technical entrepreneurship course - cap tables, building financial capital, how to get VC funding, etc. but it was so much more. It definitely introduces some of these technical concepts but at its core, the class is about learning to be radically honest with yourself and becoming cognizant of who you are and how you approach leadership, entrepreneurship, and life in general. For me, the most valuable part of the class was the set of self analysis and introspection tools the teaching staff provided as well as the ability to hear a myriad of perspectives from entrepreneurs and VCs at various stages in their career.Student comments suggest there is something of value here, and as a teaching team, we aspire toidentify and
combining the humanities and social sciences with STEM education to create a unique learning experience for students.Jeffrey Stransky, Rowan University Jeff joined the field of engineering education after receiving his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engi- neering from Rowan University in May 2019. He conducted research as part of his senior design course on the analysis of Process Safety Decision MakingDr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and
University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI).Jeffrey Stransky, Rowan University Jeff joined the field of engineering education after receiving his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engi- neering from Rowan University in May 2019. He conducted research as part of his senior design course on the analysis of Process Safety Decision MakingDr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship. ©American Society for Engineering Education
. Social capital (people in their social group that can helpthem become an engineer) provides feelings of acceptance and belief that others desire to see aperson perform well [3]. Students who feel engaged within their major and classes oftendemonstrate a higher sense of belonging than those who do not [5], [6]. Research has also showna strong positive correlation between engineering identity and sense of belonging within anengineering major [1]. Students more often see themselves as an engineer when they feel theybelong. In many cases, there is also an underlying assumption that undergraduate students desirea high sense of academic belonging. A lack of sense of belonging can feed into the absence of astrong engineering identity for some students
Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Impacts of engineering-adjacent participation on student motivation in engineeringThis work-in-progress research paper describes emerging work exploring connections betweenstudents' participation in “engineering-adjacent” activities outside of class and their motivation topursue goals. In this study, we define engineering-adjacent activities as those
inquiry assessment. She was awarded an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship in April, 2022, and aspires to continue in the research field and work for a university as a research professor and advisor.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023AbstractThis systematic literature review is a theory/methods paper that addresses the state of currentliterature in engineering
higher education data analytics, ma- chine learning and photovoltaics.Yiming Zhang, The University of Arizona Yiming Zhang is a Ph.D. candidate in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the Uni- versity of Arizona. His research interest includes machine learning, data analytics and optimization in curricular design.Tanmay Agrawal Tanmay is a senior undergraduate student majoring in Computer Science with a minor in Entrepreneurship and Economics and worked on the blockchain-based reward system as well as building dashboards to understand studen outcomes. Tanmay is originally from India, and enjoys learning new things. In addition to his technical pursuits, he has a keen interest in discovering novel
Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game-based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: Motivational Differences Between Civil and Environmental EngineeringDoctoral Students in the Pre-writing and Writing PhasesIntroduction & BackgroundThere is a common perception among students about the difficulties associated with the dissertationwriting process. Anticipation of isolation, time management issues, and not having the technical skills towrite in a structured manner are some of the challenges that students fear[1], [2], [3]. These
Paper ID #37346Work in Progress: Who Are Graduate Program Directors and What AreTheirRoles in Healing within Graduate Engineering Education?Ms. Mais Kayyali, Florida International University Mais Kayyali is the Associate Director of Academic Support Services in the Office of the Dean at Florida International University’s (FIU) College of Engineering and Computing (CEC). In her current role, she oversees all aspects of Graduate Education and Admissions for the schools and departments under CEC. Her duties vary from admissions, recruitment, marketing, data analysis, graduate funding, etc. She also provides administrative
, 1971). By acquiring multiple sources of information about the sameevent occurring in a social setting, researchers can integrate and triangulate these data, enhancingthe analysis’ depth and accuracy. Therefore, in this research project, the researcher engaged inextensive first-hand observation in classroom settings throughout the semester, collectedstudents’ written responses reflecting their class, and conducted open-ended interviews designedto validate our findings with students’ perspectives. Second, investigations of instructors’ pedagogical practices in naturalistic settings, versusin a laboratory or through lab-based experiments, can yield different findings (Le Compte &Goetz, 1982). Indeed, identifying instructor’s
gestures and facial expressions when talking. Creates an environment in the class where you can easily ask Democratic Attitude questions Value Dimension It makes you feel that s/he gives importance to your opinions. Respect Dimension It makes you feel that s/he respects your opinions. B. Population and sampling The population of the study consisted of capstone design projects students from 5 departments in Engineering school, including Mechanical Engineering (ME), Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE), Civil & Environmental Engineering (CEE), Engineering entrepreneurship (E-ship), and Chemical
represents a nuanced reason for students to use, or continue using, a makerspacethan previously researched reasons for using, including class projects [3] and architecture [4].Student staff are the brokers of the makerspace, so understanding their reason for using themakerspace is essential to understanding how students use the makerspace. Future work willfocus on the continuing to build the theoretical framework for interactions within universitymakerspaces through continued analysis and data collection from a wide variety of universitymakerspaces.Keywords: university makerspaces, community cultural wealth, higher education, engineeringeducationIntroductionA key component of makerspace culture is the people in it, in particular the student staff
Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Work in Progress: Designing a Survey Instrument to Assess Graduate Student MotivationTowards Degree CompletionIntroductionThe doctoral degree process can be arduous and time-consuming; often requiring students tomaintain a high level of motivation to obtain their degree [1], [2]. In King [3], attrition rates fordoctoral programs were found to average 43% in the USA, between the years of 1992 and
X andFacebook to upload course-related materials and participate in class discussions [4].SMPs are increasingly recognized in Engineering Education (EE) with the potential tosupport student and faculty participation and engagement. A thorough analysis of socialmedia data can offer valuable insights on EE. By examining social media interactions (i.e.,contents of user-generated posts), educators and researchers can identify emerging topics thatare gaining traction in the engineering community. Such analysis may provide valuableinsights into student engagement, revealing what subjects or topics resonate most. It alsooffers a platform for students to express concerns related to EE, which can be instrumental inshaping curricular and pedagogical
the rise in recent years, and ithas become a popular tool for students and instructors to connect, collaborate, and shareinformation [9]. While some researchers argue that social media can enhance studentengagement and learning, others suggest that its use may negatively impact learningoutcomes[10]. Studies have investigated the impact of social media on engineering educationand have found mixed results. A study conducted by [11] showed that social media platformssuch as Twitter and Facebook improve student engagement, as students were more likely toparticipate in class discussions and share course-related information on these platforms.However, another study by [12] found that the use of social media had no significant impact onstudent
Student Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Engineering Design in Work-Integrated Learning Contexts1 IntroductionTo continue enhancing student learning, many institutions are implementing work-integratedlearning programs (WIL) to aid in the development of work-ready graduates [1]. WIL integratesacademic studies with experiences within a workplace or practice setting [2]. These experiencescan take many forms including collaborative research projects, apprenticeships, co-operativeeducation, entrepreneurship, field placements, internships, professional placements, servicelearning, or work experiences. WIL programs are very common in undergraduate engineeringprograms and have more recently expanded to graduate programs
achievement in their courses (by URM and whitestudents), and were perceived more positively by the students [13] - [15].Although the two areas—faculty instructional practices and mindset beliefs directly impactstudent outcomes, the interplay between the two factors has yet to be explored. In other words,the question-- how faculty beliefs affect the choice of their instructional practices in theclassroom is yet to be fully explored. There is some evidence to suggest that growth and fixedmindsets impact instructional decisions. For example, a study by Aragón, Eddy, and Graham[16] shows that instructors with fixed mindsets about intelligence were less likely to bepersuaded to use active learning techniques in their classes. In addition, Richardson
studentknowledge and serves as an example of the benefits of asset-based practice for instructors.3. Methods3.1. Adapting and Applying APPI in a Mixed-methods Engineering Education StudyIn this section, we contextualize our APPI application in the context of a mixed-methods study ofasset-based pedagogies in engineering. Our APPI application is a qualitative component of alarger, ongoing study that also includes a quantitative survey of students in classes wherein anasset-based pedagogy intervention [28] (e.g., an asset mapping activity) is implemented after theinstructor participates in a professional development workshop offered by the research team. Thequalitative component is a series of two one-on-one interviews with a small set of students (n=5per
, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a Research Scientist in the Designing Education Lab in Mechanical Engineering and co-founder of the Integrative Learning Portfolio Lab in Career Education at Stanford University. She earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford. Her scholarship is focused on engineering and entrepreneurship education, portfolio pedagogy, reflective practices, non-degree credentials, and reimagining how learners represent themselves through their professional online presence.Prof. George Toye Ph.D., P.E., is adjunct professor in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. While engaged in teaching project based engineering
Engineering [200* A-B-C] Global Engineering Design Thinking, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship The [course 200 A-B-C] sequence immerses students in a real-world, globally distributed engineering design experience in the spirit of a Silicon Valley start-up teaching them to manage the chaos and ambiguity inherent in professional design. Teams of 3-4 [university] graduate students partner with a similar team at an international university to work on industry-funded design challenges to deliver breakthrough innovation prototypes. Design challenges are typically at the Human Interface to Robots, AI, Internet of Things, Autonomous vehicles, and Smart Cities. In A you will learn Human-Centric Design-Thinking with the guidance of a teaching team that includes