone Design withJust-in-Time WorkshopsEliot Bethke, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Eliot Bethke is a Ph.D student in Bioengineering at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). He holds a B.S. in bioengineering also from UIUC. Prior to entering graduate school, Eliot spent 8 years working in small businesses ranging in focus from healthcare to medical education to battery technology. In 2018, he was hired as an instructor at the Carle Illinois College of Medicine to assist in constructing curricular components to teach medical