Paper ID #16701The Engineering Classroom is Still RelevantDr. Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Kansas State University Dr. Fitzsimmons is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at Kansas State Uni- versity. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering with a specialization in trans- portation from Iowa State University. During his graduate career, Dr. Fitzsimmons worked at the Institute for Transportation (InTrans) at Iowa State University and received training to specialize in highway safety, particularly in rural areas. Dr. Fitzsimmons worked closely with staff at the Iowa Department of
classes. A major finding of the project has been thatpractitioners and students exhibit a fundamentally different view of writing: practitioners seewriting as integrated with engineering content and practice, whereas students view writing asseparate from engineering. In this paper, we present three cases studies that illustrate theempirical analyses that have led to this finding, focusing on organization, sentence structure, andgrammatical errors. We then offer five specific suggestions for approaching writing in civilengineering classes so that students will be better prepared for writing in the workplace,discussing how these ideas have been implemented at the university where the project is based.IntroductionIn discussions of how to prepare
the NCEES Fundamentals of Engineering(FE) exam and the NCEES Principles and Practice of Engineering (PE) exam. Most statesrequire at least four years of experiences after completion of an EAC-ABET accreditedengineering degree. However, the education requirement is far from uniform. Many state lawsinclude pathways to licensure for applicants with a non-accredited engineering degree, anengineering technology degree, a non-engineering bachelor’s degree, and no postsecondarydegree. In the following study, state engineering laws and rules were reviewed to determine theeducation, experience, and examination pathways to professional engineering licensure. Inparticular, the accreditation requirements for applicants with EAC-ABET degrees, ETAC
and reinforce that. Most professions have not developed a body of knowledge that specifies what an engineer should be able to do and at which level (baccalaureate, masters or equivalent, or experience) those skills should be attained. Because the civil engineering profession has developed an explicit body of knowledge, it is reasonable that the accreditation criteria should reflect and enforce those standards. Other engineering professions, while entirely reputable and respected, have not taken this initiative. • The new Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Examination contains questions in Hydraulics and Hydrologic Systems, Structural Analysis, Structural Design, Geotechnical Engineering
, including the “backwardsdesign” of the course learning outcomes and the arrangement of the course into 5 modules and43 lessons has been described earlier (Parker et al., 2016). This paper presents the developmentof 12 lessons in the Fundamentals module. The innovation of this process is this: the authors areunaware of any other new course that has been collaboratively created by a community ofscholars located across the US.Work to DateThe Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E) is a community of civil andenvironmental engineering faculty members representing more than 30 institutions interested inthe scholarship of infrastructure education. CIT-E activities have evolved in a short period oftime, starting with sharing
Paper ID #13450Engagement of Practitioners to Produce Balanced and Fundamentally WellGrounded Civil EngineersDr. Isaac L. Howard PE, Mississippi State University Isaac L. Howard is the Materials and Construction Industries Endowed Chair within the Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering Department at Mississippi State University. He is a member of the Bagley College of Engineering’s Academy of Distinguished Teachers and obtained bachelors, masters, and doctoral de- grees in Civil Engineering from Arkansas State University, West Virginia University, and the University of Arkansas, respectively
a broader sense, we demonstrate that ABET accreditation does have a critical supporting rolein raising the educational bar for engineering; however, this contribution is necessary but notsufficient to achieve the desired end.Why ABET is NecessaryIn promulgating its Raise the Bar initiative, ASCE’s overarching goal is to ensure that aspiringprofessional engineers attain the civil engineering BOK as a prerequisite for licensure. ABET’stwo fundamental functions contribute substantially to the achievement of this goal: Based on input from its constituencies, the EAC of ABET establishes standards for engineering degree programs at both the baccalaureate and master’s levels. These standards are organized into three different sets
AC 2010-330: HOW THE CIVIL ENGINEERING BOK2 IS BEING IMPLEMENTEDAT THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAKenneth Fridley, University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley, PhD, F.ASCE, has been at The University of Alabama since 2003 where he is professor and head of the civil, construction and environmental engineering department. In 2006, he served as an administrative fellow for the office of the executive vice president and provost of the University. He is the 2010 recipient of the T. Morris Hackney Award for Faculty Leadership. Fridley has gained a variety of experience in structural wood engineering through his studies of the creep-rupture of wood, the vibrations, durability and deflection of wood
AC 2011-2579: AN ENGINEERING APPROACH TO WRITING: A PILOTPROGRAM FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING GRADUATE STUDENTSChristianna Irene White, Iowa State University Institute for Transportation Christianna White has a PhD in rhetoric and professional communication, an MA in business and technical communication, and a BA in psychology. She is an editor and writing coach who specializes in working with graduate students on master’s theses or dissertations. In addition to her affiliation with the Iowa State University Institute for Transportation, she operates C I White and Associates.David J White, Iowa State University David White holds a B.S. (Univ. of Missouri-Columbia, 1997), M.S. degree (Iowa State University 1999), and a Ph.D
sawthe biggest reduction in credit hours included general education and “other courses.” Othercourses included a variety of topics such as free electives, additional civil engineering electives,technical writing, and ROTC.EAC-ABET CriteriaIn 2017, the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of ABET approved changes toCriterion 3 and Criterion 5. The changes become effective during the 2019-2020 accreditationcycle. The Criterion 5 changes are notable. Rather than computing the required number of credithours of mathematics, natural science, and engineering topics as a percentage of a program’stotal number of credit hours required for a degree, the number of required credit hours is nowfixed. The new criteria require 30 credit hours of
becauseit is fundamentally different. In a recent article on the topic of undergraduate engineer writing,Schnieter commented on these differences, stating: “English composition allows readers toprovide their own interpretations of what the reader intended. Technical writing, on the otherhand, demands that the reader come only the conclusion intended by the writer”3. Developingstrong technical writing skills requires practice and this practice must come in the context of theengineering discipline.In CE300, Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanics and Design, students are required tocomplete a uniaxial tension test of three different materials, draw conclusions about thematerials, and write a comprehensive report including procedures, data, and findings
importance of fluid mechanics principles.Test results showed a higher level of understanding of these fundamentals. Survey responses andtest results demonstrated that student engagement and performance in the class improved fromidentifying fluid mechanics aspects of real world problems via the lifelong learning assessments.IntroductionThe Whitaker School of Engineering (WSOE) was established in 2005 at Florida Gulf CoastUniversity (FGCU) and is now fully accredited. The WSOE teaching mission fosters excellencein teaching by providing innovative lecture-lab classes. Offered in the Fall Semester of thejunior year, Fluid Mechanics has proved to be challenging to students. While teaching is“outside” the student’s brain, learning is what is going on
thoughtful and careful weighing of alternatives when values conflict is crucial to the responsible conduct of engineering. Therefore, civil engineers practicing at the professional level need to demonstrate an understanding of and a commitment to practice according to the seven Fundamental Canons of Ethics and the associated Guidelines to Practice Under the Fundamental Canons of Ethics.7. An ability to communicate effectively. (ABET g) Commentary: Effective communication includes listening, observing, reading, speaking, and writing and requires understanding of the fundamentals of interacting effectively with technical and nontechnical or lay individuals and audiences in a variety of settings. Professional civil engineers
, there are additional program-specificrequirements at the department level. For example, at the University of Idaho, eachengineering department has established different requirements for its introductory course.There are six engineering programs at the University of Idaho; the Departments ofChemical and Material Engineering and Civil Engineering offer a one-credit coursefocused on introducing fundamental concepts and principles to new students, while theDepartments of Computer Science and Mechanical Engineering require three-creditofferings in which the depth of classroom activities along with the contact time betweenthe student and professor is comparatively more extensive. The content and structure ofan introductory course has been vetted in a
such as Blackboard allows efficient evaluation of and communicationwith the students enrolled in the class. It easily allows the department to have differentrequirements for students enrolled in different sections even though they all meet together. Forexample, freshmen can be required to visit with an advisor during their first semester whileseniors may be required to write a paper about their experience in the department.A large portion of the course is managed by elected officers of the department’s student chapterof ASCE, under the direction of the course instructor, who is also the faculty advisor of theASCE student chapter. The six officers are elected by members of the class. All officers serveone year terms. Four officers are elected
shootinghoops knows the feeling of the ball leaving their hands only to immediately know that the shothas missed both hoop and backboard. Embarrassment sets in, even as reality is still working outthe implications of a badly missed shot.A strong mental model is not directly teachable. Instructors cannot simply hand the student theirown internal understanding of the world. The instructor can help, with words, equations anddiagrams; but fundamentally, developing a strong mental model and the engineering judgementthat goes with it requires careful observation of the first model, reality [5]. By seeing andconsidering the behavior of the world, daily and continually, the engineering student can becomea competent practicing engineer. Where the engineering
engineering curricular reform. His research areas include vibration and optimization techniques. In 2005 he was the recipient of the Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award from the Society of Automotive Engineers.Jennifer Courtney, Rowan University Jennifer Courtney is an Assistant Professor in the Writing Arts department at Rowan University, where she teaches first year writing, College Composition II/Sophomore Clinic, and courses on writing assessment. Her research interests include writing in the disciplines (WID), assessment, and information literacy.Kevin Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He has received the 2002
webinar, there was not a lot of discussionsolicited, as the focus was to get the final outline approved.Overall assessment/reflectionEach member of the management team was asked to share their reflection on the process, andsome of these reflections are shared in the following list. “The biggest challenge in the process was remembering we were writing a model course for new infrastructure instructors, not the Best Infrastructure Course Ever (which, of course, each participant believes she or he had already written and is currently teaching!).” “Remaining focused on the objective helped prevent “my way or the highway” attitudes from intruding. This is not a process for stubborn people. Compromise and consensus requires each
may not include anyprovision that might be interpreted as additional evaluation criteria. To emphasize its unofficialstatus, the ASCE Commentary is now, and will continue to be identified as, a draft document.The second major limitation on the use of ABET criteria as a mechanism for BOKimplementation lies in a fundamental difference between the nature of the BOK and the nature ofaccreditation criteria. Although it was not intended as such, the BOK has many characteristics ofa strategic vision. It represents, by its very nature, an ambitious, comprehensive, future-orientedgoal—one that all civil engineering programs should aspire to, but one that few programs willever achieve in all of its aspects. Conversely, accreditation criteria represent
makes it difficult forstudents to achieve even the lower levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy [1] during class. Students aregetting lost and/or feeling obligated to ‘write down now and learn later’. Even though therequired content volume is high, students generally want all instructors to slow down, work morenumerical examples, and show them more real world applications. Additionally, at UNCCharlotte, a University wide teaching schedule change was also mandated, impacting the contacthours that Civil Engineering instructors have in the core classes. Monday/Wednesday (MW) andWednesday/Friday (WF) classes (75 minutes per class) were replaced with MWF classes (50minutes per class). There are no differences in this substitution, but prior to this change
focused topic assigned by the professor. Clickers were not used in any of the classes.Table 1. Categories of instructional method/classroom activity employed in classroomobservations.Activity DescriptionClass introduction Covers the first few minutes of class in which the instructor may be describing learning goals, handing back graded assignments, or setting up equipment.Slides writing Instructor is using a tablet (or similar device) to annotate a slide in PowerPoint or similar software. This category is used only when the primary content of the slides is the instructor’s writing.Slides explaining Instructor is
there is a compelling casefor introducing graph theory as early as possible in a computing-forward undergraduate CEEcurriculum.Educational ContextThe activities described in this work were developed for a course entitled, “Intro toComputational and Data Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering.” It is a requiredcourse in the Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) CEE undergraduate program, generally takenby students in their sophomore year, with a typical enrollment between 30 and 45 students. Thiscourse presumes prior knowledge of computer programming fundamentals and (single-variable)calculus, but does not assume prior exposure to more advanced mathematics (including linearalgebra, which is of particular relevance to the activities described
study of ethics from both a theoretical approach and an applied approach. This is accomplished through reading assignments, short writing assignments, and ethical case study presentations.Curricular Changes Needed to Fully Implement the BOK2The current curriculum at Montana State University is considered to not fully address outcomes3-5 and 17-20. A more detailed discussion of how the curriculum might be modified to betteraddresses these outcomes follows: Outcome 3 – Humanities: The BOK2 envisions graduates with a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering to “demonstrate the importance of the humanities in the professional practice of engineering.” The university as part of its general education requires 2 courses in what the BOK2
international engineering firm. He was also a career U.S. Air Force officer, retiring in the rank of Colonel.Mr. David Bowles, Louisiana State University David ”Boz” Bowles is a technical communication instructor in the Engineering Communication Studio at Louisiana State University. He earned a baccalaureate degree in English and a Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing from Virginia Commonwealth University.Paige Davis, Louisiana State University Page 23.409.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Development and Assessment of an Innovative Program to
techniques in a first-yearcourse for undergraduate civil engineering students. Four data sources are used to measure thedevelopment of students’ critical thinking skills and estimation abilities. These include: i) a pre-post written test of both core knowledge and fundamental skills, ii) open-ended, written decisionworksheets responding to each EFFECT’s driving question, iii) journal entries, and iv) studentevaluation of the class. This paper focuses on the implementation of the EFFECTs andassessment techniques. In particular, the use of an online driven database to fast-track theassessment of critical thinking and core knowledge during the EFFECTsIntroductionEngineering judgment is generally regarded as critical to success in an engineering
Structural Engineering, as well as a graduate certificate in Engineering for Developing Communities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Introducing Students to Interdisciplinary Perspectives of Building and Urban DesignIntroductionA major challenge in engineering education is the effective integration of societal andenvironmental constraints with engineering design fundamentals. This paper describes a newcourse developed that aims to introduce four factors that affect design, construction andmanagement of the structures we live and work in—Safety, Sustainability, Style and Society—from qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Central questions discussed in the course are:What are our expectations
sequentially; online course content is used not in the classroom but rather before or aftercompletion of the classroom course materials. The intent of this approach is to minimize theamount of time learners spend in a classroom versus time spent at their desks actively workingand applying knowledge. This model is very popular with commercial users, since it minimizesthe impact of training on billable hours. For academic purposes, this model allows instructors tofocus upon core disciplinary concepts and/or fundamental principles during class hours. Studentscan then familiarize themselves with technology online, as their individual schedules allow,either preparing for an upcoming interactive lecture or expanding upon information from aprevious class.The
. of Civil and Environmental Eng. She received her Ph.D. from Northwestern University. Her interests include technical writing, mechanics education and creating opportunities for undergraduate research, as well as conducting research about cement-based composites.Dragovich Jefferey, Seattle University Prof. Jeff Dragovich is Assistant Professor at Seattle University in the Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to his academic position at Seattle University, he worked as a structural engineer and is a registered Professional Civil Engineer in the State of Washington. His research interests include
test methods and procedures. The laboratory manuals of this time periodappear to establish the writing standards for manuals of latter years by way of content andformatting choice.Authors continued writing new laboratory manuals throughout the 1970s and 1980s which showlittle indication of advancing engineering education. They followed the same format and contentfound in manuals from the 1930s.Current soil mechanics laboratory manuals are stuck in the past. These laboratory manualsappear to be modified replicas of ASTM standards and contain no new material or teachingstrategies.Although soil mechanics testing procedures haven’t changed significantly throughout the years,the path in which professional engineering practice has followed is
engineering profession. 8. Write an advocacy letter to an elected official taking a position on the topic related to our profession. 9. Describe the benefits of passing the FE exam and becoming a licensed professional along with the process of becoming professionally licensed in the State of Michigan.Hybrid FacilitationThe primary mechanism for making the course a hybrid course is the course managementsoftware, Blackboard2. Blackboard is a proprietary web-based tool that allows students tointeract with the instructor and each other. In many courses, Blackboard is used to postduplicates of materials distributed in class, for making announcements, and for entering